/yohoho/ - Piracy

You've crossed treacherous waters and found our hidden cove! ☠️ SQUAWKERS GET KEELHAULED ☠️


Ω Thread has reached reply limit. Ω


Ahoy, mateys! - First Mate


54e702576c9b7e4e84dc94a8de7cdde5a55171b6ec47b72b01bb6641280b27a5.jpeg
[Hide] (32KB, 448x298) Reverse
Me heart be adrift without ye...
Previous thread: >>3608
Last edited by webmaster
Replies: >>6267
>>6266 (OP) 
wait, the thread isn’t cyclical anymore?
Replies: >>6274 >>6276
What the fuck have they done now, there's literally no other site out there with so much downtime as LC
I got kicked in the middle of voting...
7ae4e17bfa8edf74e1775f16f81928b6af50134e7d4f858fd5b92fc6ca96862f.jpg
[Hide] (29.6KB, 1419x180) Reverse
Lolcow won't exist anymore inshallah
Replies: >>6271 >>6277
>>6270
Where will I post my schizo ramblings now?
Replies: >>6272 >>6277
>>6271
You're not /trueschizo/ since you ramble on a board that blocks vpns
Replies: >>6273
>>6272
I don't want VPN companies to know my insight. I don't know about all of them but Proton regularly enages with perverse moon gods.
>>6267
I’m sorry I fucked up with the OP, but it had been days since the last thread closed and I missed my pirate nonas
>>6267
who gives a fuck
Replies: >>6395
>>6270
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
>>6271
On tumblr
LC is a dumpster fire right now. A woman was shot by ICE and it's just used as an excuse for political shitflinging on an anonymous IB.
I'm a former personalityfag and not even I would go back to this cesspool site at this point
Can someone explain to me why there’s a whiteknight (or maybe multiple) in the Taylor R threads? Even over nitpicky stuff they leap to a fabricated tale of innocence to defend her.
The lolita threads have been shit for days. It feels like constant baiting and today they are bragging about being "edgy". Real disappointing because those are the threads I check the most on LC, but they've been bad the past week or so. At least /m/ is still alright, but slow.
I got probably three redtexts for various minor offenses over the past month but haven't actually been banned. Is this normal? Wtf is up with that?
Replies: >>6291
>>6290
Maybe your ban had already expired by the time you went to post again? Usually there would still be a page that shows you the red text though and states your ban is already expired.
Replies: >>6294
>>6291
Definitely not getting a page and I'm pretty sure whatever ban I was supposed to get (if I even got one) didn't expire. Six hours is the minimum ban time, right? Correct me if I'm wrong. It just makes me wonder what the hell is going on with moderation. I also never got so many redtexts in the past.
What is crazy about lc is that the main complaint in the feedback threads is that theres not enough banning and censorship.
Also
>thread for fetishes you're ashamef of
>it's filled with people bitching at posters for their fetishes

The whole point of the thread is that its shameful already. I hate autistics
Replies: >>6297
>>6296
Did you expect that thread to be a complete circlejerk of weirdos posting their degen fantasies? By posting in there people are openly admitting that their fetish is shameful, so it shouldn't be at all surprising that they are receiving said shame in return for it. If they didn't want anyone to bitch at them for their freak thoughts then they just shouldn't post about them in the first place kek. 
That thread is ass anyway, but so is just about any thread dedicated to anonymously sharing your horny musings.
Replies: >>6298
>>6297
>Did you expect that thread to be a complete circlejerk of weirdos posting their degen fantasies? 
Strawman. Never said that. 

It's just weird and very busybody to go into a thread designated for freaky shit and complain freaky shit is being discussed. I dont know why zoomers feel the need to take a stand on everything. It's like if I went to a nude beach and started talking about how sinful it is
Replies: >>6299
>>6298
>Never said that.
Okay, so what did you expect with that thread? No one is immune from critique just because you go to a designated thread, and people can make fun of others for whatever reason. I do agree that some retards just go in there to get mad when they should just learn to ignore it, but also it's simply unrealistic to imagine no pushback against anything that's said in there when it's admitted to be full of unconventional and strange interests. Especially because you're on a website that was initially based around making fun of and following online weirdos that do and enjoy unconventional and strange things.
Replies: >>6300 >>6301
>>6299
It's not like they just make fun of them and move on, they'll be very clearly morally outraged and then demand the offending user be banned. 

I watched a french TV show called Kaboul Kitchen about westerners in Afghanistan and they had their own swimming pool that was fenced off and out of sight. A local Afghan peeped in throw a hole and reported it to the government because of how OUTRAGED he was

Reminds me of lc
Replies: >>6301
>>6299
>>6300
To clarify further, don't mind seeing people make fun of someone for a gross fetish. I've just seen replies where its like "are mods just gonna let this TROON post?" like the sheer amount of serriousness is too much
Screenshot_20260117_085124_Opera.jpg
[Hide] (73.3KB, 1075x544) Reverse
Another instant permaban for no specified reason.
Replies: >>6305
>more posts about religion and virginity 
>more posts about race, skin color, and testosterone 
>more posts about kiwifags nobody cares about
>more posts about /pol/ politics 
>more posts about vshitters and egirls
>more posts with hot takes about women's rights
Banning scrotefoiling was a mistake. I hope the mods are happy with their choices.
Replies: >>6304 >>6305
>>6303
I'm so happy when I see a post that is like "these posts smell like scrote" that hasn't been red texted, like "go nonnie, I'm rooting for you!" but it does seem the site has become decidedly more anti-woman recently, and the /pol/ infestation used to be contained to /ot/, but I'm noticing it spreading to other boards now too.
>>6302
Ouch, condolences for having been on some tranny janny's shit list.
>>6303
I agree. Plus, the kiwi thread should've stayed lock. I'm not sure how much that thread has an impact on the site but I feel like ever since it became active again, things have gotten noticeably shittier. There is such a strong scrote presence on so many threads, it's crazy.
It's a weird contradiction that LC is supposed to be a woman's website where women are free to hate on moids but if someone dares criticize gay men or immigrant moids, there's suddenly cries for censorship because apparently gay men and immigrant moids aren't like other moids and need women to protect them from mean words online.
Replies: >>6308 >>6309
>>6307
I got the stupidest ban recently because someone got mad at me for making fun of gay men. It's ridiculous how much caping there is for men on the site now. Years ago, LC opened my eyes and helped me understand how detestable faggots are. Now they are caping for them for some reason. Absurd.
Replies: >>6311
>>6307
Talking about these two things wouldn't be a problem if lolcow wasn't infested with poltards trying to bait on a daily basis now
There has been proof of raids coming from soyjak.party and other male boards, depending on how you word yourself others are gonna assume you're one of them
Replies: >>6310 >>6311
>>6309
I can get immigrant moids but fag hate? That has been present on the site for ages and is not some political thing. What would flag a post to me as a moid would be an attack on homosexuality altogether, not just on faggot moids. Can't help but feel there is a janny who struggles to differentiate between those two concepts since the current crop of jannies who keep handing out retarded bans clearly struggle with reading comprehension.
>>6308
same, I initially realized how misogynistic gay men are from it being discussed on LC. they make fun of women constantly, so why can't we make fun of them for this on a women's ib?
>>6309
In addition to the sharty raids, I have to wonder if lc hasn't gained popularity on tiktok or something as well? I understand that new users come into the fold now and then, but it feels like there's been a sudden and an increasing amount of unintegrated tiktok jargon being used and many of the threads I check have recently had an issue of constantly devolving into infighting about how "zoomers" are constantly oppressed in every thread on lc by "millennials" (and no, I'm not looking in their respective hate threads on /ot/)
Replies: >>6312 >>6313 >>6608
>>6311
I definitely see a lot of young female edgelord Tiktok/Xitter users who don't exactly hide that they browse LC (and KF too in many cases).
>>6311
I keep seeing tiktok lingo like "sybau" being written and it manages to piss me off everytime, i wanna teleport to their house and beat the shit out of them. It's so easy for lolcow discord tranny jannies to do their jobs and ban them for not integrating but they're too busy doing it instead to the last decent posters left for breathing in a way that could be interpreted as "infighting".
/m/ is straight up unusable now. so many retarded children. used to be the best board btw
Replies: >>6317 >>6320 >>6324
>>6314
I guess it was inevitable that /m/ would face the same fate as /ot/. It's sad that it's been colonized by the same argumentative retards as /m/ used to be a slower relaxed board with interesting and random threads.

The state of LC is so bad, I just wish it could go back to being how it was in the 2010s.
Replies: >>6331 >>6608
>>6314
I noticed /m/ has had a really sharp decline recently. Why does everything online have to suck now? Nobody's funny, and nobody seems to have basic communication skills. At least /m/ felt like fun after everywhere else went to shit. This extends beyond LC. I'm just sad.
>>6314
Agreed. So much infighting in the general media threads. It's better in specific thing threads but I don't know anything about the fun ones.
Replies: >>6327
>>6324
All my specific thing threads are practically dead and it seems I'm the only one who even posts in them anymore. I always liked to read the movie threads, and honestly I do still find them tolerable, but the infighting has been increasing there lately. It does seem there's a bunch of active threads lately for various video games (or mobile games perhaps?), so maybe those are quite nice threads, but I know nothing about them to join in and I'm not really a gamer of any sort.
Seeing WC is making me appreciate LC a lot more tbh. I just am not a fan of the willy nilly thread creations that plague WC and CC both. I will withdraw my LC complaints for now... (until they piss me off again ofc)
>>6317
I miss 2010s LC so much.
>>6330
Agreed, there's also too little female-only ibs to begin with for the rare new one to be based upon such a stupid gimmick, especially after there has been such high demand for one.
Replies: >>6335
>>6330
>>6334
But that's how image boards used to be. Once a thread fell off the index, either due to inactivity or reaching the bump limit, a thread would be gone. LC only has a built in archive feature because the original purpose of the site was to archive and discuss lolcows.
Replies: >>6337
>>6335
I'm a dumbass, I meant to reply to >>6329, not >>6330. My problem is that the thread limit itself is far too small, not so much that threads eventually disappear, though I'll admit I prefer LC's system in that sense too.
Replies: >>6340
>>6337
I've already given up on it due to frustration. Maybe I'll try it again in a month or so since it is new, but right now it is disheartening to be having a conversation with some anons, and then have the entire thread nuked because some dumbass wants to post a meaningless nonsense thread.
Replies: >>6344 >>6345
>>6340
this is how i feel right now. it makes me sad.
>>6340
Anons I don't mean to be rude, but you're being dummies. The threads being temporary right now just makes sense, the site is only a few days old and the admin needs to figure shit out. Why should she store all these threads when the site isn't even coherent yet? There is no reason to be precious about threads on a board that is 4 days old. Please continue to post, bring good will to the site, and just have fun participating instead of looking for reasons to complain.
>>6330
And what's happening over here? Because I just see a bunch of threads being made willy nilly. It's not even it's own site, it's a board on a cuck website. And you have the nerve to be picky and choosy while admitting there aren't enough female only ibs.
Replies: >>6348 >>6606
>>6347
sorry if i'd like to talk about cooking in the cooking thread with other anons. even if it's slow af here with only a reply every few weeks, it's still a conversation. Meanwhile on wc a cooking thread would be posted... maybe 4 anons reply to each other, and then someone boots it off the page by posting a picture of an anime girl and typing "bazonkas!!! am i right!?!?!" the threads here aren't "willy nilly lol so random!!!!" shitposts but generals that people can return to
Replies: >>6349
>>6348
The imageboard is still barebones you brickheaded fuck why the hell would there be multiple generals
Threads being slid is normal too
Replies: >>6350 >>6351 >>6355
>>6349
UH OH WITCHES GETTING HEATED
Replies: >>6354
>>6349
they'd do better to just have one general chat thread only, none of the other stupid little threads, so that people can actually have some expectation of being able to return to a conversation after a few hours. not everyone is as chronically online as you seem to be. you seem to be taking criticisms of WC awfully personally
>>6350
Wtiches off the plank! I wish the piratisms were kept up here more
Replies: >>6355
>>6349
Why don't you go have fun talking about emojis then?

>>6354
Same, I think the pirate theme is cute! Yarrr!
Replies: >>6356
>>6355
Why don't you make your own imageboard instead of complaining?
Replies: >>6357 >>6606
pirate-holding-sword-12943107.jpg
[Hide] (50.8KB, 800x539) Reverse
>>6356
>anon thinks pirate theme is cute
>why don't you go make your own ib
Are ye spoutin' bilge, or are ye truly that thick?
Replies: >>6358
>>6357
I'm talking about anon complaining about WC.
Replies: >>6361
There's no need to fight
You can post on both boards. Witchan for irreverent posting and /yohoho/ for more in depth longer discussions.

Personally I enjoy the ephemeral threads and bare bones tiny board implementation on witchan. It's like going back in time to the mid 2000s. Newfriends who weren't around not trying to be insulting, there's very few anons that are still active on image boards from that time for that era of image boards are probably experiencing this type of IB for the first time.
Replies: >>6360 >>6370
4d8afc1caddc4b76cf2e87a20cb178c7055705c1c8afc6c032c33866de49cc83.gif
[Hide] (637.5KB, 300x206) Reverse
>>6359
I do like that I don't feel like I have to watch my writing style and edit my filenames so some nonnie won't bring up a vent or something I made ages ago like on LC. LC is for archiving but Christ I had someone clock me on something I said like 2 months ago. Might as well have accounts. /yohoho/ at least lets me strip filenames.
Replies: >>6361 >>6365
>>6360
I've never understood the anons who claim they can identify someone by typing style. It just sounds a bit schizo to me unless there's something specific mentioned across the posts as well. On LC, there has to be at least a few hundred anons, surely not everyone who writes exclusively in lowercase is the same person, but I sometimes see people claiming that anyways. The stripping of filenames on here is a nice feature though! 

>>6358
Being hostile towards posters (some of which are perfectly happy here) because they aren't using the new board and are frustrated by its thread deletion system isn't likely to encourage them to go use it.
Replies: >>6362 >>6365
>>6361
If you're from one of the lower traffic countries you can notice them pretty easily by slang and phrases.
694d65d142a0541c3734b346bd7b35fcee875d7491509596ff45cfd41575daa8.jpg
[Hide] (47.5KB, 1386x924) Reverse
>>6360
I would argue that /ot/ shouldn't be archived because it's an off topic general board with most threads having a loosely defined topic.

Back when LC was slower and had a less retarded user base, it wasn't really an issue. Now LC is much faster and full of infighting social media speds, it doesn't make any sense. Outside of a few threads, nothing of value is being posted on /ot/. Instead of dying with the old thread, infights get dragged to the new thread and there's schizos following random anons over the board because they think someone is moid, troon or a fed.

>>6361
>Being hostile towards posters (some of which are perfectly happy here) because they aren't using the new board and are frustrated by its thread deletion system isn't likely to encourage them to go use it.
I agree. There really isn't any point in being hostile to anyone over it. /yohoho/ and witchan are very different and I honestly think it's better that women have more options for IBs. The internet in general has gone to absolute shit. Smaller IBs are the last hold out of genuine, bot free discussions by real women.
Replies: >>6367 >>6368
>>6365
>a fed
The people who takes feds seriously need to get out more. Lc is tiny compared to other image boards. It's kiwifags if anything.
Replies: >>6371 >>6372
>>6365
I agree about /ot/. Archiving a lot of that is not necessary. It'd be nice if once the thread hit the post limit, it sat in a "read only" mode  and then went away after like 3-5 days or so. There's no reason for LC to keep the last 4 years of American politics discussion infighting or 17 threads worth of the Fujo vs Anti-fujo war. I do think there are a few threads I'd want to keep on an archived basis though, such as funny caps or the moovie room/doodle board threads, but probably everything else could go a few days after hitting post limit.
>>6359
It wasn't my intention to fight, but a little friendly rivalry wouldn't hurt.
>>6367
Previously I would have agreed but there is something unnatural happening in the amerifags thread. I have a tinfoil theory that cerbmin implemented the VPN ban on /ot/ because of the obvious organized political shilling in the amerifags thread during the election.
>>6367
I hate to sound like a schizo but after learning that Epstein browsed 4chan and had a connection with moot, I imagine imageboards, especially the most prominent female-dominated one, are undoubtedly on the feds' radar. LC really isn't as small as it used to be especially now that younger posters from TikTok and Xitter dominate the discourse there. Kiwifags are definitely on there causing chaos too but I don't think the feds are going to ignore the psyop potential that an imageboard like LC has.
Replies: >>6373
>>6372
I think that makes sense too, especially when you consider how there are many women who are identifying as "politically homeless" these days (especially in the U.S. and GB). While I fully understand the sentiment there (and I identify with it myself at times), anyone who would want to sway an election, or even general sentiment within a country, would likely see an opportunity within someone who is essentially not committed to any particular party. Anonymity has its benefits, but at the same time we're not able to look at the background of posters and see if they might have special interests of their own leading them to push certain angles. The best we can do is research various claims using credible sources when we encounter such things.
Replies: >>6374
>>6373
>politically homeless
I'm a dumbass, could you elaborate? Is this related to the two-party system? Nayrt
Replies: >>6375
>>6374
Ntayrt but it means like lots of women feel as though there's no political party that really shares their ideals or values.

Politically homeless = having no party to call your own.
I keep getting a "500 internal server" error when I try to post on LC without a VPN. I'm not sure why it's happening, or if it's some kind of ban I wasn't aware of before. It's really weirding me out, and I wonder what I must've done if it is one.
Replies: >>6380
>>6379
Sounds like it could be something to do with your image. Webms can be funky because they're a wrapper for the formats inside.
Replies: >>6388
>>6380
Nope, no images. I e-mailed the admins, and they said it may have been a "range ban check" intended for someone else and asked for my IP. I sent it to them, but then they said my IP wasn't tied to any range ban, and asked for the last thing I remember posting. I sent them that, and haven't received any response in days. I'm even more confused now.
The lack of transparency really sucks IMO. I can technically still post on boards besides /ot/ with a VPN, but this whole thing kind of put a bad taste in my mouth. I shared a lot of documents in the Epstein thread (with source/links, of course), kind of shitty that I can't discuss that with other anons anymore.
Replies: >>6389
>>6388
Some vpns slip though the /ot/ ban, I think Mullard was one of them
why are some nonas so awful. sometimes i think i’m being overdramatic but i take a break and go back and it genuinely is unnecessary hostility

>>6276
i was just wondering when the change happened, thought there’d be one cyclical thread forever
Replies: >>6396
>>6395
That's the state of the internet. The younger generation isn't taught how to be cordial. Everyone is told they should be true to themselves and that their opinion matters, so they think being polite is not being true. On top of that newfags think lolcow is just female 4chan. 

Not related but I hope they lock the dick thread. What a heap.
>>6330
Now that it's been two weeks, what do you think of WC now?
Replies: >>6399 >>6401 >>6450
>>6397
I still can't get on board with the thread deletion mid-convo thing. It is better now that there is a higher thread cap, but even still I run into situations where I am replying to a witchnon and when I go to check if she has replied back, the thread is gone. It's nice that it is a fairly active site (especially considering how slow sailing it is over here), but I don't like how something asinine like an RP of batman and the riddler can nuke a thread anons were having earnest conversations in.
>>6397
Nayrt obviously but there's something I don't trust about it. I have been lurking but not posting and even then I can't shake the feeling that something is off. I actually like the fact the threads are temporary as that is my least favorite part of lc.
Replies: >>6402 >>6403
>>6401
I've had similar thoughts about something being off. Side effect I suppose of never being able to know for sure who is in charge. There were some replies early on that Nimu made which rubbed me the wrong way too. I wish I had screenshot them since I can't even remember myself what they were, but point is, you never really know who is moderating an ib - it's best to be careful.
Replies: >>6403 >>6404 >>6405
>>6401
>>6402
>something is off
Sounds like you have PTSD from LC. You're so used to shitty moderators that you're suspicious when someone tries to not be shit.
Replies: >>6404 >>6606
>>6403
I think it's healthy to be cautious of a brand new social space ran by a stranger. Weirdly defensive reply. I'm not saying nonas shouldn't use it, I'm saying how I felt. 

>>6402
I'll definitely keep lurking. It has potential.
Replies: >>6450
>>6402
>There were some replies early on that Nimu made which rubbed me the wrong way too. I wish I had screenshot them since I can't even remember myself what they were
Can you try to recall them?
Replies: >>6406
772c4d134641d23e38c26ee6cff3450b4ba12fbbb248c616b6d893b0625f9705.png
[Hide] (162.9KB, 2826x428) Reverse
>>6405
Nta but someone in the complaints thread was able to identify nimu asking about making an ib in the stupid questions thread and when people were voicing their concerns or questions nimu's responses were kind of immature. You can read them yourself here. https://lolcow.farm/ot/res/2769665.html#2776349 
I'm a frequent wc user myself, and I quite like it there generally speaking, though it's good to always remain a bit skeptical about things. So far nimu hasn't done anything bad and everything seems to be going smoothly, but with how much she loves to tout about wc being a super free-for-all escape from lc, I can't help but be slightly worried about what will happen. The users there are very nice though and I enjoy the atmosphere, I'm just praying that nimu won't do something stupid to fuck things up in the future.
Also picrel was in wc's meta thread when people were voicing their concerns about nsfw boards being added in the future. I could very well be too sensitive here, but something about the wording feels a bit weird in a way.
>When this site first started, most of you disliked the limited number of threads and their impermanence, and asked me to change it. But don't you agree with me now? Haven't you come to appreciate, even prefer, my format?
It feels a little egotistical but again, I may just be nitpicking. The stupid questions thread posts are definitely more damning.
Replies: >>6407 >>6411 >>6415
>>6406
The stupid questions thread anon is her, confirmed? I'm definitely waiting it out then, those replies were a whole drill team waving red flags kek.
A trustworthy admin shouldn't be so outwardly egotistical. Even if she chose not to change it, having that response doesn't look good.
Replies: >>6409
>>6407
It's not actually confirmed, but based on the clues given it's pretty likely that it's Nimu.
>Stupid questions poster mentions making their ib on Vichan. WC runs on Vichan.
>Stupid questions poster mentions being able to post yaoi porn freely. WC was advertised on FC and a decent amount of the users come from there.
>Stupid questions poster mentions modding the ib themself. So far Nimu is the only person modding WC.
>Stupid questions poster talks about how everything banned on LC would be allowed on their ib except for moids and illegal content. Nimu likes to talk about how WC is all about being able to post what you can't on LC and that moids aren't allowed (despite what some LC users may believe)

I want to believe in Witchan because I've been enjoying it so far and it has reduced my activity on LC quite a bit, but Nimu just makes me a bit nervous about how the site may play out. Beggars can't be choosers though I guess, I'm just happy that there's a new female-centric ib at all.
Replies: >>6411
What are we still doing here, anyway? Let's move on over to WC already!
Actual_moid_right_under_WC.jpg
[Hide] (179KB, 1075x2748) Reverse
truck_moid_larp_from_farmhand_psyop_thread.png
[Hide] (55.5KB, 1112x577) Reverse
>>6406
Nimu does come across with a rather rude tone, both in your picrel and in the thread. It gives me suspicions too. We don't know what is being done with our post data over there. 
>>6409
>moids aren't allowed 
tbh I think they're already there and nothing is being done about them. it's either moids or it's women trolling by larping as trucker moids in the psyop thread right now. not to mention there was an influx of people saying they were from CC this morning and then there was picrel which showed someone claiming to be male basically right under a WC advert.
Replies: >>6414 >>6416 >>6450
>>6411
>Bro, I'm a bodybuilder and fat wives ARE ESSENTIAL for motivation.
Kek, you don't actually think this is real, do you?
>>6406
clicked on the thread to see what you were talking about and got distracted by the incest convo. anon wants to fuck her cousin.

anyway, ultimately i’m happier with WC than any other ib atm, so i’m excited to see how things will go. she might come across as a bit egotistical but to be frank at least she communicates and i can’t stand Cerbmin. it is probably not her intention to come across as such, and in conversations here or on LC that seemed to be her, she seems like she means well and i like her.

and you’re right the atmosphere is good right now. cc is weird pickmes and probably some troons, lc is needlessly argumentative even if the banter can be funny sometimes and the moidhate is cathartic, and fc seems great i’m just not a fujo so not much to do there. more than anything i remember talking with some nonas about how everyone wants a new ib but no one wants to make it so i’m glad she showed up because otherwise i don’t think we’d be getting anything for a longgg time coming.

what are you all nervous might happen, specifically?
Replies: >>6418
>>6411
why the hell would anyone advertise on cc ugh. guess it was inevitable
Replies: >>6418
>>6416
It's guaranteed to be intentionally bad. No sane woman posts there anymore, it's all trannies and soyteens. 

>>6415
>what are you all nervous might happen, specifically?
Data insecurity is always the top concern. Even if i use a VPN and don't give personal info, not everyone will be as careful as me. While anonymity isn't promised, it would be nice to not worry about some crazy admin outing people they dislike. Her replies to the nonas disagreeing with her in stupid questions don't give me hope she's trustworthy. 
I am also worried about her being competent at running the site in general. How will she vet mods? How will she update and improve security? If nonas give suggestions for positive change, will she disregard them if she personally doesn't agree?
Nothing I've seen so far instills confidence. That could change, it's a really new site. It's healthy to have caution though.
Replies: >>6419
Screenshot_2026-02-16_172458.png
[Hide] (78.5KB, 1290x861) Reverse
>>6418
Wait, were you one of the anons that got redtexted in that thread? Is that why you're seething so hard? Kek, just let it go already.
Replies: >>6420 >>6422
>>6419
Nyart but what that anon said is perfectly reasonable and isn't said in an aggressive manner at all. I'm not saying it's only you acting this way, but someone or multiple someones have been responding a bit hostile towards anyone expressing the slightest bit of reasonable criticism of WC and trying to push ppl to the site. It does feel a bit suspicious.
Replies: >>6421
>>6420
it’s not nimu at least since apparently she’s busy at Carnival or something? which is why WC is just automodded right now
Replies: >>6426
>>6419
No, I haven't posted anything about wc at all on lc. I'm not seething, I'm answering your question.
Replies: >>6423
>>6422
do anons not look at typing styles? that ayrt is not the me who asked obviously. i don’t know what she’s talking about because i can’t make sense of the screenshot much. i would like her to elaborate on what she means exactly.

for me, i don’t have many privacy concerns (i ought to) but i also just don’t get the same suspicious vibes from the site others are. i think the most suspicious thing is the idea behind the site, feels like she’s going for something “unregulated” aka anything not illegal goes. idk how to feel about that, would definitely affect the site culture. but i think i’m ultimately on board with anything, i just want something new.
Replies: >>6425
>>6423
No, I didn't double check before replying if it was the same anon. My new answer is "I'm not seething i was answering a question". 
I don't mind the lawless nature since it reminds me of me traditional imageboards, which is what I started on. Only time will tell how it plays out. Hoping for the best, but being cautious for a while.
>>6421
>WC is just automodded right now
They have an automod already?
We need an award for every time some faggot posts about us and other women only ibs in /meta/.
Replies: >>6428
>>6427
The admin here is a troon? Very disconcerting.
Replies: >>6429 >>6434
>>6428
Nobody mentioned troons. This board on the website, which isn't connected to the other boards, is women only. If you're implying captmin is one of the people sharing the links in /meta/ is would bet money she isn't. There's some gay ops afoot.
If the anon who posted about "gc, em and hy" is here, by gc did you mean Girl's Channel (another website with anonymity meant for women)? I'm honestly curious.
I like using lolcow, but one thing I really hate is when you post something that the mods disagree with personally and get banned for baiting even if you have an established post history as a user who actually contributes to the boards you frequent. It's just childish.
>>6428
No way. Cuckquing? Or did someone else take over?
Replies: >>6435 >>6436
>>6434
Good day! I'm still the admin and I'm not a tranny. I hope that clears things up.
Replies: >>6450
>>6434
why are you gullible kek
>>6080
I know this post is months old but could you elaborate? What were the old discords and what do you mean with the jannys clean up your stinkies for free?
Replies: >>6438 >>6439
>>6437
>what do you mean with the jannys clean up your stinkies for free?
This made me laugh.
>>6437
Nta but 
https://lolcow.farm/ot/res/733281.html
dcb261b9c0114e58db216345d0db75b7837f71e572ddc83efb375b1aa9a4fa10.jpg
[Hide] (86.5KB, 1200x871) Reverse
Nimu went back on her words of "freedom to post" and she's limiting what women can or cannot post already, i was hopeful for an imageboard that allows women to discuss whatever without pearl-clutching, but alas
Replies: >>6442 >>6446
>>6441
What are you referring to exactly?
Replies: >>6443
6e8cb2ec810cc6fd0b112d6e406467b32f2ef50cec7343278c5b6db3e0930f96.png
[Hide] (46.8KB, 1291x297) Reverse
>>6442
>>6443
This basically says nothing let us know when you actually get banned unfairly
>>6443
>I can't copy and paste?
>This violates free speech!
Kek, what's your problem?
>>6441
Some of you are annoying unlikable friendless retards. I'm glad you're being oppressed.
Replies: >>6447 >>6450 >>6606
>>6443
she just seems to be avoiding bait not oppressing topics of discussion. this seems like a good thing, actually.

i’m a very “politically correct” person when it comes to pretty much anything but the trans topic (and i guess liberal feminism) but even i like the idea here tbh. moids tend to use such discussions as excuses to shitfling (and i guess baiters of all kind, seeing as /ot/ is prone to such as well) but i would be interested in engaging with other women who are discussing things in good faith. it’s a pity that it seems to have to be one or the other, allow certain topics and have people bait and be antagonistic, making the space an unwelcoming or hostile place, or pretty much just police everything. the former allows crazy types to thrive but the latter makes it so that most spaces for women don’t ever really have an opportunity for open discussion, which encourages sheep-think.

>>6446
it honestly comes across like some people just want something to be upset about, more than anything
Replies: >>6456
>>6443
None of this looks bad, pretty reasonable takes.
34333706b3ed3bb7959bbf85aae77c7d943431bb9fa3a2bfe11fd142e0e0d12d.png
[Hide] (29.4KB, 846x115) Reverse
61c7248a37907573f2f98c873cd74816356f57cdbb2a0a8735e3b689bad58108.png
[Hide] (19.5KB, 435x85) Reverse
e044eadcbc3888a3217385f2d89069943464e90dc3e1320bde5153fedf72440c.png
[Hide] (31.3KB, 567x190) Reverse
>>6435
It sucks that you tried your best to help a community and some people still find every excuse to tear you down and make up rumors about you.

>>6397
The user-base seems really young and annoying. A lot of them, but not all, remind me of that "RAWR xD Quirky Chungus!" type of person.

>>6404
>Weirdly defensive reply.

A lot of the witchanons have a weird hatred for JC, I'm guessing because we aren't "cozy" enough for them or we don't have enough "whimsy." I think the obsession with "cozy" and "whimsy" creates a pretentious atmosphere where toxic positivity is expected and honesty is punished, a place where we can't really share our opinions because our opinions might be ~mean~ or something.

Those two words always give me bippie Tumblrina vibes, specifically the type of Tumblrina that would run a cottagecore blog or be a TIF. That being said, there was a post in the vent thread on /txt/ that suggests that some of the anons there are TIFs or recovering TIFs, as well as several posts that are steeped in TRA ideology.

Funnily enough, I saw a lot of discussion re: Discord servers on WC and it seemed like a lot of people were against LC-specific Discords and complained about them, and then they turned around and started sharing their own Discords for the purposes of playing video games, which I thought was ironic and funny.

>>6411
>tbh I think they're already there and nothing is being done about them.
There's definitely a few TIMs on the site already. They can never really pass, but the anons that use that site don't really seem to care or able to identify them by text alone.

>>6446
The randomly aggressive and rude replies whenever someone mildly critiques WC isn't serving your cause.

>>6443
She needs to work on not typing like she's an anime villain. Referring to herself in the third person is a bit much.
Replies: >>6451 >>6487
>>6450
Holy shit. A MAGA bootlicker wrote this btw. How many neuroses do you have? Can you count them on your fingers, or do you have too many?
Replies: >>6452
>>6451
WC anons are so repressed because of their IB's toxic positivity problem that they have to go to other IBs to try and bait for infights and express their emotions in an honest way. Sad! 

But kind of funny too.
Replies: >>6453 >>6457 >>6607
>>6452
You are a very weird, disturbed person.
Replies: >>6454 >>6606
91e50d92166c3dad9ed3da92c05b8e590f2ba797a47c816a9f2eea0f732c3e15.jpg
[Hide] (92.6KB, 828x952) Reverse
>>6453
Kisses and hugs.
Replies: >>6455
>>6454
Thanks babe.
>>6447
>Sheep-think
This is the reason a lot of female only spaces online never work. Getting real tired of female spaces being aggro and against any conversation that isn't "yass girlie did you do your nails today" "what did you eat today" while in male ones you are free to have actual discussions and say what you want
Replies: >>6459 >>6460
>>6452
i don’t think you’re weird or disturbed just a bit unusually antagonistic

as for the site, i wish it didn’t get shared as much as it has (with cc now, and inevitable TIMs) but it’s still a userbase mostly comprised of former farmers, FC-users, and /yhh/, and i think that balance is why i like it. cosy and whimsy is fun to me, so i’m happy 

you mentioned former TIFs, but there are also a lotttt of those on lolcow.
Replies: >>6458 >>6460
>>6457
Anon the person you're trying to engage with just spent a day samefagging, drawing bait, writing paragraphs complaining about the crime of being too happy, and making up other disingenuous nonsense, all for attention.
Replies: >>6460
>>6456
NLOG
>>6457
>you mentioned former TIFs, but there are also a lotttt of those on lolcow.
I know, and I loathe them.

>as for the site, i wish it didn’t get shared as much as it has (with cc now, and inevitable TIMs)
The disappearance of the ability to gatekeep has done untold damage to internet communities. As soon as I saw the link posted to CC, I got kinda nervous for how it'd turn out. I've been checking KF's LC thread every so often to see if they've figured it out yet, but so far it hasn't been mentioned. CC is such a graveyard these days that I doubt it matters much.

>>6458
I'm not trying to be mean but if you think that, you might be a little paranoid.

>>6456
A lot of people are really uncomfortable with having sharing spaces with others that don't share all of their same opinions. I've noticed this is especially apparent with Zoomers. It's like they think if there's even one post that goes against their ethics, they have to spend a lot of their time and energy freaking out about that post. It's almost impossible for them to ignore bait, to the point that they'll come to other IBs to rant about it too.
Replies: >>6461
>>6460
Oh come on.
>anon freaks out about lack of free speech here
>/meta/ freak-out over lack of free speech occurs in the same day
>exact same paragraph typing style
>posts screenshots of WC, obviously almost fanatically dedicated based on the constant lurking
You are still trying to concoct some sort of fake narrative to try and turn the 1-3 people paying attention to this on your side. You also seem to waste a lot of energy on stupid shit, yourself.
Replies: >>6462 >>6478
>>6461
??? What
Replies: >>6463
>>6462
You don't have to hide your true feelings from me, neuroses-chan. We can be mentally ill together if you would just be honest.
Replies: >>6464
>>6463
No genuinely kek I don't know what you're talking about
Replies: >>6465
>>6464
Do you take any mood stabilizers? I'm partial to zoloft myself.
Replies: >>6466
>>6465
Maybe up the dose?
Replies: >>6467
>>6466
I'd get serotonin syndrome from that. You don't want me to get hurt, do you?
Replies: >>6468
3140df20a6c18f748a23ca46d31f4b045b8b45c9d4d37ca6da58583c7c322231.png
[Hide] (497.4KB, 603x706) Reverse
>>6467
Replies: >>6469
>>6468
Is that a yes or a no...?
ec02c86d53b318a55d66d2513aaf1fe8a56301efce691390b018412275610c19.png
[Hide] (4.2MB, 2266x1648) Reverse
😭
Replies: >>6471
>>6470
We're not even fighting, stop it. I feel kinda bad for her. I think she's blaming me for doing something on WC because she's confused or paranoid but I didn't even do anything on WC, besides call some of them cringey here.
Replies: >>6472
>>6471
Do you smoke crack?
y'all need to behave
Replies: >>6474 >>6479
>>6473
hewwo
Replies: >>6475
>>6474
hi hi
please enjoy your weekend if you can!
When I first heard of the new WC, I thought it would be similar to the male WC where you need to be a virgin to post, but that doesn't seem to be the case. It's interesting to me that it went with the witch theme though considering that wizard is pretty well established in IB culture.
Replies: >>6481
4322082c4b9f7ac026b7f6ff2a0a7363d16da21e78d6b42048d0412082d4e46a.gif
[Hide] (108.5KB, 182x200) Reverse
>>6461
Or maybe some people think the same about witchan and you can't handle it, thanks for proving our point, you have no place to say others waste time on stupid shit when you're this obsessed with tracking others on multiple imageboards who aren't even the same person
Replies: >>6485
>>6473
Ok sorry no more replies
Lolcow no longer feels like home to me. If you aren't a gold star, non-american lesbian you WILL be hated. Someone is going to say my post is bait. Every time you mention you're a burger you get hate. If you mention you're attracted to males you get hate. Lolcow didn't use to be so hateful towards its own users. Things have changed and it feels sad. I don't even post about my husbando or any my country, I just see how the ones who do get treated. I see more and more posts telling nonas to kill themselves. What the fuck is going on?
Replies: >>6482 >>6484
>>6477
What do wizards have to do with witches?
Replies: >>6482
>>6480
what are you talking about? i’m a gold star bong lesbian and they absolutely despise me on there. if anything hormy hetposting & homophobia has way increased recently and is now what is considered based there

i stopped visiting /ot/ because the site culture changed so much and i say this as a newfag (from 2023). i now only check /m/ /g/ /snow/ and /meta/. i actually prefer /g/ more nowadays other than the female fantasies thread being less active and unhinged.
>>6481
yeah, i think the associated is dumb. i’d never have thought of the connection. plus hardly any female ibs embrace femcelism of any kind, at least explicitly
Replies: >>6483 >>6484
>>6482
I think the hateful posting has just increased. It's bad for everyone. They just hate women in general and I'm sorry they treat you that way, nona. I also don't go to the britbong general so I might be missing some of that too.
>>6480
>>6482
I've seen hate towards both het and lesbian women more often, I think you're just noticing the one that affects you. Someone already said this on lc, but those fujo infight threads were the start of what made it so bad. Anons constantly screeching that all het women are shotacons and autopedos/lesbians are lolicon dykes was bound to spill over into other threads
As a sidenote, what's with all the nazi shit lately? I thought it was just uniform fetishists at first, but now there's people saying nazis did nothing wrong in other threads. I'm sure it's bait but it's weird that there's so much right now
Replies: >>6486 >>6498
>>6478
We're all in the same boat, sweetie.
>>6484
The influx of nazi sympathy has been really weird. Having the hots for the uniform is old stuff and will never change but the recent posts feel like moids trying to psyop women into thinking nazis are like these hot badass dudes and not overweight meth addicts with inferiority complexes. Lolcow is truly dead. The new posters hate women more than incels at this point.
Replies: >>6498
>>6450
why did this anon's post cause so much shitflinging kek. for not liking tranny speak like "amab"?
Replies: >>6488 >>6492
>>6487
more like the rawr quirky chungus accusation. also the cherrypicking because there was only one anon that said amab. and she also made it sound like the vents were full of TIFs but when i got curious and checked there was literally ONE kek. i think people are forgetting most of the userbase came from lc and there are people like that there too, more even.
Replies: >>6502
>>6487
Hit dogs holler.
d71f0bc933db48298e4c305321f28c344948d094200243c7e031511c1ad771cf.png
[Hide] (72KB, 1210x331) Reverse
>Anger is a bad thing, only moids are angry.
>If you feel anything except happiness, you are a moid or you are a bitch on your period.
insanity
Replies: >>6495 >>6497
>>6493
It just feels like the userbase over there is massively young and grew up in this more modern era where misogyny, both internal and external, stopped being called out with the rise of mannosphere podcasts and shit. I remember a thread last week where multiple anons were talking about how they went to school with /pol/scrotes and were friends with them due to them all being outcasts and like, I can't relate. BACK IS MY DAY, the outcasts browsed 4ch, but specifically nerd shit. Not a single school friend posted on r/TheDonald because it didn't exist. If one of us said "hey, you seem grumpy - are you on your period?" to another woman, we would have been lectured on how that is a rather misogynistic assumption. It literally sounds moiddish, but the younger kids didn't have that era of pushback against that shit like what older users got to experience.
Replies: >>6497
>>6493
am i the only one who hates chocolate and anything warm on my stomach when i’m on my period? i don’t even like eating.
>>6495
not you’re right, i agree with you and i’m a younger zoomer myself. that’s absolutely it. and lolcows userbase seems to be skewing younger and younger.
>>6484
>>6486
This isn't new, it's been in the background for years. The original user base was from 4chan, Ian used to post images of Nazi Pepe, there's been a thread of men in military uniforms on /m/ for years, which includes nazis and there's discord cabals of NLOGs that send nudes to 4chan /pol/tards.

It's just the unavoidable reality of image boards because it's been embedded in the culture for decades. Before /pol/ even existed, /b/ was full of ironic Hitler threads. Way back in the mid-2000s it was about being edgy and posting things online that weren't allowed IRL instead of any sort of political stance. The problem with this is that ironic nazi threads attracted unironic nazis.
Replies: >>6499
>>6498
I disagree. The recent (as in, last 2 weeks) Nazi debacle is all bait with no substance.

What happens is that baiters throw everything at a wall to see what sticks. When they notice anons complaining in the /meta/ thread about a subject they bait with, that signals to them to up the bait and continue doing it. When they saw anons take their Nazi bait and post about it in /meta/, they knew it was something that bothered them so they went ham and started posting lots more. It's Bait 101 and since most anons can't ignore bait anymore, it works like a charm.

If everybody ignored and reported bait instead of constantly whinging about it in /meta/, there'd be a lot less bait.
Replies: >>6500
embarrassing.jpg
[Hide] (81.6KB, 982x415) Reverse
>>6499
Finally someone that gets it, on top of it all there's a batch of anons so dumb and gullible they'll accidentally help the baiters and brag about purposefully upping the ante with fake obvious bait just to get threads they don't like locked. I hate siding with the farmhands but it's good they're not folding on every single lock x thread request because these anons will go around begging every thread to get locked if they could, it would only give them power and more drive to demand dumb shit. These threads aren't even the problem threads, infight centrals like unpopular opinions, fujo infight threads and all the other newfag /ot/ threads are way worse.
Replies: >>6501
>>6500
Newfags apply social media logic to IBs. They expect LC, a small, independent website, to have the same moderation as a global, commercialized website like Twitter or TikTok. They don't know anything and they're proud of their ignorance.

>I hate siding with the farmhands
I oscillate between hating them and pitying them.
Replies: >>6509
>>6488
It's been hate-stalking for days using singular posts to generalize the entire website. You just have to laugh at the sad attempts to create drama. And for who? The five people that still use this board?
Replies: >>6503 >>6606
>>6502
What are you talking about?
Replies: >>6504
>>6503
What an instantaneous response. Hit dogs holler.
Replies: >>6505
>>6504
???
Replies: >>6506
>>6505
Use your words, nonny.
Replies: >>6507
>>6506
How can a website be "hate-stalked" if it's public for everyone to see and use? If you can't handle people talking about WC here, then you don't have to visit this board. If you keep visiting it, it'll keep making you upset.
Replies: >>6508 >>6511
>>6507
Do you visit the outside world often?
Replies: >>6511
>>6501
>I oscillate between hating them and pitying them.
Same.  It's a thankless job for sure, but sometimes it feels like the farmhands refuse to read the surrounding context on posts and just ban indiscriminately all because someone reported an innocuous post.
>>6507
>>6508
am i the only one getting sexual tension from you two….
Replies: >>6512
>>6511
god i wish that were me
Farmhands are so fucking anal. Nooo you can’t have a harmless thread on /m/ discussing drama surrounding an American girl group because it’s too kpop adjacent but moids baiting all day in /ot/ and posting soyjaks is literally acceptable now. Let that sink in. Farmhands are more threatened by females discussing female celebrity gossip than soyjak spammers now
Replies: >>6514 >>6516 >>6527
>>6513
is this about katseye?
Replies: >>6515
>>6514
Yes
>>6513
The whole enforcement of the kpop ban is ridiculous. Historically, it was specifically to prevent racebaiting in regards to nonnas posting "oppa is botched now, but could still get it" or whatever, but it has been applied in such a way that Katseye, who are 1) hated by kpoppies 2) deny being kpop themselves 3) literally sing in English, is somehow a forbidden topic even tho Danidad is being massively cowish in the comments that got posted to that thread. It is ridiculous. Farmland allow so much other dumb shit to go on, but this is where they draw the line.
Replies: >>6518 >>6527
>>6516
Does kpop even need to be banned anymore? While I completely understand why Burritomin banned it, the hype, drama and hysteria surrounding kpop seems to have died. I don't think that a kpop thread on LC would be anywhere near as bad as some of the threads on /ot/ now.
Replies: >>6519 >>6520
>>6518
In another year or so, anons will be saying the same thing about the Luigi thread.
Replies: >>6520
>>6518
I agree.  It's more a niche interest than anything,  and while there maybe doesn't need to be a kpop specific thread, I don't see a problem with being able to post a kpop mv as an example somewhere,  or mention it in the lyrics thread or whatever.  They allow it during Tunesdays and it's not a problem then. 
>>6519
Tbh, I agree there doesn't need to be a thread since it was bringing in a lot of tourists,  but it should still be possible to mention him.  When the Epstein files were coming out last month,  nonnies were trying to discuss how the government immediately vilified him versus how allegations of large scale human trafficking were being brushed off,  and they'd have to find wacky ways of calling Luigi "the banned italian" when there's no reason they shouldn't be able to just post in Amerifags "they went after Luigi with far more resources that they are putting into this" or whatever.  Point is,  I can understand not having a dedicated thread for him or for kpop,  but a sitewide ban of even a mere mention feels far too excessive
What bugs me the most is how covertly tradthot the website has become. Not sure what’s to blame or if it’s a general cultural shift but I’m so over it. Who cares if a cow doesn’t cook for her husband or doesn’t put out? 
Who cares if someone dressed too slutty? That’s not drama that’s literally just sewing circle gossip. The obsession with virginity too I can’t take it. Just co-signing male grievances. The “man hating” is such a farce they’ll drop it all in a heartbeat for a Nigel who SAYS he doesn’t watch porn.
Replies: >>6523 >>6525 >>6529
>>6522
I noticed this too and it's so annoying. When they see anons post something they don't like (anything non tradthoty really), their go to is weaponize feminism in an attempt to shut them up.
Replies: >>6524
>>6523
FR “well ummm [obvious tradthot behavior that benefits no woman ever] is a WOMANS choice so it sounds like you’re not being very feminist right now”
Replies: >>6526
>>6522
>The obsession with virginity too I can’t take it. 
What do you mean?
Replies: >>6527
>>6524
That or "umm ladies, liking thing doesn't make you based and feminist you know!!"
>>6513
>>6516
Do you not remember how cancerous kpop posting was on lc? Maybe kpop doesn't produce as many brainworms as it used to, but now there's a whole other imageboard just for it so there's no need for LC to have kpop discussion. 

>>6525
I guess they mean the weird incel like sperging, obsession with purity and not being touched by a man etc. To me it's clear most of these types of posts come from underaged or under 20 year old nonnies that still have very grand ideas about sex, I think most people mellow out on that front after that so I simply do not engage with childish navelgazing.
Replies: >>6528 >>6530
>>6527
>To me it's clear most of these types of posts come from underaged or under 20 year old nonnies
You can say this in regards to like 60% of posts anywhere online at this point, it sucks.
>>6522
they're underaged blackpillers and loser virgin adults. they've been seething for weeks now after being called virgins, like weren't they prideful of that? try to tell one of them that and they seethe faster than fujos/antifujos being called whatever
Replies: >>6531 >>6534
>>6527
>there's a whole other imageboard
and it's useless. I'm not gonna be like "hey nonny! your post reminded me of this particular kpop song from 12 years ago and so i made a post in reply to this post but you have to go to this whole other image board that is hostile towards newcomers to see it." the kpop ib is wholly unusable unless you're a fan of like 3 specific groups so using "oh just go there" doesn't really work.
Replies: >>6532 >>6533
>>6529
I have zero understanding of why sex and virginity is so important to some of those anons. Maybe it's because I'm not American, maybe it's because I'm not young, but I really don't understand it. It's sex, who cares that much?
>>6530
Time for the secret pirate kpop board, clearly.
>>6530
they also just suck on there. they’re kinda weird

i’d be really interested in kpop/kpop-adjacent discussions on LC but whatever. there’s always so much drama but i don’t really care to read about it on twitter
Replies: >>6535
>>6529
What's funny is now I'm seeing those blackpillers retards call others virgins as well. It really is the worst thing in the world to them kek.
>>6533
>i’d be really interested in kpop/kpop-adjacent discussions on LC but whatever. there’s always so much drama but i don’t really care to read about it on twitter
It used to be allowed but because kpop fans are so cancerous it got banned. Seems that anons that weren't there for that shitshow now want history to repeat kek
Replies: >>6536
>>6535
At this point, most of those fans have moved on to other things like Heated Rivalry though. Kpop isn't popular anymore and it has settled back down to largely the same fanbase it was in 2012, with just a few extras. I don't think it would be a problem to have it on LC again.
The pro-troon shilling in the Amerifags thrad is insane.
Has anyone else noticed an uptick of people sperging out over femdom? Whether it's people complaining it isn't hardcore enough or shitting on it out of nowhere (the reddit hate thread had a bizarre spergout). It gives me a blackpill vibe and like they're trying to force a new fujo/antifujo type of infight.
Replies: >>6541 >>6665
>>6539
they are, but unlike yuripedo, virgins are bad at baiting non virgins kek their posts always come as retarded and have the vibes of a 12yo making an edgy "my first imageboard post"
Replies: >>6665
Celebricows feel like it's full of moids now, seeing anons defend abusers and shill shitty moid coded conspiracy theories is starting to smell even more like scrote than usual
Replies: >>6543
>>6542
Is this about the Lina Morgana suicide and Lady Gaga conspiracy? Or is there something new I missed?
Replies: >>6545
If you were curious in the uptick of shitty posts: Someone on lolcow posted a link to a tiktok video on /snow/, some farmers went to touch the poop and it turns out they are all underage with obnoxious usernames kek:
https://www.tiktok.com/@user612986045/video/7611285470907059486
https://lolcow.farm/snow/res/2126631.html#2209311
>>6543
Anons defending… should I say it… jim carrey and claiming he's been replaced.
nimu is pissing me off lately
Replies: >>6547 >>6548 >>6552
>>6546
Share your complaints
Replies: >>6550
>>6546
Watch out, the witch defense force might get angry
Replies: >>6549 >>6550
>>6548
i mean i would consider myself part of the defence force since i like the site. some of the people who were complaining are acting like lolcow is the pinnacle of internet places kek. but yeah doesn’t mean nimu hasn’t ground my gears a couple times in the last few days
Replies: >>6551
>>6548
I was the person shitting on the ICE baiter but I'm >>6547 and curious about genuine complaints from people who actually care about the site
Replies: >>6553
>>6549
NAYRT I don't consider liking the site being part of the defense force. There were posts insulting anyone who dared to be cautious of a new ib. There's nothing wrong with liking it though. 
I'm curious about your complaints, I'm still on the fence about wc. I've stopped posting on lc entirely though.
Replies: >>6553
>>6546
I like WC so far but I'm not a fan of the thread time limits.
>>6550
>>6551
i’ve also stopped posting on LC. for me, i just think she’s not got the right idea when it comes to some things - it’s most evident with the more recent updates. i will give her some grace because i think she’s done quite well with listening to the users thus far, so maybe i’m being unfair by complaining so soon. but sometimes she does seem quite uncompromising in what she believes to be best for the site in a way that, while not necessarily terrible in method, is definitely irritating lol. i honestly like the ‘impermanence’ concept for the site now but every time i read “embrace impermanence” in response to a complaint it’s a little irritating.

i can live with the changes to /b/ but /txt/ is absolutely a downgrade right now. i’m trusting that it’ll be temporary but what’s irritating isn’t the changes themselves since we’re still in a trial and error process, rather the way communication is happening tbh. also sometimes i question what’s going through her head, because there’s no way she thought a 1000 character minimum was going to work.

actually to elaborate on some things i’m iffy about, i don’t like how /txt/ just seems to be built in mind for unfiltered political discussion. like maybe not *for* that but definitely *most catering towards* that. like i agree with her ethos - just not the centralisation of this particular idea? i think what i and some other users get out of the site (thus far) are different from what she *wants*, if that makes sense? the cosiness (sorry @ that one anon who hates whenever anyone refers to it as that kek) is the number 1 appeal of the site, and what i think should be held in mind as the board culture. it feels like she wouldn’t mind trampling on that for a specific goal.

anyway i think if she does want parts of the site like that she should just add boards for that purpose, and keep /b/ and /txt/ like it was before. also i think she should try to come across as less condescending and more like she’s actually listening to people
>>6553
>i think what i and some other users get out of the site (thus far) are different from what she *wants*, if that makes sense?
Completely accurate, I think. I get the impression that anons want a focus on non-combative discussion and so far that's mainly been about media, mundane things, etc. But what Nimu has said is that she wants threads to be cycled through faster, to encourage more chaos, and the creation of threads even if it's about something totally worthless. But this puts off some anons completely and makes them want to quit the site, because they want real discussions instead of shitposting. They don't want another CC, they want something like /m/ without the annoying infights.
Replies: >>6555 >>6592
>>6554
i think she accidentally cultivated too chill a userbase for what she actually wanted.
>>6553
Embracing impermanence means there's no point in effort posting. The character limit dissuades discussion because why would I spent 20 minutes writing up a proper good post if the entire conversation will disappear shortly?

> i don’t like how /txt/ just seems to be built in mind for unfiltered political discussion
These are impossible to have on the internet, let alone an anonymous imageboard. A lot of the anons on WC seem like democrat-affiliated middle-class whites, so anything that goes against that ideology will cause massive issues like the whole ICE thing. If anons only knew how to ignore things, it'd be a lot better, but WC is cultivating the type of anon that's afraid of any semblance of cattiness or drama. It's a pretty boring site all things considered.
Replies: >>6557 >>6592
>>6556
The beginning of WC was great. Got to talk about video games and shows that I like and receive earnest replies, read effortposts like the Style Savvy poster, the paranormal thread, the cooking anons, the events anons were planning, etc. There was a range of genuine topics that were shared. I don't know what happened, if it was the Great Wipe and the following changes or what, but I feel like part of the community has been driven away. Anons seemed so enthusiastic at the beginning, but I think they're realizing they're at odds with the theme of WC, after all. They would rather have their posts stay up and conversate normally instead of having everything be erased. Maybe I'm getting the wrong impression. I used to think WC had real potential for growth, but now it might be fading. Unless there's more traffic somehow, or a different brand of users that will fit the site culture more are invited in, replacing the little "club" that it started out with. Or it's just a temporary project that won't last in the long run.
Replies: >>6558 >>6559 >>6681
>>6557
I think it's meant for hyper-online anons that just want an entire board of Dumbass Shit and don't care for anything except shitposting
Replies: >>6592
>>6557
For now I enjoy it for the oldweb disucssions because LC is monitored by neocities troons due to them all being chronically online enough to use imageboards, which I think made the LC thread a lot quieter. Personally I don't care about prying eyes but it seems a lot of anons do.
Why don't you girls complain on WC's /meta/ thread so Nimu can actually learn from your complaints?
Replies: >>6561
>>6560
I'll complain where I please. Nimu can come over here if she wants to see it that badly.
Replies: >>6564
WC is a fine imageboard with a charming new community and I hope the momentum can be kept up. Still like the IB software here more though kek.

Also will this thread be renamed the LC & CC & WC Hate / Bunker?
>>6553
>i don’t like how /txt/ just seems to be built in mind for unfiltered political discussion
"Unfiltered" discussion is how an image board should be. Even on LC, it was once possible to have calm and nuanced political discussion with people of widely differing opinions. The compulsory 500 character limit stops baiters from coming into the thread and dropping low effort posts to start an infight. /txt/ being the only NSFW board also allows for discussion without a thread getting spammed with porn.

Her aims seem to be to create an old style image board with ephemeral threads and minimal moderation.
Replies: >>6568
>>6561
Does she even know this place exists?
Replies: >>6565
>>6564
I doubt it. There's like three of us here.
Replies: >>6566 >>6569
>>6565
i was under the belief that my first interactions with her was on one of the bunkers though. i believe she had already been talking about wanting to make an IB on here, no? i assumed that’s why we were so invested here. people were pessimistic about it but a couple of us cheered her on.
Replies: >>6567 >>6569 >>6596
>>6566
It absolutely got linked here early on, I feel like most of the discussion happened on CC and LC though. I also think a lot of the complaints here are from disagreements with Nimu's vision for WC, I doubt they'd be considered problems to fix.
Replies: >>6576
>>6563
like i said, i agree with the ethos. i just dislike what it tramples on to achieve that goal. hence why i wish she would just make a dedicated red board with the character minimum and shit.
>>6566
I think it's disingenuous to say only a couple cheered her on. I'm skeptical still but I would encourage anyone with the desire to start their own. Most nonas want new websites to happen but with a healthy dose of caution. 

>>6565
It's shortsighted to assume she doesn't know about this place. We had posters talking about making new ibs several times and it makes sense someone interested in niche female focused ibs would be aware of us.
Replies: >>6571
>>6569
>It's shortsighted to assume she doesn't know about this place.
That doesn't mean she checks this place out. If you're going to bitch behind her back instead of confronting her directly, you should just stop using WC at all.
>>6571
discussing what you dislike about something is not “bitching”. and people have already complained in meta, if you’ve been watching that thread.
Replies: >>6574
>>6571
I wasn't even that anon and people have the right to discuss their feelings wherever they choose.
Replies: >>6574
>>6572
>discussing what you dislike about something is not “bitching”
It is when you'd rather talk behind someone's back than confronting them directly, especially someone who's open to criticism.
>>6573
You can complain about WC all you want here. Just don't pretend you're not a coward.
Replies: >>6575 >>6578 >>6606
>>6574
Kek I think you have some issues, your replies are a little aggressive. I'm not afraid, I'm just discussing things on my mind at my ib of choice. As slow as it is the few nonas who frequent here are my favorite company.
Replies: >>6577 >>6596
>>6567
I dropped it over on dumbass shortly after it was posted on lc
>>6575
>here is my ib of choice
>here are my favorite company
Then stay here and don't go to WC
Replies: >>6579 >>6606
>>6574
as i said, people have been voicing their disagreements in meta, if you’ve been watching the thread. i’m one of them. i’m allowed to talk about it here too kek? you are being needlessly aggressive for whatever reason.

obviously people will speak a little more FREELY about their feelings over here, being more openly annoyed with her personality specifically. doing so in a purely site-related thread would be uncomfortable for everyone. like that one anon that keeps getting mad everywhere that nimu forced someone to spoiler something disgusting, even though no one got banned kek. but yeah idk why you’re acting like all the criticism is happening sooper-secretly behind her back, it’s on her site too.
Replies: >>6583
>>6577
Okay
>>6578
>doing so in a purely site-related thread would be uncomfortable for everyone. like that one anon that keeps getting mad everywhere that nimu forced someone to spoiler something disgusting
Damn, am I really coming off that badly? Outside of /meta/, I've actually only made two posts in relation to it, and both were in response to other people bringing it up, so it hasn't all been me. I'm also not mad, I just think the rule is retarded/overly subjective and have been voicing pretty much all of my suggestions and complaints about the site to nimu, because why not. She has actually been pretty receptive so far, and has implemented most of the things I've brought up.
Replies: >>6584
>>6583
it’s not a rule if no one’s being banned for it kek. she just spoilered it herself
Replies: >>6585
ec8e1494b34f98ba71a1fb2e9433dd07173e5d23533ab1953e2a27e7b63d8603.jpg
[Hide] (129.7KB, 1034x692) Reverse
>>6584
It is a rule.
Replies: >>6586
>>6585
yes but she didn’t ban anyone in the ambiguous instance that you’re so upset about anon…. why is it such a big deal to you
Personally I would rather have an admin that has a clear vision and isn't prepared to compromise. One of the many things that ruined LC was weak admins not defending the established board culture.
Replies: >>6588 >>6590
>>6587
How many admins have LC had?
Replies: >>6591
>>6587
It's only been a couple weeks, it takes time to figure out what works and not. Going no compromise this early will kill the site.
>>6588
It depends on what you count as an admin, after Ian stepped down, Regina was supposed to be the admin but she was just the lead farmhand and Ian was still running the site in secret. Then I think it was then Burritomin, then Shaymin, then Cerbmin. It's speculated that Burritomin and Shaymin were the same person. I left LC for a while due to IRL events, when I left Ian as admin, when I came back it was the transition when Burritomin was starting to take over, so I may be wrong.
>>6553
> the cosiness is the number 1 appeal of the site
>nimu needs to be less condescending
For me,  I would like the site, but the cosy vibe is ruined by nimu coming across as a megalomaniac. Other privateers mentioned being dubious of the site,  and honestly I can't blame them for that and keep getting on board with them each time nimu posts something it feels. 
>>6554 and >>6556
> this puts off some anons completely and makes them want to quit the site, because they want real discussions instead of shitposting
>Embracing impermanence means there's no point in effort posting. 
It really does feel to me like wc is designed to be low effort shit posting,  which frankly isn't what I am interested in. I've already quit looking at the site this past week. The only time I checked in, the whole site had been nuked? But I agree. I want real discussions with other anons. This is what led me to love LC. I learned about so many books, films, hobbies from anons talking about their interests in detail, and honestly,  I know some users are very much in favor of the wc thread limit,  but a lot of my enjoyment using /m/ comes from threads dedicated to my interests, conversing with anons slowly over a span of weeks. It's almost like a snail mail approach,  I check my threads occasionally and see if there's anything to reply to. It feels like an honest form of connection across the internet,  and wc doesn't have a chance of cultivating that because threads get bumped off so quickly. 
>>6558
> it's meant for hyper-online anons
Exactly,  if you do put effort into a post,  you have to constantly monitor for any replies or risk the thread being yeeted into oblivion.
Replies: >>6600
>>6571
>If you're going to bitch behind her back
witchan defense force needs to get a life and stop posting here kekkk
>>6575
>your replies are a little aggressive
their ib is so repressed that they have to come here to be aggressive. it doesnt look good for a site when u cant even talk about it on a different site without people trying to censor and bash your opinions
>>6566
>i believe she had already been talking about wanting to make an IB on here, no?
pretty sure that that was a different anon. not everyone that talks about making an ib is her.
>>6596
Have you considered that it's not a matter of repression but simply not wanting to shit up the site, so they take it somewhere else? The WC users discussing the state of the site has been pretty civil about this, besides that 1 person.
Replies: >>6598
>>6597
if they werent repressed then they could talk about their site on their site
Replies: >>6599 >>6601 >>6607
>>6598
I mean, they've already said they complained about similar things in /meta/ if you actually read through the conversation.
Replies: >>6601
>>6592
>but a lot of my enjoyment using /m/ comes from threads dedicated to my interests, conversing with anons slowly over a span of weeks. It's almost like a snail mail approach,  I check my threads occasionally and see if there's anything to reply to. It feels like an honest form of connection across the internet,  and wc doesn't have a chance of cultivating that because threads get bumped off so quickly. 
The format is just too fast-paced. Anons who contribute to discussions usually have other things going on in their lives, so they can't be checking frequently enough to see if they've gotten a reply to their post. And because they're busy with other things, there also isn't enough time for them to give thought-out responses to others. Nimu should consider advertising her IB to a different audience, I think.
Replies: >>6601
>>6598
ntayrt but man stop being so overly abrasive. this is that one specific ib-user personality that crops up sometimes and part of my enjoyment from WC stems from the distinct lack of them compared to LC. it’s that yuripedo neurotic archetype. also they never properly read what you said and misconstrue everything
>>6599
they’re just regurgitating what they were sperging about upthread. it’s not exactly hard to understand that things will be phrased as civil criticism on the site itself, the same goes for LC in meta vs bunker conversations. no one’s being a coward. the same things are still being said on the site but for some reason they’re pretending it’s not.

i’m starting to feel like some of it is bait though, or that smear campaign by the discord server offshoots some anons mentioned. it’s drowning out normal complaints.
>>6600
i think she should just suck it up and cater to the current userbase that she is frankly lucky to have obtained. it could be so much worse.
Replies: >>6606
could you leave nimu alone?!?!?

she puts a lot of work into the site, be grateful
>>6604
Suspiciously posted not long after >>6596 tbh
Replies: >>6606 >>6620
>>6601
>stop being so overly abrasive
okay so were these replies:
>>6347
>>6356
>>6403
>>6446
>>6453
>>6502
>>6571
>>6574
>>6577
to anyone critical of wc not overly abrasive?

>>6605
an hour is a pretty long time kek
>>6452
>repressed
>>6598
>repressed
Same person?
Replies: >>6608 >>6619
>>6311
>same
>>6317
>same
>>6607
>same
Same person?
Replies: >>6611
>>6606
Typing in lowercase isn't enough to make you unrecognizable if you're going to use the exact same wording anon, kek.
Replies: >>6610 >>6620 >>6623
74aa7dd468b45ae7d83c1ff4a48a3931cb38f97ed30dd7a048e26b91023aa145.png
[Hide] (37.1KB, 418x270) Reverse
>>6609
Not everyone you disagree with or don't like is the same person anon, kek
Replies: >>6612 >>6620
>>6608
You have to admit the whole "repression" as criticism is way more specific than a word everyone typically uses.
>>6610
But you could be using a VPN.
Replies: >>6613
>>6612
If I used a VPN it'd still tag it as (You) because it'd be the same browser. If I closed the browser, switched VPNs to post the >>6604 then I wouldn't see the (You) for this post >>6596

Just admit you were wrong. It's not even a big deal, it's annoying when you act like every poster is the same person. /yhh/ has way more unique users than you think.
Replies: >>6614
>>6613
All you would have to do is clear your cookies, or use incognito. But this still doesn't address the phrasing of "repression." You switched pretty fast from lowercase to uppercase just now, too.
Replies: >>6615
>>6614
read the chain of replies kek
Replies: >>6617
>>6606
>an hour
Lightning fast for seasoned privateers due to YHH's time dilation kek.
>>6615
I feel like you are already really invested in this argument. When there's so little people who go out of their way to pump out replies at record speed like you just did on here, it only makes me think it's you even more.
Replies: >>6618
>>6617
genuinely what are you talking about? u accused me of being >>6604 and >>6596 and i posted proof that i wasnt.
Replies: >>6619
>>6618
I guess you should read the chain of replies yourself. Here:
>>6607
Look at the links.
Replies: >>6620
>>6619
I posted >>6610 in response to >>6609 which was posted in response to >>6606 which was posted in response to >>6605 which was a response to the OP >>6604
Replies: >>6621
>>6620
I'm also saying you're the same person repeating the word "repressed" from both of those post numbers. Because the anon from >>6596 is the one claiming they're the (You).
Replies: >>6622
94dfc32e4540039af7a93a755997af92167bce43921d66f0df11bdb449e8e8f7.png
[Hide] (482.7KB, 708x921) Reverse
>>6621
Get better soon.
Replies: >>6624
>>6609
i was going to accuse the same thing in my reply, before i saw the lowercasing vs uppercasing. it would add up though - there is someone that has been sperging across WC, here, & LC. first it was just complaining about WC, then suddenly there was an appearance of the exact same baity style but on the opposite side - you’re all cowards for criticising here!!! etc. they claim to be different but it’ll be worded the exact same way in the exact same accusatory manner. and comments like this >>6604 are clearly ridiculous and not serious. i actually wouldn’t be surprised if it weren’t one person because like i said there are some people who congregate in discord servers to cause chaos, on LC too with some of us none the wiser, with it just seeming like unconnected insane people. it makes you second guess yourself even when what you’re saying is common sense, since it seems like multiple unrelated anons.
Replies: >>6626
>>6622
>way too invested in this argument
>cared enough to dig through the thread for 3 anons who made argumentative posts
>uses the same criticism of "repressed" as the anon who got into similarly retarded and drawn-out infights over this subject
I'm going to live in (you)r walls and sing sea shanties to pass the time.
Replies: >>6627
304715269837.png
[Hide] (405.1KB, 700x700) Reverse
>>6623
Near the time when Nimu first posted WC on Dumbass Shit, there was actually someone willing to waste their time on using inspect element to rewrite one of Nimu's posts to say "I like trannies" or something like that. Then there's an anon on JC that keeps spamming paragraphs calling WC's userbase a bunch of trannies. That same anon used the same repression thing. It is almost impressive to me how this person is wasting their time lmfao.
Replies: >>6628 >>6632 >>6633
>>6625
Stop playing games with my heart and accept my love already.
>>6626
Was it, dare I say...autism?
What if you're all the same person arguing with yourself to convince me I'm not alone here...
Replies: >>6630
>>6629
What if you're in a coma and this is all just a dream?
Replies: >>6631
 >>6630
If this is my coma dream pull the plug
IMG_5147.jpeg
[Hide] (132.4KB, 639x866) Reverse
>>6626
i think you upset her anon kek
Replies: >>6634 >>6635 >>6640
>>6626
Bellybutton but no nipples...
>>6632
KEKK
>>6632
It’s gotta be one person with a weird vendetta, there’s no reason multiple people would care this much. Anyone else who didn’t like wc shrugged it off, said it’d die in a week, and moved on with their life
Replies: >>6636
>>6635
Definitely. There's only 1 person talking about WC online, it's so obvious.
Replies: >>6637 >>6641
>>6636
The repeating of “quirky” is kind of odd.
Replies: >>6638
>>6637
100%, it's just one person talking about WC, and they say the same words and pretend like they aren't doing it. Probably MAGA too.
Replies: >>6639 >>6641
>>6638
Nah, I think it could be more. It's definitely a low number, tho.
Replies: >>6641
>>6632
I'm guessing this isn't the yaoi site? I'll be on my way
Replies: >>6650
IMG_7224.jpeg
[Hide] (568.7KB, 1551x720) Reverse
>>6636
>>6638
literally the same sarcasm that was in WC’s meta thread. like same exact formatting. in fact here’s the screenshot since this instance is actually easy to find

there are other instances like this too

>>6639
it’s sarcasm anon, although people seem to struggle with clocking it. i agree with you though.
Replies: >>6642
>>6641
Its definitely the same anon that keeps doing all of these posts. Is there a way to report her to the police to figure out how to stop her?
Replies: >>6643 >>6645
>>6642
Maybe we could have a heartfelt conversation and you'd change your ways for me.
>>6642
yes i’m reporting you now, for the crime of being insufferably annoying
>>6606
Not that I want to hicow nimu, but considering her rather hostile way of typing,  I'm thinking these replies are either her (would make sense as we are complaining about something she put a lot of effort into) or she has some shooters/wcdefenseforce that lurk other ibs for criticism to respond aggressively/rudely to (kinda insane)
Replies: >>6647 >>6648
>>6646
Interesting theory but some of those posts are mine
>>6646
eh, i actually think she seems to respond quite mildly to insults on her board. it doesn’t seem to bother her. fits in with her “freedom of speech” preference too. she’s just domineering. often condescending but rarely angry.

i do think she frequents JC though. actually, i didn’t recall this back when anons here were speculating that she doesn’t know this place, but before the WC wipe she did respond to me bringing up JC’s formatting (i requested the shaky text) and it did sound like she was the anon who was talking about building an ib way back when, if that wasn’t already obvious. also said she had been in contact with a board owner here, whether if it’s captmin or Lord Cuck, i don’t know
Replies: >>6649 >>6650
>>6648
There was a third party who mentioned talking to cuck in the past but not nimu. There was others who were against it but nimu never have an opinion iirc.
>>6640
Not with that attitude.
>>6648
>i requested the shaky text
Thank you. I'm glad someone gets it.
>she had been in contact with a board owner here
Is cuckqnim pulling strings from the shadows? Do all the admins chat about us amongst themselves? Mysterious.
Replies: >>6652
2c26889f7f673ecead408fca9ade2e623f730a3ca5fca759672721b8b074d73c.png
[Hide] (540KB, 1886x915) Reverse
Why does CC still link to imgur through their CSS? Surely they could've uploaded the background image to the site by now. Not my screenshot, by the way.
Replies: >>6653
eYyNsq22O9sJs-gtRlJlP2ptujd2zWpTKnFzZkrwaRY.webp
[Hide] (16.4KB, 500x375) Reverse
>>6650
No, Cerebmin runs all the female IBs. It's right there in the name - one admin, many heads. She never responds because she's busy with all the other sites and a Latvian dog subreddit.
Replies: >>6654 >>6658
>>6651
My guess it's a generic CSS pack that uses imgur links so that it takes minimal effort to implement.
b1bb9ad7c5fe8b45f9587a07a4ac0ca35026002f1e22eab1722a490b0924afe0.png
[Hide] (419.6KB, 960x540) Reverse
>>6652
No... Even my Latvian dog communities...
I think all the image boards should KISS
IMG_7740.jpeg
[Hide] (349.2KB, 1066x1600) Reverse
>>6652
Kek, she's like L
Replies: >>6659
>>6658
>”she”
kek
Replies: >>6660
>>6659
I need proof cerb is a male. I wouldn't be surprised but I need proof!
Replies: >>6662
I think WC is going to die out pretty soon and turn into another YHH tbh. Fun while it lasted but it’s too impermanent.
Replies: >>6663 >>6664
>>6660
Pfft when did that ever happen except the time it did?
Replies: >>6672
>>6661
WC has legs and a niche. I think it'll stay active as long as nimu doesn't take her ball and go home.
>>6661
The impermanence encourages people to make threads with less pressure. Also stops psychos digging up past posts claiming someone sounds like you. It just takes a while for people to get it coming from lc.
Replies: >>6666
>>6539
>>6541
And now they're having a meltdown because even people in kinkshaming thread are getting annoyed by them. They want this to be the new infight so bad.
>>6664
>stops psychos digging up past posts claiming someone sounds like you
This is literally the best thing about wc. I won’t ever regret posting anything for long because it’ll eventually be gone. I don’t know why people think effortposting will cease to exist because of the impermanence of threads. 4chan still gets effortposting alongside retarded moid shit despite thread deletion. I think lc just made everyone too used to having easy access archives.
Replies: >>6667 >>6678 >>6700
>>6666
>This is literally the best thing about wc.
What I like best is that I can post whatever I want without fear of being banned or redtexted. On lc, you get banned for breathing the wrong way lmao. I like that on wc, you can use emojis, or correct a mistake without being told "learn2delete", and other things that lc jannies are anal about.
Replies: >>6668
>>6667
this is it for me too, god it makes you realise how uptight LC is
Replies: >>6669
moviethread.png
[Hide] (27.4KB, 696x328) Reverse
>>6668
Shit like this makes me hate lolcow. In fairness, the other two replies were ok but this snark. Should we all just sit around and talk about which Barbie movie was the best? And don't you dare say it wasn't Princess and the Pauper kek.
Replies: >>6670
>>6669
Why is everyone on there so neurotic about what’s “FoR mOiDs” or “pickme”? Can’t post about action movies or shooters, those are for violent moids! Not delicate flower women. Can’t post anything with female characters, what if a male looked at her pixels once! Can’t post about male characters either without someone yelling at you that your taste is wrong
Replies: >>6671 >>6679
>>6670
Hoping in the moovie room honestly gives makes me believe that most lc users are sane. Like imagine if you talked about Fast and Furious in /ot/ a loud minority of posters would sperg. In the moovie room last weekend everyone was joking and laughing about it. It makes me believe there's a good chunk of the user base is sane but doesn't say anything because it's not a big deal.
Replies: >>6678
>>6662
I'm not saying it didn't happen, I believe it, I just want to see it because I've only ever heard it on the grape vine.
Replies: >>6673
>>6672
https://lolcow.farm/meta/res/1183.html
>>6673
LC has fallen...
Replies: >>6676
>>6673
ew, the responses back then were so cringe.
Replies: >>6676
>>6674
>>6675
It was back when lc was a /cgl/ refuge and not an explicitly women's gossip board to be fair
you know the girly farmhands~ are actually israeli males when they publicly framed me for shit i didn't do on /meta/ +  deleted my post saying they are paid by mossad. they didn't use to ban me for that before they shat themselves on tel aviv KEK. they want to turn the site into a second 4chan btw
help.jpg
[Hide] (60KB, 640x604) Reverse
>>6666
still err on caution though as it seems wc gets backed up on archive.org quite a bit
>>6671
the movie room is super chill and it's hands down the best part of LC
>>6670
I'm not sure what else to call it, but these particular anons have some weird "purity" thing going on. Like anything a moid has liked? Pickme. Received any sort of attention from a moid? Pickme. Breathed in the same room as a moid? Pickme. Moids are on their mind more than actual pickmes.
Replies: >>6680
>>6679
can there even really truly be pickmes on the anonymous site for autist weebs?
Replies: >>6682
>>6557
Im upset because someone posted an amazing tomato soup recipe and I never got a chance to record it. I also was the last post in a thread which died out quickly and everyone was waiting for my response… but they were asleep when I finally responded and she wiped the entire site out by then. I don’t like the ephemeral nature of the site. Won’t be going back.
Replies: >>6687
>>6680
I say no, but calling said autistic weeb girls pickmes, bitches, whores or whatever is how they get their ego boost.
>>6673
I thought you were giving me proof current admin was male. This is being outdated and I'm aware of previous staff being male.
Replies: >>6701
The complaints thread on /meta/ is a mess right now.
Replies: >>6685
>>6684
I came here to post this exact thing kek. Why are they letting the ideal penis size thread exist after all that? I don't get it.
Replies: >>6688
Spoiler File
(90.5KB, 1864x1016) Reverse
I didn't draw this but I'm posting it here for posterity. This is a recreation of what was posted in the penis size thread and it was apparently a nona. THERE IS A DRAWING OF A PEÑIS UNDER THE SPOILER, heed caution!
Replies: >>6689 >>6703
>>6681
Don't fret nona
https://web.archive.org/web/20260225092243/https://witchan.org/b/res/5927.html
it's_fine.png
[Hide] (137.6KB, 957x404) Reverse
>>6685
I don't get it either.
Replies: >>6689
>>6688
>>6686
i wish none of you told me about this drama. i went to the site to see everything that went on and i wanna kill myself. i slightly hate farmers.
Replies: >>6693
>WC sucks!
Then how is it more successful than this place?
Replies: >>6693 >>6699 >>6703
vendettanonnie is back from her slumber it seems kek
Replies: >>6695
>>6689
I think the post was revenge porn tbh. It doesn't make sense for someone to post their face like that. I just don't get why the mods are ignoring everyone asking to have the thread locked? 

>>6691
How was your sleep? Have any nice dreams?
Replies: >>6695 >>6702 >>6703
IMG_7792.gif
[Hide] (2.1MB, 490x274) Reverse
>>6692
>>6693
if my question were bullets you'd be picrel
Replies: >>6696 >>6697
>>6695
Holy shit I look cool
>>6695
What are you trying to tell me? That I can dodge bullets?
Replies: >>6698
>>6697
No nonnie, When you can shitpost properly, you won't need to.
>>6691
They don't have a no squawking rule. Pirates are secretive by design. Although I do like this place slipped into the current moovie room pic again
Replies: >>6729
>>6666
It's very apparent that LC is their first and only image board. Image boards were always designed to have threads be ephemeral. Back in the day threads on 4chan would last a few hours on fast boards. Even /cgl/ had a fast thread turnover.

>>6673
That's Ian not Cerbmin. Ian was the male who created the site.
Replies: >>6701
>>6683
>>6700
Oh no sorry I was referring to the "one time it did" part of my comment. I have no idea if cereb is one, many or even human people.
>>6693
>It doesn't make sense for someone to post their face like that.
The recreation drawing is not entirely accurate. Everything aside from the dick was blurred, and while you could still see a vague outline of the woman, all facial features above the mouth had been cropped out.
>>6686
Thank you for documenting what needs documenting. The way the shadow curves over her nose is a thoughtful touch, great attention to detail, kudos to the artist.
>>6691
Because this place sucks. It's run by an Indian scrote who probably sniffs all our posts and uses terms like "3DPD" in the rules. Also you get max volume Lazy Town when you visit if you're not careful.
>>6693
I could've slept better, the room was too hot for some reason. I almost had a nice dream but I woke up, and way too early too. :chiyocry:
also i didn't knew i was actually right with blackpillers being deranged on /meta/ and campaigning to get their thread unlocked KEK. farmhands gave them the favor but it distracted them from that thread on /g/ and now they have resumed their gay ops into locking it. if you don't believe this is real, anytime they come and get identified by nonnas, they will post unsaged bait either in their thread or in kinkshaming. the gay ops are real
Replies: >>6708 >>6711
>>6707
I figured it was them in the kinkshame thread since their basis for shaming isn't because something is weird, retarded or dangerous, but that it gives moids pleasure.
Replies: >>6709
>>6708
can someone enlighten me on the kickshaming conversation? i haven’t stepped on /ot/ in like half a year. and why would it be a gay op?
Replies: >>6710
>>6709
>i haven’t stepped on /ot/ in like half a year
The only board that I routinely visit on LC is /meta/ for entertainment purposes.
>>6707
I feel so stupid for not realizing this. The thread attracts moids but there is some really inorganic rage around a few threads. Plus the sudden mention of personalityfag and discord link spam.
Replies: >>6712
>>6711
I'm surprised the discord link is still up.

SCOUNDREL WAS KEELHAULED FOR THIS POST Rule 7: No Discord Links

Replies: >>6715
The current status of /meta/ is unusual for the dumpster fire is usually is. Did someone toss petrol in there?
Replies: >>6714 >>6715
meta.png
[Hide] (271.6KB, 885x1380) Reverse
>>6713
Like wtf is this
>>6712
It’s been up in the friend finder thread for hours too, pic is the server. Farmhands don’t care anymore.
>>6713
If you look at the front page it’s all /meta/. The fucking penis infight is the most active part of the site

SCOUNDREL WAS KEELHAULED FOR THIS POST Rule 7: No Discord Usernames

Replies: >>6716 >>6717
>>6715
I only know maladaptive like the day dreaming thing but I'm googling it I guess it means inadequate no penis invites you to pesis god of death? This is defo a raid
Replies: >>6718
>>6715
can someone infiltrate this place and give me updates thanks.
>>6716
I assumed it was that one blackpiller who wanted nullification surgery, you can still find her posts if you search through the old bp threads. That would explain the eunuch part
Replies: >>6719
>>6718
I think I saw her pop up in /ot/ the other day. I hope she gets help. I've seen nullification pics, like drawings not the surgery and it looks bad. There's definitely trauma there.
anus.png
[Hide] (809.2KB, 1080x1287) Reverse
Hoo boy...
Replies: >>6721
>>6720
Aaand it's locked now. Farmhands proving they're biased.
Replies: >>6726
>>6721
What's the bias? That they don't support us who peg? I don't get it.
ad52dd971dce88dffc14193b328113fef82b0b55363829fecd2a933880d462b9.png
[Hide] (38.3KB, 777x558) Reverse
Which?
Replies: >>6731 >>6732
>>6699
<thanks! :chiyoclasp:
I still love piratetan! made her sleepy because honestly... we're a bit sleepy over here too kek
>>6727
Don't you mean . . . witch?
>>6727
Why don't you use witchan for this?
Replies: >>6733
>>6732
I saw that post as sort of an advertisement for people who left WC over the thread limit issue to come back and vote if they wanted their opinion to be heard.
Replies: >>6739
Witchan is really good... Perhaps the best.
Replies: >>6736 >>6740
>>6735
I'm glad you're enjoying it, nona. It's really nice more options are becoming available to us :chiyozen:
Replies: >>6737
771916b3198f776a8b8dbc6febd1bfb484fa16562880977774d2202120432555.png
[Hide] (13.6KB, 377x414) Reverse
>>6736
Right? Seems like we're on the right track. I'm looking forward to a dark mode and some custom CSS.
I don't understand people who respond to an argument a day or more later just to say OMG stop derailing! Like just get back on topic then?
>>6733
It's been almost 24 hours and only 63 anons have voted. With how involved the anons on Witchan are, I'd say most users have already voted. I don't think the admin should have made the poll #s visible, it's not the best look.
>>6739
what do you mean?

>>6735
yes… i am happy with nimu again :) yippee
Replies: >>6741
>>6740
>i am happy with nimu again
Why, were you displeased with her?
Replies: >>6742
>>6741
i was the anon that said she was pissing me off lately kek. but i’m glad to see she is indeed hearing the userbase while streamlining things.

i know one anon here said that they think it’s best when the admin has a clear uncompromisable vision and that’s why LC is shit but i disagree! i think it’s important to have a vision but also take your users’ considerations into consideration alongside it, which is what she seems to be doing.
I wonder what Captmin thinks of Nimu and Witchan
>>6739
I don't really get what you mean. 63 unique voting users in 24 hours is a pretty good number for a small site that has only been up for a few weeks.
>>6739
The poll bans VPN users so the vote is less likely to be rigged by someone cycling through VPN IPs. There's probably a few more VPN users that use witchan but can't vote. As a VPN user I'm with that.
Replies: >>6747
>>6746
Why can't you just vote without a vpn?
>>6739
I dont know if that's that bad. The unique poster count says 208 users, but this could also be largely made up of people using their phone's data with a dynamic IP. I know my phone constantly cycles through IPs. If you were to say that at least half of that number were duplicate users, the amount of people voting for a poll in the past 24 hours is still more than half of that number.
Blackpillers are back in /meta/ again.
Witchan is down?
Replies: >>6751 >>6752
>>6750
Reboot, maybe?
>>6750
I was just about to say that kek. Unfortunately, nimu is probably asleep too.
we're so back
Replies: >>6754
>>6753
it’s so over
Replies: >>6755
>>6754
hi guys
Replies: >>6756
>>6755
Hi. How's your day been?
Replies: >>6757
>>6756
i’ve had excruciating period pains so not great. just took 2 paracetamol tablets so hopefully it helps…
2f217a126806bfb2fb80b943545620b005bd7fa6b0ddb725f81ea9d9a3d433d3.jpg
[Hide] (26.3KB, 489x99) Reverse
Anyone else having trouble in submitting posts to wit?
>farmhands put a VPN ban on the infamous benis thread
>baiting, infighting and derailing on the thread immediatly stops
>but you're a fucking SCHIZO if you still suggest it was a discordite raid
Replies: >>6761 >>6763 >>6764
>>6759
It's good to be finally free from the benis raiders.
>>6759
Notice how when they put a VPN ban on /meta/ Complaints and Suggestions, the "the penis thread must be stopped" posts immediately stopped being spammed, also?
>>6759
They still fought about circumcision after that though. But it is less bad than the other bizarre shit that used to get posted
Replies: >>6765
The death of Shayna's thread was also the death of LC. Shayna's threads were the last major bastion of old LC culture. Now the site is just newfags arguing with each other.

>>6764
The circumcision sperging will never end. :chiyofish:
Replies: >>6766
>>6765
I’m glad someone else actually values what Shaynafags contributed to LC culture. The hate was overblown.
Nimu is retarded. She censored the word "racism" in several posts in the oldweb thread, and many users were confused and thought the censored words were slurs, so she then decided to hand out 3 day bans to anyone who revealed that the word was actually "racism", even if indirectly. I'm aware of rule 9, but this is so fucking excessive over something so minor. We weren't even having a debate.
Replies: >>6768 >>6769
1619654959684.png
[Hide] (57.4KB, 206x229) Reverse
>>6767
yeah i got hit with a 3 day ban. people dont even get 3 day bans for posting pedoshit and racist (oh cant say that!) shit on other ibs, wtf. issuing a 3 day ban to a user thats been posting on your imageboard almost every day since its inception over an issue thats literally never come up before... it feels really insulting. like i kinda dont want to post anymore lol.
Replies: >>6769 >>6770 >>6847
>>6767
>>6768
I'm actually screaming over this, and I was having so much fun on WC too. What's wrong with nimu
>>6768
Exactly, and I'm a day 1 user too kek. I'll be ban evading, but it is still really ridiculous.
Replies: >>6771
>>6770
i dont really feel like doing the stuff to ban evade, ill just sit in the time out corner i guess. like i said this has kinda killed my drive to post anyways. i like how there was people asking for the censored words and they didnt get banned either lol. she just decided to randomly ban two people? this shit is so stupid
Nemu's reply:
>Talking about race, and the word "racism" itself, aren't absolutely banned on /b/, but I felt it necessary in this case, as they were adjacent to other actually offensive words. In hindsight, I admit I might have been too sensitive with the censoring today.
>However, the above does not excuse violating Rule 9. Even if the admin were wrong to censor a certain word, no bans were given merely for that, no penalties came from a fallible judgement. But revealing a censored word is an undeniable trespass, and the severity of the penalty is proportional to the undeniability. Accidentally breaking a subjective rule may be forgiven, but purposely breaking an objective one has no excuse. If you want to complain being censored, take it to /meta/. If you don't want to be censored, go to /txt/.
>>Someone could have gotten the wrong idea (like thinking they said slurs) and she wanted to clear it up.
>You're free to reveal what a censored word ISN'T. You can say it ISN'T an ethnic slur, and that's okay
Replies: >>6775 >>6809
I'm so glad we have the shitty cc wordfilter and ban spreading to other female imageboards! I sure do hope it's a mainstay since it's so successful in deterring baiters and moids from cc
Replies: >>6777
>>6773
Same nona just replying instead of filling the original post with my opinions. All of this doesn't feel great. 
>Talking about race, and the word "racism" itself, aren't absolutely banned on /b/, but I felt it necessary in this case, as they were adjacent to other actually offensive words.
This feels way more censored than lc, which is basically the opposite of what the site was boasting about. Banning words because they're adjacent to offensive words? Why not just monitor the conversation itself then moderate accordingly if it skirts the rules?
>I might have been too sensitive with the censoring today
So the rules are dependant on how she's feeling that day?
>However, the above does not excuse violating Rule 9. Even if the admin were wrong to censor a certain word, no bans were given merely for that, no penalties came from a fallible judgement. But revealing a censored word is an undeniable trespass, and the severity of the penalty is proportional to the undeniability
Not even going to expand on my issue with this. This is the equivalent to getting banned for scrotefoiling when it turns out to be true. 
>You're free to reveal what a censored word ISN'T. You can say it ISN'T an ethnic slur, and that's okay
You can imply banned words but you can't use adjacent language?
I can kinda see the point to keep things light and breezy on /b/, if you mention what the exact words are then people will say stuff like naggers to work around it. Afaik you don't get a ban for a censored post but others might construe that in an unfortunate way like I did.
/txt/ is there for unrestricted stuff. I think nimu just wants to keep /b/ light.
>>6774
At least scrotefoiling is allowed. The ""Scrote" media that you enjoy" called out some bad actors that would have you just ignore it and move on lc.
Replies: >>6779
ib that advertised itself as "you can do stuff you cant do on lc here" and then censors and bans people for even saying the word racism kekk
>>6777
The wording of this post is a little confusing but if my options are one form of censorship vs another I'm just going to choose neither.
Replies: >>6780
>>6779
It was scrote media you enjoy and then one poster talked about "her" boss beating "her" for consensual  fun and wanting to get enough money for a woman to beat "her"
Replies: >>6782 >>6783
troon.png
[Hide] (6.1KB, 717x109) Reverse
>>6780
Samefag comments like picrel would get you banned on lc. I know lc bans scrotefoiling because disagreements would eventually dissolve into "you're a moid" "no you're a moid" while I don’t disagree that might happen and it enforces a certain culture you can at least call obvious shit out on wc.
Thread is this
https://witchan.org/b/thread/11943
ff6f3a70ff8eff6a42f5c614a5c7b7afad20c0af6d1808e5808f69b5704e0bcd.jpg
[Hide] (154KB, 1040x718) Reverse
>>6780
Honestly, I think it might be a real woman, just a severely mentally ill one. Anons have been recognising her across the site, you can read more about it in the "Personal Care" thread if you're curious.
Replies: >>6784
>>6783
Maybe. I know some mentally ill women but the "saving up to be beaten by a woman" line feels like moid fetish.
43784a27aa60eee2811e779964ed4986dfe109bcf0fcb828a9bee786f3094ef8.jpg
[Hide] (278.7KB, 1080x679) Reverse
If this witch is here, the uncensored version of the post you're confused about was
>This post reflects my experience as well, but I think it’s worth noting that most gendies are bigoted too and are in denial of it. They are covertly racist (at best) and use muh disability, muh transgender as their sword and shield. This is obviously especially true for white people who use their gendie cult to cope with their white guilt instead of addressing their racism. It’s the most frustrating part of these circles, even more than the blatant misogyny.
Tbh I don't really blame nimu for redacting this one, as it was retarded and would've probably started an infight, but the other redactions were completely unnecessary.
Replies: >>6787 >>6791 >>6793
>>6785
It's not wrong though. I've seen troons try to put down black women because they're also "masculine" so therefore they should also be aligned with them. I cant imagine how offensive that is to be compared to an AGP as a woman because of your race kek.
honestly i wasn’t there for it but the banning thing doesn’t bother me honestly. and to be frank i don’t want to see words like that on /b/ either but that’s me being selfish(?) since free speech blah blah blah etc. if someone got an unfair 3 day ban she should just undo it. i do feel bad whenever anyone’s moderating something by themselves though because it’s easy to get overwhelmed and make mistakes. i know i would make retarded choices sometimes.
Replies: >>6789 >>6793
>>6788
The redtext is too close to the perma (sometimes) ban on lolcow so that's why some users we're freaking out
IMG_8346.jpeg
[Hide] (581.2KB, 1179x921) Reverse
>>6785
>the other redactions were completely unnecessary
At least Nimu admitted she was wrong and apologized.
Replies: >>6792
>>6791
i would like if she apologized by removing my 3 day ban. :\
Replies: >>6813
>>6788
I watched this go down and I agree. As soon as I read >>6785 I knew something was going to happen. Whether it was an infight, ban, or censor I didn’t know but it seems like anons not realizing that naming  censored words was against the rules contributed to the confusion and bad feelings.
Replies: >>6795
the fact it got censored anyways is so dumb. not being able to say "racism" or "nazi", not even in a descriptive way, but just plainly saying the words being censored feels so juvenile. like is this an imageboard or club penguin kek? and i think i and many other people imagined "no racism" means "dont say racist shit" and not "dont even write the word 'racist'". im not entirely against the censor thing because i think it would be good when somebody actually does say some psycho/baity shit, but then again there was some person in /txt/ who was talking about how stinky and gross she thinks black people are and she got absolutely no repurcussions. i know its just one hobbyist doing this moderation but like, cmon.
Replies: >>6828 >>6829 >>6839
>>6793
The reason it upset people is because the conversation was nothing but cordial and informative, and the whole irony of it all was that the topic was centered around women having to censor themselves among gendies or men. Censoring random words felt like a slap in the face, because technically you can have racier discussions on neopets forums than on WC, an imageboard that touts itself as more free than LC? But it seems the only rule where that actually applies is scrotefoiling. 

A blue board doesn't imply "only sunshine and rainbows and never mention any concept that might cause you to have complicated feelings or make brainie do a thinkie", and if nimu wants that she should be more clear in expressing it.
Replies: >>6796
>>6795
>There's racebaiting on /txt/!
>There's not enough racebaiting on /b/!
There's no winning with you guys
Replies: >>6797
>>6796
There was nothing racebaity in the whole conversation, go read it. Censoring "white people" and "racism" is ridiculous no matter which side you're on, and I'm certainly not on ICE-chan's side. I'm so sick of women's spaces constantly having to be so infantilized and padded with bubble wrap. It's like we can't have mature conversations. Civilized women can only make little drawings and talk about silly fandom and which imaginary man they want to slobber over, and everything else is racebaiting apparently. It's like we're pretending to be retarded toddlers.
Replies: >>6798 >>6808
>>6797
>This is obviously especially true for white people who use their gendie cult to cope with their white guilt instead of addressing their racism.
How is that not racebait?
Replies: >>6799
>>6798
Wheres the bait... Is any mention of race ragebait?
Replies: >>6802
>>6800
Yeah this would’ve started a massive racebait derail on lc and somehow devolve into something about Jews or Indians. It was already sort of derailing the thread on wc.
>>6799
Nta, but saying that all gendies are at least covertly racist, that white people use the gendie cult to cope with "white guilt" (what the fuck is she even talking about?), and that this supposed racism is worse than blatant misogyny, are all baity points. If anything, I'd say the last one is the worst.
>>6800
If it's bait the post should be deleted or receive a ban message with bait and ban anyone who interacts, the CENSORED CENSORED CENSORED just caused endless confusion about what even the poster was talking about and what exactly was in the CENSORED bars. It only brought more attention to the post.
racism nonnies we're so back
Replies: >>6805 >>6806
>>6804
Who's side are you on
Replies: >>6807
>>6804
As a nonna with no skin I feel very left out. I don't have a bunch of spare time with cleaning up blood and all but I would like to be able to be racist with the skinned.
>>6805
I'm on the side of 'racism.'

the word, mostly.
>>6797
I agree the censoring was stupid but I always roll my eyes at the parts of the site anons like you are ass hurt over
Replies: >>6810
>>6773
I’m sorry Nimu but this is tranny janny behavior
>>6808
I'm not asshurt I participate in those parts too, but if that's all I'm allowed to do I might as well be 12 and on neopets.
Replies: >>6811
>>6810
I understand. Your post read like someone who thinks the userbase is beneath her and I get annoyed with unintegrated users on wc trying to shift the culture
I did find the club penguin comparison upthread accurate kek I hope nimu learns from this
Replies: >>6812
>>6811
Yeah sorry I probably came across wrong I got really heated from this whole thing yesterday. There's just something about lazy censoring like this that makes me see red...
>>6792
3 days? What the fuck? Is she trying to kill the small userbase that she has?
Replies: >>6814
>>6813
yea 3 days. she said that since its "hard to get banned" she will always ban people for 3 days for any rule broken. no warning or anything. i didnt even know what "censored words" meant because i only ever saw it happen like once before then
Replies: >>6815
>>6814
>i didnt even know what "censored words" meant 
No offense, but how could you not figure it out when you saw the big black CENSOR bars?
Replies: >>6816
>>6815
i thought it meant the filtered words (like fag->hag) or codewords used to avoid moids/tourists tbh
>most free speech friendly female image board is run by a man 
sasuga
Replies: >>6818 >>6823
3aa2efbb24bf54567d6a6c2af95c3ff35bd776f1397d860aff639b20aed0a718.gif
[Hide] (1004.6KB, 156x147) Reverse
>>6817
wait which one is that again
Replies: >>6819
>>6818
I realize now that my post was unclear because they’re all suspected but I did mean the one we are on right now
Replies: >>6820
>>6819
kek I couldn't resist being a little obtuse. this place is alright but discussions seem to default to complaining about some other imageboard and not much else. it's a shame really
Replies: >>6826 >>6832
>>6817
>yhh is the most free speech friendly female image board
Does that mean we can post shota?
Replies: >>6824 >>6836 >>7283
>>6823
Why is that your first thing you'd be eager to post about kek
But to answer your question there's no rules against it so I guess so
Replies: >>6825
IMG_8529.jpeg
[Hide] (90.7KB, 425x600) Reverse
>>6824
Yessssss
Replies: >>6836 >>7258 >>7283
>>6820
That is true. But since we are in the bunker thread, I must say it’s disappointing that the “freedom to post” IB started censorship within a month of launching. It is sadly a common trend. Thanks burritomin.
Replies: >>6827
>>6826
Racebaiting was always banned since wc started.
Replies: >>6828
>>6827
They weren't banning racebaiting (otherwise the post that >>6794 mentioned in /txt/ would be banned) but the word "racism" itself
Replies: >>6829
>>6828
>otherwise the post that >>6794 mentioned in /txt/ would be banned
So WC doesn't ban racebaiting? What are you complaining about?
Replies: >>6830
>>6829
>the word "racism" itself
being banned, other posts that even mention the word (without even discussing the topic) being banned...Basically what's been talked about earlier
Replies: >>6831 >>6837
>>6830
The word "racism" isn't banned though
Replies: >>6833
>>6820
I've tried posting in the non-bunker threads but they don't get much traction. All the conversation I've had has been nice at least. If we had more traffic this would be the best board but captmin seems to have jumped ship...
>>6831
Posts that merely said the word were being redacted all over the place
Replies: >>6834 >>6835
>>6833
Politics and racial discourse on /b/ is a restricted topic apparently, so unless you go to /txt/ you'll be censored. That's what I gathered.
>>6833
They were being redacted because they were part of the racebait.
Replies: >>6839
monitor_lizard.jpeg
[Hide] (2.8MB, 5000x2813) Reverse
>>6823
>>6825
Shota is fine as long as it doesn't violate rule 3a. Although you may want to make your own thread for it.
Replies: >>7258
>>6830
it… isn’t? there are just boards for it, and that board (right now, since the site is in an early state) just /txt/.

really finding it hard to see how that divide is a bad thing, /b/ would otherwise devolve into something worse. the site just doesn’t have the userbase for that and are mostly chill, and i guess i am a part of that majority. i don’t even visit /txt/ anymore.
Replies: >>6839
I'm so glad I backread this thread, I thought I was crazy seeing everyone gas up Nimu when she posted so embarrassingly identifiably in many lolcow /ot/ threads. She oozes NPD cow control freak and truly rubs me the wrong way. I hate having to participate on a board run by someone like that, but it seems to be where the smallweb thread has moved, so I just have to accept my fate I guess lmao.
Replies: >>6840 >>6846
b70eba45341fedd26bd355213136a34325d982faf3650613a32cc66bdd8a09ea.png
[Hide] (1.9MB, 1052x1246) Reverse
>>6835
It's really disingenuous to call the first post racebait. The second was definitely inflammatory.
>>6837
It contradicts the admin's whole "witchan is for total freedom! xD" stance when /b/ is policed so tightly that even saying the word racism is manually censored. Like >>6794 says, no reasonable person interprets "racism as banned" as "bringing up the concept of racism is banned". I think plenty of posters wouldn't mind if /b/ were branded a comfy board where all of this discussion is off-limits, but it seems like Nimu wants to have it both ways ("it's not banned to say the racism word! I didn't actually ban them! I just censored their posts manually and derailed the thread even worse than the white gendie racism post would have!"). It needs to be clearer to posters what is actually acceptable and where. I'd just think of it as growing pains if Nimu seemed capable of responding any more graciously, but I anticipate seeing more of this in the future.
Replies: >>6846
>>6838
Same, it makes me glad I quit posting over there. Unfortunate there's not enough activity over here to sustain hobby threads that well.
Replies: >>6841
>>6840
Where do you post then?
Replies: >>6842
>>6841
Here, and a handful of threads on LC occasionally.
Replies: >>6846
And the dick thread sperging continues.
Replies: >>6844 >>6852
>>6843
they really think jannies will take them seriously eventually kek not like they are the jannies favorite cows. a month in, jannies got bored of their milkless life and got rid of the VPN ban on /complaints/ to make them sperg out again. they didn't got the memo with their nigelflop thread and while they read here, they won't get the memo either even if you spell it out. like the retarded and clueless virgin they are.
>>6839
second ayrt, and yeah i agree with that. but to me that problem is strictly nimu’s personality / bad communication. like, if she hadn’t been weird about it i wouldn’t have taken issue withe the action itself.
>>6838
>>6842
other than their gender, i can’t say it really bothers me who runs a board beyond the interface i interact with. but i definitely still GREATLY prefer nimu over farmhands and cerbmin. like, to me, there’s no contest no? disregarding the state of LC they don’t see very likeable either, in fact they seem worse. we just don’t have to interact with them extensively considering it’s not exactly a new small ib. and also people are used to LC’s retarded board cultureisms and accept them as “just the way it is” which makes them kind of blind to just how fucking annoying they are. i’m glad i can finally post on a board without feeling like i’m gonna get banned for breathing.
1620913276311.jpg
[Hide] (21KB, 418x418) Reverse
>>6768
i got unbanned today so i wrote some of my recent thoughts on the site to nimu in meta, i hope she listens
Replies: >>6848 >>6849
>>6847
Really sucks that she didn't even realize how excessive it was after and didn't remove your ban earlier. Just a retarded way of pissing off users that have genuinely been contributing to your site.
>>6847
what are your thoughts on her response?
Replies: >>6850
>>6849
i appreciate that she apologized but a little miffed that she just ignored all of my criticisms lol
Replies: >>6851
>>6850
pretty much what i thought too lol, it’s kind of like selective hearing (reading?) but it could be worse i guess. she’s very obstinate in her way of doing things, but at least there’s an appeal system now.
>>6843
They really should delete discussion of boobs and dicks on /g/. Just invites horny moids in to post their fantasies and ogle at boobs and dicks since they’re all sex obsessed freaks.
Replies: >>6853 >>6855
>>6852
>completely delete any discussion of dicks or boobs on /g/
Weirdly puritanical. Why don't we just completely eradicate all sex discussion even? That'll teach 'em moids!
Replies: >>6854
>>6853
Nta but having some middle ground would be nice. Ideal dick thread is a little in the nose with men having such a size complex, maybe some sort of general penis discussion would work better? The bpers would still hate it though. Kek. As for the female body discussion, I don't think we should be censored but the ideal body threads feel like a mix between moids and porn ruined zoomers.
>>6852
I don't think so. There were a lot of nonnies in the vaginas thread who learned about keratin pearls in it. While ultimately, it's no better (and probably worse) that googling weird symptoms or reading WebMD, I think some women do benefit from having an anonymous space where general taboo or embarrassing topics can be discussed.
Replies: >>6861
Women can’t be trusted to maintain free speech SOREY LOL
Replies: >>6857 >>6858
>>6856
I trust you to maintain free speech 😳
Replies: >>6862 >>6863
>>6856
men only care about "muh freeze peach muh censorship" because its their defense when they get called out for being coomer pedophiles kek
Replies: >>6859
>>6858
Both dangerously true and based.
>>6855
Nta but there's barely any actual discussion in the dick threads the same way there is in the vagina thread. All they do is have the same fights about cut vs uncut. Idg what else is there to even discuss that wasn't already mentioned in the first thread, like the threads already covered size/color/shape preferences which is subjective. Idk there's only so much to say, dicks are kind of limiting and not that interesting kek
While vagina discussions feel more in depth/helpful since that's something most of the users (hopefully) already have
IMG_2210.jpeg
[Hide] (11.2KB, 225x225) Reverse
>>6857
A-anon…
Replies: >>6863
>>6862
>>6857
Anons...? 😳
I'm not Nimu but I thought I'd share for the people who were irked by this that there's no longer a minimum character requirement on /txt/
Replies: >>6865
Tired of the lolita threads on LC always devolving into oldschoolertrendhopper vs pure lolita oldfag discourse every 3 weeks or so

>>6864
Tbh, there wasn't really one to start with. Just spam space at the end of the posts.
Replies: >>6866
>>6865
That was against the rules
Replies: >>6867 >>6869
9dce20b30d984713685bc93ac2efd817266c1bfe0c92dda2f0081c537455efe3.gif
[Hide] (40KB, 160x100) Reverse
>>6866
54355bb8-0370-4200-87a8-c69c313cc7d4.png
[Hide] (19.4KB, 291x263) Reverse
>>6866
Huh, well, that never stopped me.
Nimu is cringing me out right now with her takes on porn. And also revealing that shes an imageboard newfag who only started browsing in 2018
>>6873
Seriously, what the fuck is this retardation? I think this might be the beginning of the end.
Replies: >>6875 >>6880
>>6873
>>6874
why don't you stay here instead of shitting up wc then?
>>6875
who is shitting up what lmao
>>6875
I swear they complain about everything, Nimus worst mistake was advertising on Dumbass Shit out of all places, home to the type of people who take tiktok videos seriously
Replies: >>6879
>>6875
The thread is for any site related comments. Complaints are supposed to go there, dumbass.
>>6877
people like you who make up fanfiction about others when you dislike them are so weird. ive literally never touched tiktok in my life and i have no idea how thats related to me not liking porn
>>6873
>>6874
seconding these. if she'd kept it to 2d porn i wouldn't have complained, but allowing 3d is just begging for a moderation nightmare and will only serve to attract the worst kinds of users.
>>6875
lmao you'll see what "shitting up" really looks like once moids catch wind of a female-exclusive ib with a single janny welcoming 3d porn.
Replies: >>6882
Oh no women are horny this is terrible
Replies: >>6891
>>6880
Men are gonna spam female imageboards either way, we should be allowed to have whatever boards we want to despite anything
Replies: >>6887 >>6888
Tbh I hope she hosts a porn board so whatever coomers were begging for it on lc can just go there. Maybe some of the lc tranny/moid population will move over there to get a glimpse of the elusive female porn interest. 

>>6873
>shes an imageboard newfag who only started browsing in 2018
KEK
Replies: >>6885
>>6883
Hjw long have you been browsing ibs?
>>6882
The spam at least gets deleted on other female imageboards. It won't on WC if it's on a free for all board where everything other than obvious cp is allowed. If you want to engage in a space like that, you may as well go to 4chan's /b/.
>>6882
it's wishful thinking to believe that the amount of posts/spam from moids will always be the same no matter what. do you think it's a coincidence that fc has fewer moids around than lc/cc? some subjects deter moids, other subjects encourage their presence, and personally "3d porn hosted on a female ib" is the best degen moid attractor ive seen in a long time.
>the new porn board is going to ruin WC!
That's what you moralfags said about /txt/ allowing political discussion, and guess what, literally nothing happened
Replies: >>6890 >>6897
>>6889
>making up fanfiction again 
i didn't oppose /txt/. what now?
>>6881
>women
Replies: >>6897
nimus_only_argument.jpg
[Hide] (759.5KB, 1500x1600) Reverse
what a retarded way of responding to genuine concerns. i feel bad for whoever took the time to write up that explanation, it's clear nimu gave zero thought to it before replying
Why can't some of you just let some users complain about what should obviously be an inevitable shitstorm? It's the correct reaction if you're not naïve. Eventually all it will lead to is infighting and other crap. Why open Pandora's Box?
I don't want a porn board. I'm a coomer myself, but it just isn't worth the headache.
Replies: >>6895
>>6894
From what I could see before she got cloudflare for proxying, she uses a spectrum business line to host, which is notoriously strict with that sort of content. They can just ban you because they feel like it. Even porn is technically banned. Seriously, she's screwing herself over for.. what? The ability to hornypost with real images?
Replies: >>6896
>>6895
She's generally really clueless regarding anything webdev and web hosting wise, wouldn't surprise me if everything has been set up by ai
>>6889
>Nimu found a way to scare off the roaches that permeate every female only space with their puritanism and moralfagging
Fucking finally kek, i prefer 2d but i don't care about 3d being allowed as well if it filters them

>>6891
Yes because women can't ever have sexual thoughts, only troons can like all the cool feminist posts i read about on tumblr say!
Replies: >>6898 >>6899 >>6902
>>6897
Why do you all type the same? just curious
>>6897
Why are you being this dense? You're dismissing other legitimate concerns about how this could affect the website just because you're focused on owning the moralfags.
Replies: >>6903
Is wc unusuably slow for anyone else right now
Replies: >>6901
>>6900
yes, its not you
>>6897
>people worried about the health and upkeep of their small image board community are puritans
I literally browse 4chan including a few orange boards, I'm far from a puritan but I agree that having porn on a website like wc with a singular mod is probably a bad idea.
>>6899
Because they're either baiting, incredibly retarded, or a mix of both. Just ignore it.
Imagine complaining about a board that doesn't even exist lmao
Replies: >>6916
>>6913
Fr JC already has a loli armpit board, why can't 🚾 have one piddly porn board?
Replies: >>6917 >>6925
>>6916
I don't think the two sites compare because JC isn't really a cohesive ib from my understanding. Every board is its own, separated community ran by their own mods,  just maintained by webmin. I could be wrong though.
Replies: >>6918
>>6917
Pardon my shitposting, I think you've got it right. A smut board would probably be fine if nimu picks up a janny or two.
Replies: >>6919
>>6918
The problem is that where there is porn, there is men. That's the reality. I'm not against women having a space for sexuality but porn will bring men more than any other thing. If she gets jannies I hope she vets them well.
Replies: >>6920
>>6919
For me it’s not just the porn = men distinction, it’s that even among femgaze porn women tend to have strong opinions about what they do and don’t like. Even if you kept the board to moid repellent like only fujo and yume stuff, then people would argue since one woman’s ick is another woman’s pleasure. 

I’ve been trying to give Nimu the benefit of the doubt (even after the [CENSORED] debacle) since running an imageboard is a thankless task, but the mere mention of a NSFW board has been a shitshow since day one. It’s really showing her lack of experience especially when WC was created in the context of LC’s shortcomings.
I feel bad filling up this thread with wc shit but it's just the latest happening. LC remains stagnant and full of roblox zoomer infights. This is a huge tinfoil but I really think the aggressive, mass replying poster on wc is nimu. It looks a lot like her posts on lc and it's always related to people directly disagreeing with her vs general suggestions. Maybe I'm wrong.
>>6921
It’s possible but it just seems like a shitstirrer to me, unless nimu is really putting on a charade of banning her own fake baiter
Replies: >>6924
>>6921
Funny that poster got banned.
>>6923 
If I was trying to cover up my posts that's exactly what I would do.
202a924b361b857f3ebb722f8f612cb6bdde6764e5827c3b12ba6ecbadeacbd7.jpg
[Hide] (83.4KB, 979x221) Reverse
>>6916
Junkuchan doesn't allow 3D pornographic content either, actually.
Replies: >>6927
>>6921
Don't feel bad for that, that's what this thread is for. Lord knows this board is slow enough as it is.
>>6925
Based.
c7525336dbd198dc0c920778c4717f0813722474076a633f3aae35d6cf49a9f0.jpg
[Hide] (75.3KB, 959x309) Reverse
>>6921
Agreed. This post was definitely also her.
Replies: >>6929 >>6930 >>6932
>>6928
I feel silly defending nimu but I do think it’s just the type of anon who likes to suck up to admins, they do exist
>>6928
Kek both the timing and post cadence are sus as hell.
>>6928
I wouldn't be surprised but there will always be users who asskiss the site owner.
>>6931
One of these replies is me but ok lol, you are all so dramatic about imageboards
Replies: >>6934 >>6940
>>6933
What was deleted?
Replies: >>6937
i'm starting to think there's no way nimu is older than 21 as if we needed another argument in favor of not adding a 3d porn board kek
Replies: >>6936
>>6935
She's definitely a zoomer
>>6934
Proof that nimu runs JC too. She's been playing us for fools.
Replies: >>6938
>>6937
nimu lives in my walls
>>6933
Speculating about site admins is an imageboard tradition as old as time. Nothing weird about it. First time seeing new leadership?
Replies: >>6941
>>6940
Wow you are so versed about imageboards, i'm in awe! Do these qualities help you get a job?
>>6941
does shitposting on imageboards help you get one?
Replies: >>6946
>>6941
don't forget, you're here too
Replies: >>6946
>>6941
This may be shocking but I not only have a job but have several hobbies that are all unrelated to my job. Sorry you're new to these traditions, it can be pretty fun.
Replies: >>6949
How much do you want to bet Nimu's "defenders" in this thread are just Nimu herself?
Replies: >>6947 >>6957
>>6942
>>6943
Seems like i hit a nerve, it's ok you'll find one one day!
Replies: >>6948 >>6949
>>6945
if they're not I feel kind of bad for nimu that her "defender" is dragging down her image kek
>>6946
When I see people who post like you I wonder what inspires that. I guess it's good if you're having fun
Replies: >>6953
>>6946
Neither one those were me, I'm >>6944
I think your post is just silly so you got replies.
It's kind of pathetic that 99% of /yhh/ traffic is infighting over another imageboard
Replies: >>6951
>>6950
We're talking about current events in our niche sphere within a bunker thread. It makes sense.
Replies: >>6952
>>6951
it makes sense but it's sad there's no other reason to post on yhh
Replies: >>6954
>>6948
I just don't take things seriously online, it's better for the soul
Replies: >>6955
>>6952
Speak for yourself. I've enjoyed posting in the other threads. It's also nice being able to freely speculate without worrying about an admin having a spergout about it. I'm happy here.
Replies: >>6980
>>6953
I think serious conversations online are more fun
Replies: >>6956
>>6955
They are, and i do have serious conversations online but taking everything seriously can't be good for you especially in the age of ragebait and bots everywhere, if it doesn't call for it it's not worth it
>>6945
Hello fellow pirateers. It's me, I'm Nimu ❤️
Replies: >>6958 >>6959
>>6957
This poster is lying, I'm the real Nimu.
Replies: >>6959
D2zt0IDXQAEWkZb.jpg
[Hide] (8.9KB, 334x192) Reverse
>>6957
>>6958
I'm Nimu, and so's my wife!
>>6941
Reevaluate how you're acting, I'm getting second-hand embarrassment from this.
Replies: >>6964
c09d8f75f2865c876355e512e4eae175229b07a0d1c2122bed91d0740c222b6b.jpg
[Hide] (7.3KB, 285x177) Reverse
are there any other nimus I should know about?
Replies: >>6962 >>6963
16d90e9f6cf80be067096e80bad400d06bfbc7a1e24797fd004635c8834d38b9.jpeg
[Hide] (45.7KB, 640x480) Reverse
>>6961
>>6961
That should be all of them. Probably. 🤔
>>6960
Maybe you should reevaluate yourself, you being this obsessed with what other people say seems like a reflection of some insecurities you may have, just saying
Replies: >>6965
>>6964
you forgot to change your name Nimu 😂
Replies: >>6966
>>6965
Shit everyone close your eyes i'm deleting the reply no one saw that
Replies: >>6967
>>6966
Lmfao.
Webmin you rascal
>>6969
>6969
Webmin, since you're here, I want to hear your thoughts on WC and Nimu
Replies: >>6972 >>6977
>>6971
Gurl he's not on our websites
Replies: >>6973
>>6972
Anons mixing up captmin and webmin me thinks
Replies: >>6974 >>6977
>>6973
 I miss captmin
Replies: >>6975
>>6974
What if captmin IS nimu?
Replies: >>6976
>>6975
I don't think she is but if that was true, I'd say she lost her way with some of these choices.
>>6971
WC looks like a fun little site and the community seems charming, I hope the momentum keeps up. I'm not too fond of vichan, especially fresh out of the box and uncustomised, but maybe the admin will make it work. Some custom CSS would be a good place to start.
>Nimu
Can't say I know much about her, I wish her the best and I hope she has fun with it.

>>6973
I couldn't resist stirring things up a bit with the temporary name change, so she got it right that I'm the active janny right now.
Replies: >>6987
>>6954
I like posting here too. I don't need to post every day, but it is a nice calm pace here.
>>6873
>And also revealing that shes an imageboard newfag who only started browsing in 2018
It's 2026 which means she's been using IBs for eight years, that's more than enough for her to gain the experience needed. If you're holding out for a admin that's a /cgl/ oldfag, you're out of luck because of how rare we are.

>>6977
>I'm not too fond of vichan
LC splinters need to be vichan because a significant majority of the user base has a mental breakdown when confronted with anything else. One of the old admins known as Shaymin, tried to switch LC to lynxchan and the retard strength meltdown was so intense she had to revert the site back to vichan.
Replies: >>6990 >>6995 >>6996
>>6987
i still consider anybody who started browsing post 2016 a newfag even if thats a decade ago now. it could be 2040 and if somebody told me they started browsing 4chan in 2018 id think to myself "lol newfag". it is what it is
Replies: >>6992 >>6995
>>6990
I wonder how many oldfags from the 2000s who'd consider the 2010s newfag territory too are around
>>6990
Unfortunately I agree. There's too much vital site history that gets lost in that time gap. We have a culture and if newfags cared more it might not be such a big deal, but most refuse to integrate. 

>>6987
Not only are we rare but most of us have careers, families, and/or other significant obligations that would make moderating a whole ib near impossible. and a lot have 0 patience for newfags too, i know i do at this point kek
>>6987
>LC splinters need to be vichan
Disappointing but it's not surprising. It reminds me of how 4channers react when they encounter any imageboard that isn't 4chan, they get confused and frustrated by things like multiple files per post :chiyolay:
Replies: >>6999
Is webmin a man or a woman?
Replies: >>6998
>>6997
webmin's a feller
Replies: >>7000
>>6996
ngl I generally dislike seeing multiple files per post. I wouldn’t mind with better formatting but the way it’s usually formatted makes threads visually annoying
Replies: >>7004
>>6998
I thought yhh was for women only?
Replies: >>7002 >>7003
>>7000
Like this one is but we're squatting on an everyone site. This started from /shelter/ which is for anons to bunker down in.
>>7000
How tf did you miss the cuckqueen and feet boards.
No it's not women only except for /yohoho/, we're just squating on this man's website since lolcow went down that september and crystal.cafe kept banning refugees. It's our now muster station whenever something happens to those websites or you wanna complain freely :chiyotable:
>>6999
It probably could be styled better so it doesn't look like a jumbled mess, depending on the file count. I could probably round some corners off and mash it into a square with some CSS to make it look more cohesive. One more thing to fret about and get around to eventually 😔
Replies: >>7005
>>7004
wouldnt it make sense to put the images in some sort of flex grid? so theyre all the same size like a gallery
Replies: >>7008
1773885259367-tegaki.png
[Hide] (52KB, 512x512) Reverse
I miss the doodle board. I saw someone had offered to take it over, but it seems that didn't go through sadly.
Replies: >>7007 >>7013
>>7006
Do you use the WC doodle board?
Replies: >>7009
585c0cfcd464fea1726cf4950891103db5561bb7965a7130dbfcdd51f26eacb5.PNG
[Hide] (178.8KB, 849x327) Reverse
6aea6f36ccb2b7dfee35f6a60d520df2d822abf7eac85671ae7b97a7b9eb4a32.PNG
[Hide] (204.6KB, 569x438) Reverse
>>7005
That'd be the gist of it, ye. With different, consistent formats depending on the file count. Working post file info into it as well would be another hurdle.
Last edited by webmaster
>>7007
No, I don't go on WC, so I didn't know they had one.
Replies: >>7012
>>7009
You should try it! It's lots of fun!
>>7006
It's sad nobody has taken it over yet. I don't draw on it but always enjoyed the art posted. Hopefully someone will soon!
Replies: >>7015
>>7013
Yeah, I was more a sometimes doodler myself, but it was a fun thing to have available for the community to participate in... speaking of,  when do we think the awards will be announced?
Replies: >>7016
>>7015
Maybe by the end in this or next month I'm guessing. I saw some nonas getting a little frustrated in /meta/ over it. They could at least give us a little update post? I wonder where all the other heads of the cerbmin went?
Replies: >>7017
ca44074c55bbd1fb858ec3bf83c5810114b14bf10cef0c25aecaa263b3bc8858.png
[Hide] (135.9KB, 173x362) Reverse
>>7016
it does feel a bit short staffed over there these days, and definitely a lack of communication. I'm honestly surprised there's not been a hellweek for a while, it feels like the infighting has gotten a bit out of control. I'm seeing it in threads that are for more specific topics where that usually doesn't happen as much.
legitimately almost threw up reading the recent posts in the confession thread... nigelfags are so fucking disgusting its insane
Replies: >>7020 >>7021
>>7019
Well, it helps once you realize most of those posters are probably males
Replies: >>7021
>>7019
>>7020
Confirming this, one was a male and got his post deleted.
Replies: >>7024
>>7021
kek thats hilarious. i literally replied that it sounded like incel fanfiction and it actually was
How much of a newfag is nimu that she didnt know who nemu was?
Replies: >>7028 >>7031 >>7032
>>7027
Who's nemu?
Replies: >>7029
>>7028
nice try nimu
Replies: >>7030
>>7029
Who's nimu?
>>7027
Tbf I didn’t know who Nemu was. She’s not exactly the face of lc. If Nimu didn’t know who Shayna was then I’d be concerned. Not everyone follows the same cows. Some oldfags probably don’t know or care to know who Addy is.
Replies: >>7047
>>7027
I've used lc since 2017 and I don't know much about most cows tbh even a lot of the "big" ones, I was pretty selective about which ones I followed.
Replies: >>7033 >>7047
>>7032
I have a theory that she's actually new to LC. She may have used 4chan for multiple years, heard that there's a female imageboard more recently, got the idea to make her own, and randomly chose the Dumbass Shit thread. She also didn't know who Rancefag was, and I'm pretty sure anyone who's used /ot/ for at least a year would have heard of her before. I also have a theory that she's the person who posted once that she doesn't even own a cellphone and sticks to small IBs, but that's more far-fetched.
Replies: >>7035 >>7036
>>7033
>she's the person who posted once that she doesn't even own a cellphone
She has said that her phone goes off when a post is reported, so no. I agree with your other theories though.
>>7033
>She also didn't know who Rancefag was
What's the sauce for this?
Replies: >>7037 >>7038 >>7039
>>7036
nta and it's probably gone due to the nature of wc but I do remember that too
Replies: >>7039
>>7036
Pretty sure this happened on /meta/ pre-wipe. I think someone asked for her to be added to Cards Against Witchanity, and she asked who that is. I don't have it saved, unfortunately.
Replies: >>7039
>>7036
>>7037
>>7038
I was the one who had this exchange with her, and it was actually about yuripedo, not rancefag. In the Cards Against Witchanity thread, someone suggested "yuripedo" as a card, so she added it, but I noticed that she changed the wording to "a yuripedo". I asked why she added "a" as it made no sense to, and she confessed that she thought it was some generic insult towards yuri obsessed troons, and that she wasn't aware of the personalityfag.
Replies: >>7040 >>7041
>>7039
I remember that but I feel like I also saw her not knowing who rancefag was in the main meta thread at some point
3ecd128de509037399987d6a72780dcc7e0f17f85e09b6bbe9bd5f074f9ca677.jpg
[Hide] (454KB, 1080x1596) Reverse
>>7039
Samefag, found this screenshot of my own post, but I didn't take one of her reply unfortunately.
Replies: >>7042
>>7041
I do think she's probably a relative newfag to lc but tbf I think it's easy enough to not know yuripedo if you don't frequent certain threads
Replies: >>7043
>>7042
Which threads is she found in?
Replies: >>7045
>>7043
yuripedo?  you're most likely to see yuripedo discussion or the poster herself if you're in the fujo/antifujo infight thread, the fujo cringe thread, threads related to female SSA topics in some way (so both threads relating to GL and the lesbian and bi threads), or if you like to browse /meta/. she might get brought up randomly in other threads sometimes but that about covers it I think
Replies: >>7048
phew.gif
[Hide] (7.9MB, 640x360) Reverse
>doesnt know nemu
>doesnt know yuripedo
>doesnt know rancefag
its crazy to me that people like this browse lolcow. like how?
Replies: >>7049 >>7052
>>7031
>>7032
I don't follow Nemu either but it's insane to supposedly be a farmer and not know that there exists a cow with that name. You can't be much of a cow board poster if you haven't heard of her, she's constantly namedropped in the threads I follow
I don't care about personalityfags, but that's a similar situation. If you don't even recognize the names, it's hard to believe you actively browse the site.
Replies: >>7050 >>7052
>>7045
Funnily enough, yuripedo just popped up again in the anime thread on /m/
>>7046
I genuinely feel like LC is infested by newfags nowadays
Replies: >>7051 >>7053 >>7056
>>7047
I even see nemu namedropped on /ot/ quite a lot
>>7049
That’s because it is, without a doubt.
>>7047
>>7046
Kek I always wondered if she chose that name on purpose. I'm amazed she not only didn't but didn't know she shared her name with a prominent cow. You don't need to be a lolcow user to make a women focused imageboard, but you definitely should be one if you market it on being everything lolcow isn't.
>>7049
Yep. And they don’t even know how to reply to posts. It’s quite annoying to my autism.
How are we feeling about Nimu being a confirmed 2022 newfag that uses the unpopular opinions thread?
 tbh I don't really care as long as the site is good 
>>7049
I saw one tell someone to learn to sage her posts...on a non-cow board.
>>7055
I don’t really care
>>7055
I don't care. She sounds young so I don't expect her to be an oldfag anyway.
Replies: >>7059
>>7058
>She sounds young
What makes you say that?
Replies: >>7063
>>7055
It don't matter. Maybe a younger admin will give more of a care about things.
>>7055
She says she heard about LC in 2022, but I think she’s been using it even earlier. It’s the only thing that would explain why she’s not even aware of prominent personalityfags. If she was more familiar with the site, she would understand more the frustrations of LC users and be better able to cater to them.
>>7059
I'm pretty sure she's a college student as she mentions being busy with school.
not that crystal cafe is very active anyway but why is it filled with pol tourists again? Thought they'd gone away
Replies: >>7065
c79684292f1cc64a6e57209473e470b45f856f33973936d7c76cf4b9fcbd4631.png
[Hide] (99.7KB, 750x650) Reverse
>>7064
it's the only place they can get away with it.
>>7055
As I said before, you don't need to be from lc to run a woman only ib. But she does ride off of lc's coattails a lot. And
>I was always frustrated on lolcow.farm because jannies would frequently ban me and delete my posts
Leads me to believe she's a retard who can't read the rules. I hope I'm wrong and the site flourishes.
Replies: >>7067 >>7068 >>7070
>>7066
>she's a retard who can't read the rules
LC jannies ban you for things not in the rules, you don't have to be a retard to hate the moderation.
Replies: >>7069 >>7076
>>7066
A lot of LC's rules are petty bullshit anyway
Replies: >>7075
>>7067
NTA but I don't understand the experience of being frequently banned in UP unless your takes were frequently garnering reports for a reason and jannies had to sweep up your posts. I'm guessing she came off like an unintegrated retard or has some opinions that people would like to dismiss as bait. Any guesses on what they might be?
Replies: >>7078
>>7066
It kind of seems like bad etiquette to me to start recruiting users from a website you don't even take the time to learn about properly over to your website.
Replies: >>7071 >>7075 >>7081
>>7070
As someone who has used LC for quite some time I can't say I really care if someone is respectful towards it or not
>>7055
i found lc in 2024 kek but i still knew who all of those namefags and cows she didnt know were...
Replies: >>7073
>>7072
>2024
Bleak.
Replies: >>7074
tumblr_bdfd279af30a26053710093d9643b0d0_2c2564f0_1280.jpg
[Hide] (41.1KB, 735x606) Reverse
>>7073
actually it mightve been 2023 but honestly the past 5 years have been a total blur and i ltierally cant tell them apart from eachother anymore haha
>>7068
They are but they're still the rules. I've literally never had my post deleted in the entire time I've been on lc and I've been there way too long. If you get your posts deleted multiple times, I assume you're a little stupid. 

>>7070
Ayrt and I agree with you, mostly because she directly references lc in the rules and throughout meta. She doesn't know anything about the site she's trying to gain from and made her image board because she kept getting banned on /ot/? She's probably the exact type of user I'm trying to escape. I wish her success on her own website though. I'm not mad, it just feels like all my hunches turned out to be true.
>>7067
The moderation is retarded too but getting banned repeatedly and getting her posts deleted means she was posting something so awful they either thought she was a scrote or she was a shitter who ban evaded. I don't agree with the farmhands all the time but I've literally never ran into this problem.
65c7cc9e2e6a56afe20cd465c19ad9a0e54e0238c62aef5dbf8f74037d85d5ab.jpg
[Hide] (34.3KB, 1040x200) Reverse
>>7069
>Any guesses on what they might be?
I do know that she's Catholic, so likely related to that. This is also a huge tinfoil, but I feel like this post on /txt/ sounds a lot like her.
Replies: >>7079
>>7078
Why do you think she's Catholic? My guesses are the porn industry, feminism, and abortion.
Replies: >>7082
>>7070
I remember a poster on LC some months ago who acted like a retard, got banned for baiting, and came back to whine in a thread about how she wasn't baiting and LC censors her free speech. It could be her
Replies: >>7084
a95d3ef8004e5cfa1b8d468227c7b8facb51f1dc75add5a766a49ce79ac8bc66.jpg
[Hide] (72.6KB, 972x761) Reverse
>>7079
Nvm not specifically catholic, but she confirmed this in the lent thread, then deleted it a few minutes later.
Replies: >>7083
>>7082
She celebrated carnival so I assume catholic
>>7081
Ayrt, that's retarded. There are hundreds of people who use LC so unless you notice something specific that matches in a way that couldn't just be coincidence, it is impossible to tell and most likely was someone else. Not whiteknighting her, speaking as someone who made a guess.
Replies: >>7085
>>7084
I don't think it's that likely, just the way she talked about her issues with LC were worded pretty similarly to how that anon complained
LC's moderation is really reaching a new, significant low and it looks like more users (at least those who don't have an emotional attachment to their cows) are starting to leave. Even the 2 mods only check the website maybe once every two days.
Replies: >>7087 >>7095
can i just say im glad wc has way less tranny discussions than lc? like, i get the point of having them especially for newly peaked women but its been incredibly grating to me for the past few months how every discussion on every board devolves into tranny seething at some point. im just so tired of the subject and i feel like we really should stop giving these retarded men our mental energy. in the end they all take themselves out whether its 41%, OD or going to prison, so its like...whatever kek. im just much happier when i can pretend they dont exist i suppose.
>>7086
the nonexistent moderation is starting to feel on par with cc which is really sad honestly. i maybe peek at the vent thread, /m/ and /snow/ everyday but thats about all i can tolerate anymore.
Replies: >>7133
The abortion sperg appearing right after our tinfoil discussions about nimu makes me wonder if it's her kek
Replies: >>7089 >>7091
>>7088
which threads is the abortion sperg in? i wanna see
Replies: >>7090
>>7089
On /txt/ on wc
>>7088
It makes sense why the abortion discussion would be redirect to /txt/ though because it's an NSFW board and isn't bannable
Replies: >>7093
>>7091
Oh yeah I wasn't saying it shouldn't be allowed, she's just a somewhat regular presence on /ot/ has this exact argument on threads like unpopular opinions and usually gets banned for baiting after awhile. It fits the profile of someone who is maybe catholic and has a grudge against the LC moderation for getting shut down often
Replies: >>7094
>>7093
There are multiple abortion spergs on lolcow and usually their reasoning tends to be the same because it's common sense. It either gets banned as bait when someone is being aggressive or flippant or just gets deleted when there's no actual rules being broken or reason to red text.
Replies: >>7096
>>7086
I’m getting whiplash from the current mod team. They’re so inconsistent. LC has felt extra slow the last few days so I wonder if they’re scared of banning the rest of the userbase since so many normal anons have left and the spergs remain. 
Meanwhile, I’m a bit sussed out by Nemu for the same reasons as a lot of you, so I don’t think WC is really a viable alternative at this point.
I hope cerbmin can be more consistent and recruit more farmhands. Less retarded one’s too. I still hope the best for WC too even though I’m not sold yet. I hope both sites can grow and improve because weirdly enough I still think there is potential
>>7094
>because it’s common sense 
You are actually insufferable and deserved to be banned
Replies: >>7097
>>7096
Not taking sides with any anons on either WC or LC but just buying a condom or getting bc isn't a crazy thing to say at all
Replies: >>7098 >>7099
>>7097
It's not crazy to say it's a good idea to have safe sex, and if that's all that anon was doing nobody would care. But you know it's not.
Replies: >>7100
>>7097
Sounds like it's time for the /yhh/ abortion thunderdome thread to round things out.
Replies: >>7100
>>7098
I was present for the infighting yesterday I didn't consider to take screenshots so please forgive me, but what the original anon who first replied to that post about the lady getting charged with murder in Georgia said was rude and communicated in an overly sarcastic manner but it also was kind of true. You should be on birth control if you're living in a state where you know you can't get an abortion 
>>7099
Kekk get your popcorn
Replies: >>7101
>>7100
I'm glad I don't browse /ot/ anymore
i just realized males arent banned in the rules of wc... welp.
Replies: >>7103 >>7104
>>7102
They are, it's just a shadow rule
Replies: >>7108 >>7109
>>7102
They are, it's usually obvious when a random new poster is baiting because they won't have any kind of post history or their post history will prove that they're posting annoying bullshit
Replies: >>7105 >>7109
>>7104
ntayrt does wc even have post history? im not sure the thread deletions would allow a comprehensive post history, but i may be wrong. i also remember nimu saying that she obfuscates ips, but i dont know if thats per user or per post.
Replies: >>7106
>>7105
There's no comprehensive post history due to the deletes, but nimu can just post histories for whatever is currently on the site at the time
Replies: >>7107
>>7106
can see post histories* I can't be assed to delete and repost lol
>>7103
Seconding this as someone who was there for that discussion. There was actually a male who posted on /meta/ once, and his post was quickly deleted.
>>7103
>>7104
i see i see
dc.PNG
[Hide] (55.5KB, 1881x628) Reverse
The gayops some anons have been attempting have been made visible today. There really are no-life idiots who will respond to their own threads and keep bumping them in order to make other anons uncomfortable/make it seem like there's a larger amount of racist anons than there really are. It's also interesting to see the amount of unique users we have.
FYEWqeXXwAEIvwY.png
[Hide] (93.4KB, 379x368) Reverse
>>7110
i was the one who suggest it heheh
>>7110
That looks like one of the blogposting threads, it doesn't even have a title and is just one anon posting about what she's doing
Replies: >>7113
>>7112
Still, it is reassuring to know that it's usually just 1 or 2 loud anons vs the majority.
>>7110
I love ids. So many problems could be solved by ibs using thread user ids. Extremely based choice.
Replies: >>7145
IMG_9627.jpeg
[Hide] (578.5KB, 1107x1190) Reverse
You think nimu is autistic? No normal person would think it's a good idea to be a Machiavellian lawful-evil dictator.
>>7115
I think she wanted to have a silly evil persona, but then realized that it came off as insincere and retarded
>>7115
She's definitely a bit tarded. I expect it to become an issue if wc gets a lot bigger, but if it stays small like now I think it shouldn't be a huge issue.
>>7115
>do you think an owner of a chan is autistic
who else would run an imageboard anon
Replies: >>7119
>>7118
There has to be a normal one out there somewhere, like moot maybe.
Replies: >>7120 >>7121 >>7124
>>7119
Moot was definitely not normal, he was implicated in the Epstein files
Replies: >>7122
>>7119
>moot
>normal
Anon please...
I think only some japanese board owners have the chance to be normies, I think whoever runs girlschannel is probably normal.
Replies: >>7122
>>7120
I thought he was only identified as a potential target for manipulation, not that he was culpable.
>>7121
alright kek you got me. He's relatively normal when compared to other admins imo. Also good morning and happy Friday!
Replies: >>7123
>>7122
Good afternoon! Weekend can't come soon enough.
I think you forgot the asukasperging he did and calling himself little girl.
>>7119
Nta he gave a talk at my uni once. He was more normal than I thought he would be but there was definitely something there.
>>7115
I'm quite certain she was just making a dumb joke kek
>>7110
Just fyi I noticed the OP of the abortion thread posted in her thread a minute before the OP of this thread bumped it to say black people are like gorillas. So I suspect it's the same person
I’m about to say something a bit racially targeted, and I just want to say, I’m not usually one to make racist statements... But what the actual fuck is up with the Polish spergs in the post-leftcow thread? They’re obvious /pol/tarded tourists that won’t stop blogging and derailing the thread to sperg about race an other off topic polishit. I’m glad the janny of that thread is FINALLY moderating it because it’s insane how bad it got despite them being personfalityfags. I wonder what Polish discord server that thread got linked in. I’m reminded a bit of bj-chan kek. I guess Poles are just Like That
Replies: >>7129 >>7131
>>7128
With that leadup I was expecting something really racist but then it was just about the Polish kek. Poland isn't a race
Replies: >>7130 >>7135
>>7129
Polaks are a race to me
polandball.jpg
[Hide] (21.1KB, 500x500) Reverse
>>7128
Replies: >>7132
voltorb.webp
[Hide] (17.9KB, 796x776) Reverse
>>7131
it's a polemon
>>7087
>its been incredibly grating to me for the past few months how every discussion on every board devolves into tranny seething at some point
Yeah. One time I posted about gamedev ideas for small projects, and the first suggestion was to spend my free time making a troon killing tower defense or something. I know we hate trannies, but why would I spend my time and energy drawing and coding tranny npcs instead of making something pleasing to the eye and soul
Replies: >>7136 >>7141
>>7129
I'm going to go and discriminate against a polack now thanks to this post.
>>7133
I feel like a lot those are newfags who newly peaked and are still have the "make everything about gender issues" tendency they used to before peaking
>>7133
>the first suggestion was to spend my free time making a troon killing tower defense or something
ngl, Plants vs. Zombies as TERFs vs. Troons where you have to stop the trannies from getting into the women's bathroom, would be something I would play.
Replies: >>7143
>>7141
I'd play it as long as it was fun and somewhat humorous. A low barrier for entry would be important too, like something that could be played in a browser.
>>7114
Meh. It's useless against trolls since they can just change their ID with a VPN.
Replies: >>7146
>>7145
yeah but a troll constantly switching ips also looks suspicious. you can also just ban vpns
5169b71900ac7ff29032b6184e9eb31ba4b9e148bf00ade36d5e400dfd690e20.png
[Hide] (38.3KB, 1116x402) Reverse
is farmcow.lol down for anyone else?
Replies: >>7159 >>7165
>>7158
It's down for me too! Interesting, I wonder how that happened.
Screenshot_2026-03-31_233553.png
[Hide] (124.3KB, 924x431) Reverse
WITCHAN IS SHUTTING DOWN
Replies: >>7161 >>7162
>>7160
april fools ;)
>>7160
I totally realize most people are going to disagree with me here but I feel compelled to say that announcing the closure of WC for a joke isn't a very kind thing to do. We have seen TONS of posts from vulnerable populations talking about how WC is a source of support and humor in a dark time. Irony and witchery aside, taking away that support without warning is not okay.

You can say I'm being silly, or humorless or reactionary. Whatever. I love my fellow witches and I love the community. But sometimes I come home after dealing with ableism and our nightmare reality all day, and WC is one of many things that make me feel better. It isn't a good feeling to find the site closed for the sake of irony. Maybe that's laughable or pathetic. But for me, it's true.
Replies: >>7166
Did lolcow do anything for April fools? Everything looks the same to me. April fools on lc was one of my favorites.
Replies: >>7167
>>7158
Domain's been up for grabs for a couple months. I noticed it stopped working back in Jan and emailed the admin. Nothing back so I'd say it's scrapped.
>>7162
i’m gonna assume this is trolling
>>7164
https://milkypets.lolcow.farm/
Honestly I’m impressed. I just about lost hope in the admin team but it’s nice to see they have these kinds of capabilities to make something as cute as this. I just hope cerb recruits more farmhands given the surge of unintegrated newfags on using the site.
Replies: >>7169 >>7170 >>7173
>>7167
Ayrt and I came back to post the same thing. I can't wait to look around the website and get my pet!
milkypets.PNG
[Hide] (87KB, 985x834) Reverse
>>7167
Kek.
Replies: >>7172
>>7170
I wanted to try all the options but I was scared the male one would get me banned KEK
>>7167
I've been having so much fun with it! A bit unfortunate that they had time to invest into this and not into announcing the awards yet, but milkypets is so fun that I'm not even mad.
Randomly got a four week ban from LC because apparently they detected that I'm a spammer. Even though I've been using the site normally for years and definitely have never spammed anything. Unless posting in the milky pets thread twice counts as spamming, I guess.
Replies: >>7176 >>7178
>>7175
You might have just caught a stray. It’s happened to me before and they unbanned me.
>>7175
i didn’t even know they did bans that long. i only ever got max 24 hours before i got my perma.
Replies: >>7179
>>7178
>perma
What was your crime, if you don't mind answering?
Replies: >>7180
>>7179
got banned for 24hrs for being retarded but then my IP changed (which makes it dynamic?) so i got permabanned for ban evading. i honestly just thought they undid my ban but i was in a dumb state. still slightly bitter about it but i’m kinda glad i stopped using the site as it’s been going to shit, plus i’ve matured since then anyway. i was hardly using it when i got banned too.
becoming quite disappointed with the witchan userbase
Replies: >>7183 >>7186
>>7182
Are you the same person that was talking about wc feeling like lc in the vent thread yesterday?
Replies: >>7184
>>7183
nope, in fact i was one of the users disagreeing. i actually think my issue is the opposite. i find what the site culture is settling as worse than what it felt to me initially. it’s still good, just, i feel like it’s attracting a certain type of person that is ehh to me. better than the infighters on lc for sure though.

there’s also a lootttt of christians, more than i’ve experienced on an ib before
Replies: >>7185 >>7187 >>7191
>>7184
>there’s also a lootttt of christians
I wonder why that is.
Replies: >>7186
>>7182
I get it, it's feeling quite off lately but I can't quite put my finger on it
>>7185
It's probably just because it's Easter time and they feel more comfortable in witchan than LC, especially since Nimu is one herself. They'll probably chill out soon, a witch themed chan should be the last place to become a nunnery.
>>7184
it's probably because the novelty of the site has worn off, so it doesn't feel as fun. the site's still the same.
>>7184
What kind of person do you mean? Also I don't think there's that many christians, I checked the religion and counted like 4-5 unique IDs at most that said they were christian without qualifying it with something like "I was raised christian but I'm not really religious".
29c63a504e96396fd76ee9ece1cc111bbdf767262bff8a7beef151817195d018.jpg
[Hide] (103.2KB, 554x1199) Reverse
wc got their first personalityfag and it's a doozy. Pic related, they're a yume for a 10 year old cartoon character. She sent this email to the voice actress.
>>7192
Second, actually, racist stoner-chan came first
Replies: >>7196
>>7192
what's the source for this being a personalityfag on wc?
Replies: >>7195 >>7196
>>7194
She’s been posting about this on the vent thread in /txt/, she linked this to the thread herself complaining that the VA she harassed did not like being harassed
>>7193
Amazing, what speed the personalityfags work at

>>7194
Vent thread on /txt/ and the thread making thread on /b/
>>7192
:chiyolook:
Exciting times for WC, looking forward to further personalityfag developments.
Replies: >>7198
>>7197
If it gets further than this I'll take it to the cow thread here.
Replies: >>7207
This feels so surreal. Almost reads like a larp, but if this is a genuine waifufag I'm really disappointed. Where was wc advertised to attract such posters?
Replies: >>7200 >>7204 >>7205
>>7199
It could have been a larp if it was just posts in the threads but she’s actually harassing the voice actor so I think it’s probably just actual mental illness.
Replies: >>7201
>>7200
You must be right but I find it really outlandish that she posted a direct link to her harassment emails where she admits to using slurs and acted surprised about getting backlash. Picking a 10 year old waifu and personalityfagging about it, then acting retardedly confused about people feeling weirded out reads like some edgy bait but I don't deny she could just be terribly mentally ill. It's mostly the way she's going about her posts that makes me suspicious. Either way, we should refuse to give it attention because she's way too eager to post about herself and we're encouraging her to harass more people.
Replies: >>7203
>>7201
This is just what schizos are like, they lack self awareness. The way she describes things is actually very textbook to a psychotic delusion in the way she describes her thoughts, I’m surprised that’s not more recognizable to people. She could be larping as a schizo but someone who goes that far to larp as a schizo has other issues.
>>7199
Crystal Cafe, probably?
>>7199
freakish maladjusted women.. on MY lolcow? no way.
>>7192
The Hazel yume is genuinely mentally ill. She believes that when she dies she'll turn into a 10 year old in the afterlife and be married to Hazel from the fairly odd parents and harassed anyone who ships Hazel with other characters. She also claims she hates artists who make lolicon of Hazel but she's been caught drawing similar shit 

>>7198
She's defending herself desperately on different imageboards, it's absolute insanity but it's fairly entertaining to see
Replies: >>7208
>>7207
It's reminding me of that Hodyfag who posted a picture of herself.
Replies: >>7209
>>7208
I don't think even the hodyfag was this crazy
Replies: >>7210
>>7209
She got kicked out of multiple Discord servers for sperging about her obsession with Hody in them. They're both obsessive, one's a low-functioning autist and the other's a schizophrenic.
there’s a whole pedophiles’ anonymous meeting going on on /txt/ right now but i can’t be bothered to insert myself. i’m scared of being hug boxed to death.
>>7211
Same, I figured it's best to just ignore it. I wish spergs would just keep their depraved bullshit to themselves instead of dumping their cancer everywhere with 0 consideration of people who do not want to be in proximity to their degeneracy.
Replies: >>7228 >>7277
>>7211
>i’m scared of being hug boxed to death
oh no how terrifying. the site has almost no rules about posting nothing bad will happen to you if you complain there
Replies: >>7216 >>7277
>>7211
The userbase dictates the atmosphere of the site. If you have a bone to pick with them, why are you not making yourself heard?
Replies: >>7215 >>7216 >>7277
>>7214
Ok, I'm going to confront them now. Let's see what happens.
Replies: >>7217 >>7277
>>7213
>>7214
hey i’m talking from experience. i’ve been dogpiled recently for pointing out something and i just don’t feel like doing it again right now. it takes energy.
>>7215
And so the dogpiling begins.
>>7211
Is it the shotafags in the "shameful fetishes" /txt/ thread? The amount of "freedom to post" shit that they automatically post there whenever you point there's weirdos there is wild. I do think Nimu at least bothered to ban the Hazelfag
Replies: >>7219
>>7218
honestly even if Hazelfag posted on there instead of vent or whatever i actually don’t think she’d have anyone agreeing with her. she was only an object of sympathy when people thought there was nothing sexual to do with it. idk why they're mentioning LC because it’s the same over there - shotafagging is “fiction not reality” but they somehow know it’s pedoshit if it’s a loli, whether it’s a male or female consumer.

honestly, i didn’t care much for it until they massively derailed and circlejerked each other under spoilertext about how it’s totally moral. that one anon randomly bringing up people getting off to real kids from shows like that’s even a point of discussion weirded me out.
>complaining about pedophilia
OMG!!! Just let people enjoy things!!!!!
Replies: >>7221 >>7226
>>7220
so theres this website called lolcow dot farm you can go to if you want to endlessly fight and cry about the ethics of being horny for cartoon characters, have fun
Replies: >>7222
>>7221
You don't have to get this defensive over something you yourself admitted makes you feel guilty. You feel that way for a good reason. Why are you surprised this causes reactions of disgust in normal people who do not share the same perverted fetish, or see children in that way, or are so retarded that they will type
>I'm very iffy with people who sexualize child characters/actors from live action shows, however. Maybe they aren't attracted to real kids either, but to me it's a lot harder to defend because there are real children being involved one way or another.
>Maybe they aren't attracted to real kids either
>Maybe
As if there's room for any plausible deniability there. You have to be subhuman levels of retarded to think this, at all. Thank you for reducing any care I have had for the state of Witchan, you disgusting bitch.
Replies: >>7223 >>7227
loopy.jpg
[Hide] (7.4KB, 271x186) Reverse
>>7222
Replies: >>7224
wcc.PNG
[Hide] (23KB, 1774x159) Reverse
>>7223
In case anyone is curious what I'm referring to, before it gets nuked.
Replies: >>7231 >>7265
wwwwc.PNG
[Hide] (19.2KB, 1813x121) Reverse
Replies: >>7231 >>7265
>>7220
Nobody said you couldn't complain about pedophilia, they laughed at you for coming to yhh to, ironically, complain about a hugbox you didn't like, then posting here to live report you getting replied to
Replies: >>7229
>>7222
Sorry but you're so corny to write this up and post it here instead of replying in the thread.
>>7212
>0 consideration
they literally spoilered their posts so much they made the thread look like a CIA document, I think that counts as being at least a little considerate
Replies: >>7232
>>7226
That's a different person, retard. Unsurprisingly, multiple people have no love for shotafaggots.
60c2c0beec125544c8eacc678e1c21f39f765161bbf4111ee20f886cd9cf81e7.webp
[Hide] (13.5KB, 200x194) Reverse
>>7224
>>7225
youre taking this shit way too seriously... like genuinely take a break from the internet for a few hours. if you are offended by shota discussions (very understandable) then stop crashing out about it on another website like a psycho and just move on. i do think that person randomly talking about real child actors is kinda weird for that but its really not that big of a deal. i dont think you can deny being a drama queen at this point kek
>>7228
Why can't you just go flick your bean to little boys in private? What is with this incessant need to dump this everywhere as if every site is your personal diary or a confessional? Especially when there are so many other places you can go? Seriously, I don't get it. I only posted in the thread to prove that anon wrong. It makes hardly any difference if you complain, you just get dogpiled.
Replies: >>7234 >>7235
>>7211
So what was your taboo/shameful fetish
Replies: >>7236
>>7232
The thread literally asked what taboo fetish you have. If any fetish is taboo, it's certainly that. The fact that there are little to no pictures of shota being posted, even sfw shota, is testament to the fact that it probably wouldn't even be brought up had that thread not have been made. I can think of one situation and that's the Len baby bottle one
Replies: >>7237 >>7259
E8AH2EFVgAAkIcY.jpg
[Hide] (24.2KB, 500x460) Reverse
>>7232
>Goes into the taboo fetish discussion thread
>Sees taboo fetishes
>Has a meltdown about it for an hour instead of just hiding the thread like a normal person
Replies: >>7245
>>7233
>>>/cuckquean/ tbh
Replies: >>7261 >>7277
>>7234
Why does every space need to turn into anons talking about their weird sex secrets when there are a multitude of other subjects we could be talking about on /txt/ instead? Especially when you start steering into the territory of how you like little boys. And then get offended when anons think, maybe this shouldn't be associated with the website. Maybe that isn't a wise thing to encourage. Why can't anons keep it to themselves? Why do we have to entertain conversations about having a fetish for little anime boys?
Replies: >>7238 >>7239 >>7241
>>7237
I don't know nona, why aren't we making threads about other topics other than taboo sexualities on txt? I wonder what could fix this.
Replies: >>7240
>>7237
>when there are a multitude of other subjects we could be talking about on /txt/ instead?
Then make some threads??
>>7238
My point is, why should WC become associated with shotafaggotry? So we can attract more degenerates? Anything goes, Nimu won't ban anything?
Replies: >>7241 >>7244 >>7247
>>7237
>>7240
If you dont want people to talk about or post shota then ignore it and dont talk about shota? Its really not that hard. This discussion wouldve been over already if you didnt raise a big stink about it.
Replies: >>7242
>>7241
>If you dont want people to talk about or post shota then ignore it and dont talk about shota?
That's actually not a solution at all, whatsoever. Thank you. That was really unhelpful.
Replies: >>7243 >>7264
>>7242
It literally is though.
Replies: >>7246
>>7240
I never said that, but it goes against Nimu's vision of the site to ban discussion like that. If there's a problem you have with the userbase themselves, what is your solution other than banning them? there are only three things you can do, tallking to them head on or ignoring them or just leaving the site. Like what are you even asking? Do you want me to snap my fingers and make the shotacon drain from those poster's bodies?
Replies: >>7248
>>7235
I'm sorry but that picture is retarded. Last time I saw it posted it was when Lolcow anons were asking mods why it wasn't banned to admit to being into zoophilia
>>7243
No it isn't, dumbass. If the site grows and there's zero pushback against shotafaggotry becoming an accepted part of the site culture, because we should just ignore it and it'll go away on its own, what do you think is going to happen? Another Hazel schizo? Thank you, again, for reducing any care I have for this website. If it turns to shit because of you people, I won't care.
Replies: >>7383
>>7240
This is like saying WC is for racists stoners just because one person was.
>>7244
>talking to them head
But you faggots are dogpiling me for even complaining about this being discussed. If you also don't want shotacons posting here, then what the fuck are you even complaining about my complaining for?
Replies: >>7249 >>7251 >>7252
>>7248
Do you just expect them to instantly submit to you? No, you have to have a little more minerals than that if you truly want to do that. You complaining about recieving pushback from them makes me think you don't have the anti-shotacon warrior gene. I'm pretty sure I've never seen stonerchan again after someone spammed in her thread to khs.
>>7248
is being disagreed with by other posters really that upsetting? I just don't get when people cry because they don't have the majority opinion in whatever space they entered. Stand your ground or go away but why cry about it?
>>7248
>tried to get people to dogpile the shotafags
>just got dogpiled instead
im sorry but kek
Replies: >>7253
>>7252
I actually wasn't planning on that at all. I wanted to see what would happen if I expressed my opinion when I was initially going to ignore it, because some anon felt the need to suggest actually responding to it. So I did, and predictably, nothing of merit happened.
Replies: >>7254
>>7253
Yeah... because they checked this thread and realized they were being played like fiddles kek.
Replies: >>7256
I came to Lolcow for the art commentary cows thread (technically Creepshow Art Shannon too) but it has gone so downhill. People are claiming pedophiles who had beefs with members of the ACC are posting in there and multiple of the cows admit to lurking and self posting but mods don't do shit. I'm pretty sure they're not even revealing cows' post histories anymore since the links to them don't work and despite anons mentioning this to them they refuse to fix it https://lolcow.farm/creepshow.html

Also they take forever to make new threads these days, where's the new Shoe0nHead thread, I'd make it myself but I've already made multiple because they take forever to
Replies: >>7257
>>7254
also the fact she posted it when the discussion was already over kek
>>7255
Im a regular lurker on the ACC thread, and yep, its filled with them just slinging shit at eachother under the guise of anonymity, I swear Lio posts in that thread every week now. He's so bad at pretending not to be himself its laughable
Scrolled up and realized there is no escape kek >>6825 >>6836
>>7234
>The fact that there are little to no pictures of shota being posted, even sfw shota, is testament to the fact that it probably wouldn't even be brought up had that thread not have been made
KEK
>>7236
The moralfag angry over fiction is into cucking? The jokes really do write themselves
Replies: >>7262 >>7263 >>7275
>>7261
many such case
>>7261
im pretty sure thats a person trolling and not the person who was moralfagging kek
>>7242
NTA but i dont get it, Nimu said she made wc to post things that arent allowed on lc, that includes shotafaggotry. Why are you posting on wc knowing it was made for the purpose of freedom to post? literally just use lc.
>>7224
>>7225
screenshotting peoples personal posts on a site meant for impermanence is so gay. and then you cry about other people "ruining le sacred site culture!!11"
Replies: >>7266
>>7265
Anything you place in a public space can be screenshotted and archived, don't be a naive retard. There's so many 4chan screenshots going around and I don't see anyone defending their honor in the form of "b-but the threads don't last forever why are you screenshotting this". Are you one of those newfags that came from insertsocialmediahere that think imageboards like LC are the standard?
Replies: >>7267
>>7266
>Anything you place in a public space can be screenshotted and archived, don't be a naive retard
obviously i know this retard, its still cringe and goes against the point of the site
>but muh 4chan
4chan is obviously not the same and has had third party archives forever, what even is that comparison
Replies: >>7268
>>7267
>obviously i know this retard, its still cringe and goes against the point of the site
For an outsider looking at WC, they don't have respect any imaginary boundary set by the userbase. Do you seethe at people screencapping instagram stories too?
>and has had third party archives forever
It hasn't had them forever, and not for all boards. The archives are as you said, a third party thing and a choice made by people that don't manage the imageboard itself, and that goes against the "spirit" of 4chan as an imageboard too. What's normal for an imageboard is to have threads that fall off into irrelevance after reaching their bump limit, and not to have them sit forever. That's what makes imageboards stand out and cheaper to manage.
There's people archiving WC threads since day one too btw.
Replies: >>7269 >>7273
>>7268
NTA but it wasn't an outsider looking at WC. It was someone who claimed to be concerned about the board going down in flames.
Anyway, the posts being complained about happened in a thread specifically for taboo fetishes. Why enter a thread for that subject if you know you're going to be triggered by some things, even if they're placed under spoilers? Just seems like shit-stirring and an attempt to start drama, I agree the screenshotting and sperging was dumb.
Replies: >>7270 >>7271 >>7272
>>7269
>It was someone who claimed to be concerned about the board going down in flames.
I dont understand the anons who are concerned about their image based on the niche altchan they post on. Oh noooo moids, who commit 98% of crimes, might think i am a shotafag for posting on a freeze speech ib, the horror. It's like some women just simply dont want women they personally disagree to exist because they make them look bad in the eyes of moids, which is genuinely such a pathetic way to think and live.
Replies: >>7272 >>7300 >>7335
>>7269
I think they just don't want to share a website with open shotafags and they're letting out frustration by stirring shit since they can't be banned just for talking about it
Replies: >>7276
>>7269
Ayrt, ah well, both things will exist at the same and there's nothing we can do about it. People will screenshot things after wandering into a thread they knew would upset them, and anons will keep posting about extremely disturbing and dumb things because they're anons. That's just how imageboards are, there will always be freedom to do both of those things even if we don't agree with it

>>7270
I don't get it either, the reputation of an imageboard doesn't follow you anywhere. Nobody has to know you use imageboards.
>>7268
genuinely how do you think instagram or 4chan are even remotely comparable to wc. like seriously how
Replies: >>7274
>>7273
I'm not sure what the problem is, I'm comparing them to the concept of impermanence, both of which have those traits ingrained into them. Have you ever heard of analogies, similes or metaphors? When you compare two things, they don't have to be exactly alike in every possible aspect you know.

And again, WC had anons archiving from day one, which is quite literally no different from 4chan. What's the issue with what I'm saying?
Replies: >>7300
>>7261
Cucking doesn't involve kids
>>7271
If that were the case they would just stick to lolcow.
jfc shit happened in my sleep. for the record, i was the first anon who brought the weird stuff up >>7211. two anons replied that i ought to “make myself heard” >>7214 or that it won’t be that bad if i complain >>7213 and a third anon said she agreed >>7212 but then she’ll try anyway since the others suggested it >>7215.

the implication was that since it’s a free speech site the only thing regulating any of that is the other users. i couldn’t be bothered because i recently got dogpiled for not coddling a witch and i didn’t feel like doing that again personally.

point proven though. speak your mind if you disagree but then don’t because actually why are you policing people.

also the cuck fetish person >>7236 is obviously a troll kek. people seem to not be able to comprehend that there are multiple anons who think the same thing even when they type differently too, weird
Replies: >>7278
>>7277
People who act like they are being victimized by disagreement are so annoying. "boohoo I got dogpiled" who the fuck cares?
Replies: >>7279
>>7278
is that how i came across? i just don’t think it’s worth it, no? if you bring up a differing opinion the end goal is a civilised conversation, not dogpiling. so yes, though i often still do that dissuades me from saying what i think sometimes. surely that’s obvious / even the intended effect of the people who disagree anyway? that’s how site culture gets brought about. so clearly it’s a consistent phenomenon.
eeb21facceee2cef28e3da22cf03ea5c545db1fde31cc33b2c26a9b9e0fe7da3.jpg
[Hide] (810.7KB, 2321x2416) Reverse
>>6823
>>6825
I've got you, even if no one else does. >>7280
Replies: >>7284
>>7283
Coulda been makin a more piratey description for ye cabin boy thread
Replies: >>7285
>>7284
kek dammit you're right. Where are people like you when there are threads to be made?
weirdly there are a lot of psychotic people on wc which i didn’t expect. christians, shotafags, and slightly schizophrenic (some very schizophrenic) individuals is such a weird mix, though i can see how 1 and 3 overlap. how the hell did it cultivate this type so early on is beyond me
>>7289
They used to congregate in spaces like the tinfoil thread and religion thread on LC. because there is no actual designated space for these people on WC, they spread out into the rest of the board. They've always been on image boards, they're just more noticeable in WCs format of two general purpose boards with limited threads.
The -hag and -hagging posts are charming! Good culture.
Replies: >>7296 >>7304
>>7289
calling shotafags psychotic is so funny
Replies: >>7296
>>7295
my friend you cannot read.
>>7292
i agree, it’s fun and fits well. i also like bitch correcting to witch
Replies: >>7304
Is LC down for anyone else?
Replies: >>7302
>>7289
What they all have in common is that they're persecuted on different imageboards for different reasons, so usually when a more FFA imageboard appears all the schizos, degens and religious people with a victim complex will group up there like vermin.
Replies: >>7299 >>7326
>>7298
Give them an inch and they'll take a mile.
Replies: >>7326
>>7274
They're genuinely cognitively delayed.
>>7270
You're an embarrassment to women and men, not just men.
Replies: >>7301 >>7318
>>7300
Nta but what's wrong with embarrassing men?
>>7297
Fastest it's ever been for me, running wonderfully. Even the posts seem more pleasant.
>>7296
>>7292
I agree, it's cute. Waiting for the moment when someone who got to lc from wc uses "hag" on lc and gets dogpiled KEK
Is this just the thread for complaining about WC now
>>7305
You can always complain about CC and LC too
>>7305
You can use it to complain about any IB you want, like always.
Replies: >>7332
>>7305
??? what else is it for?
>>7305
it’s bonding activity. i always report back to my girls.
Replies: >>7312
WC is perfect there's nothing to complain about once there's a native dark theme.
>>7311
:chiyoclasp:
Anyone else notice that sillypoo are posting on /i/?
Replies: >>7315 >>7316 >>7317
>>7314
Do you truly think those casuals would be on wc?
>>7314
Its not them. The anon who drew it aaid she purposefully used one of their characters to make a funny threadpic.
Replies: >>7320 >>7322
>>7314
who
>>7300
>men
kek good who the fuck cares what the rapist gender thinks
Replies: >>7322
>>7316
Where?
Replies: >>7321
>>7320
The attractive male thread op is a reference to one of their videos
>>7318
At least they can think, which you seem to be having trouble with.
>>7316
Yeah that was me.
Replies: >>7323
>>7322
>At least they can think
That's too charitable
>she thinks men are real
:chiyoclasp:
Replies: >>7325
>>7324
I wish they weren't
>>7298
>>7299
An imageboard for based women only???
Replies: >>7327
>>7326
Perhaps one day we'll have the technology 😔
>>7307
Can I complain about the secret jungle themed IB? So stuck up.
Replies: >>7333
>>7332
on that note, i really hate the frog themed IB. everyone there is weird and i think some of them are trannies for sure. i can sense a lot of crossover between cc/wc/sc/yc/ddjdc as well.
Replies: >>7334
>>7333
Be honest are you bitter because you didn't pass the frog check?
>>7270
NTA
I really, really don't care if there's a /txt/ thread for cabin boy. It's a thread of words that no one is being forced to read. However the major issue with fetish threads is that they attract low impulse retards that have had their brains degraded by porn exposure and these types are incapable of keeping their sexual fetishes to themselves. It spreads like an infectious disease to the rest of the site. 

It works both ways. Anons that like cabin boy should be able to discuss it in the cabin boy thread without harassment from moralfags but cabin boyfags also need to accept that not all anons like cabin boy, some even hate it, and cabin boy needs to be confined to the cabin boy thread.

A problem that occurred on LC is that fetishtards take any form of moderation that attempts to keep them in their own threads as some form of oppression and then they proceed to cry about persecution or some shit, when in reality it's simply other anons not wanting to be involuntarily exposed to sexualized or pornographic content.

>>7289
These people have always been on IBs. There's been scientific studies that show schizoids, schizotypals and autists are more comfortable expressing themselves in anonymous spaces so they tend to converge on image boards. It's these people that actually make image boards worth browsing. If I wanted to talk to normalfags, I would use social media.
Replies: >>7336 >>7340
>>7335
>that filter
KEK
Screenshot_20260409_221030_Chrome.jpg
[Hide] (284.3KB, 1080x1324) Reverse
Screenshot_20260409_221037_Chrome.jpg
[Hide] (44KB, 1080x302) Reverse
The absolute state of lolcow. And you are not allowed to "scrotefoil" this obvious moid. This site is dead to me.
Replies: >>7338
>>7337
what’s lolcow? this is the wc bunker thread
Replies: >>7339
>>7338
A large observable bovine.
>>7335
Have containment threads ever worked in the long-run?
A bunch of cabin boyfag posts happening just as Witchan is posted on KiwiFarms and apparently some /pol/ shit there too. Wonder where it all came from such a mystery 

Crystal.Cafe also had a bunch of blatant scrote posts lately even worse than usual
Replies: >>7343 >>7350
>>7342
I have seen zero political posts what are you talking about
Replies: >>7355
There was apparently someone trying to hack LC. Screenshots of his attempts are on /meta/.
Replies: >>7347 >>7348
>>7346
reading his posts gave me so much secondhand embarassment. if hes older than 16 he should just be euthanized, theres no hope there
>>7346
KEEEEK thats some real script kiddie shit. trying to write html elements that run javascript in a plaintext field. If it were that easy LC would have been hacked 7 years ago ago
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (365.8KB, 1917x818) Reverse
>>7342
i was reading the shartywiki earlier today and on the lc entry they mention they know of jc so perhaps it's gayops related to that
Replies: >>7351 >>7352
d0b154206d6f5373751c3932671054c5fe255bf8276d4d0b05322fd70d89e6bf.PNG
[Hide] (39.7KB, 1095x222) Reverse
>>7350
>shartywiki
Fascinating. I was unaware of the lore.
Replies: >>7359 >>7361 >>7397
>>7350
someone had a bone to pick jfc
>>7343
I think one thread someone randomly posted a pic of Hitler
Replies: >>7360
>>7351
Hey, nice find. /ssh/ was already abandoned by the time I got here, so I only had the vague sense that it was a also a female board. It's good to have confirmation on that. I wonder why is it that keep coming here to host their boards. Is it because this site is deader than dead, so they are somewhat insulated?
>>7355
when and where? there's been constant conversations of cabin boy but I've seen zero /pol/shit in the last days, so unless you have some real evidence your post just sounds like some weird gayop itself
Replies: >>7376
>>7351
>soycucks unironically believe they are capable of bullying kpoopers
just how delusional scrotes can get?
Maybe it's because I'm depressed currently, but I already feel tired of Witchan. I think I might be done with imageboards as a whole.
>>7363
The world is big and image boards are small. Go out and enjoy the world, matey.
>>7363
Same. I’ve realized I just don’t fit in with the crowd on WC, and that’s fine. I get it’s supposed to be more ~free~ than LC but I just don’t really want to chat with cabin boyfags because they gross me out, and I can’t really relate to the NEETS or tradcaths on there either. It’s ironic how little WC has to do with actual female witch culture. Since troons have colonized all the witchy threads on Reddit, I was hoping WC would be different. Somehow, I’ve been using LC more than WC again. I feel like there’s more good faith anons of WC, but there’s more varieties of women on LC. Maybe I’m just outgrowing ibs in general. I’ll keep checking WC from time to time. I’m not hoping for it to fail or anything.
Replies: >>7371 >>7372
>>7363
Honestly the recent cabin boy/anticabin boy bullshit has really seemed to bring a lot of undesireables out of the wood work and the infighting that it caused made me feel like I was on an lc 2.0. I still prefer wc overall because I'm so sick of lc outside of checking on some cows, but I'd be lying if I said that I'm totally happy with witchan currently. I feel like it's gotten a bit dull, though I don't exactly know how to remedy that.
Replies: >>7367 >>7369
>>7366
For me the genuine issue is that it doesn't offer anything new and I don't feel like Nimu fully understands ib culture. There are things she allows that aren't harmful in the surface but will eventually fester into worse problems if the website culture isn't established sooner rather than later.
Replies: >>7370
>>7366
It feels like the shöta discourse has already died out. Probably mateys had all that feeling pent up and it's all blown over by now.
>>7367
>There are things she allows that aren't harmful in the surface but will eventually fester into worse problems if the website culture isn't established sooner rather than later.
not disagreeing with you, but i'm curious to hear what specific examples you have in mind.
>>7365
>>7363
I feel completely the same as both of you. It's unfortunate but a few days ago I decided that I'm just checking out. I'm interested in seeing what happens to WC in a month but I'm not invested anymore in the community. LC's pros are that mods will deal with obvious undesirables sooner rather than later instead of hemming and hawing over it. And it's just more established as a board with a higher amount of users, so like you said, there will be more variety in the type of anons that post there.
>>7365
If you're specifically looking at witchcraft related threads, I think those threads on LC are actually quite good. In general, at least in my experience, the more "niche" and slow-paced threads on LC aren't usually full of baiters, but it does take several weeks for any sort of replies in them (and every so often someone decides to troll around in them).
>>7360
It was in the concerning characters you relate to thread on /b/ but the image got deleted last I checked
Replies: >>7377 >>7379
b8edcfd6dd79720249b61853c178e8dca5-surejan.rsquare.w400.webp
[Hide] (9.7KB, 254x254) Reverse
>>7376
>image got deleted but it was totally there you guys
Replies: >>7378
>>7377
To be fair, I do recall seeing a completely blank post with someone responding to it by saying 'why would you relate to Hitler' or something similar, but I paid it no mind since I though that sister was just making a joke about attributing an awful image to a blank post. I might be misremembering what the exact response was.
Replies: >>7380
>>7376
was it not just a blank message with no attachment? Image deleted messages show that the image was deleted. It seems more like they pressed enter too early. I think they were just joking about how terrible it was what the witch said when she said nothing
>>7378
I remember that too actually. That was way before the KF and shöta shit though.
Replies: >>7390
Screenshot_20260410-224556.jpg
[Hide] (689.9KB, 1080x1564) Reverse
The moids are going wild today
Replies: >>7382
>>7381
Can’t wait for his epic plan to inevitably fail and for him to quietly disappear in shame
>>7246
There is a cabin boy thread on yhh too, are you stupid?
Replies: >>7385 >>7402
>>7383
Obvious bait thread made by an outsider. True and honest privateers would never be cabin boylubbers.
Replies: >>7397
My problem with WC are neither the cabin boyfags nor the hazelschizo. I appreciate the "freedom of speech" going on and the fact that moralfags get shit on. What annoys me is the fact that,
>the word limit is too small, which discourages effortposting, thus why it's filled with "lul so random!" posts
>It's also filled with these threads because, as other pirates mentioned, threads hit bump limit and disappeae too fast. It''s annoying for people who aren't terminally online. Although the excuse is "embracing impermanence", it must be because...
>Nimu can't code for shit. Can't add dark theme or subscript/superscript. One CP spam or DDoS attack and this chan is done. Cloudflare won't save it.
>Nimu is also, contrary to what others said, extremely polite. If enough witches shit on her or tell her to do something, she will cave in and do it. She needs a backbone
posting.png
[Hide] (50.9KB, 466x556) Reverse
>>7380
No, it wasn't. It was 2 days ago. I managed to screenshot before the thread died. Shota complaint itt was 3 days ago, so it was at least a day after it all started. >>7211
f9df4658ff93f26a1834a35fbd6e653b6eadcefd338c591f5dc016df6260fc13.png
[Hide] (391.3KB, 437x453) Reverse
>>7388
>Samehag
Strange mateys onboard lately.
>>7389
>Nimu is also, contrary to what others said, extremely polite. If enough witches shit on her or tell her to do something, she will cave in and do it. She needs a backbone
It didn't used to be like that, people rightfully got angry for her for ignoring and not answering people's concerns when the idea of a nsfw board that allowed 3dpd was considered, so she mellowed out. I think theres a good middle ground somewhere.
Replies: >>7393 >>7395 >>7438
>>7389
>>Nimu can't code for shit. Can't add dark theme or subscript/superscript. One CP spam or DDoS attack and this chan is done. Cloudflare won't save it.
This is how I felt about the place too. With a bit of luck perhaps the place will pick up enough momentum and positive interest to attract someone who knows what they're doing AND is trustworthy enough to be brought on as a staff member. Someone out there has to be willing and able to add a CSS skin to vichan, surely?
:chiyozen:

>>7392
She's always seemed like she has the right sort of personality for an ib admin in my mind. My biggest concern is her getting bored, taking her ball, and going home.
going on lc after mainly using wc for so long is so jarring in how dogshit it is in comparison. endless redtexts everywhere too. even the cow threads i liked are going dry again, yawn
Replies: >>7410
>>7392
Gather 'round, cus I've got a tale to tell ya, lassy.
When I was a young pirate I decided to open a port on my router and run a web server using Apache. I didn't create an imageboard, but my own site from scratch and I allowed image uploads. Some days later, about 3, it was DDoS'd and all sorts of fucked up crap was on my PC. It wasn't an organized campaign, it's not like I advertised this site anywhere at all, there are some script kiddies who scan for open ports for the fun of it. Yes, Witchan is protected by Cloudflare (but her IP address can still be found if you know how to look for it), but that just prevents bots, if the 'chan gets posted on the sharty or 4chan or CC again, it will get raided manually. Nimu hasn't even banned VPNs. They'll keep comin' back. Not to mention how the whole impermanence thing will just make it so that the normal threads will disappear off the catalog but what will get posted on the raid will stay.
I have only seen her reaction to the Hazelschizo, but since you mentioned this I went on /meta/ and saw the discussion about the 3d NSFW. It's indeed true that she was very cocky about an obviously bad idea. If it was allowed, she'd got to moderate what gets posted 24/7 or hire jannies, she can't rely only on it being reported fast enough. And even then there's the question about whether X or Y person in that photo is actually below 18 or if it's revenge porn.
Replies: >>7397 >>7411 >>7418
>>7385
exactly. it only showed up in these waters after the witchy scoundrels started complaining about it plaguing their crew 
>>7395
>if the 'chan gets posted on the sharty or 4chan or CC again, it will get raided manually. 
aye, reading the aforementioned raidlore in the shartypedia (>>7351) , it's quite evident that they'll raid whatever board they can find and don't mind ruining a board just for fun, even if it's a dead one with hardly any posters like comfy was.
Replies: >>7427
>>7383
Why would I care about YHH? I just come here for the bunker thread.
Replies: >>7404 >>7427
93693f90af0273fb2e19dcbca7c2b9edbc3597c72302cd23b8038be5e706925e.jpg
[Hide] (502.8KB, 750x742) Reverse
>>7402
Replies: >>7405
>>7404
This board is pretty much dead besides this thread, matey.
Replies: >>7406 >>7407 >>7408
>>7405
Walk the plank! We don't want no traitors here!
Replies: >>7409
>>7405
Hey now I post in other threads regularly and so do a few other mateys
Replies: >>7409
>>7405
I try matey, okay? I can't help that I'm really fucking boring. :chiyocry:
>>7406
If you say so, landlubber scum.
>>7407
It’s still pretty slow.
>>7394
LC was ruined by the hyperfixation on feminism. It’s all they ever talk about. It gets old.
>>7395
Yeah, it takes less than 45 minutes for an individual to scan every IPv4 address if they know what they’re looking for. Ports 80 and 443 open on residential IPs are especially juicy to certain types.
>And even then there's the question about whether X or Y person in that photo is actually below 18 or if it's revenge porn.
One of my biggest hang-ups with allowing 3DPD, at it seems like so many posters and site owners either don’t know or don’t care. How am I gonna know if someone’s posting their ex or not, or posting their partner without their knowledge? I’d rather avoid it entirely than incessantly moderate it.
Fine post, thank you for sharing.
Replies: >>7418
Spoiler File
(308.7KB, 1080x676) Reverse
stare.jpeg
[Hide] (49.7KB, 400x594) Reverse
What in the fuck did I just read.
>>7412
what series of life events would lead to the mentality that would drive a sister to write this out?
Replies: >>7414
>>7413
being really high, apparently
Replies: >>7415
>>7414
okay, that makes sense. I hope she gets sober and has a normal relationship with her nigel without sexual stuffie assault.
>>7412
Some people really need to just get a diary.
07221d2789017b4a782594bc903760b5.jpeg
[Hide] (159.2KB, 1200x806) Reverse
>>7389
I agree with most of it. The pitiful limits Nimu established are more suitable for Twitter than for an IB. And having an incompetent higher-up is never a good thing anywhere.
That last point, though... I think having a chill admin is much better than having one with a stick up her ass. I know that as the site gets more popular she will be forced to be more liberal with bans (the mental state of jannies always marches towards clinical insanity) but I'd prefer that she kept her laisser faire attitude for as long as we can get away with it.

>>7395
Is that how grim things are on the clearnet? I have had a website for almost 4 years now, it has a contact form for anyone to talk to me without needing to rely on email or social media or anything else, with no captcha and no filetype restriction and a filesize limit of 4GB. It was only ever "attacked" twice when I triggered my obsessed schizostalker a bit too much, but even then it was only a minor annoyance because he is mentally challenged. It might be because I host exclusively through Tor, so I won't be randomly hit by these dragnet attacks by script kiddies.
By the way, were your image uploads public? Another reason there is no incentive to try to abuse it is because my file uploads are for my eyes only, so whatever effort is put into spamming it will only affect me (and even then, I was never sent anything too unsavory, despite what people say about darknets) while attacking a public host would affect everyone who visits it.

>>7411
Personally, if I was admin I'd forbid 3DPD purely on the grounds that 3DP r D. That it'd spare me from a huge pain in the neck is just a bonus.
>>7412
Witchan is so clearly being used by gay guys
Replies: >>7425
>>7419
what about that post makes you think its a gay guy? women can fantasize about degen shit too
>>7397
>it only showed up in these waters after the witchy scoundrels started complaining about it plaguing their crew 
That was the same person that was Cielposting on wc.
>>7402
Have some respect, ye bilgewater scoundrel. There's most loyal crew on this vessel still.
>>7412
I made that post. I was really high. I'm not a gay man, just mentally ill. My relationship is mostly normal. Sorry for being weird.
Replies: >>7431
>>7430
Based tbh. Thanks for sharing matey, I knew a gay man didn't write what you wrote the moment I read it.
>>7389
>>7392
>Nimu's too polite
>Nimu used to be too rude
There's no winning with you folks
Replies: >>7439
>>7438
She's also too overt and tempestuous.
Replies: >>7440 >>7441
>>7439
tempestuousness on my witch board? Hang, boil, that thing with the horse her now! 
Also being overt is something I don't like. Light stabbing for that.
>>7439
What's next, you don't like her haircut?
Replies: >>7442 >>7443
>>7441
It isn't a great haircut
Replies: >>7443
>>7441
Left-handed. Scorpio. Ginger. Not a great look.
>>7442
True...
i think people like being negative until the realise how good they have it. nimu is a 7.5/10 board owner and her lacking areas are mostly skill. but i really cannot imagine even berating her for that when she was the only one that sucked it up and actually created an ib when everyone else was just complaining about wanting a new one. it would be nice if some super-skilled coder was the one to take up that idea but i’m not complaining and i’ll gladly take an admin with a decent personality and isn’t terrible at it.

my biggest concern is yeah the defence of the website, it would be good to hire some mods at some point too. i haven’t checked /meta/ in a while, are there still plans for more boards?
Replies: >>7445
>>7444
>are there still plans for more boards?
Yes, Nimu has very recently said that another board is being planned.
Did she take the website down for a bit because of the potential soyjack raid?
Replies: >>7448
Is WC kill?
Replies: >>7449
>>7446
i think so, she's probably implementing that VPN ban.
Replies: >>7458
>>7447
Pirates killed WC...
>>7450
Anon, you should probably communicate these issues to nimu herself. And I do believe it was a few weeks at the beginning before nimu set up cloudflare.
Replies: >>7456
>>7453
nimu@witchan.org
>>7452
Yup, she also failed to take basic privacy measures. You could view the full domain registration info until maybe a few weeks after people started using the site.
Replies: >>7457 >>7525
>>7456
Like she didn't be ok
Replies: >>7459
>>7448
I really hope not. VPN ban did pretty much nothing to get rid of baiting, scrotes and infighting on LC, it just took away a degree of normal user's privacy.
>>7457
What?
I don't think the soyjak post had any impact, the thread only has 3 replies.
Replies: >>7461 >>7462
>>7460
those threads last for days, you'll have to give them some time to come home from school
>>7460
yeah i was the one who posted the screencap and the thread wasnt very popular, but the threads on there last a long time and it definitely will bring atleast a little bit of shitty traffic in
>>7450
>Also, I'm not American so idk the law there, I assume it has to be similar.
Please learn about Section 230 before you write out paragraphs about legal implications of hosting an ib.

I’m a cshag and have wondered if I should volunteer my services. Not sure how open nimu is to help though and I am not interested in being a mod or an admin of an ib.
Replies: >>7547
Witchan is kill so ahoy mateys!
Replies: >>7465 >>7472
>>7464
It's gonna be back soon right? 😥
Replies: >>7466 >>7467 >>7472
>>7465
She's implementing a VPN ban.
>>7465
It'll probably be back up by tomorrow. At least I found this place.
>>7466
:(
>>7466
I hope she allows TOR atleast
>>7466
???
Can't she do that with cloudflare? I think there's literally a button for that.
Any red boards on WC should be 2D only first and foremost if she adds that
Replies: >>7472
>>7466
Ugh, please be lying. That'd suck so badly.
Replies: >>7473 >>7475
>>7470
Big agree
>>7464
>>7465
I'm sure it's fine mateys
>>7471
VPN ban did nothing for LC. But Hazelscizo was insane so there's that.
Replies: >>7474
>>7473
Hazelschizo probably wasn't even using a VPN tbh
>>7471
She already posted that's what she's doing in the LC Smallweb thread.
Replies: >>7492
I was going to post my daily drawing, but neverfuckingmind I guess. I'll just sleep off this sharty raid, I doubt those brainrotten kids will have the attention span to focus on WC for more than one weekend anyway.

But keep posting new developments here, I wanna see how the situation develops.
Replies: >>7478
Either way, impermanence baby! I still have access to all my favorite nonitas
>>7476
The site is too tiny and slow for them to even pay sustained attention. 
IMO a temporary VPN ban when shit like this happens would make more sense than a full-on ban on VPNs.
Replies: >>7482
Huh, I checked lc to read nimu’s commentary and saw someone adopted my spergatory concept from wc. That’s wholesome, I’m glad they’re having fun.
Posts on here go through so fast, it's a little freaky.
Replies: >>7483
Damn I actually went outside for once and when I came back wc was kil. I had no idea I was such an integral part of the community that without me it would just disappear...
Replies: >>7506
>>7478
It likely will be temporary, impermanence babyyyyyyyy
>>7480
Like do you mean in that they posts themselves appear quickly after you hit post?
Replies: >>7484
>>7483
Basically. I think my phone doesn't like wc kek.
Replies: >>7486
Cool, so now I can't use witchan because my country doesn't allow access to anything without a VPN. The ugly girl thread wasn't even that baity. I don't understand why other stuff is ok, but one person baiting means others who didn't do anything have to suffer the consequences. Sucks because I really liked that website, I'm actually sad.
>>7484
I think the vichan backend is genuinely slower but I don't know cause I'm not a fuckin neeeerd
>>7485
Wait you're telling me the tipping point for the vpn ban was people posting animu boys on a shitty bait thread?
Replies: >>7488 >>7491 >>7492
>>7487
I thought it was because the site was posted or found and this is preventative so we don't get raided.
Did she actually confirm that she is implementing a VPN ban right now, or are we jumping to conclusions?
Replies: >>7492 >>7493
I don't think it's worth getting ourselves all in a twist, the VPN ban will likely be temporary, anyone who is planning on raiding will definitely lose interest, other imageboards have been through worse. We're all good.
Also, while I'm at it, using strawpoll to cast votes is fucking retarded because that's the one thing that can be botted easily, and I suspect that's what happened when time limit vs thread limit poll was up, since time limit was winning by majority until  it was about to close, then suddenly it was almost a tie and won by 1 vote.
>>7487
I don't think it was the animu boys, but she linked the ugly girl thread as an example of a bait thread from a country that she doesn't know like Luxembourg.
Replies: >>7517
>>7485
I'm sure that like with LC if you email nimu she'll make an exception for you

>>7487
No, it was the site being posted on the sharty about 9 hours ago

>>7489
Yes, on the lc smallweb thread it was mentioned here
already  >>7475
Replies: >>7497
Capture+_2026-04-11-14-38-10.png
[Hide] (83.2KB, 1361x344) Reverse
>>7489
Replies: >>7495 >>7504
The pretty girls thread was an example. Nimu said oftentimes threads like that were posted by VPNs which opened the conversation on a VPN ban. I think the consensus was largely if there was any ban, then it should be temporary until recent events blow over
>>7493
>I'm sure that like with LC if you email nimu she'll make an exception for you
I think it won't work because even if the location you pick is the same, the ip is gonna change
Replies: >>7497
There are movies been shown in the moovie room right now, and the hagazine room is available for any mateys who want to hang out.
>>7495
meant for >>7492 sorry
FzZ58sUWcAEBr1G.jpg
[Hide] (8.6KB, 234x182) Reverse
>>7485
You're not alone, nonna. I really hope this isn't going to be a final/permanent thing. I've really been enjoying my time on WC.
Replies: >>7500
wait what’s going on? what ugly girl thread? or did sharty actually raid?
Replies: >>7503
>>7498
It's permanent
Replies: >>7508 >>7516
I feel like, given the relatively low traffic the site gets, it wouldn’t be too hard to implement some basic moderation by asking
>Was this thread made in good faith?
and going from there. If the pretty girls thread was posted unprompted and I saw it was from a vpn then it’s pretty obvious to me it wasn’t and it wouldn’t be unreasonable to ban that user. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ the site is so slow that that approach would solve 90% of the problems I bet
Replies: >>7508
Finally, I now have a reason to quit imageboards for good. Will still probably attend the hagazine and moovie rooms though.
>>7499
Someone posted a "I hate pretty girls" thread, which was posted on a VPN. Also the Hazel poster thing happening at the same time, her being talked about by a big YouTuber. I think this is mostly preventative, I was using the site not fifteen minutes before it was taken offline and everything seemed fine.
>>7493
I don't know everything about VPNs or IPs, but won't this just happen?
>be 16 year old soyjak party user who lives in a large city in a first world country
>go to raid WC
>VPNs are banned
>don't care, post with your real IP
>get banned
>don't care, reset your router
>rinse and repeat
>since it's not feasible to range-ban an entire city or a large country, you can just keep doing this again and again (and your other friends from soyjak party will join in, so you have power in numbers)
>>7504
Yeah, they're gonna shit up the website by their sheer quantity anyway
>>7481
KEK are you me? i literally just got back from birdwatching (there were no birds, sad!) and got jumpscared by the server error screen. now to catch up on what's been said here...
It's back up
>>7501
I agree, though I'm more than willing to let Nimu figure these things out herself. I don't think this is all that serious. 
>>7500
Very unlikely, don't know why you're saying that. 
>>7504
The site is so small and slow, they're unlikely to dedicate much time, what would it accomplish? Slightly inconveniencing less than 10 women at a time?
so soyjack raid is happening because of the cabin boyhag thread, who would have guessed
>>7509
Can you not read? There is all this discussion above you but you still say something false.
Replies: >>7513 >>7515
>>7509
Hate to say it, but I can't really blame them for wanting to raid it over that. I'm sure they'd still do it regardless, though.
Replies: >>7523 >>7526
>>7509
hm, yeah im probably gonna stop posting in them even as a cabin boyhag. not worth it. i was able to find the  jeffhags account quite easily and I worry for her.
Replies: >>7552
>>7509
To be fair it would happen even if cabin boy was banned, as it does on LC, they'd find an excuse. However this probably put a much larger target on wc's back and it gives them a really good reason to raid often

>>7510
The anon is right, if you look at the soyjak thread this is their reason for wanting to raid
>>7504
Yeah and they also have their own tools that use stolen home IPs
>>7510
there's literally a screenshot on the meta thread, how is this false? "this site is full of sh*** porn", can YOU read?
>>7500
Can you post any evidence of that, or if you're Nimu yourself, could you just say "I don't care, fuck you all" or something?
>>7491
>time limit was winning by majority until  it was about to close, then suddenly it was almost a tie and won by 1 vote
i wanted to bring this up so bad but i didnt want to be labelled a schizo kek, i'm really glad someone else noticed this. there being a sudden influx of thread limit votes at the very end was so suspicious, i really doubt a sizable majority of witches who preferred thread limit waited until the eleventh hour to vote and newhags wouldn't have known wtf a thread limit was.
Replies: >>7518 >>7564
>>7517
It was really obvious it was being botted
b6a49793cc742ab128c56c900db39995023ac74d89c1dae413ad586829b54943.jpg
[Hide] (36.6KB, 461x315) Reverse
They're there now
Replies: >>7524
IMG_2118.jpeg
[Hide] (177.3KB, 1125x784) Reverse
Nimu……………
Replies: >>7521 >>7547
>>7520
i'm confused, how would she get doxxed, i thought the domain holder  hides all that personal info
Replies: >>7522 >>7525
>>7521
Depends, you can see who bought the domain depending on who she bought it from and if she used a third party.
>>7511
There's a non-zero chance one of the anti-cabin boy anons may have posted it there as a last ditch effort to force Nimu into banning cabin boy/loli content as a matter of site safety (and her own safety, if doxxing is on the table, and Soyjak Party users love trying to doxx people). The only other real avenue by which a soyjak party user could've found it and known it was even a "foid" site (gross term) is through seeing it discussed on LC or KF enough.
Replies: >>7526 >>7529 >>7533
>>7519
Someone actually told me that the Hazel schizo nonsense couldn't possibly bring in retards and I was doomposting for no reason.
Replies: >>7539
>>7521
See >>7456
>>7511
sure, but the interest in raiding would be a lot more subdued without the cabin boyfag thread. i'm not sure i'm willing to die on the hill of preserving lolisho shit, as the other matey said that's just putting a big target on our backs for no reason. 
>>7523
my bet is that they found it on cc, it never should have been posted in that hellhole
Replies: >>7529
I'm getting 403 pages. I hope WC survives. I liked posting my art on there.
Replies: >>7528
>>7527
Are you using a VPN?
Replies: >>7531
>>7523
I seriously doubt that a soyjak that naturally found it, it was posted in one yume thread in kiwifarms that I haven't seen any soy read, especially considering they are notorious for not reading and just spamming their KF thread. I haven't seen soyjakkers take any interest 
>>7526
Fuck I forgot about CC, thats where hazelshizo found it too, that's /r9k/ and /soy/ general
wtf is a cabin boy
Replies: >>7532
>>7528
I'm retarded thanks
>>7530
Shőta.
>>7523
no one cares about pedohags that much, they're the ones coming to the anti thread and seething about blowjobs
Replies: >>7540
IMG_0111.jpeg
[Hide] (55.3KB, 315x507) Reverse
Nimu get a fucking janny that isn’t you. When I was on a no name virtual pet website with ~50 users we had four mods to keep the peace. This is ridiculous. Temporarily banning VPNs is fine but you need actual changes in how the site is managed for this to have any positive impact, otherwise the VPN ban will do shit all.
Replies: >>7546
she should just take the website down for a week or so and they will get bored
Replies: >>7536
>>7535
How to kill your userbase 101
Replies: >>7537 >>7538
>>7536
kek the witch to pirate pipeline
>>7536
yeah you're right it's better to get spammed with gore and child porn so the only users staying are people who are okay with gore and child porn
>>7524
To be honest, though, no mainstream news outlet or social media account ever directly connected the Hazel poster to WC. Only people on LC talked about it, and it only really became clear it was her when she identified herself venting about her own actions. To be completely honest, we don't even really know for sure that was the same person, and not someone LARPing as her because she's their personal cow and they thought it'd be funny, or another waifufag schizo who got paranoid about being spotted and tried to pin their own thoughts/posts on another person. 
This is why we gatekeep. I kind of wish no one posted about the whole thing on LC (here would've been fine) so we could've just fucking memory-holed it.
Replies: >>7542 >>7569
>>7533
Anon, anyone who has been on LC knows cabin boy is the topic that brings all the schizos from both ends out of the woodwork. We had an incident in the fujo infight thread of a disgruntled anon linking LC to the sharty to incite a raid, none of the soyteens cared enough to take her invitation tho kek.
Replies: >>7541 >>7543 >>7544
>>7540
This is why the subject is better off never being brought up at all. I knew the site was going to get shit up by this. Sorry to say but I feel a little vindicated right now.
>>7539
who would larp as some random schizo that wasn't even present on 4chan since 2024
Replies: >>7545
>>7540
NTA but this, I don't care for cabin boy but the amount of shitflinging and shizos it brings would make it be a banned topic if I had a website.
>>7540
Sorry, I'm going to clarify, I'm saying that it's more likely that someone that saw WC on kiwifarms saw cabin boys being posted and went to sharty, because both websites notoriously hate this content, than a hag from the anti-thread doing that.
Replies: >>7551
>>7542
The other schizos from the 4chan threads she used to hang out in, especially if there's shit like Discord drama or drawfagging involved. The screenshots I saw of her posts included her being pissy at someone who liked the male character and then her arguing over fan art or something. I wouldn't be surprised if petty slapfights happened and someone would have a lasting vendetta.
>>7534
why are you saying this on here kek
Replies: >>7548 >>7549
>>7463
>I’m a cshag and have wondered if I should volunteer my services.
Looks like she's open to your help >>7520
Replies: >>7570
>>7546
I KNOW she's here... nayrt
Replies: >>7556
>>7546
Because I have given this advice before and she ignored it.
Replies: >>7550
>>7549
have you tried emailing her? maybe she feels pressured when it's on the board itself
>>7544
>hates cabin boy content
>yet raids with CSAM
I don't understand these people.
Replies: >>7553 >>7555
>>7512
>i was able to find the  jeffhags account quite easily 
Wow yeah she was actually really easy to find kek. I thought ib users practiced a bit of opsec but she literally linked an image of what her pfp is on baraa ag.
Replies: >>7554 >>7560 >>7561
>>7551
did they?
Replies: >>7643
>>7552
to be fair, even amongst the cabin boyhags she was the only one who posted images. she seems a little autistic
Replies: >>7557
>>7551
It's not that complicated when you see through the facade.
Side A:
* they like ruining things, but doing it for no reason feels kinda evil
* cartoon kids are only 1 degree removed from something most people consider objectively evil
* a site where people post cartoon kids given them a moral excuse to ruin it
Side B:
* to ruin a site, you need to either drive the userbase out or get it taken offline
* CSAM is something that horrifies people and is grounds for the feds/host to take a site offline
* this makes CSAM the perfect weapon to attack a site with

When something seems mind-blowingly contradictory like this, you should consider that you may be looking at layers of bullshit covering the truth underneath.
>>7548
If the VPN ban truly is permanent, then she might as well ban cabin boy discussion permanently too, since that's what's making them want to raid in the first place. I feel like banning VPNs is ineffective because it just means they'll do >>7504 and steal "non-VPN" IPs if they want to spam gore or CSAM (while real users who rely on VPNs get screwed over).
Replies: >>7559
>>7554
Oh yeah she herself admits that she's autistic and you can just tell by her choice of character fixation that there's something going on there (Earthbound, Simpsons, some random PPG side character, Hazbin Hotel, etc.)
I won't yuck her yum too much because it's not a battle I care to fight, she can do as she pleases, but it is certainly disturbing to look through the stuff she reposts. I wish her the best though because she seems nice enough so I hope nothing bad comes of this.
Replies: >>7558
>>7557
Since nimu nuked the thread I'm guessing Jeffhag will be okay.
>>7556
WC would just turn into LC then
>>7552
>baraarg 
Ok nuke the cabin boyhags now
>>7552
i dont think she was trying to hide her account tbh
Replies: >>7562
>>7561
I mean yeah but she probably didnt predict bald men with glasses would raid over her thread
>>7485
Nimu mentioned making exceptions to some IPs, you probably have to email her about it
>>7517
tbf i did vote late too, i remember it happening. i just think opinions changed - at the start the thread was very pro- time limit but we had a bunch of long posts on the day it was closing about why we think it would be shit.

do you dislike the choice?
>>7539
I think that's unlikely because she was posting on wc before shit blew up with her harassing the VA, the timing is too coincidental
>>7547
Ayart, I’ll consider it. I don’t have enough time right now to do much but I wouldn’t hate being nimu’s code monkey and implement features that are out of her skillset. I’m not terribly versed in security but probably know more than the average script kiddie. 

Of course this would mean nimu would have to trust me with her code and assume whatever I am sending her isn’t malicious. That’s not my objective and I genuinely want to see the site prosper, but she should be aware of bad actors or other malfeasants offering their services with less honorable intentions. I wonder how she will select jannies given the temporal nature of the site and limited post history.
some idiot namedropped wc on a bait and infight central thread, is that reportable (so farmhands can censor the name since iirc i've seen them do that before) or do we just have to live with it?
>>7571
Report it, they’ve censored the name before when it was shared and linked
Replies: >>7577
>>7571
i've seen them delete mentions of wc so probably
Replies: >>7577
>>7571
Which thread?
Replies: >>7577
>>7571
You can always report links to wc and yhh for advertising. Usually they get deleted.
Replies: >>7577
>>7575
fandom discourse
>>7573
>>7574
>>7576
done! thanks for the info
Replies: >>7578 >>7582 >>7601
>>7577
Looks like it was named in the smallweb thread too, though it’s behind a spoiler
>>7577
I reported it too.
>>7577
>fandom discourse
Ok someone is deliberately trying to shit up witchan now, first the sharty post and now fandom discourse?
Replies: >>7615 >>7638
>>7601
i cant tell if the lc posts smearing wc are trying to subtly dissuade newfags from using it (like what people would do for jc) or actually just some psycho lc users who hate wc and want it to die?
>>7601
There’s been a poster who’s been namedropping WC on CC and other IBs, even HK, since early on. Everyone suspected it was the person trolling about ICE since she would go on LC to complain about the userbase being quirky chunguses before namedropping.
Replies: >>8257
>>7553
No.
Hazelhag is back at WC
Replies: >>7645 >>7647
>>7644
No fucking way. Which thread?
Replies: >>7646
>>7645
The one about Penguinz0 making a video about her e-mail.
>>7644
Allegedly it’s her, but I’m not convinced.
Replies: >>7650
>>7647
I don’t think Hazel schizo is smart enough to figure out how to use VPNs. Didn’t her grammar suck too?
Replies: >>7651
>>7650
Her grammar was fine
71r9MrcZFqL.jpg
[Hide] (135KB, 1600x1600) Reverse
Witches are already using a possible raid on WC as a way to make threads they dislike get deleted on the freeze peach board. We told Nimu since day 1 to get moderators and jannies to clean the board, it's that simple, males shouldn't have control over what should or should not be allowed to be discussed in a female imageboard
Replies: >>7675 >>7676
>>7673
Chilling effect and all that. Would be cool if we could also have a supremely spergophrenic admin capable of building her how infrastructure so the site remains operational no matter how many enemies try to take it down.
>>7673
I thought deleting the cabin boy thread was temporary? But I wouldn’t be surprised if slowly things start getting banned like lc did.
Replies: >>7677 >>7678
>>7676
Free speech IBs for women aren't allowed because they either get raided by men (WC, Ashera's Garden) or women want to censor other women (LC).
Replies: >>7680
>>7676
Yeah, I don't think Nimu said shoota was banned permanently. That one thread was already fated for deletion.
Replies: >>7679
>>7678
Jeffhag made another cabin boy thread which was deleted. I don't know if she deleted it herself after getting comments to wait or if Nimu did.
>>7677
The sharty has raided /jp/, /b/, /v/, /lgbt/, /adv/, anon.cafe, endchan, Reddit, random streams, Wikipedia, dead imageboards and textboards, Discord servers... Female only IBs often get the short end of the stick but it's not like they're the only ones. Many of these raids failed because jannies were there on time to take care of it, banned certain IPs and VPNs (and if they posted CP, the jannies emailed some authority that so-and-so IP posted CP on specific time and date and then their ISPs will look into it), had backups of the site, implemented captchas (I have to applaud the sharty's captcha system because it's completely incomprehensible to those who aren't familiar with the culture), image recognition software that won't post NSFW images or will have them pending for manual approval. Or they failed plainly because they announced "let's raid X!" and X learned about it and took preventative measures. 
The thing about those script kiddies (because that's what they are, they're all under 18 and when sharty added the rule "only users over 18 can post here" they malded and made a fuss) is that they're actually very stupid and they're only pretending to be LE EPIC L33T HAXXORS. There are a few who are actually skilled with technology, while the rest just vibe code a front end of an existing service, use tools to track people that are on their Wiki or pastebin dumps, or wait for someone else to do the hard work while they post soyjaks where they depict themselves as a God and their opponent as a frail little thing. If you shoot an email to their mommies/daddies and tell them their son does x or y thing on the internet, they'll stop.
They also tried to dox people and failed, only some lolcows got doxxed because they didn't practice decent OPSEC. And that often just means not posting pictures of where you are, using a VPN and, not liking social medias to your irl accounts, not oversharing or at least lying when oversharing, using multiple emails and different passwords. There's a huge problem with how little privacy Americans have online, because all OSINT sites I found only work for Anglos, governments of other countries try to obscure information of their citizens online, but that's another topic.
I dealt with these kinds of people excessively. Even on breachforums, because a website I had signed up for was in a databreach. Every post is hidden until you reply to it or give the administrators money. So you have pages upon pages of "thank you so much"s on each post by teenagers who couldn't give less of a fuck. Why are they even here? Do they know? These people are unfulfilled, empty. Edgy, annoying, trying to show their own self that they're strong and in control and smart, making fun of gays and women and pedos and troons and people of different ethnicities and religions... And they're empty.
The thing is that lots of women are unconfident. They are not confident about how to moderate an imageboard, they are not confident because they don't know how to code, they see all those struggles up ahead with men hating them and other women hating them and they're discouraged, or they simply don't have enough time in their lives to be a moderator because they have actual important shit to do. It's a job that no one pays you for, they think "why do it?". Decision-making might feel more mentally taxing, but that's because they're thoughtfully weighing the consequences and seeing myltiple sides, while those kiddies and some grown men act impulsively, think overly positively, don't evaluate risk/rewaward or make decisions based on insecurity and fear and anger and their ego. It's not that others are smarter or stronger, their approach is no better than asking a magic 8-ball. Trust me, most of these men are overconfident, they can't code for shit, they are just huge leeches. While many women have imposter syndrome when they're leeches. But you don't have to: https://start.me/p/b5Aow7/asint_collection

The thing about other women moralfagging is indeed an issue. For that, I would love to hear solutions from others. The containment threads seemed like a good idea to me.
Replies: >>7682 >>7684 >>7690
>>7680
>The thing about other women moralfagging is indeed an issue. For that, I would love to hear solutions from others. The containment threads seemed like a good idea to me.

I agree with this, even though I prefer stricter rules over less between the two. In a perfect world of would prefer freely discussion things, but modern internet has shown that's no longer an option. The modern internet user cannot function without guard rails. They see things they dislike and can't ignore it, they see something that offends them and it needs to be destroyed, they disagree with an opinion and it's a moral dilemma. The modern internet population does not understand that moral absolutes are rare, topics have nuance, and culture is wildly varied. Because of all this, you literally cannot grow a space where people can talk about their interests with civility. Things will start out peaceful but even the good intentioned no longer know not to feed the troll because they think that ignoring it is compliance. 
How do we fix an entire populace? How do you undo generations?
My ideal ib would be little to no rules but it just isn't possible now. Not for a growing, populated, long term one anyway.

Please excuse the typos, I'm typing on a phone. I remember when phone posting was looked down on. It's pretty normal now isn't it?
Replies: >>7710
>>7680
If the sharty are a bunch of stupid teens, how did they hack 4chan a year ago?
Replies: >>7685 >>7686 >>7693
>>7684
Their servers hadn't been updated in over a decade. Moot bought really old servers and never updated them, Hiro never updated them, and script kiddies used ancient exploits that were known and never treated.
Replies: >>7687
>>7684
ntayrt but there's a section in the post answering your question
>There are a few who are actually skilled with technology, while the rest just vibe code a front end of an existing service, use tools to track people that are on their Wiki or pastebin dumps, or wait for someone else to do the hard work while they post soyjaks where they depict themselves as a God and their opponent as a frail little thing. If you shoot an email to their mommies/daddies and tell them their son does x or y thing on the internet, they'll stop.

That aside, 4chan was using some really outdated tech that made it really vulnerable. It was only a matter of time someone did it
Replies: >>7687
>>7685
>>7686
You think Witchan is vulnerable? Especially since Nimu doesn't know anything about software.
Replies: >>7688 >>7689 >>7693
>>7687
I’m not an expert but I think wc is more secure because it has cloud fare and uses updated software. I could be completely wrong though.
Replies: >>7689
>>7687
I would disagree with >>7688 this anon. 4chan does use cloudflare and it can only stop so much. Sites with full security teams and cloudflare still get hacked all the time. Nimu needs someone with more knowledge on her side to keep the site secure. The fact she doesn't code and has basically no knowledge on the subject does not instill confidence. Not saying to be paranoid, but be careful of the info you share.
Replies: >>7694
>>7680
Very well put reply
d6f6554d2fccf1cd2a5274125c250768fecb074b8e8c5e6eda7deea70727a43a.PNG
[Hide] (326.9KB, 897x475) Reverse
Is CC no longer rudderless? :chiyolook: I feel like she's been absent for a very long time.
Replies: >>7697 >>7722
exploits_of_a_mom.png
[Hide] (31.2KB, 666x205) Reverse
>>7684
Exactly. It was one person who exploited a vulnerability while the script kiddies praised him. Also the actual hackers are referred to as SoyGODs by the users of sharty. Here's what happened: some boards allowed uploading PDF files, but the site never checked if the PDF file was an actual PDF file. Once a PDF file was uploaded it was passed to a version of Ghostscript from 2012 which would generate a thumbnail. So the attacker found an exploit where uploading a PDF with the right PostScript commands could give the attacker shell access. This is such an old and well-known trick, even Adobe warns that PDFs can contain viruses or other malicious elements: https://www.adobe.com/acrobat/resources/can-pdfs-contain-viruses.html
And it reminds me of picrel.

>>7687
Yes. But Nimu has been informed, the 'teens don't know about them and she will correct them.
>>7689
>Sites with full security teams and cloudflare still get hacked all the time. 
Most people don't waste their time on literal-whos. They want money for their time and effort. They'll get job offers from the CIA, Microsoft, Google or become bug bounty hunters. They don't give a fuck about WC, LC or any other female-only IB. 4chan, in the meantime, is a big deal and is regularly investigated by federal agents. Moot created /pol/ after his meeting with Epstein. Whoever did that probably had political motivations. If he just did it for the fun of it... he's one in a million. 
95% of the people you'll encounter are wannabes who they can't actually harm you nor your site. You will understand their mindset by lurking "Le Dark Web".
4.9% will manipulate people in order to give them valuable information. The sites with full security teams probably had a spy among them. You will understand their mindset by lurking r/SocialEngineering/ Relevant:
>In a real takeover, 50% of the hacking is physical. A bunch of you have to go and get jobs at the company. You need to get the information but you don't want to let them on to what you're doing. 
0.1% are the actual hackers. You will understand their mindset by reading Cyberia by Douglas Rushkoff. It was published in 1994 and holds true to this day. It has some information about the other two groups I mentioned.
Replies: >>7704
>>7691
She's back? I'd be interested in using CC again if she actually starts cleaning it up. I don't typically go there because I'm worried about seeing CP. If anyone notices an improvement, can they share in this thread?
>>7504
I have an idea:
Nimu should make a pinned thread on /meta/. If you use a VPN and want to regain the ability to post, you should post in this thread, and this thread should be excempt from VPN block, with a brief explanation on why you wanna post. Then SET A PASSWORD IN THE PASSWORD FIELD when you make the post. If approved, this password will be whitelisted and allow you to bypass the VPN block when used elsewhere on the site in the password field. The /meta/ thread is locked so someone should suggest this to her.
Replies: >>7699
>>7698
A witch mentioned she sent an email to nimu and got her vpn exempted from the block.
Replies: >>7700
>>7699
Does she have her own self hosted VPN? If yes, ok. If she got her IP excempt from the ban and she uses something like ProtonVPN, she will eventually get assigned a different IP. If the WHOLE VPN is exempt from the ban, then what if a raider happens to use the same VPN and they are also excempt?
Replies: >>7701
>>7700
I agree, it is a bit worrying if you can't keep the same IP every time. I like your idea, assuming it's possible.
Replies: >>7702
>>7701
It has been done on 2 other imageboards I've seen. However neither use vichan, they have a different software package, yet it shouldn't be hard to implement
>>7694
I agree with everything you said. My point isn't that legit hackers care about literal who's, my point was that cloudflare means little to nothing. 
>Most people don't waste their time on literal-whos. They want money for their time and effort.
This is the reason there's probably never going to be a legit hack on any of these sites, but this doesn't mean that were "secure". The ones who can actually hack basically do it for a living. But the exploits will get found and shared, script kiddies will do what they do, shit happens and we can't depend on us being small time for it to not happen.
Also thanks for the book rec, I love nonfiction. I'll check it out.
>>7682
unfortunately i am a moralfagger. surely in a free speech space that’s allowed?
Replies: >>7714
IMG_2129.jpeg
[Hide] (251.5KB, 1125x1845) Reverse
From the discussion in this thread, it seems that where nimu lacks in technical skills there are sisters who can pick up the pieces. It makes me optimistic that through some means the site will remain up and functional. Maybe the real cerbmin was wc and its user base all along…

Also, does nimu really use squarespace as a host? She should look into an alternative host if she wants to continue running wc.
Replies: >>7712
>>7711
no, squarespace is not a host, its the domain registrar. witchan is hosted elsewhere. regardless, I recommend she look into hosting with NearlyFreeSpeech.
Does anyone know why WC is down rn?
Replies: >>7715
>>7710
That's allowed but other people are also allowed to say that moralbilge ratry is fucking irritating and to hide threads
Replies: >>7719
>>7713
You are using a VPN
Replies: >>7716 >>7717
>>7715
Oh, I'm a retard. I forgot my VPN was on this entire time.
>>7715
Oh no... I thought the VPN ban would let you read at least :chiyopuke:
Replies: >>7718
>>7717
Its not like LC where it bans you from posting, its from Cloudflare's side. Either way, i hope its temporary...
>>7714
i’m ok with that. also why are you getting censored and i’m not kek
Replies: >>7720
>>7719
faggötry vs fagger my moralfag matey!
49fdbbb19e4cae69554d96b48329558c3ba1b6afeed1b52e7d93bc09dfcbdcff.png
[Hide] (48.5KB, 535x579) Reverse
Again? What now?
Replies: >>7723
cc.png
[Hide] (408.3KB, 453x579) Reverse
>>7691
Holy shit, finally useable contact info? Too bad it's to little to late, CC now is /r9k/ and sharty roleplaying as women central.
>>7721
Weird sister-chan you're such a tsundere, desu!
1776034182704.png
[Hide] (3.3KB, 260x352) Reverse
Check out Witchan's new mascot
36f4feb0809d5770116319e73a40a82880446f215f4cfde2089072573f5aaf8f.png
[Hide] (3.7KB, 271x87) Reverse
>>7725
He's a boy too. I'm being baited.
Replies: >>7737
>>7725
Why the fuck did this take so long
Replies: >>7733 >>7734
>>7732
Nimu says she's been talking to an artist but the artist is flaking on her... either way no time like the present
6ea2823599240a06d8152e79400d069fb708e134ce3877e15bdd927ba2252230.png
[Hide] (96.9KB, 431x493) Reverse
>>7732
Had to get his hair right. Anyway I'm looking forward to the art we're gonna get.
1776035893759.png
[Hide] (3.1KB, 238x276) Reverse
>>7727
Look how cute he is!
Replies: >>7927
ugh why the fuck would a female ib have a male mascot kms. i was so excited to, i loved elsie but i hate lc.
Screenshot_2026-04-12_190613.png
[Hide] (225.2KB, 734x683) Reverse
This is Nimu's design philosophy
Replies: >>7745 >>7970
>>7738
If 4chan can use yotsuba, why not?
>>7738
You can always genderbend
Replies: >>7752
>>7738
Same.
>>7738
>i loved elsie but i hate lc
Now you can love wc but hate the mascot
DeBUSSY will be drawn paired up with Elsie and there's nothing anyone can do about it.
>>7739
Wow what a mastermind philosophy behind her drawing some circles and triangles. Kek at the circlejerkers in her thread
Replies: >>7746 >>7747
>>7745
makes sense to me, tbh this is done all the time with kids cartoons and brands. the easier to draw the more accessible
1776039305988-tegaki.png
[Hide] (13.1KB, 512x512) Reverse
>>7745
Makes a little sense. I can draw the Witchan mascot, but I could not draw Elsie or Pirate tan.
>>7725
I kinda hate his name honestly kek
Replies: >>7749 >>7750 >>7820
>>7748
I hate it too but I can't think of any other names that would fit with the wc pun
Replies: >>7750 >>7751 >>7820
debussy.webp
[Hide] (47.8KB, 440x538) Reverse
>>7748
>>7749
What do you have against him?
Replies: >>7753 >>7754
>>7749
>not naming him Gandelf
We should all find out where Nimu lives and kill her.
>>7741
Literally this, hardcore male dislikers can just genderbend him kek
Replies: >>7758
98a7554976064f65054a133024505e4961d10de6060a64a1c229ea6a72ec892c.png
[Hide] (187.5KB, 1290x498) Reverse
>>7750
>>7750
It isn't him himself, I can't unsee the retarded memes in his name
>>7738
I also hate it kek. I don’t care too much about this aspect but I can see some people moralfagging about the website that allow(ed) relatively uncensored discussion on cabin boyshit having an uke boy mascot being a bad look.
Replies: >>7760 >>7778
Naming the dubious cabin boy 'bussy' was intentional, right?
>>7752
It's not the same...
I guess it also bothers me that this was decided for us. Aren’t board-tans usually a community effort in their lore and design?
Replies: >>7765 >>7815 >>7838
>>7755
Nimu said you could draw him as an ikemen, its all up to the artist to interpret his simple design or something like that.
Replies: >>7761
>>7760
You can tap dance on the highway in the pouring rain, doesn’t mean it will likely happen.
Replies: >>7762
>>7761
Oh yeah? I'm going to draw him as an ikemen right now
Replies: >>7763 >>7764
>>7762
Based.
>>7762
do it
DO IT
>>7759
i also feel this way. i think there should have been a competition on oekaki….. that would have been really fun. especially if witches could team up and make propaganda of the mascots they like, or maybe make a thread for each mascot idea and streamline it idk. oh well

i guess i also like mascots that feel more like an insert for the userbase but that’s a personal preference. it looks like some anons are really happy with it, so
Replies: >>7811 >>7815
>>7725
Nimu has to be trolling because there’s no way
All a ploy for nimu to get the drawhags to draw witch boys!
Replies: >>7772
The only people complaining are those with no art skills lmao
>>7768
Cope. Nimu's using one of my drawings as the thread she used to announce DeFaggot in
>>7768
I have them but I'm going to still cringe over his name, sorry.
>>7768
I think the sorceress debussy would have a braid but the same bangs. At the end of the day only artists can really make the vision she wants real because she self admittedly sucks at drawing
6860dec11369f83175497ccfb2cfca740bbcb2b8d28797ec66487792b55f8819.gif
[Hide] (1.3MB, 481x315) Reverse
>>7767
>>7725
I think it's cute, and the simplicity allows for future sovlful mspaint drawings. My only problem with him is his name, I can't read it without thinking of boypussy
Replies: >>7775 >>7777
>>7774
>boypussy
Debussy is a TIF confirmed? I'm going to draw pooner fanart of her- I mean him now.
Replies: >>7776
>>7775
KEK, do it!!
>>7774
When you think of Debussy you should be thinking about boypussy.
Replies: >>7779
>>7755
Literally who are you even trying to look good in front of? Lolcow? The fucking sharty? I don’t understand this mindset.
Replies: >>7780 >>7781 >>7794
>>7777
Quads DO NOT confirm
>>7778
This, who cares it's a chan not shitbook, we don't need a PR team
>>7778
i mean, i also think the cabin boy association is going to stick to this ib. kind of whatever but not particularly preferable
Replies: >>7783
>All I can think of is da bussy!
Unironically, touch grass. You're way too terminally online if the name of a classical music composer makes you think of trannies.
Replies: >>7795
>>7781
Good, itll be a filter
>All I can think of is trannies!
Unironically, touch grass. You're way too terminally online if slang for a man's ass makes you think of trannies.
Replies: >>7788
>>7768
What an odd thing to say
Replies: >>7786
>>7785
Maybe it's Nimu whiteknighting herself kek.
1776041023313.png
[Hide] (48.2KB, 500x500) Reverse
1776038854735.png
[Hide] (19KB, 500x500) Reverse
1776041356937.png
[Hide] (57.9KB, 500x500) Reverse
Damn, witches work fast.
>>7784
I'm not thinking of trannies anon, I'm thinking of gay moid memes.
>>7787
The only question now is when are we getting weird sister x debussy ship art?
Replies: >>7793
>>7787
I mean this with both kindness and gentleness, witches are not beating the cabin boylubber allegations
Replies: >>7797
1776041195078.png
[Hide] (21KB, 500x500) Reverse
>>7787
>not including the best one
Replies: >>7796 >>7799 >>7812
>All I can think of is Debussy!
unironically, touch ass. You’re way too normie and mundane if boy pussy makes you think of classical music.
>>7789
That's a great idea I wanna make something that looks like a screenshot from an otome game lol
>>7778
>site has increased attention on it under the pretense it is a haven for cp and pedo content
>increase in arguments amongst the user base over an already contentious topic
>let’s debut the mascot I designed that I also headcanon to be an uke boy
You’re saying this is a good time to have this discussion? Really?
Replies: >>7796 >>7804 >>7810
>>7782
Hi Nimu.
>>7791
kek, seme x uke debussy ship art now!
>>7794
I mean why not? It's fun, and it was other anons that asked Nimu about the mascot in the thread first
>>7790
Neither the first nor the third look like like a shöta. And the middle one is just generic chibi.
>>7787
ok fine, the first art is making me warm up to him. i think his hair should be white-blonde with blue-purple eyes, if mot blonde then more like a gingery brown. and i want the gender to be explicitly neutral so i can imagine him as a cute tomboy instead of a little kid.
Replies: >>7808
>>7791
:chiyodrool: fuck... he's hot... someone stop me.
Replies: >>7800
>>7799
Based matey, I wouldn't dare stop you. Be free.
Im calling him Debs
Replies: >>7803 >>7806 >>7808
>>7787
Reminds me of Harry Potter fanart on deviantart from 2007
>>7801
Yeah I was trying to think of something else to call him other than his full name. All I could think of was wc-kun
Replies: >>7805
>>7794
i think it’s cringe that she just went ahead and made it herself. she comes across as a little self-centred.
>>7803
Something that's been annoying me that absolutely a minor nitpick is that the site is called witchan, not witkun.
Replies: >>7818
>>7801
Why not Dubs, for Double U?
Replies: >>7809
>>7787
I love him, he's so cute
>>7798
Maybe strawberry blonde/light brown hair?
>>7801
He's Debs to me now, thanks matey
3a612352a4d41a72ca8247d18b814aaccc39ae2bf631a92dc9381b2e0f627cd7.webm
[Hide] (60.6KB, 1080x1080, 00:00)
>>7806
You know why.
>>7794
She's based for it, honestly. 4chan and LC are allowed to have cutesy anime girls as board mascots without getting cancelled, so WC can have a cutesy anime boy.
I don't even think sharty would give a fuck about a SFW mascot like that (inb4 "someone" gets mad and decides to try and yank them a second time).
>>7765
WAIT IDEA, this could still be done for his familiar's design. Someone let Nimu know.
>>7791
still cant believe we got sillypoo on wc kek, if the duo's here they should know i love their womens day animations
Replies: >>7823
Screenshot_2026-04-12_201941.png
[Hide] (37KB, 606x315) Reverse
>>7759
>>7765
Apparently, there was supposed to be a contest, and there was even a girl mascot Nimu had planned. 
This timeline is so shit.
Replies: >>7816
>>7815
People can always just draw the girl mascot (Anne) if it's that pressing. It's really not that deep.
>>7805
There's no witch in witkun
Replies: >>7819
>>7818
:chiyotable:
Replies: >>7822
>>7748
>>7749
Dubsy would have been a cute name with a similar name format as LC to elsie and CC to cece.
>>7819
What did she mean by this?
>>7812
I don't think they're on wc. The only one up to question is the roid picture in Attractive Men, which is great, but I think it was a regular anon.
DB.PNG
[Hide] (14.1KB, 1045x158) Reverse
Just preserving this.
Replies: >>7826
>>7825
was not expecting twincest mascot lore reveal tonight, tbh.
IMG_1548.png
[Hide] (255.1KB, 800x1000) Reverse
Damn, look how cool he is
Replies: >>7828 >>7829
>>7827
I'm not complaining :chiyoclasp:
>>7827
Why is he giving me bedroom eyes
Replies: >>7830 >>7831
>>7829
10 minutes into incantations and chill and he gives you this look
Replies: >>7832
>>7829
He's going to burn you at his stake, if you know what I mean.
Replies: >>7832
>>7830
>>7831
Wew...
1776048539442.png
[Hide] (19KB, 500x500) Reverse
I can't believe DeBUSSY is fucking dead.
>>7759
Board-tans and ib mascots are usually made by the community, yes. I've never been on one that was made by the admin.
k3k.PNG
[Hide] (101KB, 1104x343) Reverse
Nimu's AI art.
Replies: >>7853
Witchan is kill
Do you guys have the other debussy and witchanne arts saved? I recall a debussy, a witchanne and a pooner debussy being posted before it went down
Replies: >>7850
>>7846
>a pooner debussy
Are you serious kek
Replies: >>7854
>>7840
nimu is so autistic
Spoiler File
(14.9KB, 500x500) Reverse
>>7850
yes kek
Replies: >>7856 >>7857 >>7859
>>7854
KEK. Nevermind I like the mascot
>>7854
I thought it was just supposed to look ugly here kek
>>7854
Looks like anthony fantano.
>>7738
Most ib for men have female mascots. I am kinda tired of female board-tans because they are always so fucking generic. I remember some anon found some coomer figurine that looked exactly like elsie but with big tits kek. I appreciate a cute boy, i actually want to draw him.
Replies: >>7862
I should work on other stuff but my mind wants to redesign these concepts and make them interesting so bad.
Replies: >>7864
>>7860
I am not inherently against a board-kun, but I liked the idea sisters had of wc being a girl with each board being a bishie familiar
Replies: >>7863 >>7865 >>7880
>>7862
damn that would’ve been really cute
>>7861
Yeah, it's surprising none of them are using the favicon as the outfit colors instead of a generic black outfit.
Replies: >>7867 >>7868
>>7862
better yet now all the familiars can be debussy's yaoi harem
Replies: >>7869 >>7871
>>7864
It feels like it would be a bit too much purple if both the outfit and eyes were the same color imo.
Replies: >>7870
1776052799641.png
[Hide] (262.9KB, 1750x2000) Reverse
>>7864
I saw an ourple debussy
Replies: >>7874
>>7865
So is anne the fujo that ships them?
Replies: >>7872
>>7867
Idk, she never said purple eyes were a requirement just the witch hat and circle glasses are.
IMG_2132.webp
[Hide] (31.6KB, 674x1101) Reverse
>>7865
Doesn’t really appeal to me. In part because the plain Debussy design doesn’t appeal to me, he’s very… I struggle to find the words but it’s like the antithesis of a tumblr sexyman almost. Each time I see him I think of Harry Potter Puppet Pals.
alma-boreafujoshi-imagenes.jpg
[Hide] (57.7KB, 650x630) Reverse
>>7869
obviously
Replies: >>7873
>>7872
kek this picture is a clusterfuck
>>7868
Hot tbh.
>>7871
I won't lie I'm not in love with the choice nimu made to give him a bowl cut. It makes me think of younger chris chan a little, kek
Replies: >>7879 >>7939
>>7871
I like the simple design because anons can interprete him however they want. I just know that if nimu made a contest to pick a mascot it would have ended up like elsie with a witch hat just like how our mascot is a weird mix of xxtan and elsie.
1d5de4c23411d9d57d2f8f905300de3b96a8f24e9af76bd1fa1bdc2f81952487.gif
[Hide] (6MB, 640x478) Reverse
I don't understand the appeal of the bowl cut.
Replies: >>7897
>>7875
I am not a big megane girlie but I can get behind it when appropriate. The bowl cut on top though makes it a lot more challenging… I guess like that he has purple eyes?
>>7862
Witchchan should be a girl, chan is usually used for females. I like the boards being male familiars too.
Replies: >>7884 >>7890
>>7871
A tumblr unsexyman
>>7880
I mean tbf chan is either used for girls or young children
Replies: >>7885
>>7884
>spoiler
Enough...
Replies: >>7892
Does anyone have any frankeheartie pictures?
Replies: >>7887 >>7892 >>7895
>>7886
damn filter... frankenn-nnie
Replies: >>7888 >>7891
1771624705618.png
[Hide] (59.7KB, 500x500) Reverse
>>7887
This is the original drawing.
Replies: >>7889
>>7888
God, its so fucking ugly
Replies: >>7892 >>7893 >>7911
>>7880
That would have been the better timeline. Then you could have the best of both worlds and either ship the familiars together or with wc. One time I was staying home sick from school and ended up watching the live broadcast of the national geographic bee on the National Geographic channel. It struck me how on a stage with so many children the same age as me, they all had glasses and a bowl cut at 10 years old. I’m reminded of that when I look at Debussy tbh.
>>7887
You used the n-word…
>>7885
Listen I'm not the one who generated an ai pic of a young looking boy in a school uniform and typical youthful nerdy physical traits like a bowl cut and glasses for my ib's mascot. Just sayin
>>7886
I don't have any pics except for the original art, but I do have a link to the thread archive https://web.archive.org/web/20260221031756/https://witchan.org/b/res/6244.html
>>7889
I mean in all fairness the description that resulted from the game made it pretty hard to come up with anything good lol
Replies: >>7896
>>7889
It wasn’t suppose to look good, it was a fun game someone came up with and sisters participated. Honestly it doesn’t really matter to me that the design isn’t great, since at least it reflects the community’s participation in her creation
tegaki.png
[Hide] (153.9KB, 500x500) Reverse
>>7886
I have this one
Replies: >>7910
>>7892
Poor nimu is getting moralfagged by sore losers artf4gs because they couldnt pitch a generic moe anime girl with a witch hat for the mascot
Replies: >>7898
IMG_1554.jpeg
[Hide] (88.8KB, 478x493) Reverse
>>7877
I don't think it's supposed to be a bowl cut. This is the picture she used to describe the hair. It's more like a pixie cut with bangs.
>>7896
hi nimu kek
Replies: >>7899
>>7898
Sure anon, anyone that thinks you are pathetic is nimu.
Replies: >>7900 >>7903
>>7899
There's no reason for your ass to be getting so sore over this
Replies: >>7901 >>7906
>>7900
>There's no reason for your ass to be getting so sore over this
says the person seething over a ib mascot
Replies: >>7902 >>7906
>>7901
>Seething
Ok sure
Replies: >>7905
>>7899
Tinfoil: Nimu closed down Witchan temporarily so she could have more time to argue about herself on yhh.
>I hate Nimu's mascot
Okay, let's see you do better.
Replies: >>7907 >>7910 >>7921
>>7902
calling someone a pedophile over a boardkun is beyond pathetic, be for real. This goes beyond calling debussy ugly, it's pure seething.
Replies: >>7907
>>7900
>>7901
This is so boring
Replies: >>7907 >>7909
>>7906
>>7905
>>7904
Wtf is happening. Is it really Nimu?
fem debussy (she looks the same except has boobs)
>>7906
No kidding, I thought we could put this sperging to rest already.
>>7904
Nayrt
This one >>7895 is pretty cute but i didn't make it
>>7889
At least it's more visually interesting than what nimu wants.
I don’t understand the critique that Elsie is hard to draw… Which was a justification for why the design was so simple.
>>7912
Elsie isn't hard to draw, her design is nice
t. Someone who has drawn art of her and sucks at drawing
>>7912
Elsie is fairly simple imo, even permabegs can crank out something decent.
Replies: >>7919
>>7913
Yeah. I’ve seen lots of stick figure Elsies and knew immediately who it was. But nimu said that it was too difficult and Debussy’s design is what it is so people like her can draw him..?
Replies: >>7919
>>7912
Elsie's not even that hard to draw, her design is relatively simple. I just think Nimu is just lazy because she doesn't want to draw braids or a simple pattern which were the things she complained the most about with Elsie's design.
Replies: >>7918 >>7919 >>7922
>>7917
I’m an artfag and genuinely forget people think they are incapable of drawing so I wasn’t sure how much of a legitimate critique it was. To me her design is very straightforward and recognizable.
>>7912
>>7915
>>7916
>>7917
You're overestimating the skills of the average internet user. Someone who has never practiced drawing could not draw Elsie well.
>>7919
Who cares about what no draws think, they are no draws they are never going to contribute so there's no point in catering a design to accommodate them.
Replies: >>7923 >>7932 >>8109
newwcmascot.png
[Hide] (23.4KB, 748x1102) Reverse
>>7904
Actually, I've been working on this idea for months. I think now's the right time for me to debut this. I present to you: Peter File. You see, a lot of thought went into this design. I decided to compensate for my complete lack of art skills with deep thinking on the philosophy of this design. Peter File's design is so simple and versatile, anyone can draw him! I also came up with the idea for him to be wearing a blindfold. This is to represent how half of WC's userbase wenches endlessly on a pirate-themed board on the side. Let me know what you guys think!
Replies: >>7924
1776058839188-tegaki.png
[Hide] (15.2KB, 512x512) Reverse
>>7871
Generic is the word you're looking for
>>7917
Braids aren't even that difficult even in a simple style. I can't draw for shit  yet somehow managed it
>>7920
Also samefag what the fuck this post went through before I even hit the send button, I'm freaked out.
Replies: >>8110
>>7921
I meant to type eyepatch kek. Bìtching was filtered too.
>>7919
I never draw and I drew Elsie art that mateys liked. You're wrong.
Replies: >>7928
>>7919
>draw Elsie well
Are you telling me the average person is incapable of drawing a stick figure, draw two black lines on top of the head for horns, and two yellow lines on the bottom for braids? It doesn’t have to be deviantart front page quality, it’s whether or not the mascot is recognizable. That’s the point of a mascot, it represents stuff. I don’t think >>7737 is a good, original representation. Who cares if a crayon eater can draw it when it fails at step one.
Replies: >>7931
>>7925
>doesn't post the drawing
(x) doubt
Replies: >>7930
Anyways I refuse to call him Debussy. Since Nimu said he has a female twin/reflection/alter-ego named Anne I think he should be called Wit/Whit/Whitt
>>7928
I don't like connecting my posts from other imageboards to each other. Feel free to doubt but it's a weird thing to lie about?
>>7927
Okay, how would you design the witchan mascot? And don't be ironic, give me a sincere reply.
Replies: >>7936 >>7943 >>7951
>>7920
>No draws
Wtf is this terminology kekkk
>witchan dies
>I guess i'll hang out on yhh while it's dead
>everyone is wenching
idk what i expected
eating jelly beans rn (jelly belly brand)
Replies: >>7935 >>7937
>>7934
What's ur favorite flavor
Replies: >>7944
>>7931
>Nimu's Strongest Clitsucker
Replies: >>7945
9c42620d001e7b859e4ab8760c705931064d00bc759cd411f4f4019ddf14b108.webp
[Hide] (92.8KB, 1022x767) Reverse
>>7934
Share, wench
Replies: >>7944
1776059824383-tegaki.png
[Hide] (61KB, 512x450) Reverse
>>7875
>>7939
KEK.
>>7939
Fucking KEK
>>7939
KEK I shouldn't be laughing this hard at 2am
>>7931
Hear me out. How about... anime girl, wait, with witch hat. Hell yeaaaah
Replies: >>7945 >>7950
>>7935
i like the banana, popcorn and spicy cinnamon ones
>>7937
ok but only a couple bc i dont have that much
Replies: >>7946
>>7936
>>7943
Just as I thought. You're all full of crap.
Replies: >>7957
5e11fd77fa994aec51866d91ac7ec2f1bba1f171698dbbafdd31d99ea72a3b0c.gif
[Hide] (560.3KB, 340x276) Reverse
>>7944
Thanks
maxresdefault_(1).jpg
[Hide] (121.2KB, 1280x720) Reverse
>>7939
I just KNOW nimu's sexual awakening was to this nigga
Replies: >>7964 >>7967
>>7939
The fucking Frankeheartie medallion this is too good KEKK
Replies: >>7949
>>7939
>>7948
is he a waifufag for frankeheartie?
>>7943
Witch hat anime boy vs witch hat anime girl who's winning the rap battle
>>7931
We’re already ahead as you have asked for input from outsiders on the design.
Replies: >>7955
fb0563a8c2b0d5ccfe1116449572d0e4cd1e147a067068a6ce0f9a9148b1f668.png
[Hide] (218.5KB, 499x651) Reverse
>>7919
It's not even about skill, it's about recognizability of the design. Kids and beginners make unskilled artwork of popular characters but you can still recognize who it's supposed to be.
Replies: >>7953 >>7954 >>7956
>>7952
my favourite m&m
>>7952
Is that balls or a camel toe on the bottom?
>>7951
What are you talking about?
Replies: >>7958
>>7952
Is that one of the monsters in monsters inc
Replies: >>7959
123893.gif
[Hide] (1.4MB, 500x278) Reverse
>>7945
>Just as I thought. You're all full of crap.
Replies: >>7960
>>7955
Kek
IMG_1557.png
[Hide] (89.8KB, 320x349) Reverse
>>7956
It's megamind
>>7957
Is bungou worth watching or reading. I think I watched two episodes when it first premiered and remember nothing about it. The fanbase seems young and cancerous
Replies: >>7963
i already miss wc. where else will i spam incomprehensible husbando nonsense
>>7939
holy kek
>>7939
Kek, I mean you can't spell CWC without a WC.
>>7960
It just drags on and goes nowhere, save yourself the effort
3c3c95f19677a3dcbf57e4367899bec2c78e487d0af6941ebf4f2825bb56d989.webp
[Hide] (31.2KB, 204x428) Reverse
>>7947
Did she want to ropemaxx when he had a glow up later on?
>>7964
Damn I'd put a witch hat on this wench and call him my new ib mascot if I was running one
>>7964
just edit glasses, a robe and witch hat on him and he's good to go
Replies: >>7970
Jeff_M2_Himitsu_no_Takarabako_artwork.webp
[Hide] (36.9KB, 351x623) Reverse
>>7947
Hold on, this is a tinfoil of the century, but what is Nimu is Jeffhag? I mean, the bowl cut? Glasses? Autism? I rest my case.
Replies: >>7969 >>7971 >>7975
>>7964
i know i did. Glasses nerdfags cant have shit.
giphy_(2).gif
[Hide] (880.4KB, 504x322) Reverse
>>7967
I think you're onto something, anon.
>>7966
the robe isn't necessary >>7739 you only need the glasses and the hat
>>7967
That would be funny as hell but I don't think she's a cabin boy enjoyer
Replies: >>7973
>>7971
Def is, strikes me as a Catholicfag with tons of guilt around it
Replies: >>7974
>>7973
catholic = cabin boyfag is kind of a leap lol
Replies: >>7980
>>7967
I would agree if it wasn't for the fact that jeffhag can draw and nimu doesn't have an artistic bone in her body
Replies: >>7976 >>7981
>>7975
kek I was just about to say this
BUT what if she's pretending to be not artistic...
Replies: >>7979
Can anyone predict when Nimu is gonna finally release the new  red board? Apparently, it's gonna cater to both waifufags and husbandofags because you can finally post nsfw images.
Replies: >>7982
>>7977
she can't even pretend not to be autistic though
>>7974
We knows she's catholic, and I'm saying she's the type to feel overly guilty over her degen proclivities
Not saying all Catholics are pedophiles even though it's the churches favourite activity 
t.lives in a Catholic country
Replies: >>7984 >>7988
>>7975
In my defense, it's easy to pretend that you don't know how to draw. Plus the fact that Nimu said in one post that she was going to ask her sister to draw something for her could be plausible deniability that Jeffhag could draw something and then if users get suspicious then Nimu could just say "oh but it's not my art don't worry!"
But I've seen that Jeffhag actually has some character design capabilities based off of a sona that she's drawn for herself that Nimu very much does not possess so they're probably not the same. It's kinda fun to think about though lol.
>>7978
I really hope she bans 3dpd nsfw tho, its really not worth the headache just to cater to the 2-3 anons who love staring at dicks
Replies: >>7985 >>7995
IMG_1558.jpeg
[Hide] (68.6KB, 1280x720) Reverse
Still waiting on the superior witchan mascot design
Replies: >>7989 >>7991 >>8115
>>7980
maybe but she could be into literally anything kek, that's why it's a leap
the cabin boy fags on wc don't seem like they carry much catholic guilt to me either tbh
Replies: >>7986
>>7982
Erm but I thought WC was for the freedom to post?
I'd rather stare at 3dpd dicks than cabin boy tbqhwufam
Replies: >>7987
>>7984
Her depictions of the mascot is what's making me certain she's a cabin boyfag, especially the school uniform ai drawing
Replies: >>7990
>>7985
Yeah but you don't know who's 3d dick or boob it is. It could be revenge porn and it might not even be an adult. that's the concern people have
Replies: >>7997
>>7980
>We knows she's catholic
We do?
>>7983
You’re being really weird about this ngl
>>7986
i dont get it, no one would think the designer of elsie is a lolifag just because elsie isnt a big titty anime girl
Replies: >>7992 >>7994 >>8005
>>7983
you could draw him
>>7990
i've heard anons complain exactly this actually on lc
>>7992
i am glad nimu choose to filter those retards
>>7990
Nah people moralfag over elsie as well
Replies: >>8000
>>7982
Ilikestaringatdickstoosocanyoumakethat4
i don't get it dicks are gross looking
Replies: >>7999
>>7987
That's why I don't want 3D as well, nothing against dicks.
>>7992
I think the weirdest Elsie critique I have seen was that her being blonde and blue eyed was a race thing and they would have never designed her with brown hair. When in the original thread she was brunette and then changed to blonde by popular vote.
>>7996
i agree. even in 2d, art that tastefully covers it is superior.
>>7992
>>7994
Why is that even a thought that crosses their mind
Replies: >>8002 >>8004
>>7992
I've heard anons on LC complain about Elsie being white. Honestly who cares what they think.
>>8000
Because some lc users are simply too paranoid over anything possibly being 'pedophilic malegaze tranny scrote slop' or whatever
i've heard anons complain that elsie is too conventionally feminine
>>8000
Because moralfags think about lolisho so much they start hallucinating pedophilia into everything they see.
>>7990
Elsie isn't wearing a school uniform....... 
Anyway out of context I wouldn't really meme about Nimu being a cabin boyfag at all, but considering everything that happened and her suddenly pushing a school uniformed young looking boy as a mascot is kind of funny and certainly at least an attempt to stir up some controversy. People that are pretending not to see anything are just playing willfully obtuse. I'm one of the anons that doesn't care about cabin boyfags being on /txt/ if that matters, but I'm also capable of noticing patterns
>>8005
i think nimu is just a weeb
Replies: >>8007 >>8010
>>8005
I don't necessarily think that  she was trying to make the school uniform the final design rather it was just an example of what else he could wear other than robes.
>>8006
i believe this is true though because she was coy about being a fujo lol
Replies: >>8008 >>8009
>>8007
Do you think she'd answer if she is one or not if someone asked?
>>8007
i know that nimu likes the anime witch watch because she posted about it in the first meta thread and I think she was also talking about it in the first anime thread
>>8006
>I think nimu this
>I think nimu that
Doesn't anyone care what nimu thinks?
Replies: >>8011 >>8012
>>8010
that ruins the whole point of tinfoiling
also nimu is that you?
>>8010
No, we only like headcanons here
>>8005
>anime character has school uniform
Moralfags would kill themselves if they had to sit through one second of any anime
Replies: >>8014 >>8016
>>8013
She just said she doesn't care about cabin boy you dumbass, how is she a moralfag?
Replies: >>8018
>>8005
I wonder if maybe the description that she gave whatever ai she used just kinda did it's own thing and assumed the character to be young based off of the description of "bowl cut and glasses".
>>8013
Stop inserting your headcanons onto me
Replies: >>8019
>>8005
I'm pretty sure when the cabin boy thread was made she mentioned that she thought the thread was a little creepy, so idk.
Replies: >>8025
>>8014
no one would call asuka a loli just because she wears a school uniform
>>8016
if you can make headcanons about nimu why can't others make headcanons about you?
Replies: >>8030
It would be funny if anyone here actually signed up to become a janny for nimu kek.
Replies: >>8025 >>8027 >>8029
>>8018
you've never been to the fandom thread on lc I take it?
Replies: >>8026 >>8091
It’s pretty easy to prompt an ai to not generate an image with a school uniform to be fair
Replies: >>8024
>>8018
Have you been on LC in the past two years?
Replies: >>8026
>>8022
what world do you live in where animu school uniforms are intensely provocative and not the most generic thing in existence
Replies: >>8055
>>8017
She also said that about hazelfag too so i think the line in the sand for her is lolicabin boy stuff.
>>8020
I believe that's what happened and that's why it went down for a day for updates, i think the csfag is helping her
>>8021
>>8023
so you agree, only a moralfag would think a school uniform on an anime character implies pedophilia?
>>8020
I'll die before I janny for free
istockphoto-469648578-612x612.jpg
[Hide] (76.8KB, 612x568) Reverse
>>8018
And what does that have to do with anon being called a moralfag, even though she's already stated that she doesn't care? Because arguing about this is your personality now, and even the slightest hint of a "negative" opinion immediately spikes your blood pressure? Picrel is you.
Replies: >>8031
>>8020
I love witchan but the live of a janny is not for me
>>8019
If you're going to make headcanons at least make them consistent to what I'm saying... Otherwise I'm turning you into a moralfag as well
Replies: >>8033
>>8028
Because she's the one making headcanons over nimu for creating the most generic anime design ever. If it was a generic anime witch in a school uniform no one would give a shit.
Replies: >>8032 >>8054
>>8031
Kek do you know what moralfagging is? Just calling someone a cabin boyfag is the same as posting about how morally opposed you are to it.
Replies: >>8034
>>8030
I mean the idea that nimu is a cabin boyfag is predicated on assuming she's lying about thinking cabin boy is creepy
Replies: >>8040
>>8032
when half the site calls cabin boyfags pedos, yes implying nimu is a cabin boyfag does count as moralfagging. Be for real.
Replies: >>8035 >>8038
>>8034
I think that anon is just a shitstirrer
Wow. I'm gonna pretend he's just a cute tomboy girl. Exactly the same design just girl. Thank you.
Replies: >>8039 >>8040
i love the filter for cabin boy. it makes me laugh every time I read it, and it makes this dumb argument 10x funnier.
Replies: >>8083
mental-gymnastics-rdbtc.gif
[Hide] (112.1KB, 220x165) Reverse
>>8034
That does not make her a moralfag. She wasn't arguing for or against it in anyway and already said she doesn't personally care.
Replies: >>8041
>>8036
there's also witchanne but im not opposed to female debussy.. uh.. depussy?
Replies: >>8058
>>8033
Nta but I could make some argument that perhaps Nimu said those things to simply save face since being on the side of the lolishos would be a pretty controversial stance for the owner, but that's really just me talking out of my ass. I don't think Nimu is Jeffhag personally, but it is kinda funny to think about.

>>8036
Are you either the Sans or Roy Mustang husbandofags by chance?
Replies: >>8058
>>8038
Why would you even make the headcanon of nimu being a cabin boyfag if not to moralfag? if you didnt care you wouldnt even bring it up
Replies: >>8042 >>8043 >>8044
>>8041
Let it go, Sperga.
Replies: >>8045
>>8041
to bait you probably
>>8041
okay now we're beinf silly. cabin boyfags IN the cabin boy thread are saying debussy is cabin boy-like so whos to say a cabin boyfag wouldnt say nimu could be one?
>>8042
i am not the one sperging over an anime boy in a school uniform, by far the most generic anime design
Replies: >>8046
>>8045
You are sperging about a term that you're using completely incorrectly.
Replies: >>8048
i miss witchan... i want to go home...
Replies: >>8059
>>8046
How? again, no one would think nimu is a lolifag because witchanne has a school uniform. It's such a retarded assumption.
Replies: >>8051
This yaoi shit ain't hitting like it used to
1000012798.jpg
[Hide] (75.3KB, 720x334) Reverse
>>8048
What does that have to do with being a moralfag, and what that term actually means?
dabusyyyy.png
[Hide] (9.3KB, 400x384) Reverse
I worked very hard on my rendition of dapussy
Replies: >>8057
>>8031
I think people would obviously sperg out if the mascot had loli proportions. The image nimu generated has cabin boy proportions. If she generated an ikemen wearing a school uniform, no one would care.
Replies: >>8073 >>8123
>>8024
I didn’t say anything about how provocative or not they are. Just stating that it’s easy to prompt a genAI model one way or the other.
ikemen >>> sh0tas
it's not too late nimu you can still change the design!!!!
try_not_to_laugh_challenge.mp4
[Hide] (718.2KB, 360x420, 00:16)
One thing I like about this place over wc is that you can post videos here

>>8052
Sex. Right now.
>>8040
Nope kek
>>8039
Depussy...
>>8047
Same. YHH and LC are just infighting central. Honestly, it's amazing how little infighting there is on WC.
You're all ripping each other's hair out over pixelssss
Replies: >>8061 >>8062
>>8060
Another day that ends in y
Replies: >>8067
1776052799641.png
[Hide] (262.9KB, 1750x2000) Reverse
>>8060
Those pixels have feelings...
Replies: >>8063
>>8062
idk is he over 18? that outfit kind of looks like a school uniform
>>8063
He's a toddler because he's wearing shorts, I hope that helps
>>8063
He's wearing shorts
Shorts
Shots
SHOTA
5 letters in SHORTS
5 POINTS in a PENTAGRAM
WAKE UP
Replies: >>8068
>>8063
Nimu birthed dapussy a few hours ago only, he's a newborn, he's just really developed for his age.
Replies: >>8071
>>8061
good thing tomorrow doesn't end with y
>>8065
>5 letters in SHORTS
nobody tell her
>>8063
>anon mentions that Nimu might be a cabin boyfag
>not even in a critical way
>says she's impartial to it
>still alerts a Sperga
>sperging ensues
Too bad, the thread was just getting fun.
Replies: >>8072 >>8075 >>8077
>>8063
Even as a joke this is painful
>>8066
Nimu birthed Debussy out of her mind dapussy... That's a lot to think about
>>8069
you don't have to talk about yourself in the third person
Replies: >>8074
>>8054
elsie has loli proportions and no one cares
>>8072
>Everyone that thinks Sperga's a retard is the same person
>>8069
>anons start making light hearted jokes instead of shitflinging
>this makes anons who wanted to continue spergy debate very sad
Replies: >>8076
>>8075
>joining the shitflinging
>>8069
It's ok let them circlejerk and play coy, they can't do much else because character archetypes exist and they're all well aware of it just as much as we are.
Is it Witchan that makes users chill, or Yohoho that makes users bïtchy?
Replies: >>8081
Now watch me whip!

       😜
   👊/\_ 
    _/¯    ¯\_

Now watch me nae nae 

👋 
    \ 😳
         \_
    _/¯  ¯\_
Replies: >>8082
>>8079
Yes.
>>8080
omg the spoiler fucked up my naenae this website sucks
>>8037
Me too. I think WC should allow cabin boy in the same way it does now but add it's own word filter
Replies: >>8084
>>8083
Should it be cabin boy or some form of witch's apprentice
Replies: >>8086
>>8084
How about cauldron boy
Replies: >>8087
>>8086
Oh I like that
1776066509983-tegaki.png
[Hide] (197.3KB, 600x800) Reverse
im too sleepy to finish him. can you guys babysit him and make sure he doesnt get into trouble while i sleep
Replies: >>8092 >>8095
>>8018
>>8021
there's also that never ending debate over whether shinji counts as cabin boy or not still think he doesn't
>>8090
coot
Replies: >>8178
>>8063
That busy 18 at least.
>>8090
Very cute! I'll keep him safe.
Replies: >>8178
20e12d1836de8bb2cd9e37f2bb30b02d23bc6fbc4fd3d741a5ae65ad5e4b8b68.jpg
[Hide] (35.4KB, 700x461) Reverse
>>7964
Idk about Nimu but I sure did, he becomes an insecure wenchy fuckboy.
>>7920
>no draws
is that what people really think of it? if i used oekaki enough as someone who can’t draw, d’you think it’d be good practise and i’d eventually get good at drawing? i’ve tried it twice (both times the page refreshed…) and i was kind of surprised that while using a reference it didn’t look shit, though the effort took 1 hour+. maybe i could just do a shit scribble for shorter
Replies: >>8110 >>8111 >>8113
>>7923
yeahh the posts go through here stupid fast for me for some reason. maybe there should be a timer on the parley button kekk
>>8109
keep drawing it's fun
>>8109
When does your page usually refresh? Mine never does. Don't exit the canvas mid-drawing. Open another tab if you must look at something in the thread. I think you'd get better with time, but some people don't get faster. I've been drawing since childhood and it also takes me 1h+ to finish a drawing that's not shit. When wc is back use the oekaki more, even for shit scribbles. I miss it being more active and having low effort doodles mixed in from users just having fun.
>>8109
if it refreshes i think it's possible that if you backspace your drawing will still be there if you open tegaki again
inquisition.png
[Hide] (52.1KB, 1577x1923) Reverse
>>7983
Not to self shill, but what do you think of mine?
Darkstalkers_Felicia.png
[Hide] (122.3KB, 266x373) Reverse
>>8018
There's anons in /ot/ who think picrel is a loli, N from Pokemon is a child, and started an infight over lewding botw Link because he's supposed to be 17. Madohomu and kawoshin are loli and cabin boy over there.
>>8054
It's a cartoon anime boy.
Replies: >>8131 >>8134
>>8123
Cope. Nimu herself had cabin boy in mind and mentioned it when she generated that beautiful AI art. It's the same as how she basically admitted to being a fujo.
Replies: >>8132
>>8131
nimu the fujo coven leader
I wish desuwa's oekaki program, tegaki had a slider for the zoom instead of just x2 magnification every time.
jotaro.jpg
[Hide] (1MB, 1000x1479) Reverse
>>8123
>N from Pokemon is a child, and started an infight over lewding botw Link because he's supposed to be 17
Hello, cabin boyhag here. This is my child BF for whom I have a reprehensible attraction for. He is 17 (extremely underage!!!) and wears his school uniform everywhere (very provocative!!!) although he likes to leave it open because he is a bit of a little shit.
Replies: >>8136 >>8137 >>8146
Let me in already jeez.
IMG_8250.jpeg
[Hide] (22.9KB, 360x362) Reverse
>>8134
>17
Do you even cabin boyfag? Rookie numbers. My cabin boybando is 10-years-old
Replies: >>8137
Franken.png
[Hide] (695.1KB, 928x800) Reverse
>>8134
>>8136
Step aside, mine is 4 years old.
Replies: >>8138 >>8140 >>8223
>>8137
Holy shit that guy has got some hips.
I really need to play Princess Nightmare already though it loooks fun
I didn't realize how addicted I was to WC until it was shut down
Replies: >>8142
goty13.jpg
[Hide] (147.8KB, 1920x1080) Reverse
>>8137
Amateurs... watch this.
Replies: >>8141
>>8140
I kneel...
>>8139
Weird sister: Yeah trust me bro this Witchan shit isn't addictive I'm totally fine
*Weird sister 12 hours without Witchan*: (eyes bloodshot and jittering) Hey you got any impermanence I can bump off of you real quick
Replies: >>8143
>>8142
Mom said it was my turn to embrace the impermanence!
When the site comes back up, someone tell nimu to implement something like the lc status page so we can keep up with updates.
>>8134
Nimu’s a cabin boyfag, keep coping. cabin boyfags stay winning while you mald.
Replies: >>8147 >>8148
>>8146
i've noticed a lot of talking and not a lot of drawing out of you
>>8146
I agree, but I also think it's dumb how some people insist every cute anime boy is automatically a cabin boy and no one's allowed to like them, even though they don't apply the same logic to anime girls. No one thinks of Zelda as a loli, but idiots will go to war about how reprehensible it is to like Link because he isn't bald with wrinkles or facial hair on his face, hyper-muscular and tall. 
It's like they think males are either literal infants or full on barashit.
>>8148
They’re just cowardly brainwashed pickmes afraid to admit the appeal of young looking boys
>>8148
Every woman who doesn't husbando a hairy roidpig is a cabin boylubber
>>8148
I'll never understand the women who are so weird about younger men. And I'm not even talking about cabin boy shit, like spiraling because you're going to be a year older than your early to mid 20s husbando or thinking a relationship with a moid a year or two younger than you is problematic.
Replies: >>8152 >>8153 >>8169
>>8151
There's this weird thing where they also act like they somehow won't have anything to talk about if there's an age gap. Like the implication that guys can only have interests that align with younger women and women only have interests that align with older men. It's so bizarre and obviously a symptom of misogyny.
Replies: >>8164
>>8151
I wonder if it’s partly the idea that boys mature slower so if you’re with a guy who is younger than it is indicative of your maturity? I’m jus spitballing here tbh I don’t think it’s a big deal either.
Replies: >>8154 >>8157
>>8153
This post is a mess but I just woke up so have mercy
Replies: >>8155
>>8154
No mercy for sleepy bums.
>>8153
Yeah that could be part of it. Some women are unfortunately a bit too judgemental with themselves and will beat themselves up over anything that doesn't perfectly fit the bog standard norm. Neurotic types will start to worry that they might be predatory or maybe even that they will look like a "walled old hag" if they try to date or have interest in men that are younger than them. I wish some people would learn to just not be so caught up in worry and fear sometimes.
>Witchan is for nothing and everything
What does this even mean? I never understood it.
Replies: >>8159 >>8161
>>8158
About as deep as 4chan's /b/. It's for shitposting.
Replies: >>8161
>>8158
There is no centralized theme for the ib like how lc is for cows, fc is for fujos, and hk is for kpoop. The site itself is one large /b/ so basically what >>8159 said
>>8148
black and white thinking is indicative of immature retards
was the maintenance supposed to last the whole day i thought it was couple of hours
Replies: >>8165 >>8167
>>8152
? the people who say that are usually also against older man younger woman age gaps wdym, they just think you don't share anything in common with people more than a few years older or younger than you in general
>>8163
It read as being the whole day to me.
Replies: >>8168
>>8163
Nimu said it was supposed to last 'today and tomorrow' according to her post so I kinda anticipated it not being open until possibly tonight (at least, est tonight since that's Nimu's time zone)
Replies: >>8168
>>8165
>>8167
oh dang i wonder what's being implemented, maybe jannies?
Replies: >>8170
>>8151
Women who say they can't date men in their own age group because "They're basically children!" are kind of funny IMO, because in dating older men and welcoming their sexual attention, the implication is clear, but I guess it's acceptable to them if men want to date "children" or something as long as they get to feel like a youthful little girl, I don't know.
I remember Grimes saying that all women should date older men so we can feel young forever or something. I don't care about that, I want an attractive male with a full head of hair.
>>8168
Security measures and maybe jannies. I believe another csfag reached out to her about vulnerabilities in the site and those are getting addressed today. I imagine that if nimu is unable to implement the changes herself, she is reliant on the csfag’s schedule to help and address any issues as they arise.
Replies: >>8172
1766014318272.png
[Hide] (3.2MB, 3253x2691) Reverse
how many times does this "hrm actually im more based than you because of the age of my nigel" discussion need to be had
>>8170
So... Are the hired jannies just going to help clean up any raids and self-admitted males, or are they going to start stalking and banning posters with opinions they disagree with after convincing Nimu that they're troublesome?
Replies: >>8176
>>8171
At least the same number of times as whether being a female cabin boy enjoyer is morally acceptable I should think. Bare minimum the same number of times as pretty privilege is discussed.
>>8171
Tbh I just hate when women bite other women's heads off because "reeee you need to like what I like" and pretend it's about being "problematic", but then support (not just excuse) the same behaviors or worse in men. It ties into the cabin boy discussion too. There's too much hypocrisy going around.
>>8172
Yeah, it'd just make the whole VPN ban more concerning. I already don't fully trust nimu, and I'm going to be even less trusting if there are now other jannies. At least there are some VPNs that fly under the radar, I guess. These bans never really work and are just kinda pointless.
Replies: >>8177 >>8187 >>8191
>>8176
>I already don't fully trust nimu
why
Replies: >>8180
tegaki_2026_04_13_21_05_41.png
[Hide] (399.6KB, 600x800) Reverse
tegaki_2026_04_13_21_06_27.png
[Hide] (396KB, 600x800) Reverse
>>8095
>>8092
thanks for watching over him, he's completed his metamorphosis
>>8178
What a beautiful man...
>>8177
Why should I? I don't really post anything bad, but I still don't want to be tracked around the site.
Replies: >>8182
>>8178
really pretty drawing and style sister can you draw sydney from degrees of lewdity PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE thanks
>>8180
why do you think someone will care enough to track you around?
Replies: >>8186 >>8188
>>8178
Beautiful. I think Nimu said she would make a mascot thread in meta. Please, bring him there when it's created.
>>8178
He's cute. I like that he looks slightly perverse.
>>8182
Nta but it's not unheard of. Remember how Lolcow operates, the jannies there do that all the time.
>>8176
the vpn bans actually do stop one type of attack, commercial cp spam. it's basically been explained on this other alt board: https://trashchan.xyz/meta/thread/374.html scrotal warning but most altchans have dealt with it before and tl;dr:
-Cp spammers are usually commercially based and are trying to sucker in retards to download a program or visit a site or pay them in some way
-The commercial spammers always use a VPN, but based on their browser data being logged, you can see timezones based in russia and sao paulo. Banning browsers with timezones Asia/Vladivostok, Asia/Tashkent, Asia/Yekaterinburg, Europe/Samara, and America/Sao_Paulo banned 99% of cp posters.
-Regex will work for a while but theyll just put text in the image.
-Furthermore, you can implement a hellban/shadow ban system for these spammers and once they see their post has went through, they'll stop trying to circumvent your regex. They're not very smart and they spam hundreds of sites a day in hopes to get at least one retard to click the spam.
Replies: >>8189 >>8214
>>8182 
Because I'm neurotic, and because it's the kind of position that someone with bad intentions would likely try to apply for.
>>8187
i used witchan as a russian
i was then shot 57 times
Replies: >>8190
>>8189
are you able to email nimu to request an exception?
Replies: >>8193
>>8176
Wait aren't VPNs banned here too? I guess the admin here hasn't found yours yet kek
>>8171
When women stop moralfagging other women hypocritically, so never.
>>8190
oh i'm just joking i'm fine, if she bans all russian ips then i will
Replies: >>8194
>>8193
Its not the ip, just rhe timezone. As long as you are not in those cities...
Replies: >>8196
i'm more based than all of you because my husbando is better than yours
Replies: >>8197 >>8198 >>8200
>>8194
ohh i'm super dumb
>>8195
>She doesn't know that my husbando is even more baseder than hers
>>8195
I genuinely wish everyone was this honest kek.
my husbando isn't even human so checkmate
>>8195
I didn't post about it because I didn't want other anons to feel bad, but my husbando would've dominated every husbando that got posted in the thunderdome, and he would probably dominate yours too.
Replies: >>8203 >>8204 >>8205
>>8178
waow hes cute
>>8200
Mine got called a super uke so he wouldn't have stood a chance anyway.
>>8200
i didn't post in the thunderdome for some reason but i did ponder the question, firstly i must say that i am NOT a fucking fujo because fujos are cucks and i am very defensive of my love, but he is very popular amongst f*jocucks and i think he's usually the uke but it might be kind of mixed and i think it depends on the pairing. i'm pretty sure that's partly a matter of circumstance, he could probably be the seme to most turbo basic ukes because he does have some strong and confident qualities, but his personality is pretty soft and he has a sensitive side. i don't really care about any of that though (i live in my world of delusion and I IGNORE EVERY PAIRING WITH HIM THAT I DON'T LIKE.... BECAUSE I REALLY DON'T LIKE IT, THEY MAKE ME TWEAK OUT A LITTLE. so i try to not look at it.) and i won't say who it is because h'es personal to me......
Replies: >>8206
>>8200
My husbando would remain undefeated. Not because he's more based or seme or whatever than others, but because I would defend his honor from all the other whores. My husbando is only allowed to be dominated by me and I will fight to the death over that kek.
>>8204
I believe I was cursed by a fujo witch at some point because lots of my husbandos had huge gay ships attached to them and it's hard to endure the spamming. I hate the pairings with a passion but I don't let it leave a blemish on my view of fujos as a whole. Posting a picture of him in that thread would've been a call for help.
Replies: >>8217 >>8229
>>8171
They're having an argument about this on LC so they're venting about getting baited again here.
witchan is listed on allchan.org now . . . we're fucked now, aren't we
20a361f13090b89eae8bc36b846ee34ec6e75b37d1cca720d170003e0750c05d.png
[Hide] (420.8KB, 868x960) Reverse
>>8208
It's so over.
>>8209
>the person who submitted it mentioned it was designed for women only, but I cannot verify that on the site. 
Ugggghhhhh
>>8208
you can actually ban referrals from altchan if we get browser info when posting. wether they choose to add it... i honestly believe they should.
>>8209
am i crazy or is there one or two anti-wc schizos doing everything they can to sabotage the site?
Replies: >>8215 >>8216
>>8208
I can remember an anon saying that's how the CP spammers end up finding new imageboards. It was nice while it lasted...
Replies: >>8214
>>8213
There are ways to combat this. Let's not doom yet. Like i said here,
>>8187
Cp spammers are retarded and don't really put much effort aside from assuring their post looks like it went up.
wwc.PNG
[Hide] (39.3KB, 1849x424) Reverse
>>8212
There were anons talking about it being a female-only space in the same /snow/ thread WC got namedropped in, shortly before it was posted on KF...
Replies: >>8255
>>8212
If only i could know why. If they don't like the userbase, why would they want them to come back to LC...?
>>8206
i have the exact same problem kek. i respect my fujosisters but i feel a tinge of pain every time i see him in his most popular pairing.
Replies: >>8229
>>8209
The other screen shot has the link to the magma board in it
Replies: >>8219
>>8218
That's not too hard to change at least
>>8208
Oh come on... it's too soon to turn into another CC...
>>8221
>[spoiler]ngl, I'm kinda learning japanese just for his good ending in the ps2 version[/spoiler]
>discovered yhh through wc moment
Replies: >>8225 >>8226
dfee4847fedac9ab90ad6c3404ada0640191350ee34265cd7c64e802907f48f7.jpg
[Hide] (74.4KB, 463x600) Reverse
>>8137
>Franken
Holy based anon. I love him so much he's my favorite Li from all otoge I played and ngl, I'm kinda learning japanese just for his good ending in the ps2 version
>>8222
No I was already here since the /shelter/ bunker, I just constantly forget about spoilers work in different chans
>>8222
Nta but I've been here since the beginning and I don't remember the markup either.
Replies: >>8228
>>8209
okay, i sent her an email on how to deal with the spammers. i hope she reads it and takes my suggestions into mind! ദ്ദി◝ ⩊ ◜.ᐟ let's not lose hope!
>>8226
Don't get surprised if someone assumes you're a newwag if you mess it up kek.
Replies: >>8230
>>8206
>>8217
Also have this curse. It's annoying and alienating that I'd have to pretend I enjoy being cucked to fit in.
>>8228
What does it even matter. Such an autistic thing to nitpick.
Replies: >>8231 >>8234
>>8230
WCwags have already colonized this board enough. It's embarrassing to see that some of you only arrived here because of that site.
Replies: >>8232 >>8248
>>8231
This board is essentially only used to complain about other imageboards anyway.
Replies: >>8233
>>8232
>Have some respect, ye bilgewater scoundrel. There's most loyal crew on this vessel still.
>>8230
seriously imagine acting all high and mighty about ~preserving the culture~ of a moid imageboard that hosts cuckquean porn and has barely any activity outside of being used as a bunker
Replies: >>8235 >>8236
>>8234
>moid imageboard that hosts cuckquean porn
Not the moralwagging... Are you one of the anti-cabin boywags?
Replies: >>8238
>>8234
And yet you're posting on here.
Every time I see wag I just think of a dog, don’t know if that was the intended result.
Replies: >>8239 >>8240
>>8235
how was what i said moralwagging at all
Replies: >>8242
>>8237
Reminds me of scallywag.
>>8237
scallywag.. but that makes me think. a doggy imageboard.. cute
Arf arf
>>8238
If you think you're so much better than le moid porn board, don't use the site. Simple as.
Replies: >>8244
scallywag cabin boylubber
cabin boywag...
>>8242
can you stop putting words in my mouth lol? all im saying is this shit really isnt that serious.
Replies: >>8245
>>8244
>reeee the site hosts cuckquean porn reee
That's all I heard.
Replies: >>8246
>>8245
yes im totally reeing right now im so mad grrr growl
Replies: >>8247
>>8246
Exactly. So why don't you shut up already?
>>8231
This board is literally a parody of a hoax, besides the pirate lingo in ops and jokey tone, there's not much to preserve but gatekeep against the LC crazies we all ran here from.
Replies: >>8250
lion.png
[Hide] (228.1KB, 637x681) Reverse
>how privateers look at you when you insult their cuck porn
Replies: >>8251
>>8248
Seems like there's some WC crazies emerging here too...
>>8249
Gonna be real, I've never bothered to look at the other boards hosted on here so I don't really care.
>>8209
can't nimu ask them to take it down
i had an idea for a funny post but WC is still down (sad)
Replies: >>8254
>>8253
post it here
>>8215
Isn't that tthe same archive link that was posted on the sharty? Weird.
Replies: >>8256
>>8255
It's probably the same person. Not surprised there are angry farmers who would do that.
Replies: >>8257
>>8256
That person on LC is also going on about "quirky chungus" posting. I think it's as >>7638 said. Highly likely that what we're seeing is the racist stoner person having a multi-site, several-day melty and trying to disrupt the site. From the things she said about herself on WC, she didn't seem stable, so I wouldn't put it past her.
Replies: >>8262
>>8257
not arguing with you but why do you think its the racist stoner chan
[ New thread ]
[ >>8258 ]

Ω Thread has reached reply limit. Ω


1552 replies | 169 files
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news + rules + faq + privacy + markup -
- jschan 1.7.3 + Junkuchan + vLlusion 3.0.1 -