/cuckquean/ - Women sharing their men.

ac29fb8e922e51b3e526c2937e184d77.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1371x1379) Reverse

>>7904
>>7907
Thanks friends, I had never written narrative fiction before that wasn't meant to be a shitpost. Though someone did end up masturbating to one of them. As a joke, I assume.
Wait, I did write an unironic fanfic one time in the past and it sucked.
>it was ESL as fuck
Can't hide it lol, I learned English online. And no, I don't mean with online courses.
>Laffed.
Embarrassingly, that joke isn't even mine.
>The choice to make it from the man's perspective instead of the quean's or vixen's was interesting.
To be fair, the lack of male touhous made it a bit hard for me to come up with someone to write in 3rd person.

>>7909
>Can't hide it lol
Don't worry about it - English's literary tone leaves very little for a non-native to hide behind, so just hack away and have fun. Thinking of doing more?

Omedetou_-_Evangelion_[hf1DkBQRQj4].webm
[Hide] (7.6MB, 1440x1080, 00:42)

>>7909
For a first try in a second language, I think you did just fine. Good Job!
>lack of male touhous
That is an obstacle for someone who wants to write 2hu, yeah. I guess you could always make an OC husbando.
I'm actually ESL too, I wonder how many of us there are on the board?

>>7913
>Thinking of doing more?
Sure, why not. But I think I'll read some other stories first, this time with an eye to narrative structure and plot elements. You know, for science.

>>7914
>For a first try in a second language
Well, not really. I think by now I have written more prose in English than my native language, but yes, I usually just eyeball it. Although I guess writing a narration specifically might be a different skill.
>I guess you could always make an OC husbando.
Or I could go for lesbian cuckqueaning.
>spoiler
In my experience in other places, ESLs tend to be almost as common as EFLs.

>>7922
>narrative structure and plot elements
Best way to get better at this is probably to read some real books instead of smut but don't let me get in the way of your research, anon. If you're open to suggestions, maybe in the next one you could show us the quean's perspective, and give us some of her thoughts and feelings as she watches the others. I'd also suggest that you take a little time in setting up the situation; most men, I think not that I have much experience here lol, would be a bit weirded out at first if their girlfriends suddenly said, "Hey, babe, please bang this girl while I shlick in the corner, thanks." He might assume it's some kind of test to see if he'd cheat on her or something. So seeing the quean talk him into it would be nice, and helps you as a writer think about the psychology of the characters.
>spoiler
I certainly wouldn't complain, but that's just me.

>>7201
Queany valences aside, Sappho strikes me as a bit of a spaghetti-spiller.

>>7201
Makes me proud to be 1/8th Lesbian [spoiler]from my dad's side[/spoiler].

>>7204
lol, there were several ancient Athenian comedies about Sappho. Maybe that's why they thought she was funny.

>>7216
That is an amazing thing to be able to drop in a conversation. I'm jealous.

in_the_name_of_the_pope.jpg
[Hide] (23.1KB, 326x245) Reverse

f4sg9fksjcuz.jpg
[Hide] (173.7KB, 619x933) Reverse

pedro.jpg
[Hide] (9.5KB, 206x255) Reverse

cuck_translation.png
[Hide] (669.3KB, 1280x720) Reverse

I know that question does not address the majority of the board's userbase but still curious if you crones might be able to answer through gossip and girl talk with your normalfag equivalents since it's somewhat board relevant. 

Women keep pretending that asking for an open relationship or swinging is the same as asking for a FF...FM foursome/manysome as if they did not already instinctually knew the answer. 
A man won't treat, view or think of his partner as lesser for being shared with other women, if anything he might bond even more.
Is it even possible for a woman to not viscerally perceive her man as a cuck and not lose almost every sense of respect and genuine sexual attraction if she sleeps with another man, even more so if he ACTIVELY CONSENTS to it?

Thank ya kindly.

I consensually cucked my wife and she's now crying. What do?

9a9dbe1aec2f3b3044928d6c29228d4bae777171d00ec88626545c5a428c4458.jpeg
[Hide] (230.4KB, 1531x1517) Reverse

>>7655
>hfw I keep mentally cheering, commentating, and yelling suggestions

>be me
>demon
>possess girl
>plan to torment her by fucking her crush using her body while denying her the pleasure
>turns out she is into it
>won't stfu inside my head
>mfw i had to put up with her backseating the entire time

>>7693
>yelling suggestions
>GRAB HIS DICK AND TWIST IT!
God will you shut up and let me fuck this dude jeez no wonder you suck at this

>>7699
>>TWIST IT!

smug9.png
[Hide] (117.1KB, 372x351) Reverse

>>7812
>never have  seen an uncut dick verified!

>>7516


It is still machine translate

1df13ce5f506f6b059af9ca1972a1f765494789f24eb71592b369ebf715814a5.jpg
[Hide] (15.2KB, 138x170) Reverse

>>7517
I hope a machine fucks my boyfriend

c822055eedd8a64b43226107c8a1bcdd12111d93114e036443241dee1dc7d56c.gif
[Hide] (37.6KB, 390x290) Reverse

>>7517
Congratulations!

Harmless as they were, I've gone ahead and moved the four posts starting at >>7520 to the dedicated Robots and AI thread at >>1871.

62b0e3137ce8b1c7df4d50ee4e42eb073309e35e2ba2c8aa671fbb54c23cd5c0.gif
[Hide] (196.9KB, 838x450) Reverse

>>7531

1.png
[Hide] (364.5KB, 800x1200) Reverse

2.png
[Hide] (524.2KB, 679x994) Reverse

3.png
[Hide] (103.5KB, 250x250) Reverse

4.png
[Hide] (298.8KB, 450x557) Reverse

5.png
[Hide] (421.2KB, 382x612) Reverse

>>5143
Speaking of >>5137 I absolutely love how her hair's been done, likewise her cute antlers and Deedlit-hueg elf ears. Very appropriate.

>a certain dorkiness to her color scheme that's appropriate for her.
You're right, though that particular combination's brightness ended up making her look like she's wearing a well-worn highlighter, at least to my eyes. Were I tweaking her existing colors, I'd probably pull the main yellow down a notch to make it more fabric than fluorescent. I'd color the trim to match or make it white like a Fifties day dress, which I think is what she's supposed to be wearing under her apron. You can see in pics related that that means the collar and cuffs need to be thicker to hold their own, which helps to balance things when only her upper half is visible.

On its own that could be a little frumpy, so adding a little Forties pinup spice might help loosen things up. Her leather choker and wristbands helped with that.

I'm no illustrator so all these ideas might be dead ends, though. Hard to tell what works well without thumbnailing it out.

sentencing_a_vixen.png
[Hide] (100.9KB, 1449x765) Reverse

Kidnapped from /monster/'s drawthread.

>>6861
A fitting punishment for someone guilty of being a vixen. I'm glad it's not tolerated in this nation.

16532-1.jpg
[Hide] (368.2KB, 1137x1600) Reverse

16532-5.jpg
[Hide] (391.9KB, 1123x1600) Reverse

>>6865
Dura lex, sed lex.

cuckquean-tan_sentenced.png
[Hide] (1.5MB, 1606x2476) Reverse

>>6867
Fiat justitia.

6204bf5f4179d44bcbdb12343810c97022eeac3a642db80a9567544a096465f2.gif
[Hide] (293.4KB, 675x675) Reverse

>>6850
>Hello I'm new
Welcome newfriend!

>is there a better term than hothusband? I cannot stand that word, surely there's something better.
Might be a question worth bumping our buried terminology thread for. 

I just refer to the man in the scenario as 'the man'. Or as the Husband/BF. I believe the terms 'stag' and 'bull' have been floated around in an old thread somewhere on 8chan, but they never caught on.

I would not say a more descript term for the male is really necessary. "Cuckquean" content that contains more than a singular man is not worth consuming, and words like hothusband remind me too much of the gender-reversed version of cuckqueaning. Mental prompting of either are hard turn-offs for me.

(Moderation Edit: Moved from Chit-Chat thread)

5d358c94ee9ce9c867457e7beacf3fcc.jpg
[Hide] (280.4KB, 2364x1900) Reverse

>>6850
Hello fellow word-hater! I also hate 'hothusband', almost as much as I hate 'cuckcake'.

Like >>6851 said we tend to just use 'man' (my man, her man, the man, etc.) when we don't know or need to bother with the specifics, or boyfriend/husband/whatever's applicable (master, owner, etc.) when we do. Stuffing cutesy words where they don't belong is chucklefucky imo.

(Moderation Edit: Moved from Chit-Chat thread)

881773338c4db45e36306e50432b3ee283cf16cc622f76f7b69c58242ade3b70.jpg
[Hide] (190.7KB, 536x800) Reverse

>>6851
>Might be a question worth bumping our buried terminology thread for. 
That sounds like a great idea! Went ahead and moved three replies from the Chit-Chat thread at >>4621 to here.

deer_girl.jpg
[Hide] (112.5KB, 827x1098) Reverse

>>6850
You're certainly in good company here, I don't know if any of us care for it. I generally agree with the others that a more specific word than man/husband/boyfriend isn't usually needed. There's also something powerful about names which makes me wary of using bad ones, like hothusband, but I was always partial to stag. The deergirl representation of queans resonates with me, so it makes sense to mirror that in him. Though I only really think in such terms when I'm trying to get myself into a queany headspace, if I'm just speaking academically then I tend not to.

>>6860
>stag
Shame that male cucks-in-denial got their hands on that a little over half a decade ago. But then, the same euphemism treadmill swiped “vixen” to replace the worn-out hurr “hotwife”, so you should call your fella whatever makes you feel queaniest.

>>6357
test

>>6436
cool, it works! now, can someone tell me why I got booted for respecting board etiquette? if it was some kinda circumcision joke, I must report that my foreskin is intact so it makes no sense...

USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST Guro

who cares
thats drama from 2 weeks ago
give me something fresh

>>6438
i'm not falling for this again!!

e3a28810gdsdf234342324.png
[Hide] (30KB, 298x95) Reverse

>>6437
Pottery.

7400daaf7d77be22d5abb8c096b2ec91fa033aee3d08c601ed04c39398c62444.webm
[Hide] (5.7MB, 1920x1080, 00:10)

With the power of new board, I hereby declare it to be Kim Possible. Tomoko is just a literally me who can't get a BF to cuck her in the first place.

This is stupid, and its sappy, but you all brightened my day whenever you posted. I will miss the cafe, but I can't express how happy I am that we have a new home to go to. Thanks for making the internet a little brighter throughout these years, and thanks to our new BO for taking up to torch to light the way in the time to come. I love you all, and I'll see you on the other side.

peek.webm
[Hide] (7.4KB, 600x600, 00:01)

>>6406
don't mind me, I'm on my way to fuck your man

cafe.png
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1425x800) Reverse

>>6395
It's been my pleasure.

The coming iteration of /cuckquean/ is yours, and what you take, leave, or change from this first decade is entirely up to you. I'm afraid that any emails will probably go unreplied-to, not out of malice but because I never check the address unless prompted elsewhere. You've been on /cuckquean/ since 8chan, anyway, so I doubt I'd be able to tell you anything of past hows or whys that you haven't already grasped for yourself.

If you would make accounts for yourself on 8chan.moe and endchan.net then post their usernames here under your secure tripcode (or post to let me know you've sent them to me by email) then I'll transfer ownership over those sites' /cuckquean/ bunkers to you as well.

>>6407
You brightened ours also.

Well_that's....gif
[Hide] (71.5KB, 450x640) Reverse

>>6408
You better not be one of those wretched women that remember to save their tripcodes into a .txt He's been wanting one of those forever!

>>6409
>The coming iteration of /cuckquean/ is yours, and what you take, leave, or change from this first decade is entirely up to you. I'm afraid that any emails will probably go unreplied-to, not out of malice but because I never check the address unless prompted elsewhere. You've been on /cuckquean/ since 8chan, anyway, so I doubt I'd be able to tell you anything of past hows or whys that you haven't already grasped for yourself.
Absolutely understandable, there's no pressure on your part to reply or handhold. I do feel it was important to state it now though before anyone starts worrying about the possibility of male homosexual content and guro and the like (because I know I was worried).

>If you would make accounts for yourself on 8chan.moe and endchan.net then post their usernames here under your secure tripcode (or post to let me know you've sent them to me by email) then I'll transfer ownership over those sites' /cuckquean/ bunkers to you as well.
I've gone ahead and emailed you both of them. Thanks again.

Migration's complete, new meta thread at >>6413

My simmering chastity kink has again popped its lid and boiled all over the cooktop of my libido, except this time instead of fixating on being belted I can’t stop thinking about having neat little chastity piercings that my man can use to lock and unlock as he pleases. Something about how sleek and neat the idea seems compared to a belt really excites the part of me that loves feeling owned and put away.

Problem is that a lot of pictures of female chastity piercings I can find online are pretty scary. They're heavy, permanent looking setups that seem to emphasise lots of thick rings, bolts, padlocks and other means of distortion/total closure. I suppose that's expected for something that probably attracts people who enjoy heavy piercings and other body mods as fetish/aesthetic in and of itself, but I feel attracted to the opposite, which is the smallest, neatest, most minimalistic possible "system" of piercings that'd allow my Master to conveniently lock and unlock me as he pleases without any elaborate untangling or adding/removing hardware from the piercing holes.

I guess what I'm asking here is whether anyone else here feels this way about chastity piercings, and whether anyone has pictures or descriptions of different existing "systems" (i.e. arrangements of how piercings and other hardware achieve their effects)?

1ccae3ad61b24bd06e219fd284d1b54a.jpeg
[Hide] (296.1KB, 800x1280) Reverse

6e15038994bb8f31e129b799ab00ac99.png
[Hide] (426KB, 789x1000) Reverse

>>161 (OP) 
Test

ba73a0dd23e01ce1e20b01afddc60624ba1ae7745fb311bb7740f1a6be8b362f.jpg
[Hide] (292.7KB, 900x847) Reverse

8861f08653f22c3773fe47aa4ad2850a07bb53f3f293aab3d01b21b5dcebccd5.jpg
[Hide] (178.9KB, 1000x1414) Reverse

463de365b9c2b2dc5a1eaa5ca681cc295f7a6303e0ad51a3848fe48735a1a7e9.png
[Hide] (569.4KB, 1125x1404) Reverse

>>171
Old files from Cafe.

04a0fda09151ac32eecc8afbd22cce8f51c84defbab87b1b0cc8db4f1a916a09.png
[Hide] (1020.4KB, 1280x1810) Reverse

>>6469
>Mash
She does seem like the right type for this.

e93d5cbd8b46e01bab596ac329192b1ca2b58b6354035a03febe9b70b4f224a9.jpg
[Hide] (859.4KB, 831x1175) Reverse

>>172
Old files from Cafe.

>>6470
Shhhh I was trying to be sneaky.