/yohoho/ - Piracy

You've crossed treacherous waters and found our hidden cove! ☠️ SQUAWKERS GET KEELHAULED ☠️


Ω Thread has reached reply limit. Ω


12404019_69eea.gif
[Hide] (1.9MB, 500x500) Reverse
So, I'll hoist the sails and sing this sad song, Of a pirate adrift, who feels something's wrong,
Replies: >>2128 >>2475
Not op but here are some questions so we can get this thread sailing
>How do you feel about the newfag invasion in LC? Is there anything we can do about it?
>Why does LC have three admins yet somehow all of them are absent / incompetent?
>Why does CC have such absent moderation and an absent admin?

I feel like not a lot of people are talking about how a big shift with CC is because there was a big sharty fixation on it. Maybe i'm just tinfoiling though.
Replies: >>325 >>434
>>324
I'm just not talking about CC because I felt like I let everything out about them in /shelter/ and I've been permabanned so it's not like I have anything new to say about them, I figure with many anons it's the same, they probably kicked all of their og users + nonnas out so all that's left are vpn nonnies, r9kfags and moids, reminder their fucking info is outdated and there is no way to contact them.
Also to OP, thanks for the awesome picmix and containment thread.
Replies: >>327 >>328
>>325
Fair, I understand why there's no switch in admins because of how difficult it is to find a woman who would be willing to that stuff but at the same time that place is so deserted, it's disappointing. I wouldn't mind to post more on CC but for some reason I've been banned.
>>325
The random weird permabans are so confusing. I got one too, but I travel for work so I just clear my cache and I'm back anyway. I don't even know what it was for. I like the slower pace of CC as compared to LC, because I can actually keep up with the threads but on LC you blink and there's a new unpopular opinions, things you hate, vent, etc. The sharty infestation is also terrible and I bet that's where all the recent CP spam is from which has imo totally killed any site traffic anyway. I've had more fun on the /shelter/ thread and here anyway so while I may miss the CC of the past, I have no desire to go back. Maybe if snail decided to import everything to jschan or even just start fresh and ban vpn posters from posting images.
Replies: >>329 >>2744
1674008758044.png
[Hide] (961KB, 2500x2500) Reverse
>>328
I pray that CC rises from the ashes and snail finds someone new to take her place. Cece is one of the cutest mascots and I don't want her to be displaced from her home.
37424ddda9d5ef721fcd419365b34aae5b3dcd8adb2391ba314863c3746caed4.png
[Hide] (421.2KB, 759x1684) Reverse
I personally think CC is too far gone, the random mass delete waves did it for me, but now there's automated bans like social media that mods can't revert, no contact info, inability to take care of cp spam, the huge amount of newfag femcel larpers. 
I'm sorry to the miners that still stand but you have stockholm.
Replies: >>331
>>330
>I'm sorry to the miners that still stand but you have stockholm.
This is sad but true.
captchas.png
[Hide] (1.4MB, 2296x1352) Reverse
>How do you feel about the newfag invasion in LC? Is there anything we can do about it?
How come farmers are so retarded compared to the rest of the internet? So many farmers (and jannies) seriously struggle with reading, following conversations, and recognizing banter. This is obviously not new, but it has only gotten worse with time. I used to think it was because there was a lot of ESLfags, but I realized it's not that. I genuinely believe that if lolcow implemented the newer advanced captchas, it would weed out a lot of the bad posters.
so what are ye' thoughts on there being a male in the janny team? they seem averse to hiring anyone new and are obviously lacking.
when meta went off about skirby thread and it finally got deleted, it was spurred because a nona accused a janny of being a man who finds skirby hot, and tifchan replied 'not a scrote'. i don't know if i'm reaching or not, but considering how the site has been looking as of late it wouldn't surprise me. even if not, there is some kind of 'bad actor' in there i'm sure, the retarded/newfaggy redtexts and frequency of personalityfags is incessant right now.
newfaggy b&s could just be a newfag janny, but it also could be in bad faith
Replies: >>336
>>333
It wouldn't surprise me, we already had a tranny lover admin and tifmods.
I think whether the janny is a scrote or just a newfag doesn't matter, they need to gtfo.
What I would do to give CC a fighting chance
>Merge boards to have at least 2-3 boards
>Add a cp blocker preventative or something idk
>Give admin privileges to a really passionate long-time user

What I would do to give LC a golden age
>Force the coding admin to quit their job and chain them to their computer
>Hire a new janny team and pressure long-time users into becoming jannies through a quiz and verification, also ask them earnestly how autistic they are
>merge /ot/ and /m/ so the chill /m/ threads can counteract the no-chill /ot/ threads (?) Don't know if that'll work though
>merge /w/ and /snow/
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (507KB, 800x785) Reverse
how it feels to bump a dead thread but no one replies
This may be tinfoil, but do you guys think there might be a power struggle between the 3 admins? And that's why there's so little communication and a lot of shit doesn't get done?
Either that they have to all agree on shit and since they aren't coordinated it delays everything.
Replies: >>370
>>369
Wild ass guess, but I think one is being lazy or is absentee and the others aren't doing anything because that's outside their assumed role. I don't think it'd be a power struggle because we'd see a lot more admin presence since they'd be invested in lc and it would end pretty quickly, with one admin locking everyone else out of the backend before saying ''mine now".
I feel like there's two admins maximum, if there ever were three one of them must have dropped out months and months ago but because Cerb barely communicates we'll never know. I just feel we'd have more activity if three people were managing the site, one admin that occasionally pops in and a mostly absent coding admin seems to be the most we have, if they're not the same person and Cerbmin just wanted to say that there's three people under the admin trenchcoat so anons would have more faith in her.
Replies: >>384
>>377
Just in case anyone forgot, the Cerbmin team used to communicate with users. Then as soon as Hellweek 2023 happened, and dropped off the face of the earth.
When is the last time lolcow was actively recruiting jannies? There obviously isn't enough, but I can't remember the last time the farmhand applications have been up.
I realized that the cows general thread was probably the wrong place for this. Shipmates, I pose the following questions:
>Who have your favorite lolcows been?
>How long has it been since there's been a lolcow you've truly enjoyed?
>What threads do you currently particpate in?
The aly_realrealrecover threads initially lead me to lolcow. While there have been other entertaining threads over the years, no one has truly done it for me since fatvegfemme and erin painter. I've been relying on Shay to fill the void, but now even she's pittering out. Lolcow will never be the same. Mid 2010s lolcow was entertaining at the time but sucks retrospectively. 2018-2021ish were golden years for lolcow. While this is when many permanewfags joined who have made lolcow the pit it is today, milk flowed, and threads were quality. Now, there is no milk and threads suck.
Replies: >>389 >>407 >>434
>>386
Wow blackpilling bunch of questions. I’ve been chilling out in /ot/ for years just because there’s literally no milk. Ritard was fun just for being a cross-farms production and being completely delusional like only tiffies can be. But that’s it. How long ago was that? Every thread is milkless.

I was going to say in the cow thread that modern cows just aren’t as fun as oldschool cows.
>>386
>Who have your favorite lolcows been?
I wildly oscillate my favorites between horrorcows and milkless cows, Kelly and Chompurrs, Lori Lewd, stwawbwewymilk, shayna
>How long has it been since there's been a lolcow you've truly enjoyed?
I don't think I've ever really enjoyed a lolcow, more so they fill an old desire of watching the town crazy embarrass themselves in the middle of the street. It's both a reminder to keep my head screwed on right and keeps my fascination with retardation in healthy doses.
>What threads do you currently particpate in?
Dana, Jill, Moo, and Luna's threads.
>Who have your favorite lolcows been?
The Queen, Penus, and early Moo.
 
>How long has it been since there's been a lolcow you've truly enjoyed?
Years, though Lexity has been interesting. The poly chick with the kids is too horrifying for me

>What threads do you currently particpate in?
Chronic lurker
Replies: >>413
560172ce2270fedc9cd07828971ce45b5ab9a7f5201ad1cbeb3a6197022aa132.png
[Hide] (457.8KB, 500x750) Reverse
>>412
To answer op
>How do you feel about the newfag invasion in LC? Is there anything we can do about it?
My biggest gripe is the fact that every newfag has an attitude that we need to acclimate to them and not the other way around. I don't think it can be fixed, it's just a culture shift. Sad

>Why does LC have three admins yet somehow all of them are absent / incompetent?
I don't think there's 3, or I assume at least 1 is mia. I trusted them too much, and now I'm worried about my information. I feel like a clown

>Why does CC have such absent moderation and an absent admin?
CC is a husk held together by automodding and the trannies trying to cling to the idea of being a femcel. The amount of gross moidish anime memes and teehee I'm such a depressed neet is staggering. I think the admin is hoping the site will get forgotten one day so they can quietly leave
idiots.png
[Hide] (112.9KB, 1052x371) Reverse
stuff like this is why ap.n is referral only. you can't stop newfags and normies from spoiling the fun. i hate most farmers now. lcf isnt fun any more because the site is mostly neets or zoomers with 0 life experience.
>>430
No worries, we can scare them off with more obnoxious autoplaying pirate videos.
ac46b98ee13b9fde982b952c43414e7fdb9bebd2e753f615c87b0ef18ce52119.jpg
[Hide] (96.5KB, 531x680) Reverse
>>430
Torn between being pissed and finding this very funny. Zoomers and normies don't back read so once that gets buried we're fine, and the slow pace and lack of fighting on the board will bore their cortisol addled brains of the ones who do see it so they will leave and forget about it after they participate in infighting about hair colour for the 26829263rd time. Plus you can't really larp as a NEET femcel here because pirates don't align with the arsethetic and neither does the culture we've been building here.
Replies: >>433 >>479
>>432
The femcel NEET larpers are so damn annoying. I wish LC never became the LARPers paradise. The fact that they still reeeee about this IB being owned by a scrote or hosting porn is the ultimate posturing. They are the ultimate sensitive snowflakes and it's pathetic. You're right that it'll just be buried soon, since most of the users on LC are illiterate now.
Replies: >>436
>>324
>How do you feel about newfag invasion
There needs to be more bans and bullying of the newfags
>LC three admins
I have no idea there probably isn't three anymore
>Why does CC have such absent moderation
I think it's automodded and permabans based on certain words and phrases
>>386
As for lolcows I am hoping Lexity brings milk and I mostly browse /ot/ and /m/
>>430
>'its a moid IB and theres a board that none of them use with gross pornshit on it! they must be pickmes and newfags!'
i don't think any of us planned on staying but it's nice having our own space off-site, why are retards so single-minded
Replies: >>446
>>433
I don't know what's more annoying, the Tiktok zoomer "femcel" LARPers, or the holier-than-thou turbo normie stacy LARPers.  Either way, you can't swing a dead cat in LC without encountering one
weird.png
[Hide] (147.9KB, 1055x345) Reverse
They're having meltdowns now that anybody would dare use this board instead of /ot/. It's genuinely bizarre behavior.
>>437
>i'm genuinely pissed. my night is ruined.
Replies: >>439
>>438
Kek that post made me laugh too
>>437
The irony being they were the bitchy infighters the whole time, just with inferiority complexes.
Replies: >>441
crazy-alert-minion.gif
[Hide] (98.7KB, 640x640) Reverse
>>440
tfw i don't think i've seen a single infight on this entire board kek
Replies: >>443
>>437
tbh it's probably mods trying to scare people away from it. Good riddance stay there and fuck off
>>441
Exactly, no mutinies here
>>435
They're single-minded because they feel as though LC is their safe space and that they have to posture themselves as the most farming farmer that ever farmed to be accepted. A lot of them really believe that LC is 100% women only, when really a good third of the userbase is male. The whole radfem LARP thing is so tiresome. It's annoying that every time you bring up a boyfriend or a guy you know, anons act like you're a pickme tradthot bippie sex slave.
Replies: >>448
>>446
Exactly and all of the ones who behave that way have no idea that they are the infighting retards that shit up the site kek. Not all of them are newfags, no, but they are the jaded catty bitches that make the site less enjoyable and distract from cows
Replies: >>449
>>448
It's a form of permanewfaggotry that exists because of incomplete & inconsistent moderation. The site culture has shifted too much because there was a deluge of underage retards exposed to LC through TT and Twitter at the tail end of 2021. They really do believe that LC is for femcels, NEETs, radfems, and the elk, and they will get really aggressive really fast whenever they are met with a modicum of resistance to their LARP. Just looking at how "anons" are talking about Trump on LC, it's obvious that most of the site users now are 16-20 year olds that never moved out of their parents' house.
Replies: >>450
>>449
everytime i read a post mentioning cohabitating with parents still i check out from that particular thread for awhile. no wonder there’s so much arguing on there.
elizabeth-pirate.gif
[Hide] (669.2KB, 220x295) Reverse
Ayrt and I'm a zoomer, been on the site since covid kek, and completely agree. I immediately clicked with the actual side of lolcow and came for the community/culture coming from a history of genuinely being ostracised by peers and men in online spaces when browsing forums and ibs as a teen. Lolcows core userbase is primarily women like that, those are the nonas who actually care about the site and want to keep it running. 
It's strange that they think the way to fix the site is by screeching about anything and everything when its clearly to make the jannies do their fucking jobs kek. We're all onsite for the same reasons, no?
Replies: >>453 >>455 >>464
>>452
Go back
Replies: >>454 >>457
>>453
smh
>>452
>posting
>deleting
>reposting but with a pirate gif this time
Replies: >>458
>>437
I do wish privateers stopped trying to defend us but this is too funny. Nothing I said in that anon's picrel was false nor came from a place of hate and additionally there's no real reason that men would care to raid the board- we're not talking about things that trigger or interest men (of which LC and CC both have, and that's why they're infested with moids) and again we have like 50 posts made per day maximum so there's no rush to be gained from posting upsetting ragebait because most anons are probably doing other things and if they reply, won't do so for several hours. It is such a non-issue, who cares that there's a separate board with porn on it that gets a handful of posts per fortnight, it's not going to hurt this place. Get a grip. God forbid anons don't want to deal with headaches and it's not immediately 100% SUPER BASED 
>>453
Now, now. Some zoomies are okay if they actually lurked. Let's not rock the boat.
Replies: >>461
>>455
Not enough pirate gifs as of late
Replies: >>460
>>458
22ca8ce3caa038742d0ebf69d8d48e168850fa0c_00.gif
[Hide] (462.7KB, 306x200) Reverse
>>457
Agreed, I don't have a problem with zoomies by virtue of them being zoomies, I have a problem with obnoxious unintegrated retards who can't read and barge onto a site just because it was namedropped on Tumblr/Tiktok that has an established culture and demand that the culture change to fit with what the rest of social media wants.
Replies: >>462
>>461
I miss when newfags were so scared of being banned that they only lurked for at least several months (or years from my experience). Though I guess there's no point if all you're lurking on are threads populated by /ot/ tourists.
>>451
>>452
You're exactly the type of anon I'm talking about.

The original core set of anons from the /cgl/ days were normal, well-adjusted, women between 20-30 that enjoyed cosplay and otaku culture. Yes, there were some underage people, there were some men, there were some NEETs, but these were the minority. Most anons were regular women. They regularly attended conventions, had lots of online and in-person connections, had stable jobs, and used anonymous IBs to blow off steam and gossip about the annoying members of the community.

When SR split from /cgl/, and then LC came out of the SR's ashes, that core community would dominate for the next few years. Concurrently, the popular perception of IBs would begin to turn sour. Originally, IBs were just a normal variant of internet forum. Most users of IBs like 4chan were regular people. Yet, maybe because of the preeminence of /pol/, more and more people that weren't familiar with IBs began to view IBs as cesspits of maladjusted weirdos or political freaks. 

That change in popular perception is the thing that makes newfags so annoying. The newfags post ~2018 come to LC not because they want to gossip about retards online, but because they feel alienated because they're losers or weirdos. They think that LC is a place for people like them, because they view LC as a "female alternative 4chan." You can see this view espoused in a lot of posts on Twitter, Tumblr, TT, or other social media posts when they refer to LC, they genuinely believe that all IBs are full of weirdos.

This is why we have an endemic of newfags that turn out to be NEETs, social retards, losers, radfem LARPers, etc., because they don't even understand that LC is not a "community," it's an anonymous IB about documenting freaks online with a focus on women's opinions. They want to pretend that it's a place for strange women to unite and commiserate, when really we don't even know if the person we're replying to is a woman or a man by the nature of anonymity.

You summed up the problem with modern LC very succinctly: newfags seriously believe that LC is meant for ostracized terminally-online women. In reality, YOU were the kind of women that oldfags used to gossip and laugh at. Newfags are the cows, that's why there's barely any milk these days. The recent administration and moderation decisions lead me to believe that even the staff have bought into this big lie.
>>464
I said online nona, I was incredibly well-adjusted irl and I'm an extrovert, I just had differing opinions to a lot of people? I was a normal teenager but I also had a PC. I played games and liked gossiping and lurking. I don't have many females I can talk to irl openly currently and enjoy having an anon space to sperg. Thanks for the essay though
Replies: >>467 >>469
>>466
That is not an essay, zoomer. It is frustrating when zoomers act like reading or writing more than 10 sentences is some kind of advanced intellectual feat. 

Not having women to talk to in real life makes you maladjusted, so my point stands. The fact that you use LC as a stand-in for real-life socialization is the problem, and that's been the problem on LC for a while.
Replies: >>468 >>471
>>467
I get it you just don't like zoomers, that's fine
Replies: >>470
>>466
Should have lurked moar
>>468
That's really not what I'm saying at all. I get that I offended you, but I'm just saying it like it is. Sometimes the truth can be painful. If you want your hand held, I'm not going to be the one to do it. So, I'm sorry that my post hurt your feelings.
>>467
I do have female friends irl and you don't know me. Jesus christ kek. I'm offended that you're being intentionally reactionary purely because you saw 'zoomer' and couldn't comprehend I'd be anything but what you picture in your head. Talk about maladjusted
Replies: >>472 >>473
>>471
Zoomer, nobody is trying to fight you, or demean you. Just read the post. If your feelings were hurt, that's okay, they're your feelings and you're allowed to have them. You don't have to start projecting all this crap, or trying to start fights, or try to defend yourself, because at the end of the day everyone is entitled to their opinions. I wrote my interpretation of why LC went down the shitter, and newsflash - it's not only your fault.
>>471
No offense to you persay but this sort of defensiveness is also why LC is insufferable at times, you're anonymous, it's okay to just not respond anymore.
Replies: >>474 >>480
>>473
I know but her tinfoiling is rubbing me the wrong way kek. We all have lapses in judgement sometimes "( – ⌓ – )"
Replies: >>485
>>464
>post 2018 newfags
7 years on lolcor is newfagging? Do you have autism or something, like are you this intensely change averse?
Replies: >>480
>>464
>there were some underage people, there were some men, there were some NEETs
What is this historical revision? The OG PT threads were all full of horny scrotes.
Replies: >>480
>>432
Who's the artist? The website in the corner is a bit too blurry for me
Replies: >>481
>>473
NTAYRT but I agree. Anonymity is a blessing, but too few realize this. A lot of anons take things way too personally online, probably because they're young like the AYRT. I know that when I was younger, I used to feel the need to defend myself too, even in anonymous environments.

>>475
I was referring to newfags that have joined after ~2018. I did not say that everyone that joined after ~2018 is a newfag. I, personally, noticed that around late 2018 is when the culture started to shift, and it's also when integration started to become a more noticeable problem.

>>476
Yeah, there were some horny men in PT's threads. Like I said, "there were some men."
Replies: >>604
>>479
Unomoralez
https://unomoralez.com/
https://unomoralez.tumblr.com/
Replies: >>484
9cd4c0ba16546a0f6e8417b176a9f6da59db32c92f7157a14f2ffd515aebddd6.jpg
[Hide] (10.9KB, 300x300) Reverse
>>464
NTA, I agree with your points but I do think oldfag vs newfag arguments inevitably lead to a bit of bad blood. Adding on to your "newfags are cows" point, this is incredibly true and one of the worst things to have happened in my opinion. I initially came to LC for western Vocaloid drama (so about mid 2017), and while that thread wasn't the fastest it is completely dead these days because most of things that were being laughed at were behaviours that a lot of anons do. Something like AkiGlancy being into shotacon wouldn't be mocked in passing these days but instead be turned into a moralistic debate that somehow has something to do with radical feminism, behaviour that was explicitly made fun of and called retarded. I don't think fatvegfemme would have ever gotten her own threads if she was discovered today, even someone as obviously retarded as Dana still has anons crying for her thread to be closed. Also, the misconception that "cow = bad person" is too prevalent and is killing the cow boards, and it's so obviously coming from people who've become holier than thou types after constant exposure to retarded tumblr (and tiktok these days) callouts and youtube drama.
I don't mind that LC has a place where non-cow discussion can be held, some of my favourite guilty pleasure threads are 8 year old locked /ot/ threads, but it was a disaster when the off topic community overrid the initial purpose. Especially after moid and troon hate became so overt and attracted Tumblr users that would have been cowed prior.
Replies: >>508
5c88cc30a1b6427ae3254018187181a6c73aa1c62223c255e48cea58670cebcc.jpg
[Hide] (54.3KB, 960x540) Reverse
no one's seriously going onto lc and defending jc & cuckqing's honour, right? surely it's all shitposting?
Replies: >>520
>>481
thank you! ღゝ◡╹)ノ♡
Replies: >>485
>>474
>>484
I'm so glad we have kaomoji, balm for my soul
o( ̄▽ ̄)d
Replies: >>488
I'm_a_zoomer_too.gif
[Hide] (17.2MB, 400x225) Reverse
If anon is a zoomer... I'm a retarded zoomer too
Replies: >>488 >>489
>>464
couldn't have summed it up better myself
0d2.jpeg
[Hide] (17.3KB, 499x500) Reverse
>>485
I love it so much (˶˃ ᵕ ˂˶) .ᐟ.ᐟ
>>486
Hi sister! I think same anon is baiting in mundane shit right now, I'm retarded
Replies: >>491 >>499 >>508
>>486
/yhh/ confirmed to be zoomer territory, we run this shit now kek
>>488
she came here to brag about being a zoomer and when she got flak she screenshotted and posted it on lc? i hope thats not true
Replies: >>492
>>491
ayrt and i wasn't the anon who posted it. did the schizochans really just move over here? what a shame
Replies: >>497
>>492
so you got flak and now your accusing other anons of posting it on lcf? kek
>>488
Board owner KEEP THE MUSIC KEEP THE MUSIC
ᕙ( ᗒᗣᗕ )ᕗᕙ( ᗒᗣᗕ )ᕗ
Replies: >>502 >>508
>now your accusing other anons of posting it on lcf?
Jesus why did that retard have to squawk, now the ESL schizo fags are here
fun_police.jpg
[Hide] (90.1KB, 882x307) Reverse
I hope the emojis and music scare them off ooooh watch out Σ(°Д°;
Seriously though nonnies please stop defending us, they more they shit on us the less interest we get as they work it out of their system.
>>499
We need MORE MUSIC! MORE PARROT GIFS!
Replies: >>503 >>508
200w.gif
[Hide] (481.8KB, 200x264) Reverse
>>502
nta and you're right. let them shitfight kek
Replies: >>508
>>482
AYRT, I know that the newfag v oldfag debate is tiresome, but it really wasn't my intention to offend anybody that joined post 2018. I was just pointing out that the anons that joined post 2018 have a different concept of what LC is and what LC should be compared to the original userbase from pre 2018. It's important that newfags don't take it personally. When I say "newfag," really I'm referring to anons that haven't integrated. Some new users integrate very well and very quickly, and I wouldn't really consider those users newfags. Being a newfag is exhibiting very specific traits that mark them as unintegrated.

>I don't mind that LC has a place where non-cow discussion can be held, some of my favourite guilty pleasure threads are 8 year old locked /ot/ threads, but it was a disaster when the off topic community overrid the initial purpose. 
I don't think the off-topic boards are a bad idea at all. I like using the off-topic boards. I think that there is a very clear dissonance happening. Almost all the traffic, all the rule breaking, all the infighting, all the baiting happens on the off-topic boards, but, the administration still believes that the cow boards are the main part of the site. This dissonance ends up creating a lot of problems, and it impacts the quality of the site overall.

>most of things that were being laughed at were behaviours that a lot of anons do
That's the biggest issue, really. We have Fanny for example, who a lot of anons milked for having incestuous fantasies about her father, but then at the same time, we now have a whole thread on /m/ dedicated to incest. So, how can we really laugh at Fanny when we have a whole subsection of anons that do basically the same thing that she does? We also have anons like that one sex-addict from the Friend Finder threads posted in the Vent thread, IYKYK. It's just so strange that a website originally made for the purpose of making fun of freaks has suddenly become the home of so many freaks. It's ironic in a way.

>Also, the misconception that "cow = bad person" is too prevalent and is killing the cow boards, and it's so obviously coming from people who've become holier than thou types after constant exposure to retarded tumblr (and tiktok these days) callouts and youtube drama.
100%. A lot of anons are way too interested in "cancelling" cows. They don't understand that the purpose of a cow is to milk them for laughs. I tend to blame this train of thought on anons that were raised on Tumblr from 2016-2020 and the social justice crap that they were exposed too.  Tumblrinas have always been a plague on LC, and I strongly believe that the majority of TIFs on LC actually found it via Tumblr.

>>504
>>503
>>502
>>498
>>499
You all addressing them here is just adding fuel to the fire. Just ignore them. The less attention that is brought to this board, the better. We can talk about what's wrong with LC, what we don't like about it, but screencapping random retard's posts just to say "Look at this dumbass!" is kinda stupid.

>>488
Accusing me of posting screenshots of this site to LC just because you and I had a disagreement is ridiculous and it's petty. I don't talk about JC on LC, or any other IB or community, because it's important to stay hushed about these things. Just because I made a post that you disagree with or found upsetting doesn't mean that it's bait, or that I'm some kind of secret double agent for a cabal of baiters.
Replies: >>509 >>510 >>609
>>508
Where in the world did I accuse you of posting it. Get off your PC anon.
>>508
I'm not reading all that but I deleted my post, I didn't even want to put it in this thread I'm just drunk kek. I don't even hate other sites, I'm just happier here. Relax nona ain't nobody reading all that
>>510
Update, I started reading it all
Replies: >>512
>>511
It's not like she even makes bad points she's just unnecessarily rude and obviously enjoys shit-stirring kek
Replies: >>513 >>515
>>512
They're good but longwinded points, also she doesn't need to >> me when I deleted my post like a loyal shipmate
Replies: >>515 >>516
>>510
Nayrt but ilu, please continue to drunk post on a whim. I'd join you but it's wayyy too early for me.
Replies: >>516 >>517
>>510
If you don't want to read the whole post that's fine, I really only used 4 sentences to reply to you. If you don't want to read 4 sentences, I don't know what to tell you.

>>512
Sometimes, people that aren't used to being spoken to bluntly may perceive that as rudeness. I never said anything rude, I'm just not covering my thoughts with a superficial veneer. You should try it sometime. I don't try to stir shit. If anons are offended by what I say, then that's on them and not me.

>>513
Your posts still show up until I refresh the page. I can reply to you if I so please.
Replies: >>517
>>513
kek yes, maybe she just has turbo-tism and we should lay off kek
>>514
i too wish i could join but i'm too lazy to go to the shops
f6be7d4dba55f1a527844bd636d2aea13c6201f3f6c16877fb4de2215e69d636.jpg
[Hide] (22.3KB, 390x280) Reverse
>>514
Don't worry, I'm drinking enough for the both of us

>>515
Then get off the page and come back, my post will be gone and we can sing shanties
>>510
>relax nona ain't nobody reading all that
can we leave this attitude on lolcow?
Replies: >>519
>>518
You clearly didn't read my update
>>483
TBH, I've seen a few anons that are aware of this place humblebragging about it on LC and it's annoying. Nobody here should be talking about JC or defending it on LC, because that's how chronic baiters, infighters, and scrotes end up finding out about this place. It's kind of annoying that nobody has any sense of gatekeeping anymore.
Replies: >>604
If you want to infight or complain about other users within the board, please take it >>506 here. Otherwise it's off topic
Replies: >>523 >>527
>>522
Nobody is infighting. Anons are allowed to have disagreements. It's normal. I personally think that you just want someone to be your wench. Maybe you could make an e-dating thread.
Replies: >>525
455e340237156deae9bc41004d1d20850ec95919f4b7c71733d4680526f28b77.jpg
[Hide] (17.8KB, 300x300) Reverse
>>523
Congratulations on being my first wench
Replies: >>526
>>524
I know. I was riffing with her, kek.
>>525
Nooooooooo
>>522
If you go to this post you will get gold! Ignore the other anons they are jealous and wish to keep it to themselves!
d61fa1afbd87e7363f7442f9d6fd23df3ff1962c002cf3e01bffc08e4d30f151.png
[Hide] (174.9KB, 1042x303) Reverse
Sometimes I'm reminded that a lot of anons on Lolcow are genuine creeps. This anon made a fake dating profile to screen record a bunch of women's profiles and upload it online. I hate when anons are so anal about being anti-scrote, but then they engage in the exact same creep behavior that scrotes do.
>>529
What the fuck? This is soo strange
Replies: >>531
>>530
Right? At first I thought I was being sensitive, but then I clicked on the links and its deadass just random women. I can't imagine creating fake profiles on dating apps, just to screen record 20+ women's profiles to upload to Lolcow. It's actual weirdo behavior.
Replies: >>534
>>529
Actual schizo behavior
Replies: >>536
>>531
NTA but if anon was just relaying that information it would just be a bit shitty but this is some incredibly unsocialised creeper shit.
Replies: >>536
>>533
And its the way that almost all the replies see nothing wrong with what that anon did.
>>534
If she just said what she wanted to say and didn't go through the trouble of recording so many women's profiles and then uploading it, it would been fine, but instead she acted like a creep.
>>529
if they just recorded and documented the men like a sperg i would not care as much but jesus, far too much time on their hands and obviously never interacted with people normally
egregious.png
[Hide] (39.7KB, 818x297) Reverse
all the gay farmhands hired recently need a serious wake up call and the admin needs to be more present in moderation. i posted something with 6 sentences and 2 paragraph breaks because every sentence was a new topic, but i got this ban. i wouldn't have been so annoyed by it if the farmhand didnt say "ohhh i pick and choose which reddit spacing posts to ban tee hee!" like if theres a rule then that rule should be followed for EVERY post not just the ones you personally think deserve it.
>>541
Can we see the post?
Replies: >>543
>>542
no but it was like

"example, sentence.

next example, sentence.

next example, sentence."

i know that its reddit spacing and that its not allowed, im not mad that i got banned im frustrated that the bans arent being issued fairly. its irritating knowing that farmhands pick and choose which rules they want to follow. farmhands should issue bans fairly based on rules not on personal feelings
>>541
Kind of like how jannies will only ban the infighter that they disagree with instead of both parties for infighting. The moderation has been whack since 2024.
>>541
 I know "the farmhands only respond to reported posts blah blah blah" but if it's like you've described I've seen multiple recent /ot/ posts with similar spacing. Were you saying something that an anon or farmhand would get assmad about (that's not bait because you would've been banned as so)?
Replies: >>548
>>547
its deadass what i described it as. this happened back in december. i wasnt baiting or anything i was just talking normally on /ot/. the thing im mad about is that a farmhand would type in the ban message "hey, usually i dont ban people for this, but for you i am banning you, because i thought your post was bad" when they could have typed "reddit spacing" or better yet they could stop banning based on their feelings and just follow the rules. either everyone is banned for reddit spacing or nobody is, but to pick and choose when the rules apply is gay.
df3871ba76eb2714a6569d9b8c3139bada48fef89c79aea02e5cfd09a7bdd321.jpg
[Hide] (282KB, 1002x552) Reverse
How are anons falling for this? What is wrong with them?
>>562
Outside of making me yo-ho-ho with how silly it b was, this opened my eyes to the fact that most posters in /ot/ are not familiar with lolcow at all
>>562
Because LC is 75% newfags now, a lot of /ot/fags fell for it because the majority of them have never ventured off of /ot/ and they aren't familiar with cows or LC culture.
>>562
Watching all the tourists crying about how just because they didn't recognize one of the oldest cows that doesn't make them newfags is hilarious.
IMG_9136.jpeg
[Hide] (191.5KB, 1242x1428) Reverse
Btw the farmhands are BIG mad that people use this board (๑˃́ꇴ˂̀๑)

Inb4 "don't talk about JC!" I never said anything about /yhh/ I just got annoyed by anons saying the cuck board owner is a moid when she's a woman all because they don't know shit.

My first response in the whole thread, so not really infighting, but I guess we all know that "infighting" is just when jannies disagree with you ദ്ദി(˵ •̀ ᴗ - ˵ ) ✧

Jannies are so retarded to try and have all these quirky quips in their ban messages though because most of the time nobody sees them once they switch IPs. How much time do you think a janny wastes thinking of a zinger that will never be seen by anyone?
Replies: >>567 >>568 >>605
>>566
KEKKKK they hate to see us winning
>>566
The cuckquean hate is funny as hell and you know that farmers would think it's a based kink if you presented it slightly different. Why do they use it as a gotcha? Besides not having anything to actually critique. That insult doesn't work that well on women I find.
Also I do wonder how the doodle board is going to turn out because it was taken over by privateers, will doodlemin post it or will she delete the layers?
Replies: >>569 >>572
>>568
>Why do they use it as a gotcha?
Because they are huffing insane amounts of copium.

In their world, an absent admin, retarded jannies, shit culture, non-stop infighting and baiting, that's all normal. They actually *hate* that JC has a responsive admin, normal moderation, and a nascent culture because deep down it reminds them of everything they've lost and everything they'll never have.

They all think they're too good for JC because this IB was started by a moid, as if LC wasn't started by a moid. They think they're too good to be posted on an IB that has some porn boards, even though LC is filled with creepy sex shit too. They think that we're all trying to be super secretive because they don't wanna scroll through a bunker thread out of laziness. If it wasn't so pathetic, it'd be funny.
Replies: >>570 >>572
>>569
Cerbmin making 5 posts a year meanwhile Webmin takes at most 48 hours to reply and farmers hate him for it. At least Webmin admits to being a scrote and doesn't pretend to be three women.
>>568
and i doubt any of us are even looking on those boards, maybe once or twice accidentally(like me), they're dead anyways and nasty. it's retarded because they could lurk for a total of one minute and get the actual picture that JC has been used as a bunker in the past but instead they need something to whine about. they'd have done the same if it was on any other site
>doodle board
it seems like doodlemin likes our art ⸜( ´ ꒳ ` )⸝

>>569
>They all think they're too good for JC
which is just so retarded to me, mainly for your point that lc was started by a moid and jannied by them. but also none of us here are condoning it kek, even in the screenshots they post its evident that the cuckmins handed the board over?
afaik our plan is to jump ship when something new comes up, but like you said they're just lazy and cbf'ed lurking before making assumptions
Replies: >>573
>>572
At least Webmin gives us the space to create a launchpad though. Cerbmin would have banned us all if he was active.

Most of the anons on LC now don't even know the history of LC, let alone that it was a spin off of CC or how it was spun off from LC. The Luna debacle tonight was pretty eye opening for a lot of anons that the /ot/fags have always been unintegrated tourists, but at the same time they're the ones that have to posture the hardest because they want to be seen as the realest farmers. It's stupid.
Replies: >>574
>>573
>Cerbmin would have banned us all if he was active.
kek at him only banning one nona associated with yohoho and not any of the other insane bait posts. there's no bias though!
Replies: >>575
>>574
Well it was probably one of the jannies not Cerbmin but I get your point kek.
Replies: >>576
>>575
it wouldn't surprise me if at least one of them was posting in the convo leading up to it
Replies: >>577
>>576
No way. Cerbmin is not on LC, I don't think he's been on LC in a long time. I'm pretty sure farmhands use his tag to post and pretend to be him at times because they don't wanna admit they're a team without a leader. I saw a post about that on CC a while back that was pretty convincing.
Replies: >>578
>>577
ayrt and all responses on email are from cerbmin but i think you're right. at least some of them aren't him. 
when i say one of them posting i mean maybe an associate or other janny. a bit of a tinfoil but, we already know that theres autistic baity jannies this isn't out of the realm of possibility kekek
>>562
This sobered me, at this point /ot/ needs to be hidden. I’m so done with newfags, LC is dead
Replies: >>618
>>480
I think this kind of defensiveness is just due to how drastically the internet has changed. I think youths are just not used to things not mattering, they're used to internet bloodsports, where you have to defend your position to the grave. Anyone should be able to read >>464 and reflect, ignoring the parts that don't fit one's specific situation with acknowledgement of those that do. I don't find it rude at all, it's just a perspective that's just as valuable as any other.

>>520
I was considering posting about it explicitly in the moovieroom, but I enjoy gatekeeping too much. I agree with rules-chan that this sort of dissemination would be better than outright posting it in the worst offending threads in /ot/.
>>529
CC is just as bad about this. There's a whole thread on /x/ about the creepiest women ever. I hope it's larping scrotes, genuinely scary posters are on CC, unreal.

>>541
Reddit spacing is fake as fuck, it was just made up for one of the hellweeks and has stuck around. Everywhere on the internet does two breaks for clarity. Even verbose-chan did it, totally normal natural way to break up chunks of text.

>>566
The sassy redtexts are too much for me. Just sweep it up and save your one liners for the open mic night.
I wonder why hasn't any townhall been held since 2021
Replies: >>642
>>508
>It's just so strange that a website originally made for the purpose of making fun of freaks has suddenly become the home of so many freaks. It's ironic in a way.
It does make sense somewhat. Freaks are the ones who feel the greatest need to stand over other freaks, so they can feel that "i might be freak, but at least im not as bad as THOSE freaks". Even if well-adjusted people are the ones who started with the idea of making fun them, I can see how the freaks would be attracted to it and eventually take over. After all, who do you think will be spending the most time obsessing over cows: well-adjusted people with grass to touch, or no-life alogs?
Replies: >>614 >>642
Screenshot_20250213_115846.png
[Hide] (6.9KB, 372x59) Reverse
Farmers don't know how to picrel?
Replies: >>611 >>613
>>610
Don't let them find out, it's funnier this way
>>610
absolute state of zoomers tbh
>>609
nta but op implying that lc has always been used by stacies is a topkek
Replies: >>616
>>614
Nta but nowhere did anybody mention Stacey except you.
5147732477321.png
[Hide] (153.8KB, 1179x829) Reverse
Farmers will post this then larp as Stacy
Replies: >>618 >>635 >>637
polycule_slob_bait.png
[Hide] (39.4KB, 1095x128) Reverse
>>586
Oh definitely. /ot/ is the home to anons like picrel, that don't know anything about LC so they take an in-joke and assume that it's bait. I saw the picrel in /meta/ and my eyes rolled so far back into my head that they almost got stuck.

>>617
I don't understand why anons aren't allowed to vent anymore without people like you getting upset. Nobody is claiming to be a Stacy in that picrel. Taking a picture of this vent and trying to make it into a "gotcha" is lame and trying to extrapolate and assume what this anon does elsewhere on LC is stupid. In the real world, some women have fat boyfriends and sometimes their boyfriends go bald. That's just how human relationships go. The whole man-hating posturing where anytime an anon mentions having a boyfriend she's met with ridicule and disdain is tired and boring. Why did that post make you feel something to the point of bringing it to JC? It's a mundane vent.
Replies: >>619 >>620
>>618
Long-winded way to admit your Nigel is also fat and bald kek

SCOUNDREL WAS KEELHAULED FOR THIS POST Excessive baiting

Replies: >>621
>>618
>The whole man-hating posturing where anytime an anon mentions having a boyfriend she's met with ridicule and disdain is tired and boring
NTA and I agree with you, but you're really drawing conclusions from that anons post when it's just a single sentence. perhaps let her elaborate before assuming every anon here is your headcanon
Replies: >>621
>>619
I'm a lesbian. I just think it looks goofy when an anon complains about her boyfriend (who she never claimed to be a nigel) and people like you have a hissy fit.
>>620
Read >>619 and tell me I wasn't right KEK
Replies: >>622 >>623
>>621
Second ayrt and the thing is I genuinely agree with a lot of her points but she doesn't need to be so accusatory kek. That behaviour is going to turn here into LC and I'd personally like to avoid infighting as opposed to baiting fellow nonas
Replies: >>627
>>621
>I'm a lesbian.
Lesbianism isn’t real

SCOUNDREL WAS KEELHAULED FOR THIS POST Excessive baiting

5m5y42-3265860898.jpg
[Hide] (41.8KB, 625x626) Reverse
>>623
Replies: >>626
>>625
I’m not baiting. All women are either attracted to men or polilez.

SCOUNDREL WAS KEELHAULED FOR THIS POST Excessive baiting

>>622
Calling a spade a spade isn't being accusatory.
Replies: >>630
>>626
womp womp!
>>626
>>623
This is the lc/cc bunker thread, please refer here >>506 for further debate
200w_(1).gif
[Hide] (555.5KB, 200x200) Reverse
>>627
Not going to respond to you after this because it's clear what type of anon you are throughout this thread, but can you maybe go take your infighty behaviour back to LC? Not wanted here (*ᴗ͈ˬᴗ͈)ꕤ*.゚
Replies: >>631
>>630
But behavior like >>626 and >>623 is welcome here? Come on.
Replies: >>632
>>631
I said I wouldn't reply but how dense are you? I literally reported that poster, you're not wanted here kek
Replies: >>633
>>632
I just don't get why you're aggro. I called out the baiter for baiting, but somehow I'm an infighter? Be real.
Replies: >>635
64cab4e5c33c192dfb5216e46ea92cea04fea1488ad66f4a9ee90051df72df2f_1.mp4
[Hide] (193.3KB, 570x590, 00:04)
Reminder

SCOUNDREL WAS KEELHAULED FOR THIS POST kek, but don't bait

Replies: >>643
>>633
You called out >>617 who then clarified, not the actual baiter. You're throwing a schizo shit fit because you know that you're passive aggressive and enjoy getting reactions online
Replies: >>637
>>635
>>617 never clarified? I think you're reading the thread wrong or you're mistaken.
>>607
Probably because the administration is too lazy and they don't want to deal with the autistic fury of the user base. I think that Cerbmin knows stuff isn't working, but he's too proud to actually come out and just admit it. If there was a town hall, he'd have a lot to answer for and I don't think he's interested in that.

>>609
>obsessing over cows
I think this is part of the culture change too. Before, a lot of cows featured on LC were really chronically online and the milk was so easy to find. You could go onto any cow's profiles and be met with a deluge of milk. Now, a lot of the cows are pretty dry and so anons really have to reach for milk and it makes it come off as obsessive at times. The Taylor R anons or Skirby anons come to mind when I say this.
Replies: >>668
>>634
>>626
>>623
kek at the fake redtext, but let's not act like this, please.
Replies: >>644
>>643
Wait there's a way to fake redtext on here? KEK
Replies: >>649
>>644
No, those are just regular ban messages, you can do this though
Replies: >>652 >>655
>>649
Yeah I like all the extra text effects on JC a lot. Especially the pink > sign writing. I was just confused what she meant by "fake redtext."

All the extra text options make me realize how outdated and lame LC is, but I do miss the girltalk theme. The pink theme here is too fleshy for my tastes.
Replies: >>658
>>649
LOL really? I didn't see any bans besides one I did earlier, so I assumed it was faked somehow. Did webmin and I stackban this nonnie into the shadowrealm?
Yes, that's exactly what happened, webmin's ban showed up under the logs. Bye nonnie, good luck.
Replies: >>656 >>657 >>658
>>655
KEK I figured it was something like that, I reported her posts and I think the one calling me passive aggressive did too. Either way, crazy that Webmin actually cares about his website and does work, it's such a different admin style from Cerbmin and it's a really helpful.
Replies: >>662
>>655
Yes, that was me. She caught a temporary global ban since the only reports that are working at the moment for /yohoho/ are global reports. I'll be enabling reports to board staff shortly.
Replies: >>661
>>652
LC is still leagues ahead of 4chan, still no video with audio in 2025, I think at some point IBs just stop updating software because it's a pain, especially if it's like LC where they developed their own thing on top of the previous software that just makes moving things ass.
>>655
I think so, there's no option for redtext on the faq
>>657
Thank youuu for doing board-only reports soon, & thanks for being so active.
>>656
>I reported her posts
That was obviously a scrote invading from the other boards anon kek
Replies: >>663
>>662
I don't know for sure, I say "her" because my default is "her." It was definitely from LC though. At least there's a new Mundane Shit thread so that JC convo is basically lost media now, hopefully no more tards show up to try and shit up the place.
Replies: >>674
>not gonna reply anymore
>keeps replying
some people were born to be bait junkies smh

>>642
2nd ARYT
I think part of the "dryness" of current cows is also due to a shift in what is considered milk. Like >>464 said, cows are becoming the userbase, so what would be considered milk to oldfags isn't even given a passing glance by newfags because they think that's normal behavior.
I still have faith that this place can become a new farm, or at least the precursor to a new one if the technically inclined nonas don't get complacent and finally get our mythical female-run IB off the ground. I think it was inevitable that LC would eventually get to the point it is right now. It got too popular, so of course it started attracting outsiders faster than the community was able to integrate them. If the immigration rate is low enough, we can get newfags educated in our ways and so they can help educate those who come after them, but past a certain critical mass they will instead dilute the original values of the community and when new people show up, they will see more examples of tourists rather than true members, so they will get the wrong idea and everything spirals out of control.
That's why I think a gatekept outpost like this is valuable. Get only the distilled core of LC and keep it strictly about milking cows so outsiders have no reason to come here instead of the infested site. Then repeat the process when the unintegrated newfags attain critical mass again.
It's like... I was gonna make an analogy, but it ended up sounding too much like eugenics, so nvm kek
Replies: >>673 >>677 >>699
majima-goro-majima.gif
[Hide] (131.9KB, 220x140) Reverse
>>668
>some people were born to be bait junkies smh
i'm a retard for real sometimes smh, i'm bored ;c
>I think it was inevitable that LC would eventually get to the point it is right now. It got too popular.
100%, social media has always evolved very rapidly and there's nothing we can do to undo those changes. I agree with focusing more on cows, it seems like a lot of the oldfags who are understandbly not too pleased with the newfags have given up on contributing. There are definitely good cows to be had at the moment but older users aren't as interested in their milk and the people who used to contribute are either gone/not as active, and newfags only use OT kek
>I was gonna make an analogy, but it ended up sounding too much like eugenics, so nvm kek
well now you gotta  ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶
Replies: >>677 >>678 >>679
>>663
>It was definitely from LC though.
ofc it was from LC, idk who thought it was to good idea to shill this place there. now we're gonna have niggers coming here to see if they can shit it up like they did to LC. if we must bring people over, we should point them to the public /bunker/ thread instead of directly here. those who actually care about finding a new place will bother to read the damn thread, while the adhd zoomers will remain filtered
Replies: >>675 >>678
>>674
>we should point them to the public /bunker/ thread instead of directly here
during the first couple days i saw some nonas going that route and i did it too, it seemed to get a handful of loyal shipmates on board and worked. if we are to do that we should wait a while to let the dust settle ofc
>>668
I'm the ayrt, and yeah, a lot of what used to called "milk" ended up becoming ordinary internet stuff. Photo editing is a prime example of this.
>Get only the distilled core of LC
This is part of why the bunker threads are always so fun, at least for the first while. The CC bunker thread this year during the image outage was really great for the first few days, it felt like a snapshot of old LC. Newfags, tourists, they're less likely to know about these places.
>a certain critical mass
It's a good way to put it, yeah. Somewhere along the way, the line was crossed, and now we have a bunch of defensive idiots that don't even know who Luna is.
>Then repeat the process when the unintegrated newfags attain critical mass again.
I don't think it has to be so cyclical. Part of why the newfags took over is because the moderation team got really lazy. They stopped caring about integration, and the whole site suffered from it. The staff at LC are just as much to blame for the situation as the newfags are.

>>673
>it seems like a lot of the oldfags who are understandbly not too pleased with the newfags have given up on contributing.
It's not only this, it's also that there's this weird artificial standard that cows are expected to have now. A lot of anons take LC way too seriously and they have this superiority complex about which cows we're "allowed" to laugh at. An example of this is Dana. Posts about her were clogging up the Poly thread, and it was obvious that she deserved her own thread: yet, the first few posts in her first thread are all "how dare you make this thread!" or  "she doesnt DESERVE a thread!" and shit like that. It's a gay mindset to have.
Replies: >>678 >>682 >>684
>>674
Excellent idea, we have to wait at least a few weeks before trying that but that probably would have been the better advertisement. Perhaps pirate-tan will also have to stay docked here, we can always just use Moetron instead and it'd be easier to feign ignorance because she is a meme outside of JC.
 >>673
Speaking of cows, perhaps for the moment Cow general could be a pseudo-Personal Cows thread just to get the ball rolling, I'd love to contribute to the thread but I have no idea what to post. I'm not a good cow hunter but I'm okay at digging things up.
>>677
So many iconic old cow threads would never have gotten their own threads today, hell, even Soren might have just been confined to the TIF general.
Replies: >>682 >>689
>>673
>well now you gotta  ˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶
Alright then, but pardon my german.
It's like when a country opens it's borders too much and too many immigrants come in at once, faster than they can absorb the culture of the place they are going to. What happens is they will establish they own 'mini countries' inside the borders and refuse to integrate, instead inviting even more foreigners to expand that bastion inside the nation like a cancer.
The solution is either to kick them out or kill them off while you still can or, if it's too late for that, take the L and go homestead elsewhere. Ideally you wouldn't have opened your borders in the first place, but alas that's the only way to increase population size on the Internet. Yeah yeah, okay - I just made an argument in favor of setting up an ethnostate, but in our case the ethnostate will be that of the original LC userbase and those who are already well assimilated into it. Go ahead, crucify me.
Replies: >>682 >>689 >>691
hatecow.png
[Hide] (63KB, 1087x218) Reverse
>>679
I don't appreciate the eugenics bit, kek, but I still think it's a good point. You're right that there are certain "newfag ghettos" that exist on LC. Off the top of my head, the Celebricows thread, the Fandom Discourse thread, & the Jirai Kei thread would constitute central hubs for newfags and tourists, but /ot/ as a whole is also a very different place than the cow boards where the majority of undesirables concentrate.

>>678
>even Soren might have just been confined to the TIF general.
If Soren happened today, she would have been confined to the TIF thread and posts about her would be considered the work of a vendettafag, she'd also have other TIFs alerting her to the thread via Tumblr askbox, she'd also have TIF orbiters (or herself) posting her in one of the attraction threads on /g/. That's the sorry state of LC today.

>>677
Samefag just to add a post I saw a while back and agreed with a lot, I think it sums up the state of "hatecow" pretty well.
Replies: >>683 >>689
>>682
Would PT even blip anyone's radar now?
Replies: >>694
>>677
>I don't think it has to be so cyclical. Part of why the newfags took over is because the moderation team got really lazy.
Be it as it may, cleansing the newfags will always be a possible last resort when all other defenses fail. Unless the core community actually dies, then nothing can save us.
>A lot of anons take LC way too seriously and they have this superiority complex about which cows we're "allowed" to laugh at.
I see this problem on the Internet as a whole, and I blame social media. Everything is Serious Business™ there and now we have normies who were raised in there, to whom the idea that "everything is a work of fiction and falsehood" is completely foreign. Blurring the line between Cyberspace and Real Life was a mistake.
>>678
Second ayrt and I agree! I've got far too much time on my hands at the moment and have been trying to contribute as much actually milky stuff as possible in /snow/ which seems to be well recieved. I hope it encourages others who were dissuaded with the state of LC right now to give it another go. I feel like that's the best path going forward because if we aren't making the efforts to change LC, the jannies won't.
>>679
Kek I don't entirely agree but for the most part I do and I can see the connection.
>>682
I think this hatecow mentality bled into other boards and got super infested across the entire site. A lot of anons, even ones who have been onsite for a long time, just use LC as a place to project their insecurities and shitfight whenever they're in a shitty mood. Go write it in a diary or something kek
Replies: >>694
>>679
The eugenics analogy is a bit scary but I definitely get what you mean. It's like a forest, there's a lot of different trees that do certain things for animals and microbes around them. And something like a birch grows in this forest, now birches are fine in small numbers but they actively kill any non-birch saplings near them. And trees die, they get logged, there's fires and fungus and as there's more birch trees less species start growing and then at some point you've got a forest of entirely birch which only helps animals and microbes who like birch, the soil even changes so it only helps birches.
Replies: >>693
>>691
NTA but lovely way to put it ‹𝟹
>>689
>Go write it in a diary or something kek
So much of /ot/ belongs in the diaries. 
>if we aren't making the efforts to change LC
It's optimistic of you, but I'm in the camp that LC can't be salvaged. Maybe if we had a different admin, and different farmhands it could work, but right now it seems like the 'fight' is between Admin Vs. Farmers Vs. Newfags and I don't think farmers can win this fight.

>>683
If we're talking about classic PT, then she'd be imprisoned in /w/ and her threads would be snail-paced.
Replies: >>695 >>698
>>694
First AYRT and do you think the only way to fix it would be a new site entirely? I'm genuinely curious to hear the opinion of a nona like you because like you said I'm of the mind that it can be salvaged
Replies: >>699 >>700
Did lc newfags really create the term "DA" (different anon) because they don't understand ayrt/nayrt? kek
>>694
>LC can't be salvaged 
I'm afraid you might be right, and sooner or latter lc jannies will just be as bad as cc's
Replies: >>699 >>701
>>695
It's like >>668 said: the majority of the user base is not interested in cows, or LC culture or history, or anything like that. I don't think the site can be salvaged because it would require the reduction of these elements, and since ban evasion is so easy, it wouldn't work out even if they were expelled.

AFAIK, the reason we're all here is because we're tired of the state of LC right now. We want an alternative choice, and I think it's okay to admit that. I don't wanna be on LC anymore, it's not the same site it used to be and it's not fun anymore. No matter how many times anons say "be the change you wanna see," it won't work. A single drop of sincerity in an ocean of bait won't do much.

>>697
>>698
Yes. I used to report "DA" and write "integrate" in the report box, but nobody was ever banned. It's just another example of how the jannies enable newfaggotry.
>>695
nta but i feel like one of the easiest ways to bring lc back from the depths would be to merge all /ot/ boards and make them hidden. It will also help as there will probably be more moderators to work on a single board. The biggest hurdle for this would be cerbmin, who doesn't do jack shit.
Replies: >>702 >>710
>>698
>Did lc newfags really create the term "DA" (different anon) because they don't understand ayrt/nayrt? kek
Most likely. A few days ago someone in the stupid questions thread didn't even know what ayrt meant, there was a similar question asking what it meant a few months ago too
Replies: >>702
>>700
>The biggest hurdle for this would be cerbmin, who doesn't do jack shit.
That's the root of the problem isn't it? Kinda hard for the userbase to do anything to help the site when the one holding any real power to act doesn't care.
>>701
>didn't even know what ayrt meant
That's beyond being a newfag, it's just being a lazy piece of shit. I just checked on urban dictionary and they have a definition for that. She could have easily looked it up if she wanted, but of course she didn't. That's just one of the many symptoms of the generalized disease.
Replies: >>710
drfytguyihujik.png
[Hide] (46.7KB, 2140x175) Reverse
I was wondering why newfags were talking like youtubers and then I realized mods would ban them for alogging. I don't even know where to begin when it comes to addressing this behavior.
Replies: >>709 >>710
I blame social media and the faggots who use it for namedropping lc there
>>704
I'd rather anons act like the original A-Log then whatever spineless shit that is.
>>700
Ntayrt but I don't think that would work either. All 3 off-topic boards have pretty different cultures. Off-topic boards themselves were never the issue per se, it's more about what kind of activity happens on them.

The reason why /ot/ is cancer now is because of the proliferation of chatroom-style threads where low-quality posting is the norm. The best /ot/ threads are the ones with a very clear thread theme that's conductive for discussions. Threads like General Tinfoil,  Generation General, Anti Social Media, have infinitely more appeal to me than Vent, Unpopular Opinions, or Thing You Hate (although TYH is a personal favourite of mine). It's fun to actually have discussions with anons and to get different perspectives on things, much more fun than reading anons complaining about random shit or trying to find out which "opinion" gets the most replies. The threads that are just substitutions for diaries are annoying and they reek of social media mindset, especially when they all function as de facto chatrooms instead of forums for discussion.

>>704
The farmhands are pretty new themselves, it's why they don't know what terms like a-logging, wking, samefagging, etc., really mean.

>>702
Ntayrt but what's even worse than newfags asking "what does ayrt mean?" is that there are some retards that actually spoonfeed them and give them the information instead of reporting it.
Replies: >>711 >>713 >>745
>>710
>The farmhands are pretty new themselves, it's why they don't know what terms like a-logging, wking, samefagging, etc., really mean.
nta but i was also going to say this kek
>>710
>The threads that are just substitutions for diaries are annoying and they reek of social media mindset, especially when they all function as de facto chatrooms instead of forums for discussion.
Amazing point, forcing the adhd zoomers to actually read would do wonders. I still think having the /ot/ boards be hidden would do wonders for the site.
Replies: >>715 >>724
>>713
ntayrt but i feel like that could lead to the socialmediafags shitting up other boards even more
Replies: >>719
>>715
I thought about that for a second, but I think it's a lot easier to moderate the cow boards because it's very easy to determine which posts are off topic and therefore bannable. The biggest problem that newfags refuse to do is lurk and integrate, so forcing them to do so would solve a good portion of the tourists who only know how to do the bare minimum. I also feel like there should be longer bans, instead of banning them for a day or a couple of hours should instead be for 2 days or a day minimum, so the less tech-savvy ones are forced to read instead of blabbering everything.
Replies: >>724
lolcow_literacy_2025.png
[Hide] (39.9KB, 511x176) Reverse
>>719
It wouldn't be easier to moderate, because there are too few moderators to begin with. There's periods of no moderation for at least 8 hours a day, sometimes more and sometimes less. Longer bans don't matter because ban evasion is incredibly simple to perform. It's best to move away from this idea that only tech-savvy people know how to ban evade, because that idea isn't rooted in the reality of the situation. A bigger problem than the refusal to integrate is that the moderation team have no power to correct this lack of integration and no desire to do so either. It's free reign for newfags to shit up the site.

>>713
The general literacy of LC went to the dogs a long time ago. Stuff like picrel is the norm now. The majority of anons can't read or write anything longer than a few words. It's a mix of genuine inability and malicious ignorance. There is an undercurrent where nobody wants to be seen as a "try hard" because any post longer than 4 sentences is considered just too much to bear, you can even see this attitude in posts like  >>510 here.
Replies: >>727 >>740
>>724
>There is an undercurrent where nobody wants to be seen as a "try hard" because any post longer than 4 sentences is considered just too much to bear
(NTA) I understand this and have noticed it too but there are essay-chans who are excessive and also use their posts to start shit. Not every anon who takes issue with posts like that is just a retarded newfag imo. Having a lot to unpack isn't always the best way to write something (manifesto-chan comes to mind) Also, it's not like LC always had only longer posts, there's always been a mix. The issue is literacy and reading comprehension, plenty of anons still have longer posts and engage properly
Replies: >>729 >>741
>>727
Obviously there's always been a mix of longer posts and shorter ones, but I think it's an issue when anons heckle verbosity and act like writing something a few sentences long is hard work. I think that that attitude is more common in the younger users.
Replies: >>730
>>729
Well in the case of drunknona I believe she was just drunk and having fun kek, but yes it is a problem. I don't see many anons infighting too commonly though over longer posts as long as its kept in a non-retarded thread. Most people post pretty uniformly outside of vent/unpopular opinions and the like. Is there a particular reason why all the personalityfags also do walls of texts? Kek, if they are just baiters I don't understand why they take that much time to convey all of these retarded opinions
Replies: >>732
>>730
Yeah, I didn't mean to call the drunk out or anything, it was just an example of what I was referring to. I didn't mean that long posts caused infights per se. I meant that more and more anons are hesitant to fully engage with topics and discussions beyond a superficial low-quality level.

>Is there a particular reason why all the personalityfags also do walls of texts?
They do this because they want the most attention possible. So, the more they write, the more chances they give anons to find fault and reply to the post. E.g., if a post has just "A," then only A can be used to bait, but if there's "ABC" then A, B, & C can be used to bait, if that makes sense. The more a personalityfag writes, the more chances an anon will reply and the more chances a discussion will start.
Replies: >>734
>>732
>if a post has just "A," then only A can be used to bait, but if there's "ABC" then A, B, & C can be used to bait
i was also thinking this while writing my reply before but thank you for putting it into words. i think that aspect is what might turn off some nonas from reading longer posts, especially with the amount of baiters recently. i notice longer posts are more easily taken out of context because anons(i do it sometimes too) think it could be a personalityfag especially if said fag is active at the same time
Replies: >>736
>>734
I guess it's me then, but personally it doesn't take me very long to read and usually I read everything that I see. I don't look at something and think "oh, it's too long, I'll ignore." It's just a personal quirk I suppose.
Replies: >>738
>>736
it's not just you as actual LC users tend to be lurkers and like reading stuff. if there is some kind of baity opening sentence i can definitely see why certain anons wouldn't bother though
i-aint-reading-allat-v0-nd5bqm75omoa1.webp
[Hide] (34.6KB, 750x1078) Reverse
>>724
I think particularly among younger internet users writing longer and more thought out replies is seen as lame or tryhard, so even bothering to take more than two seconds to properly read and understand someone's post is also seen as "cringe" or whatever. This likely is what leads to so many moments of illiteracy.
The amount of times I've seen memes along the lines of "I'm not reading that lol" (see picrel) being used on different social medias as some sort of argument-destroying clap back to a person's genuine attempt at debate I think is evidence to the increasing prevalence of this sort of mindset among younger internet users. It's an easy way to not need to use the brain power to come up with anything interesting to say and relegates your internet opponent as the long-winded little loser and the poster as the super cool and unbothered winner.
Replies: >>742
>>727
NTA but as a "essay-chan" I always ask permission before doing a giant post just so I'm not a nuisance, 
really wish other overly verbose anons also did this because sometimes there's a big block of text that no one is really interested in. It's also super recognisable, like oh here's X sperg again.
Replies: >>743 >>744 >>745
>>740
You summed it up perfectly & I agree 100%
>>741
Not trying to be mean, but the fact that you feel like you need to ask "permission" to post is in itself lame and part of the problem.

What I'm really talking about though is posts that are in no way long, in no way essays, but because they're over 4 sentences they're still considered "essays" by the illiterates. If nobody is interested in a post, then they don't have to read it or reply, but to reply just to write something like "not reading all that!" is juvenile and pathetic.
Replies: >>744
>>741
AYRT and I agree, I also write very long posts occasionally and I get embarassed kek and delete them. And yes, it is super recognisable in some cases especially if it's similar topics. I type differently post to post and use different typing styles to avoid this.
>>743
Also agreed but can we please stop with this 
>part of the problem
>you're one of them
stuff? some of us are just autistic
Replies: >>746
>>710
< those are some of my favorite General threads.

>>741
< I actually really enjoy a long posts. I love lurking and having something substantial to read is very satisfying. I think you should stop asking permission. Lots of people read without posting.
Replies: >>750
>>744
I get that you're autistic, so let me explain: in that post I didn't say that the anon I replied to was the problem and I didn't claim she was "one of them." I think it's sad that she feels the need to ask for permission to post what she'd like to post, she should feel free to post whatever she'd like even if it's long or short. When I said "part of the problem," the problem I was referring to is that anons feel the need to censor themselves so they aren't ganged up on or ridiculed for mundane stuff like making a long post.
Replies: >>747
>>746
>in that post I didn't say that the anon I replied to was the problem and I didn't claim she was "one of them."
You did say she was part of the problem but the 'one of them' was referring to another post. And again, I agree with you.
Replies: >>749
7c7083b9887b13406c038ad4c305f8fa442ef2e94528aee5cf769c3c3f9b9a3e.jpeg
[Hide] (41.8KB, 710x286) Reverse
not my image obviously but is this still happening for anyone else?
Replies: >>749 >>751
>>747
Anon, I'm trying to be nice to you, but please read my post again and pay attention to what I'm saying. I never called her part of the problem, I said feeling the need to ask permission to post is part of the problem, the problem being that anons struggle to read posts longer than 4 sentences.

>>748
You can just check /meta/ and there's a lot of posts about this error, it's common since the server upgrade. Lurk there.
948e1e52f136ecf44fbf0655e1c1a0748bb528220e82b104b21c1a35eb13d7fa.jpg
[Hide] (20.3KB, 598x109) Reverse
>>745
Thank you nona, but picrel is the length of one of my posts so I genuinely do need to ask kek. 1.7k word posts would be fucked to bombshell anons with.
Replies: >>752
>>748
Yes it's still happening. It only happens with certain files however so converting it or trimming it should work
>>750
Let them deal with the fallout, anon. Drop your long ass posts without asking for your own sake. Don't let retards with a 6th grade reading level dictate what you can and cannot post.
Some of the pitbull spergs genuinely scare me
Replies: >>773
>>772
It's because they try to outdo each other in a retarded competition to see who can be the most unhinged.
Replies: >>774
>>773
The folder dumps of absolute autism were the cherry on top for me. No shit animals that were trained in a specific way act that specific way! Wow!
Replies: >>775
shitbull_hatred.png
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1890x1417) Reverse
>>774
samefag
Replies: >>869
Lorena.png
[Hide] (99.5KB, 1084x253) Reverse
If more anons show up here, the farmhands are gonna show up too to try to stir shit. There was a really interesting post a while ago on CC, I attached it to this post. You can see the [Return to Dashboard] option that only staff would see. Of course, it was a post in defense of Cerbmin and putting down Lorena, who wasn't a saint but it's been years and still seething about her is ridiculous. Farmhands are known to lurk on other IBs that farmers use to gauge what's being said about them and the admin. They are obsessed with public perception.
pitbullfags.png
[Hide] (94.8KB, 966x659) Reverse
kek at this most likely samefagger sperging that every person who calls them weird is a pitbull owner

>>777
always thought cerbmin typed like a moid, checks out
>They are obsessed with public perception.
naturally. especially those retarded jannys who unironically seem to need tone indicators for certain anons posts
cc.png
[Hide] (1.6MB, 1107x2153) Reverse
This place is fucking boring
Replies: >>788 >>789 >>792
>>787
KEK the absolute state
>>787
I feel like half of the threads on cc were made to train some deficient AI model.
>>787
One of the shortcomings of CC is that it's way too open-ended. I've never seen anything of quality on that IB. It could go down tomorrow and nothing would be lost except the Cece images and maybe the DNAtan mascot images.
2X_dysphoria_thread.png
[Hide] (32.8KB, 828x212) Reverse
Great, they also dropped it in the gender dysphoria thread
Replies: >>794 >>795 >>798
>>793
What a fucking arsehole. Though I guess the retards from that thread can't type properly so can be recognised thus ignored and reported.
>>793
Fucking retard
>>793
I just checked the thread and it's gone. If this was a troll post, it worked on me for a minute before I checked the /2X/ thread kek
Replies: >>804 >>806
>>798
NTA but I did report it from a few different IPs just on the off chance jannies are still cranky. Guess it worked, hooray!
>>798
Wasn’t trolling but it’s interesting they deleted it. I was going to come in here with a crazy tinfoil earlier about how tifchan(or copycat) may have been one of the baiters. in unpopular opinions during the shitbull sperg, the jannies did the usual thing they do with her posts, delete and cover their tracks. some of the posts read as tif-chan and/or the one who would reply to nonas with yuri and pretend to be trolling afterwards but I might be insane and retarded. At the very least I believe that one or more of the jannies are personally involved with that poster because the way they handle her posts stands out
I miss when paki-chan was the worst personalityfag, she seems so tame compared to the personalityfags we have on lolcow now.
Replies: >>811 >>812 >>820
>>810
At least keeping up with romanianon and pakichan was a novelty, when it's constantly happening everyday and they're trying to bait reactions from anons it's just annoying. Also the anons insistent on making any slightly recognisable anon a personalityfag was awful, the NTYfag thing was a headache.
>>810
Well at the moment they obviously feel like they can run amuck more than usual, it’s very bizarre that the only times the admins have even acknowledged it was to call out anons replying rather than addressing the multitude of personalityfags spawning in
Replies: >>814 >>815
>>812
Yeah even pakichan tried to not be a personalityfag sometimes but ended up sperging about how shit pakistan is eventually, nowadays I feel like personalityfags don't even bother to contain their autism and you're the one banned for pointing out "this is xfag, don't bother replying"
>>777
Nice trip. this is pathetic behavior for people who are anonymous. 
>>812
yeah you'd think personalityfagging would be met with swift bans due to the purpose of an IB to remain anonymous and unrecognizable, but instead calling out personalityfags gets banned because of the logic (?) that its baiting those fags to come out of hiding. they shouldnt be allowed to post the way they do in the first place it's awful.
Replies: >>817
>>815
second ayrt and that’s what leads me to being of two minds. one being that the jannies literally do not care, and the other being that they’re cynically not taking this seriously to see how nonas would react and to get personal lulz. either way it’s pathetic and strange, they still maintain certain boards and threads correctly so i don’t think they’re trying to kill the site, but it just reeks of stubborn and scrotey behaviour kek. also as far as i can tell they have been ignoring most janny applications for a while? if it’s this evident that you have long periods of time on a busy site with no moderation, that needs to be solved. why wouldn’t they just hire new anons? if it’s a trust thing, don’t they apparently ‘ID and voice verify’ anyways? it smells very fishy me-hearties!
Valentines day... Still no lolcor of the year... or vpn poll
>>810
I think most personalityfags now may not even realise they're doing it, considering most newfags are from social media now so I don't think they even realise how to be anonymous, and keep bringing attention to themselves.
>>777
>they are obsessed with public perception
this is why they write those cringe one liner redtexts, they want us to like them so bad
Replies: >>862
>>858
Ironically they would be better liked as an integrated and silent team of jannies only noticed when delivering canned red texts fairly and then vanishing again.
Replies: >>864
>>862
Cheeky moderation is fine, it can even be entertaining, but the farmhands act like they're emotionally invested in the conversation and they consistently display subpar reading comprehension through their actions.
>>775
i feel so bad for people who had nothing to do yesterday. apparently everywhere was full of miserable people making every ib unusable to make themselves feel better for being alone. backreading it was just pure misery and fighting or complaining about the fighting. no wonder everyone has kind of went lurker mode lately.
>>869
ya, people need to learn that sometimes life sucks you just gotta suck it up. yesterday i just went to work normally and spent the rest of the day watching tv shows. bitching and moaning about it wouldnt do me any good.
>>869
I can't believe there's actually people who feel bitter on valentines day, who cares? I think a lot of women who are single are too busy spending the day working, because that's what I've been doing.
>>869
Everyone went lurker mode because there's no point in posting anymore. Anytime you post you get a bunch of 16 year old speds replying to your post with no reading comprehension trying to roleplay as Regina George. Most interactions are inflammatory and designed to upset you.
Replies: >>877
>>869
I was a bit confused as to why yesterday in particular was bad (even the usually okay threads I frequent were shit) but realising that it was just because it was Valentines day really hammered in the fact that a good many anons are emotionally retarded and immature at best. It's just a random pseudo-holiday, get over it, fucking hell.
>>876
Agree, too many anons don't want to communicate, they just want to "win" a argument and because they don't want to communicate they also don't read. It's really annoying behaviour and it's not encouraging normal people to post because anything you say can turn into a game of infight telephone.
Replies: >>878
>>877
it’s weird cos of all holidays i’ve back read, most people aren’t online at those times. it’s really really sad that such a cute fun holiday full of appreciating loved ones inspires such seething. just do galentines day for fuck sake that is also really fun and i can’t wait to do the second brunch with my other friend group i have planned. it’s not that deep.
Replies: >>879
>>878
nta but same here kek, the days you think would be active aren't and for some reason valentines is the most active i've seen lc in months
What do you anons think about the radfem culture shift on LC?
Replies: >>890
>>886
Like the anons who are radfems or the anons who are now suddenly super against radfems? If the former they were there since quarantine and have settled down. I do notice there's these vocal anti-husbando posting newfags, but I think they got the wrong idea. I notice there's anons who either think lc is some radfem heaven, but there is a real difference between an actual feminist website and a website where women complain about moids and troons.
Replies: >>892
>>890
nta but i agree with your point, i think both camps are equally retarded. stating that the website is for any particular reason other than being for women and talking about lolcows is dumb, but also arguing against topics that obviously women would talk about makes you stick out like a sore thumb. there are all types of users on lolcow (evidently) so trying to police fairly common traits of the average LC user ultimately accomplishes nothing
oh_my_god.png
[Hide] (82.8KB, 2835x212) Reverse
I'm so...
>>897
Just read that too, I'm disgusted. Between the anons trying to comfort the Luna poster, the troon defense force, and the dead admins, there's no hope for LC
Replies: >>911
>>897
kek i was just about to post this and saw you beat me to it
>>897
>these women have never met creepy, nerdy, fetishist men in their life
>>897
Well, considering I peaked nearly a decade ago because my bf at the time trooned out on me, I'd say I definitely have met one irl.
Replies: >>907
>>905
I peaked because I kept making friends with trannies who all ended up sexually harassing me, physically. I always thought "they're not all like this" and then the next one always did the same thing. They're all pornsick and none of them are good. I was in artsy and music focused groups irl because of work, and have met many.
Meeting trannies IRL is what peaked me, kek. I don't know how anyone could meet one without peaking that second.
>>897
It was banned for "bad bait," i.e., the jannies don't want to admit that the user base is rapidly shifting because of their poor moderation skills and lackluster involvement so they call this sort of shit "bait" to absolve themselves. It makes me sick to my stomach.
Replies: >>910
>>909
agreed with their stupid redtexts and trying to show us how ‘zased’ they still are. however don’t let this sicken you nonner, we have eachother (っᵔ◡ᵔ)っ(˶ᵔ ᵕ ᵔ˶)
>>899
I still have a tiny bit of hope for LC. It can be saved if there's a major shakeup with a change of ownership to someone driven who actually gives a shit. The chances of that happening feel so vanishingly slight right now, though.
567756765756756756.png
[Hide] (437.6KB, 700x467) Reverse
>>913
>>914
KEK
>>914
Immediately saved this image... gonna using it a LOT when this place gets big
>>914
kekk what were you replying to?
Replies: >>918 >>920
>>917
Ntayrt but iirc it was something about 9/11
hahaha-laughing.gif
[Hide] (637.5KB, 300x206) Reverse
>>914
kekkle me timbers nonnie
0afabbb8b3c60f9e15c9be58777ce89a2309962bef5e977cf9af8a2f44863140.png
[Hide] (55.5KB, 2376x252) Reverse
>>917
heres the deleted message
Replies: >>921
>>920
That wasn't the post? Stop making stuff up
Replies: >>922
>>921
it was though. you can see that 914 replied to it you goofball
Replies: >>923
>>922
No that's all photo shop and lies please stop trying to harrass me
Replies: >>924 >>926 >>928
>>923
whatever you say you landlubber
>>923
some of the meanest bitches on this board run while you still can
>>923
It was that alien they posted on 4chan that brought the site down that once. Caught the briefest look. You should have been there nona.
Replies: >>929 >>931
>>928
it was a star
98c90ad37ae489f8c4e548ce9c849ae3dab65af739730ea772a0b743f8c027b6.gif
[Hide] (3.5MB, 498x280) Reverse
>>928
wtf this one? (it's an example) (don't send the government killbots pls)
Replies: >>932
>>931
DELETE THIS FAST
f46197205140bdcf266b4d58aa7aea43d5c7924915a3ffaf9850fae13b70822e.png
[Hide] (23.1KB, 624x84) Reverse
It's not funny anymore. Next they'll be asking what "kek" means.
Replies: >>939 >>942
>>938
KEK nonnie were you the one who replied
Replies: >>940
>>939
Yeah I told her to drink rat poison and I'm proud of it
Replies: >>941 >>965
>>940
Yarr, like a true pirate!
677878.png
[Hide] (336.4KB, 1891x640) Reverse
>>938
This was one of the funniest moments on LC in a while ngl. But jeez, the newfag who asked can barely even type. Where are these people even coming from?
Replies: >>943
>>942
It wasn't funny. It was like watching a paraplegic rat drown in a puddle of piss. I wanted to stomp on its head with my boot to put it out of its misery.
us.jpg
[Hide] (38.6KB, 550x412) Reverse
>>943
deep breaths nonnie
Replies: >>945
>>944
How would you like it if you had to witness your house burning down and all your friends are being burned alive and their corpses are charring and all the memories and echoes in that house are going up in smoke and then the arsonists look at you and say "haha it was always like this! your house was always a pile of ash!" how would you like that? Would you laugh? I would weep and pull my hair out in chunks and vomit.
>>943
I meant the way that nona typed up an elaborate fake story out of nowhere and multiple people just went with it to troll a newfag.
5d1079724b9b8fa8fed927c1099cb6dae5ac24d647c7edaef3c352cf703ecf44.png
[Hide] (4.4KB, 461x80) Reverse
anon replying to the meta post about this, i sincerely hope they're trolling
Replies: >>948
>>947
I think the anon in your picrel is calling the spoonfeeding faggotry.
Replies: >>949
>>948
but no one actually told the newfag who asked
Replies: >>950
explanation.png
[Hide] (197.6KB, 1124x677) Reverse
>>949
What do you think this is? Read the thread next time.
Replies: >>954
they need to make lolcow to where there will never again be a newfag who doesn't know what stuff is
Replies: >>955 >>957
200w.gif
[Hide] (144.4KB, 200x169) Reverse
>>950
kek my bad, i get that this is a difficult situation but lets all share a handle of rum and play sea shanties. the one anon replying with the direct translation of the acronym didn't come across as enough of a spoonfeed to me to i assumed that meta post thought the /freemarket/ was real
Replies: >>957
>>953
The issue isn't people not knowing things, it's that they ask to be spoonfed instead of lurking.
Replies: >>956 >>960 >>966
>>955
newfags will do what newfags do
Replies: >>959 >>964
>>953
Shit like asking what nigel means should get a person a 2 month ban minimum. Fuckers need to learn to lurk. Learn to read. Posting isn't a right, it's a privilege. Anyone that was spoonfeeding should be banned for 3 months minimum. Bans don't mean shit anymore though because we need to accommodate the 20 posters that need a VPN to escape their countries' dictators or whatever the fuck excuse they pull.
>>954
That post in /meta/ was pretty obviously condemning the farmhands for allowing such levels of newfaggotry to exist to begin with. Obviously nobody is mad about a Nigel Farage joke.
Replies: >>960
>>956
Yeah, but the current culture of LC is permitting and excusing these blatant and disgusting displays of newfaggotry
abd035de6cdf6328621d9d6bc605af9c658926fbc11a94aceb3541ae7338868f.gif
[Hide] (6.5KB, 150x150) Reverse
>>955 
They also don't know how to fucking look anything up. God forbid the new batch of newfags do anything for themselves and need to be led by the hand and taught to socialise like fucking children.
>>957
I miss when "lurk moar" actually had some sway and didn't trigger anons to whinge about how they're actually not newfags actually they've been here for ten years etc. Banning for spoonfeeding would be amazing but considering LC is being run by a very lazy skeleton crew that'll probably remain a pipe dream. There seriously needs to be an overhaul of the people running LC because in the current state it's in I don't think it will last until the end of next year.
Replies: >>963
wat.png
[Hide] (154.9KB, 527x348) Reverse
>do not defend ugly men itt
>'ugly' man is the same one anons have been posting in there for weeks with no problem
the jannys dont even lurk themselves
Replies: >>968
>>960
>They also don't know how to fucking look anything up
Honestly I see this kind of attitude a lot with zoomers in general. Instead of Googling the name or an explanation of something literally right in front of their faces they'll just whine and ask for someone to spoonfeed them info. I see it a lot in hobby circles. My tinfoil is that algorithms have made them passive. They expect to have information delivered to them while using technology versus actively seeking information out like we did before algorithms dominated the internet.
>>956
Newfags in 2017:
>Do something stupid
>Get banned for it
>"Aw shucks, guess I can't do that? Must be against the rules. I won't do it again so I don't get banned!"
>Learns and integrates
Newfags in 2025:
>Do something stupid
>Get banned for it
>Switch to new IP with a VPN before seeing ban message
>Continue to do stupid stuff
>Never learns or integrates

Before, when VPNs weren't built into browsers, bans were one of the major ways that anons learned to integrate. Bans weren't meant to be some personal vendetta thing, they were meant to be time outs that helped maintain the site culture. Now that bans can be evaded before the ban message is even seen, the newfags can't learn nor integrate so they're stuck in a state of permanewfaggotry, and that erodes the site culture and makes it shittier and shitter by the day.

>>963
Zoomers don't know how to research, they barely know how to read.
Replies: >>976
>>940
As she should
>>963
This. I really thought this was just my “old man yelling at clouds” moment but nah the future is doomed
>>955
This. I have to admit I am actually a relative newfag to LC (only found the site in 2023, should've found it so much sooner, pls no bully) but I came from 4chan so I already knew to lurk for a bit before posting and attempt to integrate. It really is a lost art.
>>963
I just saw a zoomer do this in my knitting group, so I'm convinced you're right. It was a very common acronym, wyif (with yarn in front) so it shouldn't have been difficult to find. Reminded me of them not being able to decipher ntayrt.
Replies: >>968
>>962
This thread is dumb to begin with. It was created after yet another /fit/tard raid in one of the /g/ horny threads and I'm 90% certain it was created by those same /fit/tards to further their weird incel-type looksmaxxing worldview. The premise of the thread was interesting, but it quickly devolved into anons saying "water is wet" a thousand times over and chimping out over whether or not a moid is considered unattractive or attractive by random people. This thread and celebricows always struck me as dominated by gay male posters.
>>967
The "what does ayrt mean?" shit pissed me off because you can find the meaning of "ayrt" by just keying into Google "ayrt imageboard acronym." What pissed me off more was the spoonfeeding.
Replies: >>970
>>963 
AYRT, I'm a retarded zoomie and I say that not to get defensive but to agree that it is definitely because of the algorithm. It scares the living shit out of me that my peers are so lazy and unmotivated that they end up making themselves helpless and literally retarded because they spend all day being spoonfed slop, and that behaviour is eating away at their brain and they're not going to be able to get that grey matter back. I grew up on forums and barely use social media even now and the difference between me and someone my age who is a social media addict is really awful. 
>>968 
I hate how many anons participate in spoonfeeding and end up encouraging those posts. I don't know if they're trying to be nice but the kinder thing would be letting that newfag fend for herself.
Replies: >>971
>>970
NTAYRT but me too and we sound fairly similar (I have social media but I don't use it or care to), I'm apart of the older batch of zoomies so I think I missed being completely brainrotted but the difference between me and my peers, some even being older than me, is pretty astounding. It all depends on how you're raised, but the younger zoomies and all the proceeding generations literally do feel somewhat doomed to me. It's refreshing seeing normal children nowadays because so many kids are irony poisoned and drool-y because of their ipads nailed  to their hands since birth.
I try not to complain about zoomers too much because I know there's bound to be some smart ones among them. But something I've noticed everywhere and not just LC is a total lack of agency from a lot of them. We have (paid) interns who are zoomers and it's almost more work to just get them to do things than it is not to have them. I have to list every single step of every single task. It's like if you were writing a recipe and had to include the step "open the oven, pick up the baking sheet, put the baking sheet into the oven, close the oven." It's unreal. If I mistakenly forget to outline every moment of every second of their shift they just stand around totally clueless. I guess everyone in their lives has always spoonfed them everything and they've never had to figure something out on their own? They're here to learn so I do try and quiz them like "What should happen next?" or generally try and let them do stuff, and they stare at me totally blank faced. It's shocking.
>>964
I used to roll my eyes at people begging for the VPN ban to come back but I think that's the only way forward personally.
Replies: >>980
I'm still against a VPN ban, but I think if there was a way to ban the free ones it would be less promblematic. The paid ones may be a barrier against the chronic troublemakers. Maybe the nonnies in Eritrea have paid ones? If you're really using it to get around your country's restrictions it would make sense to me that you'd shell out for one without IP leaks and such. Either way, many VPN users were in the shelter thread and we never had any sort of issues there in 5 months.
Replies: >>980 >>982
>>976
>>978
I really wish the VPN ban was tested in any other time besides Christmas, just to see how well it works when anons aren't away. I'm neither entirely for or against I just want what is best for the site, and if a large amount of the user base and problem anons aren't around during a test it's hard to make a judgement on it.
>>978
People addicted to baiting will pay to bait. It's their lives. Most people already have access to paid VPN services, anyway. VPN bans should only be for /ot/ and /g/, which is where all the newfags congregate, for cow boards VPNs should be allowed. I thought that this seemed to be the general consensus.

I personally don't give a damn about the few anons that live in dictatorships, but either way, Cerbmin mentioned that if a VPN ban were to go through, there would be concessions made for those anons to continue posting through a VPN.

There really is nothing to lose with a blanket VPN ban on the off-topic boards. If anons are very particular about their privacy, they could just opt for a dynamic IP or reset their IP manually every so often. A lot of people overestimate the amount of information one can gleam from an IP address.
Replies: >>1024
916f477976316f06e6e7756128160e6d304623f05d42a8176e7defbb08a1d7d8.png
[Hide] (333.7KB, 1334x474) Reverse
>Newfag attempts to self-censor
>Doesn't realize two asterisks make italics
>Gets banned
>"Now I'm gonna be racist!!!!"

Newf*ggots are so r*tarded. They don't bother reading the rules, they don't bother lurking, and then when they get banned they're so far up their own asses that they blame everyone else but themselves.
Replies: >>1002 >>1005 >>1008
>>1001
Honestly can't even blame her for thinking she has to though, i've noticed lots of anons say 'the n-word' now because theres a few woc anons that like to reply and racebait just as hard
Replies: >>1003
>>1002
What's next? Are we gonna have to say new f-words? C'mon now. It's pretty obvious that this is a tourist who hasn't been around long enough to see a (self censor) redtext.
Replies: >>1007
>>1001
I never understood the point of self censoring if you're not trying to get around bots, you're still saying the word you just look retarded.
Replies: >>1006 >>1009
>>1005
It's a sign of the social media brain worms. These tourists are coming from TikTok where you can't even say "kill" so they're used to playing it extra safe.
Replies: >>1013
>>1003
Well yeah it's obviously retarded, what I kinda meant to say was the anons who say 'the n word' to avoid an infight kind of started the problem, along with the self-hating 'anons of colour' who like to sperg about racism all over /ot/ instead of in their own thread. The jannys themselves don't seem to understand racebait unless its about non-white people so I've seen a lot of posts fly under the radar
Replies: >>1009 >>1013
>>1001
Kek this faggot needs to be banned for life
>>1007
Zoomers have very lackluster critical thinking skills. They believe that they can't so much as type certain words without being bigoted. So they go out of their way to virtue signal that they're not bigoted by self-censoring, even though like >>1005 points out: they're still typing the word out. I personally like the racebait rule, I think it keeps a lot of /pol/ level sperging out (if the jannies did their job right anyway) but there's a big difference between typing 'nigger' to explain a words history versus calling someone a 'nigger' to offend or upset them, which is something that these tourists have difficulty understanding.
Replies: >>1010 >>1011
>>1009
I heard "unalive" spoke aloud. It's so over.
Replies: >>1012
>>1009
AYRT and I'm a fan of the racebait rule, no matter my or anyones opinions on race and different people, it's bound to start a huge infight and attract the most retarded twitter-fags. just wish the jannys were consistent with their b&s
>>1010
Yeah I've been hearing 18 year olds say stupid slang shit for years now, you get used to it.
>>1006
I know that it's because of Tiktok but people do it in real life too which is so fucking retarded, like they mentally can't log off. It's extra funny when they do it around me, someone who calls things spastic and faggy all the time.
>>1007
Reminds of me of when there were posts going around complaining about how white children should be beaten more, fucking weird no jannies stepped in for that. Advocating for child abuse for one particular race is weird no matter what race it is.
rasta.png
[Hide] (21.3KB, 1836x213) Reverse
this one is even worse kek what the fuck is r*
>R-star? Rasta?
Replies: >>1017 >>1018
>>1016
>censoring retard 
>calling her special needs
>>1016
< KEK what is with this push for considering retard a slur, anyway? We don't consider "dumb", "stupid", or "moron" slurs and they were used the same way.
Replies: >>1020 >>1022
>>1018
<AYRT, and even most zoomies say retarded liberally now, she's got to be from some retarded(kek) spaces online to be censoring retard in 2025
confessions.png
[Hide] (115.4KB, 994x571) Reverse
The fact that some of you are still mentioning this place on LC JUST to complain about certain users is embarrassing and laughable. There's like 25 of us here. You can just speak your mind here instead of vague-posting off-site & compromising the board.

& just a BTW, I never claimed that LC used to be "mostly stacies." Learn to read please and stop posting about this board on /ot/ where all the retards live (づ๑•ᴗ•๑)づ♡

>>1018
I think it started in the late 00s or early 10s when there was this push to de-stigmatize autism. It was at least before the DSM-V came out.
Replies: >>1023 >>1025 >>1028
typical.gif
[Hide] (313.5KB, 400x168) Reverse
>>1022
>certain users
>is the only user who was talked about
Replies: >>1026
>>982
>VPN bans should only be for /ot/ and /g/, which is where all the newfags congregate, for cow boards VPNs should be allowed. I thought that this seemed to be the general consensus.
Eh the cow boards have that problem too, especially /w/ and certain /snow/ threads. /w/ needs it the most though. /g/ is slow enough that it's not much of a problem imo except in the luigi thread. I prefer specific threads having the ban instead of the entire board unless it's /ot/
Replies: >>1026
>>1022
Sqawkers get scuttled (ง'-̀'́)ง I don't know why you would complain about here THERE of all places at THIS moment. Cowardly behaviour too, just talk it out here and make up and be friendly.
Replies: >>1028 >>1035
>>1023
I'm more concerned that there are some users on here that are too afraid to speak their mind on this board and instead mention it on LC just to attract real personalityfags like BJ-chan.
>>1024
/w/ definitely needs it since the Jirai threads. My personal tinfoil is that a lot of the vendettafags that use that thread have begun venturing off of /w/ and into other boards.
Replies: >>1031
>>1022
>waiting to alog anyone she can
does anyone know what alogging means anymore
>>1025
cowardly behavior through and through
Replies: >>1029
woah.png
[Hide] (167.1KB, 1886x517) Reverse
>>1028
>>1029
KEK you can't be serious
Replies: >>1033
>>1029
Yeah you've been a little aggressive towards the feedback, nonnie >>1026
>>1029
are you being fr
>>1030
It's just cringe and over the top and we're here to post like a pirate.
Replies: >>1035
>>1025
It is kind of cowardly. Zoomers need to work on conflict resolution skills.
>>1033
Complaining about me on LC is a little bit more cringe IMO. Same with making posts and then deleting them.
Replies: >>1037 >>1038
>>1029
this oldfag is genuinely such a sperg, one personalityfag is causing way too much low quality infighting on our pirate ib. i say make her walk the plank!
>>1035
That post that was deleted wasn't even mine, but please, keep exposing yourself ( ,,⩌'︿'⩌,,) Let's go back to talking about the retarded jannys
Replies: >>1040
>>1035
its probably the one that you called a cow kek
>>943
normal post
>>1037
Listen, Zoomer, just because you and I had a disagreement a few days ago doesn't mean you should go on LC to post about this IB. It's super secret for a reason. You can make a thread on here about how much I upset you if you want. All I'm saying is that you should stop talking about this place on LC. It's not good for the health of the board.
Replies: >>1045
>>943
>It was like watching a paraplegic rat drown in a puddle of piss. I wanted to stomp on its head with my boot to put it out of its misery.
/yhh/'s sanest privateer
Everyone please ignore the oldfag if you find her cantankerous.
Oldfag please cheer up at least a little bit.
Continue coexisting in a peaceful manner.
Replies: >>1044 >>1047 >>1051
>>1042
I'll pop a Prozac just for you Captmin ( ˘ ³˘)♥︎
>>1040
Did you miss the conversation where anons said vagueposting is fine as long as the actual board isn't linked or mentioned by name? The only people who will bother to find this place will lurk. Captmin and the moidmins also ban any newfags that come to shit up the place, just stop being such a (very noticeable) killjoy and lighten up like captmin said
Replies: >>1048 >>1051 >>1052
>>1042
Sometimes I forget that not everyone has learned to deal with that aunt. Let's all learn together!
Replies: >>1049 >>1050
>>1045
Let's drop it now ( ˘ ³˘)♥︎
>>1047
KEK a very good comparison actually, i'll keep it in mind
>>1047
And you whippersnappers and I will become the best of friends soon enough ᝰ.ᐟ
>>1042
Thank you Captmin.
Maybe we could have a mediation thread though that probably won't turn out well.
>>1045
IMO we should really wait a month before bringing this place up again over there because of how negatively farmers reacted to the last time someone squawked. It's just bad juju and you can't really control spoonfeeders who will let every annoying anon know about here (see: tifchan further up itt)
Replies: >>1056 >>1057 >>1061
>>1045
Rules-chan had a good idea for dissemination as well, for sharing it in the moovieroom or among users you've met on the friend finder threads on LC and CC.
Replies: >>1056 >>1057
would it be possible to actually convert this to a real IB? i would be willing to help. i hate to bring up LC as it taints the nature of this cove, but it keeps getting worse and i just want something positive and lighthearted. i dont care if thats moralfaggy or unrealistic, but i cant stand seeing all of the threats with HATE and the infighting. theres gotta be a middle ground
Replies: >>1057 >>1063 >>1068
>>1051
Second ayrt and I agree but I'm also pretty confident in the admins abilities over here compared to LC at the moment. But I think if we are to shill at all >>1052 this is probably the best method. It's not like we need a lot of users here but there's definitely some nonas who would like a space like this as well
>>1051
The mediation thread is kind of pointless. We can resolve our differences like grown ups when we have them. We should just wait a while and see what happens organically, maybe a weekly update post in the meta thread to update us on how many unique IPs there are.
>>1052
I have this thought that some of the moovieroom anons might already be here.
>>1054
I don't think this community is viable as a stand-alone IB yet. It's still a very small user-base. Maybe we could try getting to 100 unique IPs before thinking about moving on to a wider sea.
Replies: >>1063
yeah we're going to need some restrictions against infighting soon this is retarded
12427681_34606.gif
[Hide] (1.5MB, 500x500) Reverse
>>1051
Oldfag newfag cultural exchange thread.
Replies: >>1062 >>1063
>>1061
We should definitely have a pirate-fication meme and picmix thread. I liked the pirate 'Sure Jan' pic shared earlier. It'd be fun to have board specific memes.
Replies: >>1063 >>1075
>>1057
Yarr, fair points.
>>1054
Computer thread anons are working on a new IB (or rather working on the skills to work on one) if you have any ideas or knowledge to contribute that's the best place. Right now this place is fine for the number of anons we have, and having a active admin puts less pressure on Captmin in comparison to running a full IB alone.
>>1061
>>1062
Both ideas are very cute.
Replies: >>1066
>>1063
Yeah I'm trying to think of all the pirate versions we'd need. We'd definitely need a 'bait used to be believable' one kek, but hopefully we won't have to use it much.
Replies: >>1070
>>1054
That would be ideal imo. It would settle the complaints from nonnies who have an issue with this being a porn board with a male admin. It would also cut down on XY tourists. One hopes
I'm basically thinking of a full replacement for CC (I'm sorry snail) or asherah's garden running modern IB software (jschan). I'm personally ready to do it whenever. I can feasibly do it. I just don't want to janny on my own. I was picturing if I ever do make it, just making one single board with a shelter type thread and letting that build up speed and interest and expanding from there as nonnies express wanting another board or thread.
>>1066
i've been wanting to draw more of pirate tan lately ngl so if there were more ideas for memes or reaction images to redraw with her in it i would probably consider trying to do a few drawings lol
Replies: >>1073
bait.jpg
[Hide] (1MB, 1475x1776) Reverse
>>1070
me too actually! i think going through the temp elsie thread would be a good place to start. https://lolcow.farm/m/res/189560.html 
i think picrel would be pretty funny
Replies: >>1074
>>1073
have we decided on a board mascot yet akin to Elsie?
Replies: >>1075 >>1081 >>1094
>>1062
Samefag, I did make the thread just a bit ago. I didn't know what to use for a thread pic so I just chose a cat meme.
>>1074
I'm hoping it's not Johnny Depp in his pirate LARP gear kek
Replies: >>1077
Screenshot_20250216_204213.png
[Hide] (67.4KB, 1724x207) Reverse
< Nonnies I'm asking you please ignore things you don't like and take a breather if something makes you upset, don't do picrel.

>>1075
I'm voting pirate-tan.
>>1077
Anons, this is seriously so embarrassing. Throwing away the security of the board for nothing? Come on we can do better than this.
>>1077
anon who did this show yourself you fucking retard
Replies: >>1084
>>1077
the headcanon they have made up is insane
>>1074
Pirate-tan is a good mascot, and the so far nameless manatee-chan could be akin to Ceecee.
>>1077
Right after we were all talking about not doing this. I don't want this fight to continue further but come on nonnie just write in your diary if you don't want to resolve things here.
Replies: >>1084
>>1077
This is definitely someone trolling
Replies: >>1084
>>1079
I'm guessing it was one of the zoomers I pissed off? I didn't think they'd take my words so personally that they'd start linking the board on LC.
>>1081
We have to come up with a funny pun name from the manatee still. I liked that Cece is CC and Elsie is LC, but I don't know if that would work with /yohoho/ kek
>>1082
Hopefully it is. We could report it for promotion too and see if the farmhands take it down.
Replies: >>1088
>>1084 
The only names in that vein I could come up with were Yolanda or Yohana, but also like the suggestion of naming her after real pirates.
Replies: >>1092
>>1088
polly parrot
Replies: >>1093
>>1092
but shes a manatee not a parrot
>>1074
what if she looked similar to elsie but with a single braid instead of two, plus a pirate outfit, so she's like her long lost traveling cousin or something
another term that newfags misuse constantly is "oldfag." an "oldfag" is someone who has been on lolcow since its early years (pre-oldmin in my opinion). oldfag doesn't refer to an anon who has been there for a few years, the state of not being a newfag, or, as an even worse misconception, that the poster is old.
wow lolcow is disturbing today. from the pet euthanasia to mod team exposing themselves as another kinkster personality fag. it’s so over.
Replies: >>1137
at_least_i_fuck_chad.png
[Hide] (271KB, 828x1430) Reverse
>>1135
assuming you’re referring to this, what happened? it’s scorched earth in there kek
>at least i fuck chad
Replies: >>1139
can’t say much but just want to say don’t post anything assuming they can’t see every post you’ve made even if you think they can’t even if you’re mobile posting and on a vpn. i wouldn’t post on there at all ever again but it’s confirmed not only as compromised but as gathering data. that’s all i can say.
>>1137
That janny temporarily locking the vent thread and permabanning that anon for calling her out for being in that argument was actually crazy to witness.
Replies: >>1140 >>1143
>>1139
Wasn't she permabanned for refusing to integrate and ban evading multiple times?
Replies: >>1141
>>1140
So was the other anon involved in the argument though
Replies: >>1142 >>1145
>>1141
The other anon is literally still on there saying thanks angel as if it’s not her who banned that anon as soon as people came to her defense
>>1139
hold on what?? holy shit kekek. this particular infight really rubbed one of the tranny jannys the wrong way huh.
not convinced that this vpn poster isn’t currently in this thread right now, please go back
Replies: >>1144
>>1143
like she LOCKED THE THREAD LMFAO
>>1141
What the fuck is even going on, I feel like I was following up until a certain point and then shit hit the fan.
Replies: >>1146
>>1145
kek i just backread it and i have no fucking clue, anon can you please explain instead of being upset you got banned? kek
Replies: >>1147
>>1146
It was an insane argument virgin vs whore men that went off the handle, the one who wants to fuck virgin men started posting that the other one was a whore and then people defended her as annoying but having just had a dissenting opinion. Then the mods came and deleted a bunch of the defense and banned only the one who said she didn’t understand wanting to fuck virgins and called a whore and the people defending her. She ban evaded, got banned then ban evaded again to ask why only she was getting banned. Then the entire thread got locked for several minutes and they fought in meta and anon got permabanned.
Replies: >>1148 >>1153
>>1147
I think somebody posted their own email during the infight too. LC is fucking busted.
Replies: >>1149 >>1150 >>1153
>>1148
THEIR OWN SCHOOL I THINK TOO
Replies: >>1152 >>1155
c10237139dde6adfa972753e571068f66d910edae6cd8ce9532cdb392abdb774.jpg
[Hide] (47.5KB, 500x500) Reverse
surely this is the end of LC...
>>1148
jfc honey no, why would you do that
b2515595147615aff5e646843a316e355d74fb009dd1c483d333fa1e61c61d65.jpeg
[Hide] (57.4KB, 554x554) Reverse
>>1149
what?!! at least the jannys were even active i guess. what a shite show
>>1147
>>1148
god i wish someone archived this
Replies: >>1154 >>1225
>>1153
i did but i’m not doing that to kit.
>>1149
I swear to god if you're the retard who was typing in all caps in the vent thread
Replies: >>1157 >>1159
what i don’t understand is what about that argument was so divisive. i have never seen a thread get temporarily locked and it was blatant what was happening and the control they were attempting to enforce while they controlled their own call out in the other thread. that is a disturbing abuse of power over a literal nothing argument.
Replies: >>1160 >>1165
1739826165484-tegaki.png
[Hide] (12.6KB, 500x500) Reverse
>>1155
she needs to relax a bit kek
Replies: >>1158 >>1161
>>1157
just unclenched my jaw and breathed out
>>1155
actually that was me hehe gomen 👉🏾👈🏾
>>1156
i wasn’t watching while happening but i’ve never seen that really either, especially over an infight in the vent thread. i have noticed jannys doing similar in the past though
Replies: >>1165
>>1157
She needs to stop typing like she has brain damage and is hooked up to 24-hour Subway Surfers Tiktok slime compilations A Clockwork Orange Style. This is the exact fucking reason why LC is going to shit
Replies: >>1162
>>1161
she was likely doing it on purpose to annoy that person further.
Replies: >>1163
>>1162
It's still against the rules and annoys everyone else too, though.
Replies: >>1166 >>1167
why did that fight get so psychosexual for the janny anon
>>1156
>>1160
I've seen temp locks happen for the amerifags thread a few times, mostly last year around the summer/fall
Replies: >>1166
>>1163
nta but
>annoys everyone
speak for yourself kek, yes it’s identifiable and cringe but i don’t care. she’ll go back to tiktok soon enough when she isn’t accepted
>>1165
i assume to do with trump?
Replies: >>1169
>>1163
as someone who has done this, noted. sometimes in the heat of the gladiatorial fight i become locked in and forget it’s annoying for other people.
Replies: >>1168
>>1167
>Sometimes when I'm dragging out infights I stop integrating because I think it's funny
Genuinely why?
Replies: >>1170
>>1166
>i assume to do with trump?
Kind of, it was during one of those neverending abortion debates that went on for a whole night. some of the argument continued on /meta/ at the time too
Replies: >>1171 >>1174
>>1168
because i know they are the type to hate it when i talk like that so i use my tik tok accent. sometimes it’s funnier to just drive them insane like that and they start flying off the handle and lose the fight because they can’t stay calm. it’s like a red flag with a bull i guess.
Replies: >>1176
IMG_8298.gif
[Hide] (2.7MB, 500x500) Reverse
<i foresee an infight, me-hearties

>>1169
ah right that makes more sense i guess though. i don’t check amerifags, you can probably guess why kek
Replies: >>1173
chuckles-nervous-laugh.gif
[Hide] (5.3MB, 640x640) Reverse
Tf is going on?
>>1171
nooo we are not fighting in here too don’t jinx us
Replies: >>1177
>>1169
or the immigration sperg outs
F6A4B05D-56E1-4A52-8F8E-7AA85370B1CB.jpeg
[Hide] (37.3KB, 694x402) Reverse
>>1170
No offense but that’s embarassing
7a289a2dd1d9820eeeef72652ea81d96dc32a95eed5b5d620c6d8da866c9e9ba.gif
[Hide] (232.1KB, 498x329) Reverse
>>1173
<me crystal ball would never tell a false tale, lassie
i don’t think there’s any dignity to be found in infighting matey
me-hearties please keep in mind that we have active jannys here and a smaller community, if we report and ignore users they’ll actually be banned shortly
Replies: >>1184 >>1189
thank you you’ve sufficiently defended the community
if you guys recognized an artnona on here would you say anything
Replies: >>1196
>>1181
Aye, sometimes I forget that not every board is moderated and ran by lazy scallywags
nonas not being able to tolerate dissenting opinions to the extent i’ve witnessed today has been so depressing. who even really cares. why do they attack each other
Replies: >>1186
>>1185
yeah it’s been depressing me when i see it too. just remind yourself that probably all of these people only feel comfortable taking such staunch opinions on topics because they’re anonymous
Replies: >>1187
>>1186
sometimes it’s not even the topic but dissenting in there at all makes them come at you with instant raging aggression and say the most out of pocket things. i don’t even like lurking anymore.
>>1181
Active moderation is the blessing of a new board with a low amount of users. If/when this ramps up you'll see the same issues unfortunately.
>>1188
ntayrt but I imagine them to be very timid and bottled up irl
Replies: >>1191
>>1190
that’s funny because i’m a prude irl too but i think i do vent some aggression online when i would never irl
>>1192
one of them today i’m assuming was posting so much about virginity cos she’s a virgin herself and in every topic about that surprise surprise there were really long angry graphic sex posts. and a lot of shaming of sexuality. and it’s just like god this is what you’re doing instead of dating when you’re sexually frustrated isn’t it.
Replies: >>1195
>>1193
>Dating
If you have sexual hangups to the point of chimping out online, willingly exposing yourself to scrotes and their degeneracy is just going to make it way worse
Replies: >>1197
Arggh, I can't believe I choose earlier to have a nap, I missed everything. If they really have a personalityfag kinktard on the team that's insane because all my LC dreams the past year have been about that exact situation
>>1183
Outside of here definitely no, but inside the board it depends though I'd rather we stick with not acknowledging drawfags being the same person unless they do.
>>1195
honestly you’re right. they should become nuns
IMG_8302.jpeg
[Hide] (40.3KB, 594x516) Reverse
>>1196
>spoiler
KEK NONNIE, maybe you were the fortune teller all along. here, this crystal ball is rightfully yours
Replies: >>1208
>>1196
Plot twist: The nona with the dyed hair who was exposed in the friend finer thread  for being a diaperfag is a janny
Replies: >>1203 >>1205 >>1208
>>1196
oh my god prophet tell us the future of lolcow. it sounds grim
Replies: >>1208
Chiyo-chichi, crying.
>>1199
she’s definitely still among us don’t you think
Replies: >>1205
>>1199
oh dear god…
>>1203
ntayrt but i’m pretty sure she avatarfags, and i’ve noticed her typing style before along with the avatar i called her out kek, didn’t get a reply
Replies: >>1206
>>1205
wait omg which avatarchan. please not cat nona i love her so much
Replies: >>1209 >>1214
cow.gif
[Hide] (982KB, 256x256) Reverse
>mod outs themselves as powermad kinkster personalityfag
Live long enough as a milker to see yourself become the cow
Replies: >>1210
>>1198
There's room on the ship for both of us nonnette (๑•̀ω•́๑) there's a reason why prophetic crones come in numbers.
>>1201
The only other reoccurring situation in them is that Cerb dies and no one finds out so everyone thinks she's AWOL forever and LC starts deteriorating over time 
>>1199
God, what a horrible but unfortunately believable twist
Replies: >>1212
>>1206
Nta but I think it's the one with sailor moon reaction pics, though it's a popular series so idk for sure
Replies: >>1211 >>1214
>>1207
kind of dying laughing that the mods on ot think anyone who isn’t a virgin is a whore. yeah. that tracks honestly.
>>1209
wait you’re right i saw that when she responded to the call out for whatever reason. i wish that had ended up in a bigger shit flinging battle honestly.
>>1208
God forbid cerb will die but I'm honestly curious how long a board could last without an admin. The domain is paid up until 2026.
Replies: >>1213
>>1212
isn’t that what’s happening on cc right now
>>1206
AYRT and >>1209 is right. I also don’t know for sure but the screenshot the anon originally posted of the diaperfags post had a sailor moon picrel and a semi-distinctive typing style, I’ve noticed very similar posters since that anon got exposed (tried to find the screenshot but i’m lazy, i’ll post it if i do if someone hasn’t already)
Replies: >>1215
>>1214
i would love to see examples to pick up on typing style. especially post call out because holy shit imagine continuing to use a place where everyone hates you
Replies: >>1216 >>1227 >>1232
>>1215
>continuing to use a place where everyone hates you
I mean...don't all personalityfags do that technically? Like rancefag and pakichan
Replies: >>1217
>>1216
oh were they pictured and identified? even if my speech or opinions annoy nonas i’d like to think a picture of myself wouldn’t get ridicule like that pink haired thing
Replies: >>1218
>>1217
Rancefag's pics were posted, no idea what happened to Pakichan.
Replies: >>1219 >>1221 >>1230
>>1218
I can't get over the fact that Rancefag's face reveal was via Duolicious
Replies: >>1222
>>1218
i know bjchan allegedly left. although i never believe nonas who are supposedly in contact via discord with a personality fag that doesn’t post anymore. they just happened to be there. posting just like them. defending them.
Replies: >>1232
>>1219
KEK yeah, anyone who actually used Duolicious was a megatard
otaku_types.jpg
[Hide] (74.3KB, 590x443) Reverse
I believe this image destroyed /ot/
>>1153
I have the thread open with all the deleted posts still and tried screenshotting it but it didn't work. Sorry nonnie.
Replies: >>1226 >>1229 >>1232
>>1225
try to save the page as html and then open the html and screenshot it
Replies: >>1231
Spoiler File
(744.7KB, 873x1328) Reverse
>>1215
found, i’ll try to find some examples of other posts i thought were her too
Replies: >>1228 >>1244
>>1227
i hate that she used one of my favorite sailor moon reaction images
>>1225
don’t dox the copy and paste email nona she wasn’t one of the infighters
Replies: >>1231
>>1218
pakichan posted a sort of censored pic of herself with her relatives in the babushka thread on /m/ years ago and still continued posting after that, plus the hand pic with her brother's hand during some fight about fujos. idk if she's still around this year though
>>1226
I'm not sure how to make a screenshot that extends past the screen so I'll just upload an export of the whole page. I use 4chan x's experimental support for other board software on LC so it may be a bit effed because of that but the text is all there.
https://files.catbox.moe/h3uf11.zip
>>1229
Whoops, too late.
Replies: >>1233 >>1244
>>1196
I'm in the same boat. I slept through it and now I'm trying to backread but it's of no use.
>>1215
It's not as hard as some people make it out to be. I can pick up on typing styles pretty easily, I just look at how the sentence is formed and what words are used. It doesn't work all the time.
>>1225
At least you tried. Hopefully someone did archive, it might show up on CC or here soon.
>>1221
AFAIK, BJchan has a Discord server that she's in with a bunch of her orbiters. They'll write rants similar to BJchan and post them to garner her approval.
Replies: >>1235
>>1231
Hm, downloading a zip file seems like a bad idea, but my curiosity is so strong...
Replies: >>1237
e6a31423c0081fa2f7220e22bcceb12e58792cf95eda5a37a4d50d384b94a154.jpg
[Hide] (95.1KB, 1670x1505) Reverse
>>1232
>bjchan has orbiters
no way anon, you're joking right?
>>1233
if you sacrifice your pc please post screenshots
>>1238
i thought her profile picture was her for a second and my jaw started to drop
>>1227
kek I completely forgot this happened and now you've reminded me. I repressed the memory, I guess. I have to say, that woman does shockingly look like a tranny. 
>>1231
I don't really go on LC anymore but 
>kek af
took me out. What is happening? Truly the milk flows freely, but this time from the fatmhands themselves. Thank you nonnie.
1c2bf17691be4633df2eb1073e238eadee5248b56dfc65b7bf216135906699b8.png
[Hide] (86.4KB, 953x413) Reverse
>Enjoy your permban
Why do farmhands still pretend that permbans exist?
66b4fda284b9ed0d22d3ff7be00519ecd0eaf49df7084af50d502a09b32dd72e.png
[Hide] (11.3KB, 1841x85) Reverse
>>1245
last two ayrts and me too, or selfposting because she does seem like the type based off of her tumblr posts, picrel was a post earlier that i think might be her
Replies: >>1253
>>1252
oddly sweet in a way. it’s kind of sad to see so many lonely unhappy women.
8280d3214db0dfd3bd478db92328de11a06708608419a7458323e092cb992e80.png
[Hide] (8.7MB, 1888x35689) Reverse
>>1246
I managed to cap most of the argument (and I don't think the email post is there from what I can see). There's some unrelated innocent vents mixed in because it'll take forever to crop out so apologies to those anons
>>1268
It's anonymous IB, there's not really any way that she can be mean to us. If you ever feel like she, or any other anon, is being mean to you, remember that they don't even know who you are. They can be talking to anybody in the world. In that moment, you're a stand-in for anyone else. Taking things personally on an anonymous site is silly. BJchan is a clinically retarded misogynist, nothing she says has any weight or real meaning.
>>1269
Thank youuuu, I was so hesitant to unzip that file kek.
>>1269
The fact that all of this happened in the vent thread of all places is embarrassing. The rule stickler is right, and all the replies to her calling her a "boomer" or an "old ass bitch" are pathetic.
Replies: >>1274
>>1273
it starts way above the argument that was an hour or two ago that was another argument it was a shit show in there.
Replies: >>1276
>>1274
Oh God KEK, so you downloaded the zip then right? It's safe to do so?
1EE7DE0A-A5CF-4BA7-94A4-97AD5AB3D083.jpeg
[Hide] (74.3KB, 989x1062) Reverse
>>1269
>Daddy has a wallet and can find the clit
Holy shit, I’ve never felt this amount of cringe in my life. This has to be bait…right?
Replies: >>1281 >>1282
>>1279
those were baiters that turned up at the tail end for sure
>>1279
Seems like it'd be some 2014 Tumblr Lana Del Rey proto-coquette shit kekk
Replies: >>1283
>>1282
that’s an unreleased lyric for sure
IMG_3986.jpeg
[Hide] (245.5KB, 1052x1066) Reverse
IMG_3985.jpeg
[Hide] (234.5KB, 1048x1060) Reverse
IMG_4014.jpeg
[Hide] (785.1KB, 1042x1754) Reverse
a second mod kink has hit the towers
Replies: >>1310 >>1313
>>1309
Their "ban evasion" detection is very shoddy. I've been banned for "ban evasion" twice even though I never posted whilst banned. They see a position or thought similar to something else that was banned and they use that as an excuse to ban you.
Replies: >>1311
>>1310
i didn’t think there would ever be more pathetic mods than reddit but being a woman into loli and moderating a space like this accordingly… and then going powermad? it has to be the same mod abusing power right or are they emboldened to now all customize the site based on their particular kinks like men?
>>1309
I don't want to defend the jannies because they're retarded, lazy pieces of shit but it's clear they were banning whoever was reported instead of actually looking at the thread. In the new Artist Salt thread every post responding to that derail has been banned.
Replies: >>1314
>>1313
was it bans on one side and then bans for everyone who kept trying to talk about it because that’s been a suppression tactic lately
Replies: >>1316
>>1314
It looks pretty equal, posters on both sides in the old thread were banned for derailing and not a majority of either side
Replies: >>1333
>>1316
i actually read through all of that and i don’t even get it anymore. i still think the mods are acting sus but what is it with these innocuous conversations resulting in this over moderation? as fights went that was honestly tame for a loli freak out. were jenny’s really involved
goodbye_anon.png
[Hide] (72KB, 1182x378) Reverse
Am I the only one that finds these kinds of posts annoying? Permabans are easy to get around, it doesn't really stop anyone from coming back. If you wanted to leave, why wouldn't you just leave? It's gratuitous.
Replies: >>1375 >>1377 >>1382
>>1374
I can see where you're coming from, but the reason why they ask to get banned is presumably because they're struggling to just leave. Not everyone uses VPNs either, so it adds somewhat of a barrier to prevent one from posting at home.
Replies: >>1376
>>1375
I guess my thought is that if they're really struggling to leave, they'd still just ban evade. You don't need a VPN to do it. Even just turning your cell data off for a few moments or unplugging your internet connection for half an hour is enough to remove a permaban.
>>1374
Yeah, it just comes across as fishing for attention, what happened to: "this isn't an airport, you don't need to announce your departure."?
Permabans for those anons and those posts keep getting more frequent.
Replies: >>1382 >>1383
>>1374
>>1377
It's retarded and they're probably internet addict zoomers (the attention seeking is a bonus too). And kek at jannies complying with the requests
Replies: >>1383
>>1377
>>1382
it's from the "lolcow graduation" thread to be fair, where announcing departure is the whole point. but even then the thread concept always seemed kind of dumb to me and some of the anons there still return and reply back
they can permaban people for real now and the mobile posting/turning phone off thing doesn’t work the same way. they just haven’t announced it yet
Replies: >>1385 >>1386 >>1494
>>1384
like just so you guys know post histories are for real now even with those protections.
Replies: >>1494
>>1384
Care to elaborate?
I think the radfem thread on LC is more sexist than most of the people who get posted about for being bad feminists. For example, recently Sasha was getting called fat, ugly, and being mocked and bivestigated for doing prostitution for survival. Which I think is worse than Sasha's crimes of just being a bit full of herself and talking in a hammy, over the top way.
Replies: >>1390 >>1588
>>1389
I'd guess a good 50% of the anons in that thread are cowish members of the community themselves. It's similar to the Jirai thread or the TIF thread.
Replies: >>1391 >>1513
>>1390
Yeah, I think a lot of people in that thread are in online radfem communities and post people they just happen to dislike or disagree with even if they're not milky. Sometimes when I see an obvious vendettafag (which are like a third of the posters), I feel tempted to go to the page of whatever boring radblr/radtwt user they posted and scroll until I find out whoever they argued with most recently, because there's a 99% chance it's the account of the anon that posted them.
And on the flip side of the coin you have anons white knighting anyone they're friends with who gets posted. Menalez/mithliya for example not only gets defended whenever she's posted, but also cow tipped every single time. There are definitely friends of hers in the thread who hate it when she gets discussed. Which has led to her milk being spoiled because she's way less active than she was before getting cowtipped every five minutes in the last couple of months. I'm sure there are also cows in there who WK themselves but do a better job at integrating than HD did so we just haven't caught on yet.
Years back my mutual was getting talked about on radfem-gossip (she didn't do anything milky, just had a divisive opinion that some agreed with and others hated). And the asks were so vicious, as in I was thinking when I read them "what the fuck is this 4chan blackpill language??" Then after finding out about LC and the radfem thread I realised whoever was sending in those asks likely came from there, because it was the same nitpicky, outright sexist cadence that nonas use about people they just disagreed with in an attempt to make people hate on the person. Said person left radblr years ago and is a normie with a 9 to 5 now who doesn't post much on social media in general, but sometimes very rarely gets brought up by someone in the thread who's still hung up on her, and of course never gets any responses because anyone who's joined radblr in the last half a decade wouldn't know who she is.
The radfem thread was always doomed because LC and radblr are just too intertwined. I think a lot of people who sent in anons to radfemgossip are in the LC thread now, so it's full of cowtipping, self posting, vendettafagging, and WKing. It's too bad because there are radfems who are actually milky but people would rather post about random tumblr/twitter users they lost an argument to.
Replies: >>1513
The online radfem spaces are so plagued. I've been to some women's lands and the experience was a complete 180, maybe because most lands don't have reliable internet connection lol. I was really bracing myself for the same nitpicking and surveillance but it was just a bunch of cool women being in nature. If any nonnies have interest and have the opportunity to go, I highly suggest it.
People who come to LC to LARP as some sort of Regina George megastacy are so embarrassing. Where are these people coming from, Pinterest?
73836829475896.PNG
[Hide] (1.2MB, 1780x847) Reverse
keking at newfag autists thinking this is a selfpost
Replies: >>1399 >>1417
artworks-000540408681-p2stmc-t500x500.jpg
[Hide] (32.9KB, 500x500) Reverse
>>1398
This is like the third time this has happened. Luna, Raven, and now Oldmin. When will they learn
Replies: >>1417
1719789708493.png
[Hide] (294.1KB, 715x479) Reverse
Love the infighting going on in unpopular opinion. A couple of moids are baiting and too many nonas are biting, but heaven forbid we scrotefoil.
>>1401
There's no reason to use that thread anymore. It's the same infights going on day in and day out. Using that thread is a dumb move.

Some retards in the Desi Thread were namedropping a popular IB used by Indian men and some were posting about LC on there too, so if you see an influx of poorly-worded moid posts, you can blame them for that.
44512fcff35ac9463c42e7d0ab9eb7abffd0fdf26be5b40b8914437d187c9087.jpg
[Hide] (140.2KB, 1024x713) Reverse
>>1401
I don't know how anons aren't tired of "poopy brown eyes bad poo poo poo!!" infighting I swear it has been going since July baiting moids or not that's too long to be invested in it.
Replies: >>1408
>>1403
It's the same as the "does anyone think bi women aren't real" infight and the subsequent "lesbians are the REAL misogynists" infight. we have been having the same infight for 4,000 years. Can we fucking drop it? Like please has everyone not had a chance to voice their opinion yet? Do we really need to do this again? You had the same infight in 10 of your past lives, drop it already.
Replies: >>1431 >>1442
Screenshot_20250219-212151.png
[Hide] (592.2KB, 856x1065) Reverse
Kek
Replies: >>1410
>>1409
Omg it's her, Alexandria Genesis
>>1401
unpop opinions is the only /ot/ thread I refuse to click on even when I'm in the mood for infighting. nothing of value in that thread at any time, should have been autosaged a long time ago.
>>1399
>When will they learn
They will never learn, sammyclassicsonicfan. Never.
>>1398
It is pretty funny to witness. I'm enjoying how revelatory it is.
>>1257
>same with that one anon who talks about gangstalking all the time 
are you referring to carrey-chan?
Replies: >>1439
>>1401
Vent is worse now imho
>I feel lonely sometimes
>kek dumb pick me bitch
10+ replies, red texts are far as the eye can see
Replies: >>1424
vent_thread.png
[Hide] (125.7KB, 1036x514) Reverse
>>1423
Vent slowly became a chatroom over the course of 2024. There is no reason why that thread should be moving as fast as it does. We're at ~2 Vent threads per week now.

Then we have retards like the one in picrel saying that it's actually good when anons get rude ass replies because that's apparently what lolcow is about in 2025.
Replies: >>1425
>>1424
/ot/s too angry
/g/s too horny
/m/ is peace

The moovie room is pretty chill somehow too
Replies: >>1426 >>1433
>>1425
>The moovie room is pretty chill somehow too
The minecraft server too (even if it is a bit dead now). Two of the best things about LC aren't even onsite, sad state of affairs.
Replies: >>1427
>>1426
One of the channel admins for moovie room does minecraft server too. I don't think it's a coincidence
Replies: >>1428
>>1427
The Moovie anons have a minecraft server too?
Replies: >>1429
>>1428
It's not really part of the moovie room. Just one admin is in both (same username). You can see how to join the minecraft on /m/. There's certain times anyone can join, outside of that you need to be whitelisted. I've only been on minecraft twice so I don't know the full admin list there.
Replies: >>1430
>>1429
The Minecraft admin is so nice and dedicated, she's a gem in the sea of shit that LC is becoming
moovie room, the mc server and the doodle boards remind me that there are still ‘normal people’ on-site. infighters and retards don’t have the patience for them

>>1408
>You had the same infight in 10 of your past lives
topkek nona you’re so right
Replies: >>1432
>>1431
I'm guessing part of it is you're only pseudo anonymous. If you show up out of nowhere and start trying to infight you'll get muted/banned immediately
non-cow-boards.png
[Hide] (456.3KB, 1000x1069) Reverse
>>1425
Replies: >>1434
>>1433
kekking so hard at this
>>1418
i’m actually pretty sure i am but i don’t see how it’s possible because she’s a personalityfag in a different way and is carreychan really still there? she responds to this other name but their behavior and posts are the same??
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (7.3MB, 1600x2253) Reverse
>>1408
>lolcow.farm
Replies: >>1472
It will never happen but I eagerly await the day unpopular opinions gets autosaged and watch the interactions tank. Fake shitposters couldnt even sustain dumbass shit without attention, I'd love to see unpopular opinions wither and drop dead.
Replies: >>1446 >>1451
>>1444
There are some genuinely unintelligent people in unpopular opinions. I don't know if they're underage or what but the genuine lack of understanding of...anything in that thread concerns me.
Replies: >>1451
e8364410cc538b5568532673e723444148ba55bf06ec41dead2ec475c1b635ad.png
[Hide] (268.3KB, 1034x653) Reverse
>>1446
I don't think it's genuine misunderstanding at all. They purposefully misunderstand and misinterpret things because it fuels conflict and garners more attention.

>>1444
>Fake shitposters couldn't even sustain Dumbass Shit without attention
It took about 2-3 months, but I believe that Unpopular Opinions (UO) became the "new" Dumbass Shit (DS) for a lot of DS anons. If you were active on /ot/ around the DS autosage, you can recall that a lot of threads on /ot/ were shit up for the first couple of weeks post-autosage, and then sometime in June 2024 the UO threads really became the cancer we know it as now. I used to use UO, and it was nowhere near as toxic as it is now. I remember in the Post 2024 Hellweek thread, it was mentioned that 80% of anons that used DS had never posted in any other thread. I have a suspicion that there's something similar going on with UO right now, i.e., a good chunk of the anons that post in that thread only post in that thread.

18/02 was the one year anniversary for SD being autosaged, and in that time there's been 61 iterations of UO. That's more than 1 thread per week. The first UO thread was posted back in 2016. If we do the math, that's 112 threads over ~364 weeks compared to 61 threads over 52 weeks. So the new thread rate prior to DS autosage was appr. 0.31 threads per week, whereas the new thread rate post DS autosage is 1.17 threads per week. That's a really significant change IMO.

I never used the DS threads, but I didn't see the point in autosaging it. It was such a good containment thread for newfags and low-quality posters on /ot/. Maybe the reason it was such a good containment thread was that it was implicit rather than explicit. I thought it was obvious that if the thread was autosaged or closed, the newfags and low-quality posters would flood into other threads and ruin them, and since bans are so meaningless now there would be no real way of ridding the site of them. Of course there were normal anons that used DS, but it's obvious that there is a militant sect of DS posters that took the thread way too seriously and go out of their way to shit up other threads because they live off of attention. I think this type of poster found a new home in UO.

I saw picrel on CC in the LC Hate Thread there, and I thought that it was interesting. I think that the autosage of DS had cascading effects on the culture of /ot/, and I don't think the admin team likes to admit that or confront that. The current team has a big problem with admitting that they can be wrong, or that sometimes their ideas aren't good.
Replies: >>1466 >>1473
>>1451
I wish people understood the value in containment threads. DS can be hidden. No Fun Allowed nonnies can hide it. By autosaging you're just setting them free to cause chaos elsewhere.
Pacceka.JPG
[Hide] (119.8KB, 800x532) Reverse
>>1442
>the pratyekabuddhas of the seas
>>1451
>I think that the autosage of DS had cascading effects on the culture of /ot/, and I don't think the admin team likes to admit that or confront that. The current team has a big problem with admitting that they can be wrong, or that sometimes their ideas aren't good.
Ntayrt, but agreed. I understand why DS was autosaged, but clearly that strategy hasn’t worked. Ultimately, there are different types of anons on LC, and while I wish we could integrate all of them, they’ve essentially created ghettos where they congregate and don’t interact with regular farmers, which makes it even harder to integrate them. 

That being said, I feel like anons can get too worked up about trying to “cleanse” the site of certain types of anons, and instead we should just try to weed out good faith anons vs bad faith anons. For instance, I truly think the luigifag husbando thread has brought a hoard of underaged schizo newfags who have led to an overall decline of the site culture. However (stay with me here kek), I understand the appeal of husbando culture, which has been a big part of /g/ for a while, so I don’t think the threads should be outright banned, and I’m not trying to kill anyone’s fun. But it is weird that shit-flinging in those threads isn’t as moderated as elsewhere (probably because /g/ farmhands are logged off 90% of the time). I’m in the camp that LC needs stricter moderation if it’s to be saved. Not to doompost, but the state of illiterate, overly sensitive, mentally disabled newfags genuinely has me worried about younger generations and our collective future.
Replies: >>1502
>>1384
>>1385
doubt.png
7f67643283d03c4b4ca4fff06d7dadd4512cfd13e6bcafa164ae0524922518aa.jpg
[Hide] (33.7KB, 640x480) Reverse
Something really bothers me about the enshittifaction of the Vent thread. In the grand scheme of the site and culture it's not that important besides from a few inactive personalityfags, it's just another /ot/ thread. But I find it a bit indicative of how much the site has changed so quickly, not even a year or six months ago anons were being respectful but now it's just being swooped by the most infight hungry anons. I find it sad and a little worrying, but I also feel a bit melodramatic because it's such a small thread. Not to say that we should be all kumbayah especially towards cows or say that one scrote who made a bait post about cucking a lesbian couple but the lack of basic respect doesn't sit right, though I guess you could say that anons shouldn't be seeking asspats so, very mixed feelings.
Replies: >>1502 >>1516 >>1518
spam.png
[Hide] (626.6KB, 1060x689) Reverse
>Report this schizo in picrel for spamming babble in 3 different threads.
>I'm the one that gets banned for 8 hours for "abusing the report button."
Jannies are actively trying to kill the site. I have a VPN so I just evaded instantly, naturally.

>>1500
It's because Unpopular Opinions is the most popular thread right now. Anons see the hostility in there and they think it's the "norm" for the rest of the board. It's like how when Dumbass Shit was the most popular thread, shitposting was more common in other threads. I've noticed that if nobody is taking bait in Unpopular Opinions, the baiters will move onto Vent, Mundane Shit, or Things You Hate to start infighting there.

>>1473
>I truly think the luigifag husbando thread has brought a hoard of underaged schizo newfags
100%. It might have been funny for the first week, but it should have been locked soon after. Right now, it's a competition between retards to see who can be the most quirky loser in the thread. It seems as though at least half the thread consists of gay men as well. It's pretty obvious that most of the losers in that thread aren't farmers. I imagine what happened was a few of the Zoomers that use the site sent messages to friends like "hey, I know a place where we can talk all about Luigi! And it's so crazy too it's a site for ~femcels~!" or some crap like that. After seeing the Luigifag completely ruin the mood in the Moovieroom the other day, there's no doubt that that thread needs to be locked.

>Not to doompost, but the state of illiterate, overly sensitive, mentally disabled newfags
The literacy keeps getting worse and worse. The younger anons will read between the lines for the chance to be offended. They relish in feeling attacked. It's annoying because they'll chimp out at the slightest provocation.
Replies: >>1503 >>1504
>>1502
About your picrel, that's fucking retarded. I remember maybe a few months ago some janny said that they "rarely" ban anyone for reporting. Either that was bullshit or we have new retards for jannies now 
>Luigifag completely ruin the mood in the Moovieroom the other day
Kek what happened nonnie? Sorry for spoonfed request, but that sucks because moovienights have always been so chill
>>1502
>Luigifag completely ruin the mood in the Moovieroom the other day
I remember that user being a bit off but can’t remember exactly what happened. It was very apparent they were young though
5831f38ad76ab592c58c052684cf3ea1afcf91cafa5921d3fcb8d90aecfa1b0f.jpg
[Hide] (81.8KB, 696x1200) Reverse
Does anyone else just not feel safe posting on lc anymore? The lack of moderation, the claims of schizos being mods, site issues after the server migration, it all feels uneasy.
Replies: >>1512 >>1515 >>1691
>>1511
the false promises, same nonnie. It's like seeing the downfall of lc. It's sad.
Replies: >>1517
>>1390
>>1391
it's obvious from how they post about being on some gossip discord servers, i think some of them are part of the group who used to gather aroud that one literal regina geourge larper on tumblr
>>1511
yes honestly. i never even thought twice in the past about posting most things but now i’m being extra careful
Replies: >>1517
>>1500
>not even a year or six months ago anons were being respectful
eh not by much, i've seen similar infights in that thread like the one from last night for the past two years, and even years before that sometimes anons there would dogpile anons venting about sexual assault, or offhandedly mentioning a boyfriend, or that one fight over a single sentence post where someone just said she wished she had friends and a boyfriend. 
but i noticed some of the recent hostility seems to be from the new rule added to the thread (even though it's added for a reason) because in some recent vent threads infighters kept complaining about that specifically. i think they're lashing out to spite that rule, or like a reverse psychology effect
>>1515
>>1512
Glad I'm not imagining it. The lack of communication has made me feel like something bad is on the horizon.
>>1500
I don't know about 6 months ago but I remember the vent thread being fairly chill most of the time.
d954b10f510a09f44373c80202d8e939efc57c0399f959bea44bb0891c973eea.png
[Hide] (58.1KB, 958x346) Reverse
kek qrd? any screenshots?
Replies: >>1524 >>1529
>>1523
>believing anything from crystal cafe
put down the pipe anon
Replies: >>1525
>>1524
fuck you're right I'm sorry, the possibility for curry milk was too alluring
Replies: >>1526
>>1525
it's genuinely all a cope. farmers can't comprehend an admin that's responsive and kind because every admin for lc has been a fucked up sub 80iq piece of shit. they'll make up all this gay shit to discredit using this board b/c they don't wanna admit to themselves that some rando from india cares more about the community than the actual admins of lc.
Replies: >>1542
004cef37b80eb11911fbb46759145d4db3d6950fc7b10e39704cecc70e046eba.jpg
[Hide] (84.6KB, 419x424) Reverse
>>1523
>harem of cuckqueans
How does that even work? Is Admin cucking us or are we cucking Admin? Are we cucking each other? And how does a random anon/probable janny have access to this super secret Telegram group?
>using CC with images not blocked
brave
Replies: >>1532 >>1533
>>1531
it's brave enough to even use cc at all
b86ec78d73f76722020640300acec994e870683cd915e1fd7242ba1d10215237.jpg
[Hide] (217.2KB, 1167x697) Reverse
>>1531
>blocking images in an imageboard
the state of CC... Miners really have stockholm
Replies: >>1535
19c964cbcc0479568a74f7665006c85a00ff75db8976c9862a6e2a02f21fc8b0.png
[Hide] (268.4KB, 1200x1260) Reverse
>>1533
it might be stockholm but I think the site could still be salvaged if there was an admin who gave a shit and figured out how to block the abhorrent spam. I also wish the staff would start deleting the braindead is coffee good for you? threads.
Replies: >>1537
>>1535
IDK. The reason I don't think CC is salvageable is because there's no point in it existing. The only reason it exists to begin with is that a bunch of /ot/fags and de/g/enerates wanted their own IB because they weren't interested in cow culture. Now that /ot/ and /g/ are the main boards on LC and cow culture isn't a major part of the site culture, there's not much point for CC to exist anymore. LC became CC in a weird way.
Replies: >>1539
IMG_4193.jpeg
[Hide] (260.8KB, 1242x1133) Reverse
the people still on lolcow… even the jannie’s decided not to vain bitch the person calling this fucking creepy. if a woman said she was going to track down her rapist and hunt him for sport i wouldn’t bat an eye. somehow it is so much worse when its love not hate and a person they think is good and not evil. like you’re going to punish someone you love who you know doesn’t deserve it? like not even pretending he deserves it. just feels entitled to this person no matter what it does to them and felt the need to say it without anyone being allowed to talk back about how fucking sociopathic this is. i don’t believe the dark triad bait posters but this is… genuine.
Replies: >>1540
>>1537
i was never really interested in following people on lolcow but i liked the type of conversations on ot. now ot is nothing and cc is dead.
>>1538
The bans have been weird all day, more so than usual. The janitors really don't give a fuck anymore. I saw someone get banned for ban evasion even though her ban expired.
Replies: >>1541
>>1540
sometimes the posts on there just have this horrible nasty vibe and you know there’s no point reading it or responding or even trying to discuss other things because they’ll literally be mad at you they can tell you’re trying to change the subject from their hissy fit and they’ve already driven most people off so no one normal besides that one anon who is like… finally… a post i can respond to and then no one else does and they keep fighting. and if you keep trying to talk to that one anon and ignore them, they report you and freak out in meta that thread is a chat room now! and then you get banned and they switch their vpn and start another in fight about how short women are pesos or brown hair or virginity lately for some reason
Replies: >>1542
02657e997b07c133473f0f8469ec8b1c44fee5408a546d3da74cdfa1bc7c8c76.png
[Hide] (214.8KB, 1203x663) Reverse
>>1526
If you go back and read through the August 29th incident thread on /meta/, you can see examples of this cope like picrel. A lot of retards that LARP as radfems and constantly posture were enraged by the fact that some people used JC to bunker instead of CC, even though JC has better moderation than CC.

>>1541
>this horrible nasty vibe and you know there’s no point reading it or responding
More and more anons think of LC as a place to fight without consequence and to blow off steam by chimping out instead of a place to laugh out loud enjoying fresh milk, and that shows in the type of posts you see.
Replies: >>1543 >>1546 >>1573
>>1542
The projection is really impressive because neither whinging fakefems or unintergrated retards really stuck around after a while nor were the bulk of the original nonas in the bunkers. They really spun nonas sick of being permabanned for no reason on CC into problem posters :chiyolay: - Chiyo-chichi, laying down No one is virtue signalling except them.
>>1542
I don't remember us getting kicked from fujochan. I don't know how to properly express it, but fujo is somehow less "wholesome" to me than cuckqueaning, although I would hate to make a "disreputable fetishes ranking" or something. I mean, hey, the cuckqueens aren't starting fandom wars over vixens or anything bizarre like that.
Replies: >>1548
Screenshot.png
[Hide] (281.5KB, 1811x415) Reverse
I wonder how this nona must feel as of today
Replies: >>1550
>>1546
the fc bunker thread was locked shortly after its conception because not even 30 minutes in rancefag showed up and immediately started shitting the thread with bait kek
not to mention the non-fujos who acted disgusted to bunker on the "gross fujoshi site" then act surprised when the fujos don't take well to being insulted on their home turf
>>1547
Uh, wasn’t there only 1 admin between oldmin and cerbmin, shaymin, who only lasted a few months? I wasn’t active on lolcow 22-23 so maybe I don’t know. I’m not sure what the significance of adding “been here since oldmin” was.
g_-_ideal_penis_size_2.png
[Hide] (728.1KB, 1206x804) Reverse
g_-_ideal_penis_size.png
[Hide] (213.7KB, 1078x403) Reverse
Am I going crazy or was this the most obvious moidposter of all time that jannies were protecting? I’m none of the “scrotefoilers” in that thread but it’s insane to me that jannies didn’t even ban the scrote tourist for his obvious lack of integration. I reported the scrote and nothing happened, and when newfags took the bait, they were banned. The male anon I’m referring to called women retarded females and fat sexless losers just for criticizing penis shapes. Could they be any more obvious?
Replies: >>1559
>>1558
Scrotefoiling should have never been a bannable offense. Most people who were moidfoiled would just ignore it, because if you're not a moid you wouldn't care. Now you can't even call people who use foid a *potential* moid without getting banned.
i miss when the image issue happened and a nonnie created a minecraft server. it was my first time playing. everything was full of joy  and community. no fighting. but i dont really have a desire to play minecraft, i just wish i could find nonnies like that again. i guess its really time i make an anonymous neocities or tumblr to maybe have some connections. the lc friend finder thread isnt great either, a lot of nonnies are scrotes in disguise or are fickle (which is okay, just not a good place for any sort of friendship). whatever lc is just retarded and miserable now
>>1563
I feel you, nonna. I’ve seen a certain oldfag(s) complain about how lcf was never meant to be a “community” and that we’re not “friends” there, but as someone who does have friends irl but prefers to stay anonymous online and doesn’t use other social media, I do really appreciate a female online space where I can stay on anon to talk about random shit or even get advice from other women. For a while, I thought /snow/ would actually be safe from the newfag speds and baiters, but it seems like they’re just as active there now too. I feel guilty for making the new Elon thread now tbh. I just wanted to discuss his embarrassing, autistic, and evil ways with nonnies, but I fear that thread has been attracting politispergs and literal /pol/fags (I see farmhands delete their posts all the time because it’s just so common now). Other /snow/ threads are filled with redditors now too. It feels hopeless.
Replies: >>1567 >>1569
>>1563
Same, I made a friend finder post but I think it was too boring and never got any responses kek. I would post it on CC to see if there's anyone less fickle/insane there but posting any kind of contact there is like spraying industrial chemicals in your house without a mask.
Replies: >>1587
>>1565
im glad you understand. i dont have social media, either, and though i completely get the nature of imageboards (conflicting opinions, not a hugbox), i find it odd when the space becomes destroyed by the infighting and attacks on each other for no reason, rather than the focus on the cows, at the very least. oldfags call you a newfag if you express gratitude for the likeminded female community aspect LC once had.
Replies: >>1604
>>1563
Definitely look into making a website! I've come in touch with some wonderful and based farmers via neocities/personal webpages.
>>1565
Two nonas, both alike in dignity, in fair yoho where we lay our scene. From ancient grudge break to new mutiny, where civil blood makes civil hands unclean.
a92dd34760cdecb2da9a3bea016410b0e5017185a17e2eedc51b178228f33d5c.jpg
[Hide] (20.8KB, 569x241) Reverse
I miss when nonnas were calling everyone troons/moids compared to now. It feels like reddit 2 in how you aren't allowed to point out the elephant in the room.
Replies: >>1571 >>1581
>>1570
the post is bait though, i would say just ignore and report but mods have shown to not give a shit when a baiting moid so its a lose lose situation all around kek
>>1542
The 29 August incident is a testament to Cerbmin's inadequacy. The only reason hackers were able to gain access to LC is because there was a data leak in January 2024. Cerbmin never bothered to change the login credentials for whatever reason. Maybe Cerbmin wasn't even aware that there had been a leak, but any good administrator would keep up to date with that sort of thing. Besides the data leak, one has to wonder: why hadn't there been a backup in over 5 years? You'd think one of the first things a new admin would do is to create a backup, but there hadn't been one in half a decade? That's ridiculous.
does anyone else get the feeling that 70% of the anons in the luigi thread are gay males? its something ive been feeling for a while but i feel crazy saying it
7a5762e3457d7c8a89e9909447f746f4c8691f2ad4fb4f72f00a70c2624b703a.png
[Hide] (52.5KB, 393x351) Reverse
Zoomers need a lesson on gatekeeping
Replies: >>1579 >>1583 >>1647
>>1574
Not really, they actually made fun of a gay male fan a few days ago
>>1574
I haven't opened that thread in ages, but last time I peaked in it did seem like there were a lot of fags in that thread.
Replies: >>1583
>>1563
Wow I never even considered that there might be scrotes in the friend finder thread.. I’m glad I never posted there now. I’m also thinking joining neocities, WOTI looks like a decent webring to start with
>>1575
This is how I know the initial pirate board wasnt real because of the "600 unique users" zoomer anons cannot help themselves and woudlve announced the exact url and name once they found out the link as per >>430
tranny.PNG
[Hide] (236.5KB, 1862x556) Reverse
>>1570
I will never forget how this tranny was allowed to go on a rampage posting his retarded catgirl drawings for so long. It took for him to start nya-ing, using emoticons, and asking to add nonas on discord for him to finally be banned
>>1574
>>1577
Can you show examples of posts you think are made by faggots?
>>1575
This sucks
Replies: >>1595
>>1574
I think the Luigi thread is mostly straight women, just a lot of edgy zoomers. Edgy zoomer girls talk like moids thanks to aggressive porn culture being their introduction to sexuality.
Replies: >>1586
>>1585
So typical de/g/enerate behavior. There's a good reason it's on that board and not /ot/ that would be a disaster.
939384882.jpg
[Hide] (784.8KB, 2258x2625) Reverse
>>1566
The people in the CC friend finder thread are 10000x worse. They're all moids, underage femcels, put zero effort into their posts, or are actually just deranged. Picrel is a twitter profile that someone linked as their contact, I burst out laughing when I saw it.
Replies: >>1590
>>1389
I'm one of the anons who posted about Sasha, i didn't post stuff about her because she is a bad radfem, i think shes based unironically, but shes also batshit insane and hilarious at times, she spends half of her time entertaining obvious trolls on twitter riling her up and also selfposted on that thread telling us all to kill ourselves if we aren't going to be like her etc, also i didn't like that she equated doing sex work out of your own choice to literal rape, afaik theres nothing that implies she did it out of survival and a lot of online radfems and grifters are know for lying about this and other things. Also everyone on lolcow nitpick cows bodies all the time and half of the people posting there aren't radfems, the moralfags on that thread are cancerous and annoying, at least the wks are funny.
>>1587
The bearded moid in the profile picture...
>>1583
Any post that has to do with his feet
>Visit CC for first time in months out of morbid curiosity
>Nikocado Asshole
Don't know what I was expecting.
Replies: >>1598
>>1596
It’s likely a raid from sharty
2c217984a47aaed8127ac455ca8ce1e295fdca5f12041bf811ae9d1791e2dc9b.png
[Hide] (161.7KB, 1864x495) Reverse
What the shit are these people talking about
>>1599
Someone is incredibly bored and wants to stir shit. That, or the farmhands are playing us all like fiddles :chiyochichi: - Chiyo-chichi
Just woke up and saw I got permabanned from LC for an unspecified reason, wtf does that mean? I lurk 99% of the time and sometimes post on /m/, I really don't get what's going on
Replies: >>1605
>>1599
what in the schizobabble is this
>>1567
ntayrt but i agree as well. although, i have met some lovely nonas from friend finder and talked to them for a while now. a lot of the anons i’ve met recently have been yohoho’ers kek
Replies: >>1606
>>1601
Probably a rangeban, try a VPN
>>1604
>Privateers have met already
🤯
1036785.jpg
[Hide] (53.8KB, 640x480) Reverse
>>1599
>lolcow deep state
>>1599
i mean this has to be real since they can device ban. it makes sense.
at this point it’s just been so obvious that’s always been the way it is. it’s a small enough site now that i think at the end of it the staff doesn’t really care to hide it anymore. no one is answering any questions. moderation choices are insane. schizos who know who you are will fight with you and say as much and then all of the sudden only you are banned. the kind of personal information is like gonna be negligible though. i doubt they know who most peoples personal identities are and we shouldn’t be posting things we would be embarrassed to have found out publicly on the internet anyways right? like it’s not okay but i don’t feel bad for the people posting racist stuff or that they’re into some weird kink.
Replies: >>1615
>>1599
only lie is that there are 500 deep state lc users. there aren’t even 500 normal lc users lmfao.
Replies: >>1623
b8667bfd9409bbf5feb01f1a423126a03ce86c261c401535b09f6ec1e8149cfc.jpg
[Hide] (7.6KB, 275x275) Reverse
>>1613
I posted about some regrets and some trauma in their fitting threads without realizing that my device name had extremely identifying information in it. I had it named a specific way due to work and I've luckily been able to change it, but now all those posts have my identity tied to them because I didn't realize that websites can see my device name.
Replies: >>1617
>>1615
Are device names tied to posts though? Because if so then I'm also fucked kek. From what I know they are not, my ex ran an IB years ago and he told me that only IPs were visible, but maybe things have changed since then.
Replies: >>1618 >>1645
>>1617
I'm a certified retard so take this with a grain of salt, but the nonas talking about this issue have specified that device name is visible to the admins. If they just mean the device type, that isn't a huge issue, but device name is a big problem. I wish I could find the post that lists the suspected information that admins can see, it's out there somewhere on lc
Replies: >>1619
>>1618
it had device name i saw that post recently too. do you guys like put your unique first and last name as your device name and have public social media with it? my device name was fine but if they really wanted to they could find me. i just have a common name and no social media so idk if they’d even find “me”
Replies: >>1621 >>1625
>>1619
The name of my device is enough for me to feel unsafe. I don't have social media, but that isn't always the only way people get found. I just think seeing that is overkill in general, though. Isn't ip and device type enough to moderate?
Replies: >>1622
>>1621
i agree. they have shown clearly they are abusing power and probably have added ways to see more information about people during down times. i’m also really curious about why those pictures went down because let’s be honest it’s a website for keeping tabs on people who have done embarrassing or bad things. no way all the images disappeared and it was unrelated to SOMEONE who was posted. i’m not sure the site came back with the same admin.  they at the very least have added mods after and a lot recently. that alone would compromise the userbase so soon after an attack and when it’s gotten down to such a small user base even letting new jannies in from the existing pool is going to be vendetta filled powermodding central. it’s so over. remember that anyone laughing at your post history likely looks like that pink haired diaper wearer like idec? the things i’ve posted were fine and the degens i infighted with were retards amen.
>>1599
>I'm talking device bans
This is something that I've always wondered about. If the admins can see how many unique devices post, since they upload stats about it sometimes, they have the option to device ban, so why don't they do it for notorious personalityfags? The only way they'd be able to get around it is by using a virtual device, like Bluestacks.
>>1614
It doesn't specify 500 in the post, it says there's at least 10 Discord servers and some of them have 50 people. I'm in 3 Discord servers with farmers and there's 10-20 people in each of those.
>>1619
My device name did contain my first name, but that isn't the only issue associated with posts being tied to it. I always use a VPN for post history privacy, so if it's true that they can see your device name, then using a VPN alone is pretty much useless, as they'd be able to track your post history by that instead of IP. This poses the biggest threat for anons who use VPNs and have posted in places like the friend finder thread, as it means that their contact info will be connected to posts that they intended to keep seperate from it.
Replies: >>1628
>>1625
>I always use a VPN for post history privacy.
Me too, but the VPN itself isn't that great. I'm unsure if they can see device name, but device type is enough for the farmhands to follow you around the site and catch ban evasion. It's alright if you have a very common device, but there could be a potential situation wherein you're the only poster on LCF that uses a certain device model - so even if they can't see the device name they'd be able to track you perfectly regardless of your IP changes.

Another thing that hinders true anonymity is the EXIF data. Most anons don't think to scrap the EXIF data from their photos before uploading. Since LCF doesn't scrap the EXIF data automatically like JC does,  that means that any anon who looks at the EXIF data can see your device type and your general location. One moment comes to mind as an example of this: there is a farmer from Northern Ireland that posted a picture of herself once. The picture was taken from her phone, so the EXIF data was available for anyone to view. Another anon figured out her location, and also the type of phone that she used to take the photo. In her area, only around 100 people had bought that phone if you looked at sales history. So that information, along with the picture of herself, could be used to very quickly figure out who she is.

If you, or anyone else, want more evidence of how anons are identified, scroll down to the bottom of /kiki and witness the autism on display there.
Replies: >>1629
>>1628
Holy shit I doxxed myself. Full doxx not just first name. Wtf do I do? The posts themselves are not embarrassing or bad but it's still out there for everyone computer savvy.
Replies: >>1630 >>1633
>>1629
How did you manage that?
Replies: >>1631
>>1630
Well I won't go in to detail, but I'm not the only one. I even found a nona close to me.
>>1629
If it makes you feel any better, this happens incredibly often, assuming you mean that your address was attached to a photo you posted anyway. For future reference, you can just turn off the setting in your phone for location data being attached to photos, that way you won't have to worry as much if you ever do forget to remove the EXIF again. Your device, country, and camera info will still be attached if it is a photo that you took, but your precise location won't be.
Replies: >>1634
>>1633
Unfortunately that was not my problem. I guess I can only hope the site goes down forever before anyone notices me specifically.
Replies: >>1635
>>1634
I know you said that you don't want to go into detail, but is it still related to photos? I'm unsure what else it could be and now I'm also paranoid kek, especially seen as you mentioned that you aren't the only one
Replies: >>1636
>>1635
Yes. I found around 10 other anons, but I'm sure there are way more since I mainly searched for my posts. Why isn't LC scrubbing the metadata though that's just retarded in hindsight now. I guess it's not LCs responsibility to take care of that, but it wouldn't hurt either.
Replies: >>1637
>>1636
I'm guessing their excuse could be if a cow or someone related to one posts and exposes themselves, but the admins are shady as fuck anyway so I'm sure they keep it for reasons unrelated to that too. They give absolutely no transparency regarding what user data they collect or what they do with it, so I can't imagine they are up to any good.
Replies: >>1638 >>1639
>>1637
Well I guess I'm the cow now. I feel like such a retard. At least one of the other nonas had cs qualifications too.
>>1637
>if a cow or someone related to one posts and exposes themselves
iirc the majority of cow post history reveals were founded on very shaky evidence that didnt really prove anything if you thought about it for a bit
Plugged my phone into debugging tools and made a post. Here's what I saw getting sent up:

>sec-ch-ua:
This is browser name and what version they are running
>sec-ch-ua-mobile:
?0
If the user is using a mobile phone
>sec-ch-ua-platform:
The operating system name so like Windows, Android, iOS
>user-agent:
>Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X x.y; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0
Webkits and what version to run on what software. The sample above is a Mac using an Intel chip using Firefox. Weirdly mine says Android 10 when my phone is on 14

It's pretty standard and I guess they could use it to spot ban evaders in the same thread but it would be difficult to use to identify a particular user across the whole site unless they were using something rare like linux or a really old phone. Doesn't look like it gives out a device name like "Samsung Galaxy s9" or "Nonnie's Phone". It'd also be weird for them to be able to see this easily unless regular farmhand's have access to the full site debug logs or it's specifically set up like that.

As for exif data, yeah it's pretty strange they don't remove that. 90% of sites do. It's only photos taken from your phones camera though, not images on your phone.

I'm not an expert at these things though, I work in a bakery.
Replies: >>1641 >>1642
>>1640
>it would be difficult to use to identify a particular user across the whole site
I've been the victim of this before, it's not uncommon. In 2023 I was taking part in a really dumb infight and I ended up getting banned for 6 hours. I wrote something snarky in the appeal like "I'll just switch IPs and it won't matter." I switched IPs and I stopped infighting and went back to using other /g/ threads, but my posts kept getting deleted after a few minutes. I switched to using Chrome instead of Safari after a few hours and suddenly my posts stopped being deleted. I think a farmhand got so pissed that she followed the logs looking for my device info to delete my posts as they were coming in.
DSCN0038.jpg
[Hide] (153.9KB, 640x480) Reverse
exif_test.png
[Hide] (447.9KB, 1438x873) Reverse
>>1640
I'll have to agree with you that I don't think lc staff or admin(s) can see a device's hostname, and I have yet to see a demonstration showing that it can be done with your usual browser fingerprinting tools. If a nona here has a hostname on their phone or computer that uniquely identifies them, they should probably change it, but they shouldn't be losing sleep about posting with it previously.
HOWEVER, just because they probably cannot see your hostname doesn't mean they cannot identify you as the same poster across the entire site. Look up browser fingerprinting, you can see a demo here:
https://www.amiunique.org/
If you've ever posted a photo you've taken and you didn't scrub your EXIF data, they could also find out your general neighbourhood and associate you with your local ISPs. I've uploaded a sample photo and a screenshot of its EXIF data as an example. Even with scrubbed EXIF data you can be located based on the buildings and features in the photo. I don't think anyone in this thread is interesting enough to be tracked that way, though.
Also, when you change your IP, your posts still originate from the same IP range and you're still using the same ISP. If you switch to your phone, your browser fingerprint may have now changed but posts are still coming from the same geographic region. If you're the only nonnie in Cambodia it would be trivial to identify you if you're not using a VPN.

Pardon the ramble but this sort of stuff is interesting to me. This post also seems more appropriate in the computer stuff thread but alas, captmin can move it if she wishes.

Also, I hope working in a bakery is as rewarding as I would imagine it is, that sounds like such a cool job. :chiyoclasp: - Chiyo-chichi, with hands clasped.
Replies: >>1643 >>1648
>>1642
The exif data can give away way more in rare cases unfortunately. It sucks so much because I wanted to quit the site anyway since it's become an unhealthy past time and now I'm aware I doxxed myself for months. Should have quit a year ago.
Replies: >>1644
>>1643
I'm sorry that happened to you. Take solace in the fact that your posts probably weren't interesting enough for someone to track you, at least. I'm still peeved that lc stores poster data forever, it's probably more well-preserved than posted images.
Replies: >>1646 >>1648 >>1660
>>1617
They don't see your actual device name, they only see your user agent string.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_agent
>>1644
Yeah for an anonymous ib it really isn't anonymous at all.
d345a1116c12dbbec19743eeecda377a045de73b782a4a92b447a2b411f41b29.png
[Hide] (9.1KB, 540x95) Reverse
>>1575
She's probably here right now, staring at our posts. :chiyocooked: - Chiyo-chichi, well-done
>>1642
>https://www.amiunique.org/
Wow this is really interesting. I was only really looking at the HTTP headers but the JS ones are really interesting. I've known about the screen size and battery hacks but the font family downloaded is very sneaky. I was only really checking the headers in the HTTP request, since I didn't think the rest would be sent up when making a post. I thought the others in the JS section would be on the page load. 
It would make a bunch of sense of how they managed to get 5k~ devices vs 8k~ IPs during Hellweek last time. Maybe they had a one time fingerprinter they ran over the stats? I wouldn't see the effort in running it constantly.
>you can be located based on the buildings and features in the photo.
GeoGuessr players on Youtube made me super paranoid about this
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/XGLHLNm_0rw
Help us all if there's an vengeful nonnie like that
>posts are still coming from the same geographic region
As a sub 100 IP poster that's why I always set my region to the US.
>Also, I hope working in a bakery is as rewarding as I would imagine it is, that sounds like such a cool job. :chiyoclasp: - Chiyo-chichi, with hands clasped. - Chiyo-chichi, with hands clasped.
Ty, I love it. I do miss not having to get up at 4AM like in tech but alas job satisfaction is more important.

>>1644
It's started out as more of a Kiwifarms but girls rather than a typical 4chan esque ib so archiving makes sense. It'd be nice if off topic boards didn't have it though.
I'm kind of spiraling because of the doxx but getting the farmhands to delete my posts is probably impossible too :chiyocry:
Replies: >>1650
>>1649
You might be able to get the offending posts deleted if you email about it. It probably wouldn't hurt, at least.
Replies: >>1651
>>1650
That's a good idea actually. In all my spiraling I haven't thought about that. Thank you nona that's what I'm going to do!
>>1653
She reminds me of Samantha Prater in the way she behaves, except Samantha needs to be supervised so I'm sure BJ chan is at least somewhat doing this for attention even if she's earnest about it.
Reading this thread makes me realize how most of LC's userbase is still incredibly tech illiterate, even though this became apparent during shaymins failed attempt at remaking the website. Every website that you access can have access to your user agent (the type of device, firmware and browser you use - not the actual name of your device that you set up yourself) and your ip address. How else would banning on an anonymous imageboard work if there's no accounts? And all of these things are incredibly easy to change yourself which is why ban evading is so easy on imageboards. This is not an LC issue, this is an imageboard issue.

>>1644
If my memory serves me correctly previous admins would wipe user data upon swapping ownership, so not all of it is stored forever.
Replies: >>1667
>>1660
>If my memory serves me correctly previous admins would wipe user data upon swapping ownership, so not all of it is stored forever.
I'm 99% sure they haven't been doing that. They didn't do it for oldmin 7 years ago, because she said it was impede an investigation. Ever since then we haven't heard a word about it.
I actually don't understand why they keep the design of lolcow as minimalistic as possible. I'm tired of it not being treated like a cow focused website. I remember they had fake "pop up" ads for the cows earlier in 2024, like i remember a eugenia one I found to be funny. wish i had screenshots, maybe it was for an event or something. but I don't get why they're not a bit more maximalist
idiots.png
[Hide] (57KB, 880x749) Reverse
What is going on with them lately? Anons have been spacing replies like this since the beginning. Are all the janitors newfags?

>>1668
I believe there's a thread in /meta/ that has all of those ads.
Replies: >>1672 >>1674
>>1671
Usually I think most of the bans from that thread were deserved, but this one was just retarded.
>>1668
I'd rather they don't fix what isn't broke.
>>1671

Reddit spacing is when you reply with one space below the reply like I did here. Unfortunately the farmhands are retarded so they didn't get it and have been nitpicking on all spacing ever since they were introduced to the term
Replies: >>1675
>>1674
Reddit spacing is when you want to make a paragraph break, but instead of hitting enter twice you hit it only once
Replies: >>1683
I really wish we could collectively stop caring about the shambling, AI-infested corpse called Reddit. What a worthless site to have living rent-free in your head.
>>1675
No, that's the opposite of Reddit spacing. On Reddit you have to enter space twice to quote someone. When you add a double line break after a reply or a quote it's redditspacing.
Replies: >>1684
>>1683
I don't care either way, since reddit spacing wasn't mentioned in the ban message, I just think it's stupid that they banned it to begin with since formatting replies like the ones in picrel is so common
Replies: >>1685
>>1684
As I said in my first reply, I was just bringing it up because they only started nitpicking on spacing after they discovered the term redditspacing and completely misinterpreted it. Since then, any double line break has been considered redditspacing or "integrated spacing" by them
>>1668
The design is mostly fine aside from some wonkiness on mobile. I think more events throughout the year would be fun, though. It would also be nice to have a new board style, maybe something community-made?
This is such a small thing but my god, it's nearly March and the awards still haven't come out. If Cerb didn't want to do them she should have just not done them in the first place.
Replies: >>1688
>>1687
have we seen any proof of life? maybe she got arrested.
>>1511
i haven't felt safe since the hack last year honestly and i feel even more right in that now
I'm so tired of the trad scrotes in cc, i think i'm one of the only ones actively fighting them in there, it's fun because they don't expect it since the board is filled with trannies and pickmes
Replies: >>1700 >>1701 >>1708
>>1699
Nvm, there's other women going against them too but not many.
>>1699
got any screenshots or examples? I'd peek myself but I'm somewhat hesitant to go to cc at this point.
Replies: >>1706
pleasegodifyouareouttheresmiteallyourfollowerslikethese.png
[Hide] (189.3KB, 1291x559) Reverse
>>1701
All of them besides the anime girl posting one sound male
Replies: >>1711
>>1699
Not the same thread but that "me after puberty" art meme thread wreaks of troons. It's sad that the site is so overrun
random.png
[Hide] (113.4KB, 1049x550) Reverse
anons are in denial that moids have infiltrated and it never fails to make me roll my eyes
Replies: >>1712
556654.PNG
[Hide] (584.4KB, 544x550) Reverse
>>1706
There's really motherfuckers posting Azur Lane bullshit now. I swear /img/ is 85% XY defects, there simply cannot be that many yuripedo types out there
Replies: >>1712
>>1709
2X becoming hidden was such a mistake, now we have to hear scrote abortion tradbait 24/7. I think that with all of these decisions (hiding 2X, making scrotefoiling bannable) they’re trying to make the site easier for males to access. It’s so annoying
>>1711
Yuripedo is her own case because she’s obviously just a lesbian who is retarded degen but the moids just come in there and try to gayop their political beliefs.
Replies: >>1713 >>1716
>>1712
>they’re trying to make the site easier for males to access
i think the same thing. it's pretty obvious with all these stupid rules. it's working too. today ive seen: anons defending trannies and saying they're real women and anons saying that women are biologically inferior to moids. it's pretty obvious that we have a lot of men posting already.
Replies: >>1714
IMG_9563.jpeg
[Hide] (234.2KB, 1011x534) Reverse
>>1713
You can just tell they’re newfags too. Lolcow is such a shithole now, only the cow threads are useable. Im so tired of /pol/fag save evropa garbage being spammed in all of the threads too, atleast the trump hate is funny because he’s undeniably comical and retarded. They need to be stricter on the polisperging ban (they won’t). Also tired of all of the femcel larpers who pull up on lolcow because it got name dropped on tiktok. Ugh
Replies: >>1715 >>1765
>>1714
i wish they'd delete /ot/ and hide /g/already. its well deserved. the trump hate thread is funny because of the zoomers with trump derangement syndrome posting in there, but otherwise they're annoying as hell
>>1712
2X was actually waaaayyy worse when it briefly became unhidden (under shaymin like a month or so before she quit) like it became flooded with rightwing fags and baiters for a while and I suspect that unhidden moment is possibly the reason why it's even worse now and taken over by personalityfags
Who here an oldfag from lc and cc? I used lc from its inception and dropped it once the pandemic started because I knew it would go downhill.  Cc was nice the first two or three years, moids and troons caught wind of it thanks to r9k, and then CP and scat spam in 2022 was the final nail in the coffin for me. 
Just for nostalgia I sometimes lurk threads made ~9 years ago. Anons had good discussions and conversations, the infighting wasn’t as bad as it is now, and you didn’t have larpers. You can tell the quality of posts have declined on both sites starting around the pandemic most likely due to tiktok and zoomers intrigued by imageboards (the edgy teen and early twenties phase)
Replies: >>1718
>>1717
I'm not an oldfag but whenever i lurked on old cow threads the shift on both the userbase and the moderation was really clear, seeing unsaged replies with none of them getting redtexted besides the ones going off topic, rules were different, males allowed for some time even if they got made fun of and there was a lot of pro trans people too.
As for cc it's still the same as the old threads, just with males around and nonexistent moderation.
357cebb044ab7b1772bba12796962d6830896a15c31f478be61a4846c7bcef1f.png
[Hide] (194.3KB, 1245x719) Reverse
Anyone else notice that they're not banning pro-troon posts anymore?
IMG_9269.jpeg
[Hide] (1.7MB, 1135x1922) Reverse
do people just not know how to lurk anymore?
Replies: >>1724 >>1750
>>1723
Kek like this hasn't been asked a thousand fucking times already
Replies: >>1725
>>1724
thats what gets me kek one just needs to read the latest lc hate thread on cc to find the link to this place. it is not difficult at all and we still have retards asking for a direct link
I'm honestly so bummed about the state of lc these days. It was my favorite ib for years, and the mods are seriously running it into the ground. I am an unabashed rannyjanny tinfoiler, it's so evident that there is a scrote presence in their midst.
Replies: >>1740
f4c22d46c92b69844eea9cb3500cf2b745cc89c4a639be6138b43d4d4bc6f57a.png
[Hide] (9.2KB, 1366x85) Reverse
this retard is genuinely bragging over knowing more baby gore/rape hentai than a cow. jesus christ the absolute state
Replies: >>1737 >>1747 >>1827
>>1734
I can't believe that reading a cow thread made me remember the retarded meme that faggots on 4chan would constantly post about the guy raping a baby, I remember always avoiding the threads where that shit was posted. I miss cgl.
>>1730
LC has a curse, and I still don't understand why cerbmin has been completely MIA. It doesn't take a fucking hour to say a sentence, so why is she so damn absent? Right now I think newfags have gotten bored because the site has been a bit slow so it may have weeded a good portion of them out. Ib's don't bring in the same stimuli compared to the non-stop slop on social media. Right now I've been binge reading the artist salt threads.
Replies: >>1745
>>1740
She lost all the ballots for the lc awards and now she's shamefully avoiding us.
>>1734
What cow thread is this?
Replies: >>1748
>>1747
Dexpuppy/Zoe Simone Lorange. The thread was just made earlier today on snow
16d57e13bffe679c231468c87b448b8da2072cd0d040ba276a3c16cfa6ab5544.png
[Hide] (119.6KB, 1242x538) Reverse
>>1723
I'm starting to think that the "anons" that are linking to this board directly are farmhands. I think that they have a deep pscyhological desire to ruin good things. I think that they purposefully ruined LC and now they're purposefully trying to ruin the communities that grow out of LC out of spite. They already post on CC, as shown here >>777 so I doubt that they don't also keep tabs on this place. I assume they want to direct moids or troons to this board so that it can compromised in the same way as LC & CC.
Replies: >>1751 >>1752 >>1839
>>1750
You may be on to something, but I would assume they would rather instantly delete and ban any references to the board in the hopes of suffocating us out. Every time lc links this place we get a small bump of completely benign activity. Unless captmin has been working her ass off it doesn't seem like we've been getting bad posts.
Replies: >>1752 >>1755
1740978491859-tegaki.png
[Hide] (13.6KB, 500x500) Reverse
>>1750
Kind of hard to ruin a board as slow as this where the main appeal is that you're a defector (...from what I understand. Just joined here, hi). Like, what would they even have to post about here? I'm honestly glad to see this thread exist because lcf has been complete ass, particularly the last year. I hardly visit anymore besides a small handful of threads in ot and g. I happened to find that direct link post and appreciate the anon who posted it since I remember bunkering on junku last time the website shitted itself and it was the most fun I've had with anything lcf related in years. If there is indeed an agenda to tarnish this area of the web, I imagine the most effective thing they could do is delete any posts directly or indirectly mentioning here (they've done that to my posts over the most innane shit before anyways) and instead shill on other boards. 

>>1751 
Basically what I think too
Replies: >>1753 >>1755
>>1752
Very cute cow and welcome :chiyokiss: It is pretty slow here, yeah, I hope we continue to get the gradual trickle of visitors and momentum builds. I've gotten into the habit of checking the place occasionally and making an effort to post, even if I don't have the most interesting things to say kek. Maybe lc will go down again and we'll get the fun insanity back for a few days.
>>1751
>I would assume they would rather instantly delete and ban any references to the board in the hopes of suffocating us out.
I don't think so. I always report the posts for "promotion" anyway for good measure, but they're never deleted nor red texted. I think in the mods' minds, they think by linking this site they can direct some of the annoying anons to it. There seems to be a perception that this board is for the retarded anons, we've been called "vicious bitches" and I've seen a lot of anons assuming that this board is filled with fights.

I don't think it works out because the majority of bad eggs on LC are attracted to the speed of the boards, and how quick and easy it is to start an infight or have someone respond to bait. It doesn't work as well here since the board is slow and most of us seem to be normal. I think that's why we haven't seen a lot of negative activity here, I think the last time an anon was banned it was for anti-lesbian bait and it took less than an hour for the ban to happen.

>>1752
The bunker threads last Aug/Sept were the most fun I had on LC in a loooong time. It was like a snapshot of how LC used to be! I miss that atmosphere a lot.
aMZT-QAt7d8.jpg
[Hide] (481.7KB, 1400x1400) Reverse
>>1668
Changes to the site's appearance usually result in an autistic meltdown in /meta/.

>>1714
>They need to be stricter on the polisperging ban (they won’t)
All politics needs to be brutally culled from /ot/. I was around for when Oldmin locked /ot/ for a week because it was so intolerable and it's current state is far worse.
Its pretty weird to see anons complain about right wing politics being outwardly tolerated on lcf when in my experience, if I so much as express anything that can or could be conveyed as slightly rw (even if worded in the tamest of ways) I get banned for "bait", get accused of being a moid, etc. Even when replying to violent leftist rhetoric in a civil manner I've copped a ban instead of the other person. So I've been of the perception that there's been a lot of extreme leftist shielding - which falls in line with the shielding of pro tranny posting that's been going on too. It's part of why I don't care for the site as much as I used to. It's frustrating seeing anons inject their shitty political takes where it's not needed and without consequence while knowing if I so much as make any semblance of a rebuttal while staying on topic I'll get red texted and bombarded with hateful replies.
Replies: >>1767 >>1768 >>1799
I haven't been able to be super active, but I've been lurking when I can and I'm very appreciative of how cosy everything still is. :chiyoclasp:
>>1766
It's incredibly strange seeing anons whinge about rw/centre right politics as if lolcow was always explicitly a leftist political site. As long as no one is trying to bait or be racist and misogynistic (which leftists can also be) I think either side should be given the same amount of respect if political discussion is allowed, which I don't think should be especially not to the extent it is now (maybe a couple of containment threads at most, nothing more), but anons seem to forget that literally anyone can access the site and shocker they're not 1:1 following their exact ideals and political beliefs. I'm not even right wing but I got called a tradtard because I said not every woman who hates trannies agrees with radfems, kek annoying sollipistic types are too numerous.
Replies: >>1778
>>1766
This is the problem with allowing political discussion. LC is supposed to be a lolcow website, it doesn't need to be aligned with any political party. Forcing the site to conform to left wing US politics is retarded because LC is international. The extent of political consensus on LC should be that the site is pro-women's rights because it's a woman's website.

>pro tranny posting that's been going on too
I've noticed this ever since the US election. There's been a few posts in /meta/ and there's always someone whining that the democrats lost because people didn't vote because of trannies. Any time I see a pro-troon post I report it and it usually gets redtexted. I rarely browse /ot/ and I think this is the problem, the old userbase doesn't go to /ot/, so no one bothers reporting the pro-tranny posting. Retards then assume they're welcome on LC and post more of it.
Replies: >>1778
My problem with lcf is that there are too many snarky lesbians on there, or maybe even larping moids/troons who self-hate on other men to boost their own ego, that froth at the mouth if you even mention a male in your life. I am not a femcel and men are a part of everyday life, I’m not perpetually seething at the existence of other human beings going about their day. Most of the scenarios blogposted on that site i am convinced are reddit tier fabrications to justify the perpetual seethe at XY holders. If you point this out, they scrotefoil or they accuse you of being a pickme.
 
No, I just go about my day and co-exist with 50% of the other population. You got to deal with them on a daily basis if you go to work, to school, volunteer or interact with your in-laws. It’s no good hyperfixating and over analyzing a snippet of a conversation shared between an autist woman with no social skills and a man who did a “micro aggression”.

At the end of the day, there are some bad eggs and some good apples, not all deserve a broad brush stroke of “men bad rapist porn addict pig!” there are literally so many men who do nofap and don’t watch porn. Hell, the women on that site to me are bad people and are just as bad, if not worse, mostly because they are trying to out-coom the male coomer. To me, any coomer is a gross coomer and I’m a proud kinkshamer. 

Don’t care if I get called a pickme internalized misogynist. gender war bullshit is stupid and shouldn’t have any time invested into it and I think both sides who hate 50% of the population are ridiculously funny and two sides of the same coin.
>>1771
>implying straight women don't hate men
>equating misogyny with manhate
Are you lost?
>>1771
>My problem with lcf is that there are too many snarky lesbians on there
It's not lesbians, it's self identified "femcels" that seethe at the thought of another woman having a life outside of hating men on the internet. Man hate and misandry have been on LC for years, it was only during the pandemic did start to get insufferable. While I agree with the general sentiment, it's all these posters ever talk about and it gets extremely stale.
Replies: >>1775 >>1778 >>1800
>>1774
This nona is right on the money. Manhating has always been and always will be and it's fine, especially in the threads about those topics. What's annoying is any nona mentioning their Nigel in vent threads or relationship thread only to get seething ((( femcels ))) calling them diseased whores and alogging
Replies: >>1776 >>1778
>>1775
kekk of course this place has stylized ((( echos )))
Replies: >>1777
>>1776
a veritable pantheon of shitposting potential
>>1774
ntayrt but it started getting insufferable when anons began to casually derail every thread with diatribes about how they hate men. it comes off as posturing, especially since we have so many threads dedicated to moids already. the "ugly man psyop" thread is just "whine about men you find unattractive and post men you find attractive" version 5, but the anons in there act like they're talking about something important.

>>1775
its so annoying seeing clearly very socially retarded neets that leave their parents' house once a week trying to pretend that they're normal and that their opinions matter. you can tell that a lot of these "femcels" fit that description pretty well.

>>1768
>>1767
its the 16-22 year olds that found the site through twitter. they're used to having to conform 100% to the latest idpol pc bullshit. nothing is funnier than seeing a completely normal average viewpoint and at least 2 replies calling the op a russian bot.
>>1766
Agreed, this is exactly how I've felt as well.
>>1774
>It's not lesbians
What about the goldstar ones though? They are incredibly bitchy.
Replies: >>1801 >>1975
>>1800
Why are lesbians so cowy? In between Yuripedo and the goldstars i don't know whos worse
Replies: >>1975
8ad9a344271f4c705591d093c466743312a21a5f717fbe5adda93983c5f4db70.png
[Hide] (225.2KB, 739x284) Reverse
Is anybody else grossed out by this banner?
Replies: >>1803
>>1802
me on the right
I try not to think about this banner too much
lol.png
[Hide] (36.6KB, 715x599) Reverse
>report a newfag in a cows thread who is obviously directly related to the cow
>post a reply but delete it 2-3 times(im retarded) to fact check, telling them to censor their friends name
>newfag gets a ban after my post and thread is quiet aside from one reply
>report reply as a samefag as it sounded like the newfag
>less than a minute later i get a snarky redtext
i guess they don't like that i called them trannys
Replies: >>1811 >>1817 >>1822
>>1810
>If you make an error in a post, delete it and repost instead of doubleposting, as doubleposting is bannable.
>But if you delete it and repost it we will still ban you

The mods are so dense. I laughed when I saw the janny respond to you without his tag too. They are so autistically unaware of how easy it is to tell it's them.
Replies: >>1812
>>1811
Ban is gone now too. I feel like another janny has to wrangle the snow one and stealth lifts bans in their wake lmao
Replies: >>1813
>>1812
Did you appeal it for it to be lifted or was it just lifted?
Replies: >>1814
>>1813
I went to appeal with 'embarassing' kek and it was already gone
Replies: >>1815
>>1814
It sometimes feels like they'll press the "ban" button before they actually investigate the reason for report.
Replies: >>1816
>>1815
Definitely, in ot I feel it's sometimes more excusable given how fast it can move when theres infights, but I really see no excuse when it's a slow to decently paced thread, especially in ontopic boards
Screen_Shot_2025-03-03_at_5.15.38_PM.png
[Hide] (99.4KB, 1042x428) Reverse
>>1810
they're still trying to make you look bad for following the rules kek
Replies: >>1819
878dbeb3-ae9c-4e32-9ac9-b07092a17e8d_text.gif
[Hide] (151.5KB, 400x225) Reverse
>>1817
>I noticed her do it yesterday
Well I guess I'm the only anon who has ever over-scrutinised her posts
Reports dismissed. Meta: >>1818
Replies: >>1821
>>1820
Woops my bad I didn't realize you added the board report sorry </3
>>1810
Anon, I'm the one who replied to your post. I get it, I do the same if it's to correct info, but it's a little unnecessary when you're mostly just doing it to change the insults each time and it is over a 10+ minute period. It doesn't really matter though and I didn't report it nor do I think it's ban worthy, I just wanted to point it out to you as it was getting very noticeable.
Replies: >>1825
>>1822
Of course it was you. I was changing other info in my posts by the way anon, and was crosschecking the instagram and discord linked whilst doing so.
>Getting very noticable
Do you really think I'm the only person who posts and deletes multiple times?
Replies: >>1826 >>1827
>>1825
But who is "you" kek??
>>1825
>Of course it was you
?
>Do you really think I'm the only person who posts and deletes multiple times?
I don't, but the lowercase typing, replying to posts just to insult the poster (not saying that's wrong btw), reposting it several times over a long period, and it obviously all being in the same thread, all matches up, plus the other post that I suspected you replied to got posted here >>1734 , so I think it's fair to assume that both instances were you. I'm not looking to infight or anything about this though so it doesn't really matter, I just wanted to give you some context.
Replies: >>1829
>>1827
It's really not my fault that you camp threads and have thousands of tabs open, I delete my posts for a reason. I'm not trying to infight either but this schizo over policing is cringe too, and you continued to derail the thread on snow as well
a87d5b3e88da748f8e1dc384eb6acba9b1fe16ac607b333aa21ed17c4262a77c.png
[Hide] (21.7KB, 709x131) Reverse
>>1828
no reason to be insulting. she explained why she told you to quit it. you've been doing the same thing here where you repost just to add more insults like she said you were doing. mini modding is annoying but so is what you're doing
Replies: >>1831
hellfire-skeleton.gif
[Hide] (200KB, 220x157) Reverse
>>1830
>To add insults
I have further thoughts to add so delete my post immediately because I type like a retard? What do you people want from me? Accused of personalityfagging for reposting stuff
Replies: >>1833
>>1831
nobody is saying that you're a personalityfag??? i'm just saying before you hit post just wait 10 seconds, reread what you wrote, and then decide if you want to write more or change what you say, especially if you know you type like a retard
Replies: >>1834
>>1833
yes thats the obvious advice but are we seriously going to be minimodding people deleting their posts to repost it once? also wasn't implying anyone necessarily said that but moreso to the other anons
>it's getting very noticeable
regardless it was a retarded ban on the jannys behalf and plenty of anons occasionally post in the way i do
Replies: >>1835
>>1834
yeah it's minimodding but you have this attitude about it. it was a stupid ban but she wasn't the one that reported you and she even came her to explain why she said what she said and her reasoning makes sense so idk why you started insulting her
>newfag told to integrate by reading post before posting
>vehemently says no
why, just stop being retarded
Replies: >>1837
>>1836
I don't always type fast and retarded, we all have bad days, jesus christ anons
16BFDEEF-C959-442C-9A9A-20138C471E41.jpeg
[Hide] (153.1KB, 720x1080) Reverse
Does anyone else notice that lc gets more chill when the days are slower? It makes me think newfags are only sustained by higher activity because of how social media algorithims work. Maybe the only way to prevent newfags from coming back is to have a chunk of the regular userbase just go on a small hiatus.
That being said, jc has a large opportunity to create more threads that should provide something that LC does not, not necessarily a LC replacement. It already has an upperhand regarding posting style, it’s really up to us for keeping traction.
>>1750
It kind of is sad, isn't it? But it's the same for CC. There's a lot to say about LC, frankly.

My tinfoil about the new pro-tranny posts is that it's the mods protectionism now that they're apparently hosting the server on their own hardware so they want to astroturf po tranny stuff to make transphobic nonnies dip out of here.

>>1838
Yeah! Agree, it's why I think the vpn thing was silly to do during the holidays. I think they should have tried that during the summer, frankly. But also yes I like the threads here better even if they are slower. They seem higher quality and nonnas are wholesome. I think generating interest in a new thread in Dumbarse Shite is the best way to get a thread maintain traction.
>>1838
I’ve primarily only been checking up on snow recently and despite its shortcomings has been sometimes better in quality and easier to read due to less traffic but obviously has shit moderation. I guess we could theorise threads that typically have less infighting on lc and think about what would work best here.
>>1838
One thread I'd like to see here is a tegaki thread, maybe with a weekly theme to keep things fresh while still allowing for general chit-chat and critique/advice if someone actually requests it. I'd make it myself if I could actually draw and contribute kek.
Replies: >>1843
>>1841
I made one around the start >>141
there are some super cute ones of pirate-tan in there
Replies: >>1844
>>1843
oh no I'm retarded and blind :chiyocry:, thank you.
a2db24b031eda83ccfe9099ad89c4797b25f36a9165fb0d5d5128672d19e9137.jpeg
[Hide] (34.5KB, 617x497) Reverse
Let's not harsh the vibe me nonnies.
>>1838
>Maybe the only way to prevent newfags from coming back is to have a small chunk of the regular user base go on a small hiatus
This has an equal chance of working or of turning out disastrous as newfags may stimulate each other's cortisol receptors Sounds gross but I don't know how to word this kek completely unchallenged and then we get a constant feedback loop and a huge amount of newfags infighting with each other and assuming retarded shit that they'll defend even when proven wrong. I might be a bit cynical but I think when LC is slow and calm it's partially due to underaged retards being busy with school. I do agree that JC has great potential, even just as a launch pad for something else.
Replies: >>1893
Oh it's midterms week isn't it. Maybe that's why it's slow?
Does anyone else get really uncomfortable when anons start talking about how they want to rape certain moids? I guess maybe I'm sensitive, but I get really uncomfortable when rape is brought up in any context. I wouldn't wish that on anybody, it's devastating and horrific. I get that it's supposed to be a "joke" but I don't think rape is funny at all. I don't think that talking about how they want to rape men is "based." I've seen more anons arguing about how "women can't rape men anyway so it's fine to say that you want to rape them," but it really feels gross and creepy to me to even be talking like that to begin with. What's worse is that if you bring up how it's weird, they act like you're a scrote yourself or that you're somehow defending men by being against rape.
>>1883
I've seen some of those posts and this is just my take but I assume those nonas are zoomers and are either brainrotted from being terminally online since being a child or are deliberately overcompensating in trying to outcompete r9k tier moids in raunchy'ness because of how popular and trendy radfem ideology is now. Could be a mix of both. It doesn't make me uncomfortable, just makes me cringe because it seems so edgy and tryhard.
Replies: >>1886 >>1888
Random, but it always embarrasses me when anons in the sonic totem thread immediately do a reroll lol. With all the "newfag" and "learn to integrate" bans, you'd think they'd target the obvious ones.
Replies: >>1888
>>1883
I'm mostly in agreement with >>1884 it reeks of edgy brainrot from excessive porn consumption. Keep that nonsense squirreled away in a dark corner for fujos where it belongs.
pirate_parrot.jpg
[Hide] (428.5KB, 2400x3770) Reverse
>>1884
>they act like you're a scrote yourself
Which is weird because wanting to rape someone is the most moid like behaviour I can think of. It comes across as a gay male or edgy over compensating TIF.

>>1885
It makes me wonder if newfags even know what the sonic totem is.
Replies: >>1902
>>1883
Couldn't care less if they're wishing it on an actual rapist like Till Lindemann. It's just cringe at most
>>1883
I think they're annoying and tryhard. It's that type of "edgy misandry" posts that are made for shock value. I think the posters are very young.
>>1845
When is LC ever slow and calm, though? /ot/ is full of drama. Unless you're referring to other boards.
Replies: >>1895
>>1883
It mostly just makes me cringe when they say it, although personally I think that think men can get raped by women, just that it's an incredibly rare occurence, but watch me get labelled as a pickme for that on here as well kek. I think the most horrific accepted behaviour is the fujos posting their hardcore fetish tier lists with shit like "gore" "wound fucking" "underage" at the top as if that isn't the most mentally ill porn brainrotted shit ever. I know fujos are degenerates, but it absolutely shocked me when basically everyone on LC who posted theirs put at least the gore related ones at the top.
Replies: >>1899
>>1893
Nta but I find it calmer during Aus hours. It could be because there's fewer users though.
Replies: >>1908
>>1883
Honestly I couldn't care less, I hope it filters males but it probably doesn't. It makes me think the poster is just ovulating. You can't really share those type of unhinged fantasies on any other site (for better or for worse kek) and it's humorous at best and cringe at worst but I just don't care. It needs to stay in containment, though.
>>1894
The problem with fujos on LC is that fujochan exists. Fujochan is a far better place to discuss yaoi. It's a smaller site with better moderation and minimal infighting. That leaves the fujos on LC that are either unaware of FC, can't handle the slower posting rate, have been banned from FC, or those that want to bait post and infight. Yaoi is one of those subjects where the dedicated threads in /g/ and /m/ are slow as fuck because everyone is to busy arguing over it in /ot/.
>>1888
>It makes me wonder if newfags even know what the sonic totem is.
I feel like we're a few months off from zoomers unironically saying shit like "Erm a mentally ill trans woman who was harassed?" when CWC is brought up.
Replies: >>1904
>>1902
"I know SHE raped HER mother, but we need to have some respect for HER pronouns!"
>>1653
confession: i think i first summoned bj chan to lolcow kek like i honestly think it's my faul she ended up in there
Replies: >>1907 >>1913
>>1906
Did you talk about LC on Roblox or something?
Replies: >>1908
>>1907
KEKK
>>1895
Agreed, it’s usually pretty slow unless there’s an infight lol, that would be 2-7am ish EST if I’m not mistaken
dc8da90b94fe1ba57a1a039098124676b3930bbbbed73bee8fb260a9ebc87c95.png
[Hide] (59.8KB, 1282x266) Reverse
It took them 14 hours but the jannies did finally do something! They gave him a ban. As if bans do anything. I don't know why they even leave moid posts up
>>1906
If you know her, do you know why she acts like *that*? i’ve never had an issue with her beliefs because i just don’t care but she just has a really retarded cadence to her speech. it could be because of the fact that she’s esl but she always spams terms like “my reality” , “pig” , over uses quotes when they’re not even necessary , is just extremely aggro, constantly claims she’s being stalked and harassed.. etc etc. is she like schizophrenic or something?
>>1771
>too many snarky lesbians
whatever
Replies: >>1971
What's wrong with some anons in Celebricows? Some anons said they didn't find a celebrity attractive (which is normal in a gossip thread), and a few people got triggered and started to wk and derail. Maybe it's because they look like her.
>>1913
Nah shes right, the snarky lesbians are super fucking annoying. I bet half of them aren't even lesbians and are just larping for "totes real feminist" points
fd2ab47c296917723811dbf30a5a6f027da0e83dc7678450f28502b71f734ca2.png
[Hide] (715.3KB, 822x1117) Reverse
>>1771
kek
Replies: >>1976 >>1992 >>2032
>>1883
It’s clearly underaged teens who discovered the luigifag threads and think talking about raping moids makes them edgy based femcels. I’m sure there are also actual faggots among them too because only fags are that excited by the idea of raping moids and you can’t convince me otherwise. Farmhands have allowed newfaggotry to infiltrate lcf so this is simply standard board culture now. 
>>1800
>>1801
When the goldstar thread was created, I knew /g/ had truly fallen. It’s just an extension of the femcel LARP as I discuss above but this time young autistic lesbians have their own speshial thread where they can feel SPESHIAL and circlejerk about purity culture. It’s seriously just embarrassing.
Replies: >>1984 >>1998
>>1973
kek. I came to post that.
>>1883
I think saying it about an irl scrote is a little weird but it's perfectly fine for 2D. It doesn't make me uncomfortable or anything, they're probably just blowing off steam.
Replies: >>1979 >>1981
>>1978
agree 100%. if the moid exists in real life it's a bit odd, but who cares if it's 2D
Replies: >>1981
>>1883
Quit moralfagging. The female-on-male rape jokes are just cringe - leave it at that.
>>1979
>>1978
i’m sorry but i couldn’t care less. i’m not even straight, but men talk about raping women all over the internet, there needs to be at least one place where het women don’t have to be pc. it’s not even the men who care, they’d love to be “raped” by a woman so the only people going out of their way to persecute them is fellow women kek.

i find it extremely cringe and depraved and gross, and whenever i see it i do usually point out how tryhard it comes across. but if there’s one thing i actually agree with beyond internet larping is not giving a fuck about men’s “rights”. shit like this is the whole reason i’ve been wanting a new good ib and didn’t fuck off to the rest of the internet where everyone thinks like this. so it’s not a moral thing.
>>1975
goldstar thread is fine nobody wants to hear fujofagging debate and husbandofagging debate in lesbian threads. goldstars have existed since forever. hide the goldstar thread if it’s annoying, it does its job as a containment thread for that kind of debate too and it’s not even that active. it gets bumped like every ten days. it’s not even lesbians doing most of the stuff people itt are talking about, a lot of you guys are referring to fds women or women who are active in psyop thread. you all are being pretty annoying about this lol
Replies: >>1988 >>1989
>>1771
Femcels aren’t real. Get the fuck off /yohoho/
>>1984
let’s not bring this here but i agree, it serves as a containment and most of the spergs elsewhere aren’t even lesbians. (i even have a conspiracy about the /g/ spergs because the insanity became most active after moids mentioned it elsewhere)
Replies: >>1990
>>1984
Idk nonna, if multiple anons in this little ib think the goldstar lesbians are annoying and cringe on lcf, maybe they are. I don’t see why we should coddle anons that need a designated circlejerk thread.
>>1988
what’s your conspiracy nona? i’m intrigued? Also i agree, goldstars aren’t some zoomer thing. they’re gonna exist and dislike every lesbian with a kinsey scrote lower than 6 no matter what, oh well. Anybody who thinks it’s something unique to lolcow or twitter or whatever is extremely incorrect
Replies: >>1996
>>1983
you weren't the one that posted what the ayrt replied to, at least say 'ntayrt' because i don't concede kek
Replies: >>1993
>>1973
it's kinda obvious that that reply was posted in anticipation of starting an infight, and when it didn't the author screencapped it and posted it to lolcow instead to facilitate one. not many people (besides a few pissed off zoomers) screencap this site to post on lc, and if they do it comes off as if they're trying to start stuff anyway
>>1991
holy FUCK I'm retarded, sorry nona. going for a walk kek
I think the jokes are cringe but fine, I think goldstar lesbians are fine, I think manhating is fine, I think being straight is fine, I think husbandos and waifus are fine
Infighting about groups with their own containment especially if you don't belong is stupid. I like women having places where they can talk about their interests without having to be censored
Replies: >>1996 >>2000
>>1990
fuck i meant kinsey score not scrote
>>1995
based nonnie. i don’t care about what nonas do unless they’re going out of their way to bother other people about it. if they have their own thread, who cares? i’m actually glad they have their own thread now, there’s much less infighting in the main lesbian thread. the stuff being said about lesbians in this thread is kind of dumb
Replies: >>1997 >>2004
>>1996
I think it's just a couple nonas complaining. I have a hunch the majority is fine or indifferent about other nonas sexuality, they just aren't saying it because there's no point arguing these things. 
Love me nonnies
d8dc067526b62664beaa564714de74acb3ca549d33f668016b9d271de2416962.png
[Hide] (44.9KB, 702x323) Reverse
>>1975
Ackshuyally it was anons in the male bodies thread who first popularized the rapeposting trend, about a year before luigifags arrived
Replies: >>1999
>>1998
Ayrt, well… I can’t say I’m surprised. That thread is straight out of /fit/ and probably fag central. 
Regarding my seetheposting about goldstars, I’d like to formally announce I have nothing against lesbians. I love you lesbians. I just hate the concept of circlejerk threads, and I’m upset at the state of lcf. But the goldstar thread is hardly of concern to me and not a primary offender by any means, I just wonder if it’s representative of overarching culture changes (mainly brought by young zoomers) on /g/ especially. I’m an older zoomer so I see the kinds of cultural discourse that exist on tiktok and x. It’s unbearably retarded. Yes, goldstars have always been around. Still think it’s cringe. You can be a goldstar and not need asspats for it. That is all.
>>1995
fukken based, agreed. I don't think anyone should be be going into the man rape thread on /yhh/ and throwing a ragie about it, literally hide it and keep scrolling.
Replies: >>2001
portrait-of-a-woman-pirate-armed-with-a-pistol-holding-a-navy-officer-AYA24T.jpg
[Hide] (215.8KB, 868x1390) Reverse
>>2000
>how do you do fellow privateers
>>1996
>Kinsey scrote 
Kekk Freudian slip (fuck freud though, he was a hack)
Replies: >>2005
>>2004
How was Freud a hack?
Replies: >>2006
>>2005
>she doesn't know
if you never had the desire to fuck your own father it proves Freud is a hack
Replies: >>2007
>>2006
If Freud was wrong then we wouldn't have a incest thread on /m/
Replies: >>2008
>>2007
NTA but I find cocaine addicts quite untrustworthy and iirc none of the anons posting in that thread have a Electra complex, from what I've seen it's mostly shipping siblings. Obviously incest is bad irl but I don't think Rin x Len is going to harm anyone.
Replies: >>2009
>>2008
nta but electra complex was from jung not freud
Replies: >>2010 >>2013
>>2009
It's a better term than "penis begrudge" which is fucking retarded and I don't really want to get into it.
>>2009
They're both pretty much discredited anyway. It's the psychological equivalent of blood letting. Important to see where the field came from not at all useful now.
Replies: >>2014 >>2017
Jungs-model-of-the-mind.png
[Hide] (193.5KB, 732x876) Reverse
1_5Z8wYzGcih0AfP3E8WzUWw.png
[Hide] (254.7KB, 1200x800) Reverse
>>2013
Samefag, they do make some nice imagery though
Replies: >>2016
>>2014
I've always thought that Freudian and Jungian ideas can only really work within a structure of a fictional story.
>>2013
i disagree
Replies: >>2023
>>2017
How darest thou.
>>1973
Why am I not surprised that got posted lmao
97048aa478ec0e9e060fa8d83f646f84e9e26030b69ffe1bcc9b64917394537a.png
[Hide] (32.9KB, 975x394) Reverse
0c33030cda8965e2af11a8f9c1bfa924b5adcff9eafd7431a683d40ae07c910b.png
[Hide] (213.8KB, 1063x558) Reverse
Does anybody know why the fuck there's so many baiters who act like *that* in /2X/?
Some nona will write and entire essay about her feelings about some feminist topic or will just reply to another nona and some retard will reply with extremely low effort bait. I do think its like one or two camping retards. They all write with this exact same type of cadence, they never fuck off despite getting no replies. What happened? 2X history is so messy and i remember when it slowly started to die.
Replies: >>2035 >>2039
>>2034
It costs them nothing to post low effort bait and they get a nice dopamine hit if they manage to get a bite. I'm glad they get zero responses most of the time though.
f9e996f48ff5510f3ea54e328230f99f8d6d81cb607d6844aab695e969bf16f2.jpeg
[Hide] (107.5KB, 1080x1175) Reverse
There is some retard sperg who keeps going around calling everyone bpdemon as an insult. Her typing style is insanely recognizable and she's starting to irritate me. I'm also pretty sure she's a luigifag and one of those edgy zoomer femcel larpers. I find this new wave of barely legal or underage sounding anons fucking insufferable. Shame on them especially if they're actually older adult women who sound like that. I've been on that godforsaken site since 2017 and I can't find a reason to want to stay because you can't even vent about having mental problems in the designated vent thread without one of those retard low empathy zoomers hopping on your ass to infight with you.
Replies: >>2037
>>2036
I hope the bpdemons in her head leave her alone and allow her to find peace someday :chiyolay:
Replies: >>2038
>>2037
if anything she's the one who sounds like she has bpd and is in denial of it. poor little anon. all that and she's obsessed with a jailed killer. where did her parents go wrong?
>>2034
I can't even tell who's baiting who. Everyone there sounds deranged, especially the blackpillers and tifs
Replies: >>2040 >>2041
>>2039
nta but it's crazy that we have so many tifs on lc kek
>>2039
I don't mind it when people rant about having dysphoria or whatever. tifs are annoying but dyphorics are their own thing. I feel bad for them, they really have no outlets. if you go to the doctor youre told to pump yourself with a shitton of hormones
Dying laughing because Luigi has been revealed to be a ladyboy fucker and owned Japanese pornstar trading cards. Hopefully this will be the end of the Luigifagging.
>>2042
The man was photographed with pissed trousers and not one luigifag was deterred, there will be no end to it.
Replies: >>2046
thielshill.png
[Hide] (58.7KB, 654x331) Reverse
>>2042
Amen, i've been tired of that faggot since i saw his tweets sucking off Peter Thiel (the guy who ruined everything ever).
Replies: >>2046
>>2044
>>2043
They're only fagging over him because he's young and attractive, if he were old and ugly nobody would give a shit. I don't disagree with him shooting a CEO (in Roblox) but it's dumb to act like he's a pure cinnamon roll to fetishize over something as dumb as that. He's still a scrote at the end of the day
>>2042
I honestly don't even understand why the Luigi thread has been active for so long I would've thought it would be dead already. Though admittedly I don't keep up with news relating to Luigi so if there is interesting shit to talk about that's one thing. But from what I saw the last few times I looked it was just nonnies being exceedingly horny over nothingburger photos or shitting on other ppl being equally as horny for him on reddit or twitter. I mostly just avoid the luigisperging but i wouldn't mind if it died off soon
I don't care for LC staff gossip but Cerb has been dead for too long. The rumors about discord shit are probably fake but if they aren't, they really should come forward with information. Just a crumb, so we don't feel so in the dark
Replies: >>2050 >>2051
>>2049
We were too mean to cerb so they took their ball and went home :<
The discord shit is almost guaranteed to be fake, not a single screenshot posted yet which tells me it's a nothingburger. I wouldn't mind being proven wrong though, of course.
Replies: >>2052
>>2049
If you're talking about this post >>1599 then it's certainly not fake. The only thing I doubt is that anyone non-staff would be allowed in. But besides that, there are several LC-based communities online. This whole board could be considered one. I've been in 4-5 LC Discord servers over the years, it's not that unbelievable to me that there would be a lot more out there. The staff team most definitely communicates through Discord or a similar platform.
Replies: >>2053 >>2068
>>2050
I want to see screenshots if the discord is real because I definitely believe it's possible. At least evidence of people talking about what goes down more extensively in it. I remember the PULL and Gossipgate related discords and there was a lot of drama going down in them behind the scenes. If LC was similar it wouldn't be shocking whatsoever, drama breeds drama
>>2051
> 4-5 LC Discord servers
What were the ones you were in like? The ones I was in blew up due to drama and disbanded multiple times.
Replies: >>2054
>>2053
Dramatic and prone to blow ups. We might have been in the same ones a few times.
Replies: >>2056
>>2042
I was never a luigifag but I did lurk the very early threads because I was interested in the shooting and his motives and I suggested that he was engaging in sex tourism while in Southeast Asia but everyone was coping hard and disagreeing. I kind of feel vindicated now. I'm honestly shocked it took this long to dig up some real dirt on him kek. A moid is a moid is a moid.
>>2054
One of the servers I was in had a hierarchy of text channels certain members could access. The private text channel was used to make fun of the newer members joining the server. Absolutely clique-like childish behavior. Discord itself is full of overly dramatic mentally ill underaged users, so I’m not surprised.
Replies: >>2057
>>2056
The only time I joined a LC-adjacent discord server, I was immediately accused of being some sort of spy sent from a different server they were having beef with. I don't think I ever managed to convince them that I wasn't, but all the people on there were annoying as shit and I left pretty quickly.
Replies: >>2065
>>2057
Was it Jopping or the rival to Jopping? I can't remember the other discords name but those were at odds with another. May have been in both under different accounts.
Replies: >>2067 >>2096
>>2065
That doesnt ring a bell but I honestly don't remember that well either. The server they were at odds with had a name along the lines of "Cat Cafe" or some other cozy-sounding thing. This was in like 2021-2022 as well.
Replies: >>2083 >>2096
LC is such a dump right now. The farmhands are acting like they're overwhelmed and don't know what to do. Cerbmin seems to completely absent.

>>2051
>The staff team most definitely communicates through Discord or a similar platform.
IIRC Cerbmin shut down the official discord when she took over from Shaymin. I assumed that they either used Slack or IRC for communicating with board staff.
Replies: >>2069 >>2070
>>2068
AFAIK Cerb shut down the official community server, but not the staff server. I think the community server shut-down is what spurred the creation of so many off-shoots, I remember even before it shut down there was a lot of secondary private servers that you'd be invited to through the main one. I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing the staff uses Discord because most of them seem to be below the age of 22.

>The farmhands are acting like they're overwhelmed and don't know what to do
It's a body without a head. It's been painfully obvious since early 2024 that the IB is understaffed, specifically summer 2024. Sometimes I almost feel bad for the farmhands, because it's obvious that too much is being asked of them for too little in return. They're horrible at what they do, but I don't blame them so much as I blame the one who hired them. A site as big as LC should easily have 40-50 moderators, but I'd guess there's less than 10 right now. It doesn't help that Cerb isn't around to lead them, or keep them in check either.
Replies: >>2070
3d8d740577117296518981cfa66ac5f7e8474ff87179cfad8d59014cbdec98b1.jpg
[Hide] (60.6KB, 1267x151) Reverse
1674077788658.jpg
[Hide] (25.2KB, 1230x102) Reverse
>>2068
>>2069
The original "cerebmin" introduction was from a discord, maybe that's what they're referring to 
https://lolcow.farm/meta/res/46413.html#50489
>>2070
>Jenny Death
>anime icon
Oh that's not good
Replies: >>2073
7881468e26dd82fb6d879c00f662521384a7d4baa608d36b5ede73368830c8fb.jpg
[Hide] (24.7KB, 453x439) Reverse
>>2070
>discord-first updates
>mod team can't moderate because of spam
>announcement was made without granting any rights to lc to begin with
exceptionally grim
Replies: >>2073
>>2071
>anime icon
>not good
/cgl/ is LC heritage

>>2072
To be fair, Shaymin was incompetent.
Replies: >>2074 >>2075
>>2073
I know, I was a seagull when lc was created. That doesn't stop the Death Grips and anime pfp combination from being a bad omen
>>2073
"Jenny Death" was also the screen name of a notable poster on other sites that went out of her way to defend troons.
Replies: >>2076
>>2075
It's a Death Grips album name, so there's a high chance it's coincidence. It could also not be.
>>2070
fuck fuck fuck that fucking trannycore name and avatar god fucking dammit why didn't I realize
:chiyogetout::chiyogetout::chiyogetout:
>>2070
Not shaming anons that only joined past 2021, but this is a perfect encapsulation of how LC went to shit. The Discord era was the perfect example of why anonymity is so important. That Discord was full of the most outrageously annoying attentionwhores you could imagine. IIRC it's where the phrase "farmers became the cows" became popularized. It was so damning when suddenly to get updates on the site and stuff you had to be in the pseudo-anonymous Discord server. The new admins were sourced from that Discord server, where being an annoying retard was the norm, so I knew that "Cerbmin" was gonna be a failure since I first saw that post so long ago.
Replies: >>2081
I was on LC when it started but took a few years break on and off in between, most of the staff drama is pretty new to me. I wish there was a good archive of it all. 
>inb4 kwf 
I'm not going on there, please don't make me
Replies: >>2084
>>2079
I remember there was a thread on /ot/ for documenting the discord cows.
Replies: >>2082
c345fbc32d243b56fbb20868f7a851a18dec8bf71c9c6e6c20262a80a29020ef.png
[Hide] (132.4KB, 694x303) Reverse
comfort_thong.jpg
[Hide] (150.3KB, 1080x513) Reverse
1646543226424.jpg
[Hide] (41.7KB, 366x344) Reverse
>>2081
this one right?
https://lolcow.farm/ot/res/733281.html
the memories...
>>2067
I haven't been on one since 2021-2022 myself. There were several. I was in at least 3-4 of them. One of the ones I was in was the one with the user tier list where the more you posted the more channels you accessed.
>>2080
Honestly, if you want the run down you kinda have to go on KF.

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/lolcow-farm.11942/

That's the link to the thread. It's only 72 pages. It recaps a LOT of the drama that you may have missed. I know that a lot of farmers have a certain hate towards KF, but as someone that uses both: it's really not that big of a deal for you to use the site once to check out the thread that details what's happened on LC.
Replies: >>2085 >>2087 >>2093
>>2084
Almost unreadable due to the bitching about muh foids and muh sjws. why do kiwifags desperately want it to be 2016 again?
Replies: >>2086
>>2085
Yeah, it's annoying, but there are former farmhands, regular LC users, and even members of the LC Discord that post in that thread too and dish out certain information that's hard to find elsewhere. Read the whole thing if you have the time.
Replies: >>2093
>>2084
Original AYRT here, I'll read it but only slightly begrudgingly. Thank you for the link
Screenshot_20250307-055932.png
[Hide] (154.5KB, 1008x438) Reverse
Moralfagging on moidfarms is out of control.
Replies: >>2099
>>2084
>>2086
Nta, you know when the 90% of the thread is bitching about femcels and foids it's pretty hard to justify reading the whole thing.
Replies: >>2094
>>2093
I wish Kiwifarts had a "hide unsaged posts" equivalent so I don't have to sift through "xyz is fat and i would not have sex with her" for 99 pages when reading cow threads.
Replies: >>2095
>>2094
Agreed, even the highlights don't work properly. Maybe kf needs to go back to it's roots and get a wiki for it's lolcows that has all the important info. 
Inb4 that's the OP, it's rare the OP gets updated regularly and has all the important info, and the 2013-2015 OPs are the worst with just "hey guys you know cow? let's make fun of cow", you'll be damned if you didn't know about the cow before and wanted some introduction first. I would be lying if I said I'm not having more fun nowadays with kiwicows milk than our milk though
>>2065
>>2067
I was in both of those servers, the Jopping one was full of underaged koreaboos and monster fuckers.
Replies: >>2097
>>2096
>Jopping
>Koreaboos
Who would have thought  https://youtu.be/pAnK1y7qjuE 
sometimes I wish I was a koreaboo so I could enjoy hkc with their reliable and competent staff :chiyocry:
>>2092
TOPKEK the irony, these people are speds
If I was an anthropologist or sociologist or anyone that studies human culture and psyche I think lolcow would be perfect for my study. Seeing the development of the culture and the context of culture shifts on threads spanning over years is incredibly interesting. It's like watching human culture except on 2x speed.
>>2042
they're coping extra hard now and attacking other luigifags who criticize his porn loving sex tourist ways by claiming it's all one anon and/or moids in disguise trying to tear them apart KEK
Replies: >>2102
>>2101
I'm surprised no one has told the anon/s saying it's one singular anon replying to themselves for 24 hours straight that they're acting a tad bit schizophrenic
Replies: >>2103
>>2102
I'm just happy it's finally hit the fan. I've hated what the Luigi thread did to /g/ and to LC at large. It's about time they shut the fuck up. If mods had half a brain, they would have closed that thread down back in early Jan or late Dec.

It's also funny to me that now that his weird past has come out, suddenly everyone is saying "oh, no, he must not be the guy that shot the CEO! It must be someone else!" It's neurotic.
2c9e2a7b9965b25e914ce9922668f02056af157478605afbc5c71f4f2a4acc83.webp
[Hide] (69.4KB, 768x768) Reverse
Replies: >>2124
Anyone else watching the zoomers and scrotes taking over /ot/ right now?
Replies: >>2109 >>2117
Spoiler File
(132KB, 728x345) Reverse
>>2108
Not scrotes, it's yuripedo and her discord friends, she spammed the thread with porn
Replies: >>2110 >>2114
>>2109
Really, REALLY doubt that. I think it's a cope. Yuripedo is a retard but it's obvious that it's the dumbass shit retards and men.
Replies: >>2111 >>2112 >>2119
>>2110
Nona, she answered multiple people who made fun of her, she said she hated hetties and fujos, it's her.
Replies: >>2113
>>2110
nta but you don't know yuripedo lol
Replies: >>2113
>>2111
I don't doubt that she's posting, but I doubt that she's the only one using that chatroom.
>>2112
Oh how I wish this were true.
Replies: >>2115
Spoiler File
(138.8KB, 902x610) Reverse
>>2109
Also kek at her porn spam staying up while sfw posts get deleted
>>2113
>but I doubt that she's the only one using that chatroom.
The thread likely got posted in her discord server and they all spammed the thread
Replies: >>2116
>>2115
Maybe, but I don't think that she's the only one to blame for this mess. We'll agree to disagree. I think that the anons that want /ot/ to be Discord are more to blame.
>>2108
Yeah it's certainly scrotes. Why did a thread like this appear all of a sudden? And aside from tons of uncensored animu porn it looks like someone sent a gore vid of a dog being run over (though it was already deleted, while the porn is still up. Wtf).
If threads like these keep appearing I'm gonna start believing in the tranny jannies theory. It should've been locked up already
Replies: >>2118 >>2134
>>2117
The video of the dog wasn't gore, it was just a cheesy edit. No animal gore was posted AFAIK.

The reason it appeared is most likely because certain groups have realized that the moderators are not active during certain time periods. It becomes very predictable after a while. Retards take advantage of these gaps in moderation to shit up /ot/.
>>2110
Yuripedo wouldn't be a problem if retards report and ignore.
Spoiler File
(967.8KB, 789x740) Reverse
Spoiler File
(23.7KB, 558x114) Reverse
6821417fa8336f897c9aff5c6c2a332557ae799f67ebc7fdc796c2590049a0ad.png
[Hide] (21KB, 504x71) Reverse
Well, after 5 hours of shit flinging, the janny finally decided to lock the thread. This comes 2 hours after deleting the initial wave of shota porn. Lots of egregious posts like those attached are still left up, meanwhile every post critiquing the janitors or questioning the lack of moderation has been deleted. Kind of interesting, right?
>>2120
A janny got to the thread first and started deleting and handing out temp bans. I don't think jannies can lock threads so they probably had to wait for a farmhand. Some posts may have been left up so a farmhand could issue a permaban. Sometimes I wonder if it's all janitors and Cerbim with no farmhands left.
>>2120
>ctrl-f 'a-lo'
Aye, now that's the way to do it proper :chiyolook:
>>2106
KEK what is this? Did you make this? Can't wait for the content of his USBs to be leaked and it's just weird ass porn and the anons in his thread still find ways to cope
>>2120
>The conversion therapy one
Kekkk
>>2120
I bet some tumblr esque discourse kicked it off. also the conversion therapy one is ew
>>321 (OP) 
Right now on CC there’s a load of spams from sharty since it’s international women’s day, and the mods are hardly doing anything.
Replies: >>2130
>>2128
There are like at best 2 autistic women on that site, who tf are they even trying to troll?
Replies: >>2131
>>2130
I'm guessing that they can't get past Cerbmin's anti-spam measures on LC so are forced to go for the softer target.
>>2120
>every post critiquing the janitors or questioning the lack of moderation has been deleted
I don't have a picture, but I made a post in /meta/ around 6AM today 
saying "why did you all allow this to go on so long? why did you delete posts without locking the thread? why isnt the site moderated for hours at a time?" and the post was deleted within 10 minutes. I wasn't banned or anything, the post was just deleted. I didn't take a picture because I didn't expect it to get deleted.
be75de77da3f95ee3f2646e2fca1069f20fe5a2d367d8e00d496622608ad72fb.png
[Hide] (110.6KB, 1026x557) Reverse
The masses still blame "kiwiscrotes" for every problem that ever happens on their IB. Bad moderation? It's the kiwifags' fault. Spam shitposting? That's kiwifags. Someone disagrees with you? That's definitely a kiwifag. Anything at all happens on lolcow? It's the kiwifags! It's crazy that they'll be blamed for everything and anything because the staff doesn't want to take responsibility for what the IB has become.

It's not kiwifags, or at least it's not all kiwifags. It's the unintegrated masses of zoomers that have made the board their new home since late 2023. It's the retarded fujos that refuse to go to their own dedicated IB. It's the anti-fujos that post shotacon to bait the fujos into replying. It's the dozens of retards in Discord servers run by personalityfags like Yuripedo and BJchan. It's the retards that use /ot/ as their personal Discord chatroom,. It's the anons that never got over Dumbass Shit's autosage. It's the chronic infighters that camp in UO. It's the femcel larpers. It's the TIFs from Tumblr. It's the absent staff that have no real moderation tools because of the existence of VPNs. It's the dead admin that refuses to take accountability for anything. It's the perfect storm for destroying the culture of a board.

>>2117
>a gore vid of a dog being run over
There was no gore being posted in that thread. It was stupid for someone to upload a video and write "dogs getting run over!" but it's even also stupid for anons to report that post for gore without watching the video, and it's even more stupid that the farmhands deleted it without watching the video.
Replies: >>2135 >>2137
db0e724cb589380305f77d6ab4de8f44fb3436abc8aa82d567214c96559a098f.jpg
[Hide] (39.7KB, 349x642) Reverse
>>2134
I'm not gonna watch a video with a caption "dog gets run over", sorry anon, but the ban was deserved, you don't need to click the shady links with a "normal" child picture to verify it's cp as well
Replies: >>2136
Spoiler File
(1.4MB, 1066x1068) Reverse
>>2135
I never posted the video. I didn't post in that thread, I only watched the melt down. It was pretty obvious it wasn't gore because it would have been detected by the autoban feature. I'm not arguing about whether or not the ban was deserved, I'm saying that the moderators should not be banning things based on reports alone. They should at least do their due diligence and look into the posts reported. If I spoiler this picture, and said "omg look at this porn" and people report it without actually looking at it, should the mods ban me for posting NSFW content? Even though nothing NSFW was posted?

Your CSAM comparison is stupid.
Replies: >>2139
>>2134
I agree with everything you posted except that posters shouldn't be banned for pretending to post gore. If someone makes a post that says "my pussy" with a spoilered image of their cat, then banning someone for an obvious joke is retarded. Gore and CP are very different. No one should need to watch a video that could show an animal being tortured to death. The fact that a poster on LC thought that this was an acceptable joke just shows how far gone the userbase is. LC is not 4chan /b/ in 2007.
Replies: >>2138
>>2137
Ayrt and I agree with you. I said it was stupid that these videos were deleted since they weren't gore. It makes it seem like the farmhands didn't actually vet the reports. Still, I don't think a dumb joke deserves a permaban, maybe a longer temp ban for trolling.
Replies: >>2152
>>2136
Boardmin have the opportunity to do something so funny right now
Replies: >>2140
>>2139
Plz no (´;д;`)
Replies: >>2142
apologies if this contradicts with the thread topic but I tried branching out to other ibs to find discussion after frustrations with the current state of lc and holy shit never fucking again. I would tolerate all the baiting and retardation in lc if it means not having to see unfiltered moid depravity front and center. At least moid posters in LC put some effort into integrating or get culled as bait, I cant imagine being in the same presence of people making variations of threads like "women you would eat" or "women built for bbc" next door. zoomers being retarded has absolutely nothing on unrestrained moid autism.
Replies: >>2143 >>2144 >>2151
>>2140
it's too late, DING DONG BANNU
:chiyogetout:
>>2141
I'm sorry you had to experience that. I've been lucky enough to fare a bit better during my male space safaris.
>>2141
I don't think I'll ever drop lolcow because at the end of the day it's meant for women. Female spaces are so valuable. i hate scrote autism. the things they say about lesbians makes me sick
Replies: >>2159
>>2141
Moid IBs can occasionally be tolerable, but only on the boards dedicated to very specific themes, e.g. cooking. I've never seen an off-topic board that wasn't full of degeneracy and retardation though, that's just out of the question.
>>2138
>poster says the video they've posted is gore
>no one wants to see a video of an animal dying so no one watches the video to find out that it's a joke
>reports the poster for posting gore
>farmhand sees the report
>farmhand doesn't want to see a video of an animal dying either so takes the op's claim of posting gore and the reports at face value
>bans the poster for posting gore
I honestly can't blame the farmhand in this situation. Whoever thought that making a gore joke during a raid got what they deserved, especially as CP and gore featuring animals and women have been spammed on LC in the past.
Replies: >>2153
065ce4d124dc837b12c623e821e17cedf0d9af1f12ad37053d002a2910353e11.png
[Hide] (153.1KB, 1050x335) Reverse
>>2152
>Farmhand bans at face value
That's kind of the whole issue. There were several anons that pointed out that no gore was posted, so if the farmhand had just read the thread she would have known. Gore is detected through an autoban feature, it's why so little gore is posted on LC during raids now, so there was very little likelihood of the video being gore anyway. I agree that the anon should have received a temporary ban for trolling, but it's dumb that the video was deleted and the anon was perma& for gore when there was none.

I also really don't think that this was a raid. A raid wouldn't have been contained in one thread on one board. A raid wouldn't have involved inflammatory topics specific to LC. It's pretty obvious that virtually every anon that was posting in that thread was a regular user of LC, specifically a regular user of /ot/. The whole thing was another example of the piss poor moderation.

It's basically what the anon in picrel said. Moderators have given the very clear signal that so long as they aren't active, /ot/fags have free reign to do whatever it is that they want. It was very reminiscent of early 2024 when /ot/fags would create new Dumbass Shit threads to circumvent the autosage before having the threads locked by farmhands. There are lots of other examples of similar things happening throughout 2024, but last night was especially egregious because of the moderation choices that were happening (deleting posts before locking the thread, locking the thread but taking an hour to type up a final message, deleting all posts that referenced moderation failure or critique of farmhands, etc.) during the whole fiasco. It doesn't take much to learn when the farmhands are inactive - if you post something very inflammatory, e.g. very petty infight bait, on one IP and switch to another IP to report it, you just have to wait and see how long it will take for the report to be processed. Obviously retarded anons realized that there was a consistent period of non moderation and exploited that to "have fun" as they so like to put it.
Replies: >>2156
335945cb2f2627ed7b5bafff1c5d826cb6e884ab1536f775cfd093ab4317f7d2.png
[Hide] (97.1KB, 659x195) Reverse
Of course the classic "anyone who doesn't like an ugly creep is a lesbian" excuse.
Replies: >>2155 >>2156 >>2167
>>2154
>Everything is kiwifags' fault
>And if it's not them then it's a dirty disgusting l*sb*an's fault!
kek when will the madness end. the luigi thread should have never been allowed to go on for as long as it did. people advertising the thread on reddit youtube and twitter all so that they could get more retards to join them in their quirk-off competition. cringe to the max.
>>2153
Again I agree with everything you said, the current state of moderation on LC is in the gutter but I'm not going to hold it against a janny or farmhand for not wanting to expose themselves to gore. The poster of the videos claimed it was gore, other posters said it was gore and some said it wasn't.

>Gore is detected through an autoban feature
This only works if the image or video is already present in the database that Cerbmin uses.

>>2154
The lesbian hate on LC is weird. The rare times I bother looking at threads outside of /snow/ and /pt/, there's often someone blaming lesbians for something that doesn't even make sense. Why would a lesbian give a single fuck about the cringefest happening in that thread?
Replies: >>2157
869ce90ad2e9a87c41cc919dc39715d8650240226c72adde2aec695b2f592181.png
[Hide] (538.5KB, 535x782) Reverse
>>2156
Anons have to claim it's "lesbians" and not moids and trannies being inflammator, since scrote/troonfoiling is banned.
Replies: >>2161
>>2144
Same here, as much as I complain I can still just go to the threads I like and check/contribute to snow. Doing my part! :chiyolook:
>>2157
But that's just next level fucking retarded.
>think it's men
>can't say it's men
>blame lesbians instead
How is that a sane and coherent state of thought?
Replies: >>2162 >>2166 >>2169
>>2161
ntayrt but the retards that do it aren't necessarily sane or coherent
>>2161
Retards unironically believe they're lesbians and we can't correct them or call out any of those posts because it's scrotefoiling
>>2154
What lesbian gives a fuck about women who wanna fuck luigi? I thought what he did was cool and i don’t really care about him. I don’t care if women like him. I only like their retarded rivalry with reddit because it’s funny
Replies: >>2186 >>2192
nyle-leila.gif
[Hide] (1.3MB, 220x211) Reverse
I don't give a fuck about Luigi and I don't give a fuck about the Luigi haters. I wish people would talk about literally anything else.
Replies: >>2172
>>2161
That's just how people start to speak when they live in 1984. Maybe we should start a meme where we say that obvious moid posts are actually made by the reptilians trying to mine our chan. And then we switch the culprit around when reptilefoiling becomes a bannable offense.
Replies: >>2172 >>2173
>>2169
I'm actually going to start doing that, fantastic idea :chiyolook: Reptilians seem to disguise more as moids than women anyways so it's scrotefoiling with flavour. 
Also I don't know how retards believe those posters are actual lesbians and that ebil lesbians cause such a high amount of damage to LC, I'm pretty there's more people with prion diseases than there are lesbians so it'd make more sense to blame people with vCJD than them but whatever retards gotta tard.
>>2168
I don't understand either side, I'm sure no one was chimping out this hard over Lee Harvey Oswald.
Replies: >>2173
>>2169
>>2172
You will be banned for racebaiting. Some idiot is gonna report it for anti-Jewish hate speech or some gay shit like that and then everyone is gonna call you a /pol/tard.
Replies: >>2190
c07a12395199867d45638c08c8903a486abd85a7233348f13af545823b782e7f.png
[Hide] (22.5KB, 910x67) Reverse
Can we stop talking about /yohoho/ on the BP thread on the hidden board, please? It's like posting about it in the dysphoria thread. I don't know if it's from privateers or if it was a tourist, but still. I don't think that the anons that use the BP thread are the best stock to be inviting to this board.

I know BJ chan is an annoying personalityfag, but at this point it feels like vendettafagging. You shouldn't feel the need to "expose" her or bring anymore attention to her because that's what she wants anyway. She's a loser that's terrorized the IB for like a year, I don't know about others but I couldn't care less about her or her antics.
Replies: >>2179
>>2177
Somewhat, but the reason I deleted twice was because I wanted to add more to my thought.
557f84c3c1220017489781085c6ed522c5f3bb713baedb5cee04db9e05e62451.png
[Hide] (10.7KB, 445x138) Reverse
kek
>>2176
Agreed nona, BJchan is retarded but people are clearly posting screenshots from her reddit onto the BP thread to cowtip. All of the nonas here posting her probably just think she's cowish and they can't talk about her on lolcow which is fair. The blackpill thread is such a shitfest now though
Replies: >>2180
>>2179
I also giggled at the coward comment. Anons need to wait at least a minute for me to retype before calling me a coward! Kek

But yeah, it does feel like they're purposefully aggravating her. I don't think she's cowish at all, she's just really really annoying. I wouldn't mind the talk about her IF she was actually permanently banned and unable to post at all to LC, but until that happens it's only encouraging her to post more and to be more annoying. I really wouldn't want her coming to this board and infecting it with her bullshit, that's why I don't think posting her socials and info here is a good idea. Anons going out of their way to post information about her are cringey IMO.

>The blackpill thread is such a shitfest now
I guess it became a shitfest when it stopped being about BP and it started being about BJ chan. It's essentially her thread now. I don't use it, but I do lurk it every so often and it's crazy seeing how much of the thread is devoted to her.
Replies: >>2181
>>2180
>I guess it became a shitfest when it stopped being about BP and it started being about BJ chan. It's essentially her thread now.
she took over at around the third or fourth thread. it hasn't been blackpill related in a looong time
Replies: >>2184
ishdnjk.png
[Hide] (27.4KB, 615x581) Reverse
>>2181
I miss when /2X/ was active
Replies: >>2188
>>2167
That anon with the insanely recognizable typing style who calls women bpdemons should be banned for avatarfagging but jannies aren't going to care. Knowing she's a luigifag too it only makes me hope more for her banning
What's with all the tinfoiling over the vent thread sperg being a previous avatarfag? For all anyone knows it could be an entirely new avatarfag or just a schizo off her meds.
Replies: >>2188
>>2184
/2X/ was always going to be a dead board because the majority of anons claiming to be feminists are purely performative. When the board was more active there was some genuinely good discussion happening. Now no one wants to visit the board because it's just schizos infighting with bait posts.

>>2187
Newfags don't get the point of an anonymous image board and desperately try to assign posts they don't like to personalityfags.
Replies: >>2189 >>2199
8ab05f83c1d639888ec24ff444d2e1ff2184ecef295e17fac650aee9f7cb473d.jpg
[Hide] (80KB, 1024x576) Reverse
>>2188
/2X/ wasn't a dead board, it was a slow board which was fine, now it's literally dead, I agree that the shizos killed any chance of any of /2X/ returning to normal. It gets really demotivating posting there, especially when you see how many replies bait shit gets over actual good discussion.
>>2173
True... what if we were the reptilians calling out the starseeds? Like "kool-aid stained hands wrote this post"... bit dark though.
>>2167
on lolcow lot of them, especially the goldstars (or if not luigi, about some other scrotes theyäre obsessed about women wanting to fuck men or fucking men)
Replies: >>2193
>>2192
>On Lolcow lot of them
>Theyäre
Wow we even have Scandinavian pirates
1741593592469.jpeg
[Hide] (828.5KB, 1051x922) Reverse
Found this screeshot on /meta/... we have actual, self-admitted moids on lc.
Replies: >>2195 >>2196 >>2198
>>2194
IIRC that was an anon making fun of the incels on 4ch that were raging about Luigi. It's a tongue in cheek post like you'd find in the "Post Like a Moid" thread.
969586457364272538.png
[Hide] (42.7KB, 1757x199) Reverse
>>2194
Well yeah, they've been showing up and admitting themselves for years, they just usually get deleted. There used to be some lolicon guy who'd show up in /g/ every few years asking for a girlfriend no matter how many times he got banned
Replies: >>2197
>>2196
Kek I see you in /meta/ right now. I agree with you, that thread brings nothing but disease to the board. It should have been autosaged or locked months ago. It's like the Ideal Male Bodies thread in a way.
>>2194
LC has remained a female majority space for so long because of it's obscurity. The moids that do know about it are from KF or other IBs and most of them don't care about LC. Now newfags advertise the site everywhere, it's going to bring in more and more moids. Security through obscurity is long gone.
>>2188
It's even stupider if the newfags weren't there to witness the activity, rise and fall of these personalityfags in the first place.
Replies: >>2200
the_lore.png
[Hide] (36.2KB, 824x164) Reverse
>>2199
Ntayrt but yeah, this pisses me off too. I spotted this on the blackpill thread a few days ago. What it tells me is that the thread attracts newfags. How are you in in BJchans thread but dont know "the lore" kek
1741577058509.jpeg
[Hide] (32.8KB, 340x340) Reverse
Holy shit. Cerb lives and the VPN poll is up
f50da5930c082e09e12d77f5ca812cd958c5116b0c64d587f68f625e2b018975.gif
[Hide] (180KB, 220x242) Reverse
Damn, we finally got the vpn poll! That's nice! Now give us the lolcow of year results, it's March cerbmin, do it you coward
0b4f19d47d5ab5a46c90b9175f2fe65d9eb290a161b3a9fce31f7eae13d466d1.jpeg
[Hide] (91KB, 645x679) Reverse
I wonder what Cerb was up to in her sabbatical, and whether we will see more life come from her or if her activity is like a dead fish exposed to salt.
Replies: >>2209
d1b17cf48b2c442f6f201cb84a662e6b8a0e9022153906670ebb3248bf85d63d.png
[Hide] (52.5KB, 1023x167) Reverse
This is the option everyone wanted, right?
>>2208
Nah. Cerb will just disappear again once the ban happens. It's apparent that her (or their) time on the site is coming to a close. I doubt Cerb will still be admin in 2026.
>>2209
That's what I voted for and I don't even use /ot/ anymore
6226027_fd2a0a6b_original.jpg
[Hide] (454.2KB, 1024x685) Reverse
VPN poll probably took so long to set up because cerb needed to find an appropriate cow pic

It's a good cow pic
Replies: >>2220
>>2209
im voting for the option above that one because i dont want /m/ to be turned into current /ot/ by spiteful vpn baiters looking for another easy target
Replies: >>2216 >>2219
69ed4b4ffcc61710d004fea1cc4d16a300b92af85bba7008e9d2e19190bdad8a.jpeg
[Hide] (292.2KB, 1088x760) Reverse
>>2209
I voted for all off topic boards because I fear the ban evaders will just hop to another off topic board and shit it up like >>2212 said. I usually use VPN myself but I’m fine mainly sticking to /snow/. I’m surprised how few votes there are though. I always assumed the anons claiming that there are only like 100 active users are newfags/schizos projecting, but there’s barely been over 100 votes in 9 hours.
Replies: >>2219 >>2225
>>2209
That's the option I voted for and I am a VPN user.

>>2212
I'd imagine that if that happened Cerbmin would just ban VPNs from /m/ and /g/. I don't see it being as big of an issue on /m/ because the threads are based on subjects that posters within the thread need to have an interest in. To post bait in the Pokemon thread would require the baiter to know something about pokemon for example. /pt/ and /snow/ would the same. To post bait in a cow thread requires knowledge of the cow.

>>2216
>I’m surprised how few votes there are though. I always assumed the anons claiming that there are only like 100 active users are newfags/schizos projecting, but there’s barely been over 100 votes in 9 hours.
I doubt that the majority of the userbase even checks /meta/, they probably go straight to /ot/ and ignore the rest of the site.
>>2211
this post made me kek uncontrollably
>>2209
I know socialmediafag zoomers are out there voting for the last option
Replies: >>2224 >>2237
>>2222
Most socialmediafag zoomers probably don't even know what a VPN is kek, let alone use one
Replies: >>2226 >>2227
Someone needs to do something about the fandom threads, it's full of newfags, they don't even know who rancefag is.
>>2216
>I’m surprised how few votes there are
I'm on holidays, I don't have my home IP so I can't vote, also it's just the first day. I'm surprised by the amount of anons that want it on a ad hoc basis though, /ot/ needs a nuke.
>>2224
Are you a newfag? Or a zoomer yourself? We talk about zoomers and socialmediafags using VPN all the time
>>2224
They do know, youtubers keep sponsoring that shit and it gets touted as an "alternative" to piracy in some zoomie fandoms
Is anyone else's vote not going through at all or is it just me? Wasn't on a vpn or private browser
Tbh I didn't even vote. I don't really trust Cerb with my information anymore. I mentally voted
Replies: >>2235
None of the new personalityfags are funny or lolworthy, bjchan and yuripedo are just annoying and grating. They're an example of how different lolcows userbase is nowadays.
>>2231
Agreed, I never pictured the day I'd be missing Komaeda-chan
>>2231
The old personalityfags could take a joke and didn't always act like malicious assholes. A lot of them understood they had issues. The new breed of modern personalityfag is not only lacking in originality, a lot of them are known more for being rude bitches and infighting with the userbase instead of just being quirky or weird
>>2230
smh can't even trust a discord kitten with your IP these days. what's the world coming to?
>>2222
I think it's probably more so older people than zoomers.
Screenshot_20250311_210226_Chrome.jpg
[Hide] (154.6KB, 1080x1024) Reverse
Wtf is going on? I'm not even getting a banned message, I'm getting some retarded error.
Replies: >>2245
>>2244
You broke posting on LC, it's your fault.
Replies: >>2246
61986a0901f4b9c8b0c533a915795a02.jpg
[Hide] (38.2KB, 736x754) Reverse
>>2245
to whoever deleted, i theorize that some votes aren't going through because of anons not having enough of a post history due to using an incognito/private browser. even when i tried creating more of a history outside of incognito (even though i've used the same ip there for years) it still said i'm not eligible to vote
Replies: >>2257
>>2256
AYRT, I realised that and had a big "d'oh" moment kek. I understand what cerb is trying to do and I'm not sure how else it could be done but her method does leave a portion of anons out.
Hyrax_on_the_Rocks.JPG
[Hide] (8.7MB, 3404x2964) Reverse
Anyone else quitting if the ban goes through? I guess it'll be for my own good anyway. Will still attend the moovie room though.
Replies: >>2262 >>2263
>>2231
i miss pakichan
Replies: >>2260
>>2259
I don't, she's still one of the most obnoxious personalityfags we had, she's only good in comparison to Bjchan
>>2258
I would. It's kind of what I did in December honestly.  I lurked a bit in my usual threads, but it was depressing not being able to reply to something interesting,  so by the end of the month, I had stopped lurking as well. Hopefully, the ban won't go into effect, but if it does, at least we'll have here and the moovie room.
874248549c51f640c4a3c9e424983d8bc106df79ac95fa3b5065718ccf980e58.png
[Hide] (668.2KB, 685x507) Reverse
>>2258
I don't think I'd quit. I'm actually for a VPN ban on /ot/. I think banning VPNs would help the board culture on /ot/, and also prevent a lot of bullshit. I mostly post on the cow boards and /m/, but even if the VPN ban extends to all boards, I wouldn't quit posting. I like LC too much. I live in a large population center, I have a dynamic IP, and I regularly use different browsers and devices to post on LC: so, even if I couldn't use a VPN anymore, they'd still have difficulty creating a post history for me that spans more than 14 days. I also practice basic internet safety, which includes never posting personal information about myself that could potentially link back to my identity. 

I think a lot of anons that worry about posting with their home IP are overestimating how much can be gleamed from an IP, and maybe they aren't practicing basic internet safety either. LC is anonymous, but even so we have to all make a conscious effort to avoid revealing certain information about ourselves. Like, for example, someone today mentioned that they'd gone to see a Cigarettes After Sex concert. Right now, that band is playing concerts in Melbourne, Australia. So even if that anon usually posts with a VPN, we all know that she lives somewhere in the state of Victoria now. If she was following basic internet safety, she wouldn't have mentioned the name of the band, she'd just have mentioned going to a concert. This is just one small example of the greater issue; that being the false sense of security that a VPN provides.

I find it the setup of the poll to be sort of disingenuous and rushed. IMO there should have been two rounds of voting, the first being "we should or shouldn't have blanket VPN bans on boards" and then, if the former option won, "which boards should feature a blanket VPN ban." It feels like Cerbmin didn't really think out the logistics of the poll, especially when other people had to point out that there should be a run-off. I don't appreciate that it took 3 months for Cerbmin to finally get around to posting it either, especially since it's such an easy thing to do. It feels like Cerbmin treats LC as an afterthought which I don't think is a good quality for an admin to have. My ideal admin is a NEET that spends her entire day on LC, which I don't think is too unrealistic.

I'm tired of anons that only use /ot/ acting like /ot/ is the only part of the website that matters. It feels like a lot of  the anons on /ot/ aren't interested in cows, so they end up bloating the website. You just need to look at the Complaints & Suggestions thread in /meta/ and it becomes clear that too much of the moderators' time is wasted babysitting the retards that constantly shit up /ot/ with garbage. I know that the off-topic boards are fun, and I like using them, but they shouldn't be the "main" feature of LC. I think that the popularity of /ot/ is actually preventing the cow boards from doing as well as they could.
Replies: >>2266 >>2286 >>2336
>>2263
I think it's different for you because you're in a large population center. If someone is from a more rural area and the IP pings to a place where there's a population of 683, there's a good chance that anon might be the only LC poster in her town. If you couple that with having an obscure hobby (or a combination thereof), like say she posts in the lolita threads, not necessarily about herself or whichever comm events she travels to attend, that already singles her out. There are quite a few threads among the non-cow boards that are niche enough that they'd make someone from rural area more identifiable just by nature of that person showing an interest in those things. Considering we don't have a way of knowing who the farmhands are and that the site has roots in the jfashion community (which is itself quite small), if such a person did frequently travel to the nearest city for events and one of the farmhands is also from that city and is able to see an IP posting from an hour or two away in that general area, that anon is no longer really anonymous. It's hypothetical and it would rely on the right circumstances to transpire, but it is possible.
Replies: >>2270
>Melbourne, Australia
is this board made entirely of aussie pirates?
Replies: >>2269 >>2270 >>2287
>>2268
Kek, it really seems like it is. Aussie pirates well past their bed time at least.
>>2266
That's true. I'm not sure how it is in other rural municipalities, but IME the IP location isn't accurate. The last time I was posting in a rural area, my IP gave a location some 50 miles away. I guess it depends on ones internet provider.

I also wonder how the VPN ban workaround will function for those in countries that can't access LC. I'm wondering if they will be given certain VPN IP's that won't be blacklisted, or if they will be instructed to use a certain service that won't be added to the ban. In December, I heard from others that not every VPN service was blocked by the ban. I wonder if that will be applicable for those that have actual need for IP masking.

It sucks that the retards that rely on VPNs to ban evade ruined it for the rest of us. I understand why the VPN is necessary to combat rule breaking and ban evasion, but I'm still sad that it came to this.

>>2268
I was just talking about an example earlier I saw on /ot/, yet IMO Australian farmers are the best farmers (and the same is true with privateers).
Replies: >>2394
f6e9971baa70bb77caecdd3217ea1c4aa8c91c1aec18d0e4354a417625547801.png
[Hide] (14.9KB, 682x123) Reverse
I hate Aussie shitposters so fucking much. Why couldn't we have a vote on banning them instead? 😡
>>2272
@webmin @captmin ban this anti-Australian propaganda now!!!
2f5c325952447d56b36c47575de8f749d79b995c5ca6dc76e72bbd2b85c4c7cf.jpeg
[Hide] (20.5KB, 500x281) Reverse
>>2272
We're like a plague of locusts, you may strike down a hundred but many more will come.
Replies: >>2277
>>2272
I hate Aussies too kek
>>2274
Kim is my one true love.
1611812348752.gif
[Hide] (19.7KB, 434x32) Reverse
>>2231
I kind of miss anorectal violence-kun...
baac1787bbaea9e3419d5cee37cec2654faaa108f8347a1130444143dc67fb9a.jpeg
[Hide] (5.4KB, 366x138) Reverse
>>2272
Reminds me of this
Replies: >>2282
>>2281
based aussies
>>2263
VPNs hide your browsing history from your ISP too, tho. Otherwise completely agree.
>>2268
Are you daft? Do you think there's some grand Aussie conspiracy? 
It's clearly New Zealand.
8af42f55a9e8e5380c14d0ee87e89630b425e8c666a5b105da57b33501d086f4.png
[Hide] (20.5KB, 608x84) Reverse
We have an aggressive schizo coming tomorrow, yippee! 
(╥ᆺ╥;)
Replies: >>2292 >>2328
>>2290
I reported that shit for trolling
Replies: >>2293
>>2292
Me too. The schizo that's having a meltdown just posted a bestiality image but thankfully it was deleted in less than a minute by farmhands. Kind of proving the point that the anti-VPN crowd has a lot of crazy trolls.
I want the ugly man psyop thread to be banned so bad. I don't even mind the conversation in theory but it created these weird rabid anons who can't stop with these needless nitpicks on the smallest of shit. It makes scrolling on unrelated threads annoying as fuck when they decide to butt their head in.
Replies: >>2298 >>2307 >>2332
The VPN ban discussion thread on /ot/ is a complete shitshow (as expected) :chiyochichi:
Replies: >>2303
>>2294
100% agree. Im with you on not minding it in theory and I do think that that there's an ugly man psyop going on in society but that thread has just devolved into schizo blackpill territory that has caused a cancer to spread across LC. You can't mention any normal or very tame media across /ot/ without a high chance of those people swarming like locusts and throwing a fit about its purity yet they don't even bother criticizing anything when it comes to discussions of actual coomer media that objectifies women and/or glorifies ugly men. Anymore they just make mountains out of molehills and police the shit out of /ot/.
Replies: >>2299 >>2317
>>2298
>>2297
>It's really weird
It's less weird when you consider the history behind the thread and the factors that spurred it's creation. IIRC, it started out in the Unconventional Male Attraction (UMA) threads on /g/. A lot of anons started to complain about the content in those threads, and it'd lead to infights. The Ugly Male Psyop (UMP) thread was created by anons that were annoyed by the type of men posted in UMA. So, the UMP thread was really made to clown on the anons that used the UMA thread and to "discuss" how those anons could possibly find anyone posted in the UMA thread attractive. The whole theme of UMP is kind of stupid if you think about it, it could really all fit into the Tinfoil thread had it been about the psyop itself; but really, the psyop was just an excuse to create yet another thread for anons to talk about which moids are the prettiest moids of all. Most of the thread is basically social retards that don't understand that attraction is subjective.
Replies: >>2301 >>2306
>>2299
I don't think it was solely the UMA thread that spawned the Psyop thread. There was also a growing amount of fandom discussion about various media trends that lead to fewer pretty male characters in video games and tv shows compared to their female counterparts, trends glorifying pairing up with old men, and the overall lack of importance in media when it comes to portraying men as attractive objects in media rather than subjects. Repetitive infights like the suits vs slutwear thing among fujos and yumes also led to that thread's creation as well imo. I really do hate what it has become though and I wish it wasn't such a polarizing topic that makes Nonas become absolutely rabid and obsessed with purity.
>>2295
ngl the anti-vpn ban anons are really not making a good case for their cause with how they're acting in there
Replies: >>2304
>>2303
>Inb4 Cerbmin disappears for another 3 months after the poll and the VPN abusers shit up the place even worse
Replies: >>2305 >>2716
>>2304
maybe she'd be more present and motivated if you didn't neglect her on discord
>>2299
ACKSHUYALLY it originally had nothing to do with unconventional attractions at all though they did eventually went after that thread in later editions. It was made because some anon didn't like some chubby guy from that fantasy manga (dungeon meshi or whatever it's called), there was a bunch of debating over whether he was ugly or not in one of the fandom threads, along with other fictional men so UMP was created to contain that. The theme itself isn't bad just kind of redundant since there's already a men shilled as attractive and characters shilled as attractive thread. The first earlier threads were fine imo and had actual truth regarding double standards in media, mostly in hollywood like directors pairing 50 year old actors with barely adult women as love interests and that sort of thing but after a while they ran out of things to talk about so now it's more about debating over personal preferences like hair/eye/skin colors despite generally agreeing with eachother on everything else. Even though I usually agree with their point, it is kind of dumb when they started brigading the unconventional thread and infighting with anons there (and capping random posts) when posting ugly men is the whole point lol. If they stuck to their own thread, and the thread's original earlier point about what gets shilled by media and not what some random anon is into (even more pointless if it's some guy not actually shilled nor popular in the first place) it wouldn't be so bad
Replies: >>2308
>>2294
The UMP thread had some pedo anons admitting they prefer barely legal teenagers. At least the ugly male fuckers don't want to fuck 15-17 year olds. Teenage boys are fucking disgusting, why would anyone admit that? Seeing the IRL equal to shotafuckers in that thread shows some anons have gotten way too brazen about how degenerate they are
laios.jpg
[Hide] (34.8KB, 550x802) Reverse
>>2306
This asshole cause that anal annihilation? Really? kek
>>2308
*caused
fuck
>>2308
He was even part of the thread pics at one point kek
>>2308
Sometimes I forget how autistic some farmers are, but like in the zoomery way so it's not as endearing or fun.
>>2298
I agree. I sort of want Cerbmin to go full authoritarian and lock or delete shit threads that attract newfags, leak into other threads and are full of retards flinging shit at each other.
>>2308
idgi, he is kinda hot
Replies: >>2321
9a5ec3a6630c473302e7643982c5c40f291aa25fa81bde2a6f94fca88ed4c65d.jpg
[Hide] (708.5KB, 4096x4053) Reverse
>>2320
I get why he could be liked or disliked, but I find it especially funny that he kicked off UMP and not some fat, overshilled alcoholic from hollywood.
>>2308
That anime is pretty fun. Like 70% of it is cooking vids. He's a little bit of a bonus.
>>2308
Do not forget he was being shilled by rancefag as well, causing additional seething
Replies: >>2326
>>2325
No, rancefag was the one to start the shilling against him, and she was one of the main posters (if not the maker, I don't remember anymore) of the ugly man psyop threads.
>>2290
>one day later
>still no proof
nothing ever happens. same as that anon who brought up shadow deep farm discords in /meta/ two weeks ago but never posted caps (tbf they are probably the same anon).
Replies: >>2331 >>2350
>>2328
I do believe it's possible but I wonder if it's true if anon is easily identifiable if posting caps and that's why they haven't been posted. Only because there's been so many discords over the years that the mods forming a clique to mock users would not shock at all
>>2294
Why do you all want the actual good /ot/ generals to get banned
Replies: >>2333
>>2332
Nta but they're all cancerous threads because their retardation seeps into all other parts of LC. God forbid a nonnie says she's attracted to a man older than 17, she'll get a twitter tier hoard of angry replies. It's like nobody can be chill anymore, it's all reactionary and everyone is posturing about something
Replies: >>2334 >>2387
>>2333
Literally this. I don't dare speak about my husbando anymore because anytime he's mentioned,  some bitter anon talks about how old and ugly he is. As we if we don't have different tastes. Sorry I don't think gay Instagram twinks are hot?
Replies: >>2335 >>2347 >>2406
>>2334
Who is it nona? :chiyolay:
Replies: >>2339
>>2263
I knew you’d be able to tell where I am and it’s a massive city with many farmers kek, I’m really not worried about being doxxed
>>2335
Arthur Morgan :chiyoclasp: and reposting because I didn't sage
Replies: >>2340 >>2342
>>2339
AYRT and I commend your boldness :chiyodrool: I should probably play your man's game eventually. I got hung up on if I should play red dead revolver first kek
Replies: >>2341
>>2340
It's a better experience to play rdr2 then rdr1 story wise. Revolver isn't related to their story so don't worry about it. Both games are incredible but 2 is a masterpiece even if he wasn't my husbando. It's worth it
>>2339
NTAYRT but I think he’s pretty conventional, and given his profession and all of course he’s a bit scruffy. I always see anons ripping him to shreds kek RIP my beloved :chiyocry:
b8804934ab4302db84b9b176e5b06bd2261a9a396867177daa164651400692ad.jpeg
[Hide] (147KB, 1300x1389) Reverse
The most unpopular of unpopular opinions here this will get me thrown overboard but I genuinely don't care if someone calls the guys I like ugly and don't see why it's a big deal. Idk I just never responded or joke along with whoever said it, some of the insults are funny. I kind of get it tbh, on some sites if you say you don't find some popular guy attractive you get 500 replies calling you a lesbian (as an insult not in a neutral way kek), "basic", "high standards" even over bare minimum requirements, that type of thing. Or like if your friends irl are gushing over some celeb and you just have to nod and smile so you don't seem rude. For a long time I really did think I had something wrong with my brain for not liking facial hair kek

I think there is a time and place for it and depends on the context, obviously it gets annoying if there's too much derailing over it or within a thread where any type of look is allowed, but in a vent type of thread or threads discussing things you hate I think it's fine. idk I just see it as venting, but wouldn't directly attack/reply to whoever posted whichever guy. Other times I understand why someone is considered conventional but just find their face annoying for no reason.
Replies: >>2349
a0aea2b2228b48e171f2768e211a832518eabaa78696f525b27f6fd6b6fa3c86.png
[Hide] (34.5KB, 903x117) Reverse
We're now being blamed for trolling LC? Why are farmers so retarded kek
Replies: >>2346 >>2349 >>2357
>>2345
Imagine lurking here and putting blame because you read some shit. I haven't mentioned my husbando on lc in years, I only go on cow boards because /ot/ is a cesspool. Sad state of affairs
Replies: >>2348
>>2334
Someone else mentioned my husbando once and a bunch of people called him ugly and someone said he looked like he was from a scrote anime. That pissed me off so much because he's cute and was designed by a woman.
>>2346
>putting blame
That's all farmers know how to do. They never actually wanna admit "hey, some of the regular users here are really annoying," they will ALWAYS blame some outside entity. I have no idea why they do this.
>>2344
I don’t think your opinion is unpopular at all, I just hate it when I’m on an unrelated thread like artist salt or character designs and theres these rabid anons who just HAVE to nitpick every single feature on this random design of a man that was posted. It comes out of nowhere and does not add anything to the pre-established discussion. 
>>2345
This has to be a farmhand psyop kek
>>2328
I mean, I'm happy that it didn't come here. It started posting bestiality porn after anons called it a schizo. It's been crazy seeing how the anons on /ot/ are acting regarding the potential ban on VPNs
Replies: >>2353
the “virgin male” bait poster/janny who chimped out and locked the vent thread has created the new most annoying personalityfag/imitators. it’s like blow job chan all over again just this time it’s so clearly a zoomer in a discord with men from 4chan. who else would be devoted to this narrative. you have to have a REPULSIVE personality to be a male over the age of 18 with their virginity. even ugly fat men managed by 16 most of the time. only the rankest filthiest misogynist slobs struggle to lose it as a man. who would be invested in the narrative they somehow are chivalrous and have worth ON AN IMAGEBOARD FOR WOMEN. like the fact more people aren’t going “okay discord kitten go back to 4chan” and taking the bait is insane. just stop  replying jesus christ you’re helping some incel build their self esteem.
>>2351
tbh it's because there's a lot of social-outcast virgins on /ot/ that use that board for socialization instead of going outside and so they have this neurosis about sex and relationships because they're adults that never moved out of their parents' house. nobody irl cares about virginity
>>2350
I'm pretty sure it was a "he"
>>2351
Do not start this crap over here.
>>2351
Damn I wonder what you have to say about female virgins then.
Replies: >>2356
>>2355
absolutely nothing it’s completely different for women and you can tell i believe that by my post. where i’ve said over and over again men. it’s good to be a female virgin but then again not to the extent and age some of these femcel take it, like another anon above mentioned it gets to the point it’s bjchan level neurosis. don’t fucking infight bait here.
Replies: >>2358 >>2360
>>2345
Like hell I'm ever going to look at that thread out of my my own will let alone to troll. If I wanted to see autistics I'd wait by bus stops.
>>2351
>>2356
This take is pretty neurotic as well. Give it a rest.
>>2356
You sound like a whore.

SCOUNDREL WAS KEELHAULED FOR THIS POST infighting

>>2351
im a zoomer and i feel like its common for well adjusted guys to be virgins in their 20s now just because of how antisocial we are and how pussy and scared our men are of relationships. or maybe they are actually just broken weirdos, im not really close with any guys right now to know
Replies: >>2362
>>2361
There are some zoomer guys where I work that seem decent, aren't slobs, and are also probably virgins but they do act like scared rabbits sometimes kek. None of my business though, I've got my Nigel.
Replies: >>2372
>>2351
I feel like some of the replies just haven't seen the bizarre level of virgin obsession that's been going on on lc lately, especially in the stupid questions thread and unpopular opinions. Like it goes way beyond a simple preference, plus one of them turned out to be an actual scrote if the redtexts are anything to go by
Replies: >>2370 >>2379
>>2367
>unpopular opinions
You mean that thread where people bait and infight non-stop? Those are not real farmers, but trolls, and I bet some of them are not even women.
Replies: >>2375
>>2362
i dont have one and probably never will, the way things are going.
>>2351
I think male virgins can be pretty cute
Replies: >>2378
>>2370
True but their current trolling methods keeps spreading outside that thread
Replies: >>2379
>>2373
i wish they were real...
>>2367
It's one of the prime bait topics right now. Baiters don't care what they're baiting with, so long as people reply.
>>2375
I have a feeling that a lot of chronic baiters are getting their "last kick" before the VPN ban kicks in. If CC was anything to go by during December, nothing scares them more than a potential VPN ban. I also think the recent thread pics and thread description on Unpopular Opinions are making it so that fewer anons are using it, leading to trolls trying to branch out into the different chatrooms to bait for an infight.
Replies: >>2390 >>2395
cc.png
[Hide] (279.3KB, 1875x531) Reverse
Are CC posters underage? They have always seemed underage or just weird to me.
Replies: >>2382 >>2383
>>2381
Smells moidish, especially that Asia comment.
12921449b94b33c29b78c2dab53ee480a90e419566df66676b5f244c4a0facc1.png
[Hide] (266.1KB, 1062x359) Reverse
>>2381
Those question threads on CC always seemed sus to me. They look like slightly adjusted bait threads from 4chan.
Replies: >>2384
>>2383
Half of them are one singular moid writing them all who just camps on cc, i've reported a few of them and they all got deleted.
>>2351
I will have my virgin moid you wont stop me and shame me into dating manwhores, fuck off.
Replies: >>2386
based.png
[Hide] (148.3KB, 480x480) Reverse
>>2385
holy
>>2333
Imo unpopular opinions and the fandom drama thread should be deleted instead, the ugly man psyop thread makes men seethe and it's funny.
Replies: >>2388
>>2387
i will probably be banned in a few hours for replying to the baiter in fandom drama and im sad because lolcow is the only thing keeping my mind off how bad i want to off myself right now
Replies: >>2391
>>2379
As someone who bunkered in JC and CC both during December, it wasn't bad, and I'm not sure why people keep claiming it was some sort of pro-baiting haven full of anons sobbing because they couldn't infight on LC.
Replies: >>2394 >>2396
photofunky-2978724308.gif
[Hide] (97KB, 262x300) Reverse
>>2388
I would tell you not to waste your time arguing with the schizos in /ot/, half of them don't even read what you wrote before they write back and just wanna rile you up.... but i don't wanna judge your coping methods so if you really wanna reply then just use a vpn while it's still allowed. And don't kys, things will get better nona.
Replies: >>2392 >>2404
>>2391
no youre right i shouldnt even bother, im just in such a weird mental state where im acting uncharacteristically... and thank you thats really sweet
>>2390
Yeah, there were at most a couple of very vocal shitstirrers supporting trolling, infighting and baiting, claiming "THAT'S JUST IMAGEBOARD CULTURE!" while other anons who were against the VPN ban (for privacy reasons) called them retarded. Then /meta/ anti-VPN posters cherrypicked the worst posts by the baiting spergs as "proof" that all VPN users are like that.
>>2270
I think the reason some VPN services weren't blocked is because their IPs/servers still haven't been put on any IP blacklist, not necessarily because they manually picked which services to ban.
And yeah, it sucks that people like those ruined VPNs, almost every time I use mine I find that the IP has been permabanned for either scrote posting or excessive bait in the usual threads (Unpopular Opinions, Blackpill, etc.). Tbh I don't want to post on LC with my actual IP, and the recent paranoia/fearmongering about staff sharing post histories to laugh at is making me extra paranoid, so if they do ban VPNs on my favorite boards, I'll just stop posting altogether. If it's for the good of the site, I'd rather they ban VPNs, I don't need to post on LC anyway.
>>2390
Don't worry nonna, we'll get banned together. Those posters can't read and are just looking for an excuse to infight anyway, don't take it too personally or let em ruin your mood. Focus on the serious replies instead and if there are none, just wait until you get one worth reading.
Replies: >>2396
>>2379
>chronic baiters are getting their "last kick"
That's what I think too. I have been counter-baiting them and trying to start the flame wars they want. They will be gone very soon, so I guess I can give this little parting gift to them.
>>2390
I remember the CC one getting shat up only when LC went down for 12 hours. Before that it was like >>2394 says. Mostly reasonably concerned nonnies with 1 or 2 weirdos. I haven't been on LC since yhh was made, but I'm sure the deranged VPN posters in /meta/ are gayops.
Replies: >>2402 >>2403
Spoiler File
(1MB, 1133x1152) Reverse
>>2396
>I haven't been on LC since yhh was made
Absolute legend. I still lurk plenty, for better or worse. I had a giggle over /ot/'s gender ideology hate thread since the OP image is perfect.
Replies: >>2403
>>2396
>>2402
I haven't used /ot/ since January. I still use the cow boards, but I think I'm over /ot/. I sort of realized that the type of person that uses /ot/ isn't really the type of person that I want to be around. Back in December I was having a lot of fun when VPNs were banned, but when January hit and there was a flood of bait and infighting I finally decided that I was done with it. I don't find /ot/ enjoyable anymore, I haven't since it became a social media knock-off.
>>2391
there are so few users at this point that even within threads like the vent thread, recurring themes that are posted and it’s noticeable. virgin anon is an example, and people will come just to fight with that one particular nona because they know it’s her at this point. it’s been the same for a bunch of topics and it’s actually gotten to the point where it’s either downright parasocial or schizophrenic when they’re wrong about who they’re arguing with. it’s exhausting and not fun agreeing with a random take and then getting attacked like you said this yesterday. like no i didn’t but i can’t even call you crazy for thinking im that person cos there’s ten of us here now lol. like it’s too small to even be fun anymore. the vpn ban would fix one problem but kill the board the rest of the way. it was honestly unnerving how during the vpn ban you could literally tell which different anons in ot were posting in which thread at one point it was so slow. which is fine and mostly invisible when everyone is getting along. but holy fuck when they’re not and that website is treating as a fighting ring….i don’t think a board like that can survive being small because of the pvp aspect. i don’t think it’s scary in a “you’re gonna get stalked” way i think it just makes for a really unpleasant atmosphere with that particular user base. i think a slower board somewhere like here is fine with the moderation style because we can’t all fight all day long, it gets stopped.
>>2351
I wonder if virginchan and "bpdemon" chan are the same person
Replies: >>2407
>>2334
The only place I ever felt fully safe talking about my IRL husbando was on /g/ and I stand by that. I don't like him anymore but the site was always kinda mean to anons who liked "unconventional" men and it's gone overboard. He wasn't even that unconventional, he was just a bad person who hadn't aged that well. Like you could say that's most of the men in the entertainment industry though
>>2405
I've seen a lot of differens nonas use "bpdemons" for years now and I don't think having a virgin preference is weird tbf.(Exploding diarrhea rage all over /ot/ about either of those topics is fucking weird though)
Replies: >>2408 >>2409 >>2410
>>2407
they can want what they want but i’m still going to think they’re creepy like men who like virgins and don’t want to hear about it. it’s insane it’s been all they’ve posted about for weeks now. i see posts about virginity and i just keep scrolling tbh. i wish people would stop responding because it’s shit up so many threads and they spin out if you say anything negative about it to them like a psycho. will seriously never forget them locking the vent thread for fifteen minutes over that, i’ve still never seen anything like that on lolcow.
>>2407
The "bpdemon" anon uses it as an insult to describe things that have nothing to do with borderline personality disorder. She uses it to describe women she doesn't like very often. She's pretty clockable once you recognize how she types and how often she uses the word and highly internally misogynistic to boot

Not everyone with borderline personality disorder deserves to be called that, and I've been on LC for years and never seen someone use "bpdemon" as often as that anon does. I've seen it occasionally but never used that liberally until she came along
Replies: >>2411
>>2407
The preference in itself isn't weird, it's the extra sperginess over it
>>2409
“bpdemon” is such a 4-chan term for a woman coming forward about being raped or abused i’m shocked to see “women” use it. i’ve seen anons on here use bpd as an insult but i’ve never seen that specific term on there before a few months ago. i’ve literally only seen it in screenshots of 4chan and leaking into reddit and all used by men.
Replies: >>2412
>>2411
Demon anon appears to be a luigifag so I'm doubting it's a man, it might be an edgelord girl zoomer who started off on 4ch.
>professing that all moids have to be either madonnas or whores with moid level thinking
also everyone knows that all men including "virgin" men are inherently whores. fucking shut up already
Continuing the retarded virgin moid discourse should be a bannable / executable offense due to it being fucking retarded
Replies: >>2418
>>2417
This, I literally don't think or care about this topic, especially in the LC bunker thread. Retard behavior
9e700c02f5db047f7ff1753c00ba40bf46b1c769367b24b598b8233b2dd1c8d0.png
[Hide] (17.6KB, 536x221) Reverse
Samefagging is so retarded it makes me giggle
Replies: >>2420 >>2422
cbcaac39aaa27f5cec82c90e785dc6081add63c44c8a7405051b2793dc9de1d7.jpg
[Hide] (12.6KB, 450x298) Reverse
>>2419
KEK
>>2419
I was OP and that wasn’t my reply. Ask janny for IP if you’re schizophrenic enough.
Replies: >>2423 >>2424
>>2422
NTA, Don't call captmin a janny :chiyogetout:
>>2422
Nah that nonna had two replies after each other about virgin moids. I scuttled them because I found them annoying. Not suggesting you're that same anon.
IMG_4496.jpeg
[Hide] (153.5KB, 1004x940) Reverse
IMG_4495.jpeg
[Hide] (312.4KB, 983x1234) Reverse
i might just be stoned but this infight had me actually laughing under my breath. infighting where people crash out over literally nothing is genuinely so funny to me. it gets me in the same way sometimes BJchan appearing out of nowhere with a well timed PIG! would kill me sometimes.
Replies: >>2435 >>2447
>>2434
No, I agree with the second poster. It's annoying when anons go into threads to say dumb shit that nobody appreciates. It's especially cringe in the Tinfoil thread because anons will march in there to say some derivative of "schizo" even though it's literally the schizo thread. Some anons need to learn to shut up. It reminds me of those kids in school that would try their hardest to be the class clown. Same cringe factor.
Replies: >>2436
>>2435
i agree with you but she could have just worded it like you did instead of crashing out about the textual equivalent of someone following her post with a fart noise. the full a-log in response literally had me in tears with suppressed laughter it’s never that deep.
Replies: >>2437 >>2448
0bc23bb21ab119dd7c7341d8685e57734fbc699e4cb01ea206a880c3ee4ad505.png
[Hide] (248.1KB, 1162x698) Reverse
>>2436
Maybe it's because I'm not stoned, but I don't find it funny. I can sympathize with the anon's frustration, even though her response was a little bit much. This new type of anon that seeks to disrupt and derail every thread with "a fart noise" as you say is really annoying, and sometimes it's good to put them in their place.
Replies: >>2438 >>2488
>>2437
i don’t think the reaction put that person in their place at all. i pity that anon for thinking they are conversing with deities and hope they can get the help they need don’t get me wrong like i feel a little bad for laughing now because rereading their original post they clearly aren’t well. but ranting like that almost never accomplishes what the person losing their cool thinks it does unfortunately. the best thing you can do is ignore it and not create a new butt hurt copypasta. calling people empty and cancerous for making a joke about their im 13 and this is deep post at best and their uncomfortably mentally ill in the wrong place post if serious is. more than a bit much. like empty and cancerous lol?
Replies: >>2439 >>2441
>>2438
It's the Tinfoil thread.
>>2438
NTA but you wouldn't go into a church and tell the people that are there that God isn't real and you're all going to die and be turned into muck no matter what you do, even if you truly believed it and thought all christians were severely mentally ill retards. Also, if you think that anons posting in that thread are geniunely delusional, I don't see how you can defend that behaviour because it generally makes them worse especially if they're paranoid type which most tinfoilers tend to be. How is making a retarded unfunny, obnoxious joke in the schizo containment thread that will trigger the schizos in any shape or form defendable? It helps no one but the anon's ego, and worse of all it's never funny. It's never ever funny. Harrass schizophernics all you like but it has to be actually funny and not a Redditor thanks for the gold huehue zinger :chiyofish:
Replies: >>2442
>>2441
i don’t think they knew she was serious about it until she chimped out and i don’t think most tinfoils are schizophrenia.
Replies: >>2443
>>2442
It happens so many times in that thread that either anons doing that are either completely obvlious or enjoy sticking their arms into lion cages. It's a tinfoil thread at minimum 40% are mentally ill, it's the same when you discuss climate change informally, you always attract at least a handful of manic-depressives and people with OCD, you have to go in to the thread with the assumption that anons are very very serious about it. I don't want to sound like a moralfag but if you want to rattle their cages can it be at least be a way that doesn't give one turbomyötikset and make them want to curl under a radiator and die. Anons need a better sense of humor to do those things.
Replies: >>2444
>>2443
what does that one word mean nona?
Replies: >>2445
>>2444
A poetic Finnish word meaning extreme second hand embarrasment.
Replies: >>2446
>>2445
i really like it thank you for showing it to me
>>2434
I think the joke was funny and schizo anon's reaction was over the top. Also, in my opinion, anon should post her tinfoil theories in a more serious place, if she can't deal with silly replies. Lolcow is a dumb gossip site, it doesn't have serious vibes.
Replies: >>2449
>>2436
I think she just snapped. For a while there's been someone shitting up the tinfoil thread because the thread isn't talking about the type of tinfoil they personally like.
Replies: >>2451
>>2447
Dumbass shit thread autosage advocates are going to hate me for this but it really helped define the site’s culture as being more lighthearted and was a good balance to all the infighting prior. Without a thread of that popularity and caliber to be a source of lighthearted shitposting the only threads left are really mundane or infighting. When newer users post-autosage encounter lolcow and dont have a place to vent their silliness and expect every post and thread to be high quality and follow the rules, we end up with a more miserable /ot/. I know the point of autosaging it was to deter off newfags but i’d take silly shitposting newfags than the illiterate ones that expect to be spoonfed every 3 seconds.
Replies: >>2450 >>2480
>>2449
>Dumbass shit helped define the site’s culture
Not really, no. The site's culture is by and large defined by the cow boards. If Dumbass Shit was so integral to the culture of lolcow, the autosage wouldn't have been the death knoll: anons would still use it today like they did prior to the autosage. The fact that it dried up and died so quickly after the autosage is proof that it wasn't important, nor popular.

>When newer users post-autosage encounter lolcow
You're operating under the assumption that new users land in /ot/ rather than one of the cow boards. IMO, that's incorrect. The vast majority of newfags discover LC through the cow boards. The type of anon that lands in /ot/ is looked down on because the main landing points for /ot/ are the Celebricows thread and the Fandom thread, both problem threads in their own right.

>dont have a place to vent their silliness
I don't think /ot/ is a place to "vent" ones silliness. I'm not trying to be mean, but why wouldn't you just be silly with your friends in a groupchat or something? What's the point of "venting silliness" with random anonymous IB users?

>expect every post and thread to be high quality and follow the rules
I don't expect every single post to be high quality, but I do expect every post to follow the rules. If you go back and look at the DS threads, most of the posts weren't even mid-quality, they were low-quality nothings that flouted the rules.

>I know the point of autosaging it was to deter off newfags
AFAIK, this actually wasn't the point. It wasn't "let's autosage DS so that new users won't be able to use it," it was "a certain rabid sect of ban-evading retards use DS as a hub to shit up the site, so let's try to get rid of them." There was a tiny, but very vocal, minority of anons that seemed to live in DS and whenever they would post in a different thread they'd only bait and infight. The problem with autosaging DS to get rid of these anons is that Cerbmin erroneously believed that those retards would fuck off instead of migrating to different threads around the board.
>>2448
I think of any user, that schizo nona is the one i would most like to sit down with a cup of tea and ask nicely how they’ve been because they’ve been “pushed to snapping” constantly for like a year now.
e409f5e342961f44ef6c6fe5b750c338f53d12a8695982ebe5e284e27a1b3491.png
[Hide] (28.5KB, 1777x63) Reverse
The users have already started to act schizo towards each other. kek.
Replies: >>2470
d16cec3b8393fb4102f37d4b8bc95bc2e7087c7a74a8561af89d77f1908513cb.jpeg
[Hide] (803.9KB, 1168x1603) Reverse
/2X/ is absolutely fucking unusable now. Holy shit I look in the pink pill thread, talk about a radical feminist topic and here come these retards talking about “reality” and “muh cocksucking” under some random nonas post about incels and femcels. I’m so tired of the blackpilled shit, they can’t stay in their own thread, they all want to be BJ-chan. EVERY post in the pink pill thread has some snarky retard replying, accusing random nonas of being whores. VPN ban as soon as possible. I have such a hate boner towards BJ chan now, I hate these b8rs so much.
Replies: >>2460
ClipboardImage.png
[Hide] (707.8KB, 800x449) Reverse
Im acquaintance with someone who used to run an IB and I can somewhat understand why a majority of LC's admins eventually go AWOL or quit. Its a really loveless hobby that sucks up real life resources and IBs are one of the most frustrating site softwares to work with due to how code intensive managing one is. 
My acquaintance worked a day job while running her IB and would have to push updates to the weekend because something as small as adding a filter took a shit ton of work and most of the time managing moid spaghetti code is spent circumventing errors from adding the new code. sometimes updates will take from weeks to months to go live and even then her site was pretty small, I can't imagine trying to manage something as large as LC.

I'm amazed that cerbmin didnt quit after the aug /ot/ incident and voluntarily funneled more resources in ensuring it didnt happen again. The restoration progress is even more impressive, practically all of /ot/'s images are restored. It needs to be accounted that LC does not receive donations for its maintenance and presuming that cerbmin as of now is only 1 person, she would have to pick up more work to make up for the cost.

I'll admit that the radio silence from the admins is annoying but I'd be reluctant to interact with the userbase if I'd get lashed out and scrotefoiled for anything I do.
Replies: >>2495 >>2496
>>2456
38728 is right though.
>>2455
Which thread I wanna see
17ce34f42e830ef9ac51d9f1a9abddea36105b0278b5a79d9311a95c549291e6.png
[Hide] (423.6KB, 1021x628) Reverse
Luigifags are so braindead and annoying. I wish the thread was banned already. Is this really what they think he looks like? It reminds me of the portraits of Charles II of Spain that try to make him look less like a monster.
Replies: >>2490
It'd be funny if we planned a day where nobody would look at UO and we can see the bait posts just stacked up on eachother
Replies: >>2473 >>2481
>>2472
Isn't that what's going on now post-new threadpic?
Replies: >>2476 >>2481 >>2476
IMG_5773.jpeg
[Hide] (446.3KB, 1242x2068) Reverse
>>321 (OP) 
Least rulecucked female imageboard be like:
Replies: >>2481 >>2562 >>2563
>>2473
I was just saying it'd be funny if we saw the retarded baiters all grouped together
>>2474
I don't think bj-chan is a victim, she does say she has an extreme fear of it though.
Replies: >>2478 >>2481
>>2476
why is someone in GIOYC trying to do a AMA based on a larp where she found out her partner is secretly rich after SIX YEARS LMFAO and they are going to be multimillionaires like please where are the jannies
Replies: >>2481
>>2449
The original dumbass shit threads were more like the mundane shit threads. It was just a thread for mundane and random, light hearted discussion that didn't belong anywhere else. It was culturally consistent with the rest of LC at the time. It was never intended to be used as a shitposting or chat thread.
08b9533f2396fd8c7d7c30ea56d7f9787f88f5ebdbe5edecf890b4efeaf5909f.png
[Hide] (131.7KB, 835x364) Reverse
>>2475
Unfortunately, thread descriptions like these are necessary when newfags are too thickheaded to understand thread topics. The Mundane Shit thread is supposed to be a lighthearted thread to share funny stories about the daily happenings of your life, not to talk about movies, or food, or video games, or shitpost, or anything else. All threads have topics, anons have to post in the correct threads, it's not rocket science.

>>2478
I saw that too and I rolled my eyes. "Tee hee I never realized what thread I was in!!" shut the fuck up. Sunday nights are always a blackout for moderation.

>>2473
I hope that that thread pic and description keeps going because it obviously grates the baiters that live in there.

>>2476
Baiter A posts, Baiter B responds thinking that Baiter A is a normal anon, Baiter A is happy because he thinks Baiter B is a normal anon too, Baiter A baits Baiter B back, both are smiling smugly. That's how that thread feels. Just retards that think they're not retards having a competition to see who can be the most stupid.

>>2472
Careful, the paranoid farmers will use your post to claim that we're the ones that are "raiding" LC and everything wrong with the site is actually our fault. Don't forget we're all Grandpafuckers too apparently!
Replies: >>2497
>>2437
Grimes anon is unfunny and schizo chimp-out anon is insane. No winners.
Replies: >>2489
>>2488
judging by the person defending them in both threads using the same examples and sounding like the same person who suddenly pops up every time that poster in the tinfoil thread does this talking the exact same way saying they’re just “defensive over vulnerable anons in that particular thread”. they’re or she is with us here. she seems like she’s a good person just sensitive and got triggered. it seems like it’s an issue that struck an actual nerve with her that maybe we don’t understand the full context of. i don’t think we should bully that person because they seem like an integrated member of our community here who doesn’t talk like that here. maybe best to show a little grace to them and assume the best and just wish them well you know?
Spoiler File
(324.4KB, 2000x2000) Reverse
>>2471
I greatly appreciate their demented art of their chosen scrote. Maybe they could get quarantined off to their own board instead?
>>2490
this is creepy and weird. also very shayna-esque
>>2490
imagine being the fbi and having to look through this stuff. unreal.
>>2490
>Drawing over notrious amputee shota loving piss lobotomy gore fetish TIF art
Not even original in their degeneracy. Sheesh.
>>2457
I wonder what even compels a person to start a new IB in the first place. Maybe I'm just cynical, but I can't see anything good in being an admin. Furthermore, if working with preexisting spaghetti code is so hard, why not write your own code?
Replies: >>2496 >>2501
c9f7bc9b5f0c6414b8f5653b46380b03d6c3229d74616d87d60d9cb5de829db4.jpg
[Hide] (123.4KB, 375x500) Reverse
>>2457
>>2495
The software really shouldn't be the bad part. There's some decent imageboard software out there at this point, you aren't necessarily stuck with vichan and its derivatives. It's moderation, after you've set up or inherited your shiny IB, that'll kill you. If you've seen CC then you know what it looks like when someone is ill-equipped to effectively moderate the shit that gets posted to IBs.
>>2481
Who the fuck cares like actually. Oh my le god they posted about movies on the mundane thread! That’s not mundane enough! It’s going to anally bother someone who will doubtlessly look through this thread in a few months because this is meant to be a perfect pristine archive of mundanity. I don’t get it. Men can just banter and shitpost and band together to shit on the jannies, women defend them and henpeck each other.
Replies: >>2501 >>2504
>>2495
>I wonder what even compels a person to start a new IB in the first place
Over the years my observation has been that it's generally down to the administration and moderation of an existing image board. A community isn't satisfied with how they're being moderated or the admin makes an unpopular change to the rules. Both happened with the /cgl/ split. Moderation and post quality was declining on /cgl/ and moot banned drama threads.

>>2497
>Men can just banter and shitpost and band together to shit on the jannies
This isn't part of LC culture and it never was. The ebin shitposting trend on 4chan peaked in 2016 on boards such as /sp/ and /pol/. /cgl/ was a weeb board and the weeb boards on 4chan were anal retentive about rules and post quality. LC derives it's culture from the weeb boards in 2014, hence the insistence on sage and rules banning emoticons.
Replies: >>2503 >>2504
Spoiler File
(158.6KB, 1132x1200) Reverse
>>2490
Wow weegee and homunculus. Most unexpected crossover.
>>2501
I guess I see your point but it just gets narrower and narrower, the new jannies are especially hysterical.
>>2497
AYRT
>That’s not mundane enough!
It's not really about the mundane element, it's about the "events" element. The thread is for sharing personal anecdotes about events in your life. That's it, that's the thread topic. Going into threads to post about off-topic things has always been poor form. I wouldn't go into the movie thread on /m/ to post about novels, or the skincare thread in /g/ to talk about weight loss, so why would I go into the mundane shit thread to post about something that isn't a mundane event?

We have hundreds of threads on /ot/ that can fit almost every topic of discussion. Anybody can use them. Instead of having five threads that are always on the first page, it wouldn't kill anons to use other threads for once. It'd actually be better for the board culture is more threads were actively used as intended.

>>2501
>This isn't part of LC culture and it never was
Thank you! I'm so tired of anons using the "erhm LC originated on 4chan so erhm we should be more like 4chan" argument because they weren't even using 4chan when the /cgl/ split happened and they have 0 idea about the actual culture there at the time. They always come off as Zoomers that don't know their internet history and think if they say something enough that it becomes true.
What's wrong with having 5 threads with general, mild topics rather than having 100 microniche threads that get bumped once a month? Genuinely, how is that better? Isn't it sillier to be super pedantic about what counts as mundane and banning nonna over her pussy being not mundane enough to be posted about in the thread (janny x nonnie enemies to lovers).
Replies: >>2509
>>2507
Asking anons to follow the rules and to post in appropriate threads is not a big demand. It's basic etiquette. If you don't like the format of IBs, then you don't have to use them.
Replies: >>2535
f6753a5a23a8be2588f9accf407586dde24c4c4734a95e2923891b5b124e10df.png
[Hide] (104KB, 1859x355) Reverse
I'm sick of this moid from the right wing grifters thread.
Replies: >>2511 >>2512
>>2510
He sounds so fucking hurt kek. “outwit women”
>>2510
Oh no someone’s ’foiling
What’s with the newfag/tourist infestation across /snow/? So many threads are practically unreadable. I feel like it’s even more palpable than on the OT boards right now.
Replies: >>2514
ef38bfd8dc2cd037d0eea797e12dad2fcde9a818816354766c79d5f503fb8fea.jpg
[Hide] (368.1KB, 1242x2274) Reverse
afbb43c928a08424cf9e9b8a724e7bfa31a4dcc539c5cdf3c44189c8532f7da6.jpg
[Hide] (224.5KB, 1242x1124) Reverse
a621e5daab3cef74b8c39e8d515379e34d105e349885a4cb4b37172e3b5f3e4f.png
[Hide] (89.1KB, 659x674) Reverse
>>2513
Less than a week ago, a well-known troon on Tumblr received an ask from a cowtipping Tumblrina with a direct link to /snow/ and he published it for his thousands of troon and handmaiden followers. I'm guessing the uptick in newfag retardation is casually related to the site being linked to on Tumblr. I've noticed an uptick in the amount of LC links sent to Tumblr blogs in recent months, particularly those that espouse TRA viewpoints.
Replies: >>2516 >>2521
ew.png
[Hide] (135.8KB, 604x847) Reverse
True and honest women
Replies: >>2523
d8fe07d07b18305aa6fa8a0165952d333bb4dbd3b5dc5c6f2385dccf18c5fc74.jpeg
[Hide] (576.3KB, 1095x1258) Reverse
>>2514
I think you may be right…
Replies: >>2517 >>2551 >>2569
>>2516
Jesus Christ. What thread is that from? I'm guessing somewhere on /2X/. I'm so so tired of TIFs being welcomed with open arms on LC.
Replies: >>2518
>>2517
/snow/ TIF thread
Replies: >>2520
>>2518
Makes even more sense. Half the anons in those threads are TIFs themselves.
54d7d515b8659acf37821ad55ad0c4454695a420e5bdcd63e69755d671e817d7.png
[Hide] (79.5KB, 2020x272) Reverse
>>2514
god and i remember some anon who was defending the snow cowtipper (likely the cowtipper themselves?) said this shit when someone was justifiably annoyed abt the tipping
Replies: >>2522
>>2521
I think this was the cowtipper, yeah. I'd reckon that all the posts in that thread that were calls to action were made by the same person, most likely a handmaiden Tumblrina that got burned in the past by those that she's now posting about.
wtf.png
[Hide] (859.6KB, 942x1477) Reverse
>>2515
There's definitely a tranny in that thread. What the fuck is this deleted email post? Sorry for the mobile screenshot, I saw this while I was in another room and when I went to my computer it was deleted kek
Replies: >>2541
I seriously cannot WAIT for the 19th. I hope Cerb bans VPNs outright while we do the run-off poll. The baiting/infighting has been ramping up the past few days because all the ban evaders are shitting themselves over the loss of their #1 tool. So excited.
Replies: >>2525 >>2527
>>2524
Same, and I literally use VPN, but I just want to lc to be saved
Replies: >>2526
>>2525
I use a VPN too but just one look at /ot/ and I know in my heart that there needs to be a serious re-evaluation. Look at Mundane Shit right now and be amazed at the chimp outs from the spergs that can't understand why they aren't allowed to post whatever they want anywhere they want. Look at Things You Hate and see the massive troonfoiling campaign. Look at Unpopular Opinions. We needed a VPN since June 2024 and I'm so happy we're getting one.
>>2524
I hope so too. LC is literally unusable now. It was good while it lasted, I guess
Replies: >>2528
>>2527
I’ve had this thought about lc so many times, and ime it usually does get slightly better after a while, but sometimes I just need a break first. Whenever a wave of undesirable newfags join, there’s usually a period of time when they wreck havoc and demand we coddle them, but eventually most of them get banned, get bored, or they integrate. However, I haven’t enjoyed lc in a long time, so I really hope it improves significantly soon.
Replies: >>2529
>>2528
>I haven’t enjoyed lc in a long time
Ntayrt but this resonated with me. It sucks because LC used to be one of my favourite websites, but now it's a drag to use. Way too much time and energy goes into the off-topic boards and that makes the cow boards dry, to the point that I use KF now to get the scoop on cows. /ot/ and /g/ used to have fun discussions, but now those boards are ruled by the same 5 chatrooms. It's boring.
Can't believe jannies are really banning people for making fun of the obvious troonery happening in Things You Hate.
Replies: >>2531
>>2530
You mean the infighters and baiters that are ban evading?
Replies: >>2532
>>2531
All I see is that none of the people spamming anime girl boob gifs were banned and the people making fun of them were when the whole conversation itself was a massive derailment.
Replies: >>2533
>>2532
The people "making fun of them" are actually trolls that constantly ban evade to stoke the fires of an eternal infight. I'm sorry anon, but not every lesbian is secretly a man. Farmers are notoriously bad at clocking males to begin with, which makes the scrote accusations against lesbians even more deranged.
Replies: >>2534
>>2533
Thirsting over Nikke gifs in an /ot/ thread about things you hate is equally deranged. Both "sides" should have been banned
>>2509
LC is literally the only IB this pedantic and it hasn't always been.
Replies: >>2536
>>2535
I really don't understand what is so vexing to you about being told to use appropriate threads. If you don't like that format, then don't engage with LCF. You can go to CC and post however you'd like there, they're much less pedantic about that sort of thing there.
Replies: >>2537 >>2558
>>2536
Nayrt and I wouldn't wish CC on anyone. It'd probably be better for her to contribute to the dumbarse thread here, honestly.
Replies: >>2538
>>2537
CC is a good lesson on why having stringent derailing rules is a benefit and not a hindrance.
Replies: >>2558
lcf will never become usable again because at the end of the day, the mod team is the mod team. the userbase could behave largely perfectly after the VPN ban but they will then have to continue contending with mentally unstable jannies continuing to police the now 100 user large user base based on their own personal preferences of what they like and don’t like. they’re already abusing their power and once they get even more it’s not like they’re going to loosen the reins. like yeah let’s go post on the website where a bunch of bored obsessive schizos who cyberstalk as their one hobby can follow you around all day if they want. what could go wrong.
Replies: >>2540
>>2539
>let’s go post on the website where a bunch of bored obsessive schizos who cyberstalk as their one hobby
Are you talking about farmers or the jannies? That could describe both of them.
Replies: >>2542 >>2543
>>2523
Lol, lolcow lesbians are so tryhard, i feel as if they try to "outlesbian" each other by being the edgiest and horniest and calling all others polilez, it's funny to watch as a straight woman
IMG_4551.jpeg
[Hide] (567.9KB, 945x1121) Reverse
>>2540
i was talking about jannie’s but as if on cue i saw this and just. imagine being this person and having this kind of mental dialogue omg? like “i want you to fear me” type psycho shit wtf
Replies: >>2545 >>2559 >>2638
>>2540
that could probably describe the jannies on every small IB kek
Replies: >>2544
>>2543
i think they seem nice on here. i don’t get the vibe they want to stalk and control us, just have a nicer place finally to hang out with The Girls
>>2542
Yeah, that's farmers. The majority of farmers now are just weird mentally-stunted adult-children that never moved out of their parents' house. I miss the days when farmers were witty and interesting. The amount of farmers with main-character-syndrome (to use a Zoomer term that I'm fond of) is shocking. There are too many NEETs, LARPers, Zoomers, and troons on LC now for me to enjoy it now. I miss 2018 LC.
Replies: >>2546 >>2547 >>2550
>>2545
>The majority of farmers now are just weird mentally-stunted adult-children that never moved out of their parents' house.
That was always the case what are you talking about. The first (female) farmers were itas who orbited pt.
Replies: >>2548
>>2545
honestly GIOYC is one of the most low key illuminating threads because these women children who want to be inappropriate but want to control if anyone can say anything get WAY too comfortable. the amount of “i would jump you if i ever saw you in person” “you deserve rape” and psychotic a logs about people they presumably know who have no idea they are being thought of this much by someone that obsessive… it’s easy to forget when you hang out in the nicer quieter threads what the people on there are really like
Replies: >>2548
>>2546
You wouldn't get it.
>>2547
Diaries need to be more widespread.
Replies: >>2554
>>2545
Are you that one JC personalityfag they talked about on LC?
>>2516
Whatever. I'll take tifs over tims or normal moids who post misogyny.
>>2550
JC has a personalityfag aside from j*ff? kek
Replies: >>2555 >>2557
>>2550
No, I'm not Jeff.
>>2550
which personalityfag?
>>2548
some of them need a diary and some of them need to be separated from the general population for the safety of others. some of the posts on there are sad and hard to read; but some of them are just really vile and scary.
Replies: >>2557
>>2552
where is the jeff lore btw i keep seeing him mentioned. i know a really psycho jeff i wonder if it’s him
Replies: >>2556 >>2571
>>2555
I highly doubt anyone has compiled anything but I did find these with some basic google dorks:
>>>/archive/15656
>>>/archive/16682
:chiyochichi: very mysterious
Replies: >>2573
>>2552
>>2554
I'm assuming she meant the anon that posted >>464 a while ago. That post ruffled some feathers and a few Zoomers that felt called out ran to complain about her on LC where they tried to make her into a personalityfag.
>>2536
>>2538
You don't see it as being a little silly that you have 100 threads with highly specific topics about nothing that gets bumped once a month vs more general threads that actually move and are used? Like I don't even post on LC anymore lol, you can go post about your mundanity in peace without me. But ONLY if you correctly identify what is and isn't mundane, ok? I just generally find it so silly that you're making it about the heckin goshdang rules. Like what a redditor you sound like. There's a vast ocean of possibilities between LC's general topic threads and CC's vague ones. If your mundane thread needs like 30 disclaimers on what is and isn't mundane... you're nuts. You're lost.
Replies: >>2561 >>2585
>>2542
>solo-poly
Cows walk among us
Replies: >>2565
>>2558
But it's not about what is mundane or not mundane, it's about the topic of the thread lol. The thread has always been about sharing stories about the happenings in your life, not random thoughts.

>more general threads that actually move and are used?
Quantity doesn't mean quality. I think it's better that we have lots of threads for different topics. I don't think having a few very general threads is a good idea because it would stifle discussion.

>you're making it about the heckin goshdang rules. Like what a redditor you sound like.
I've never used Reddit before except for when google queries lead me there for tech help, but I don't think rules are specific to Reddit. I think every site should have rules.

>you're nuts. You're lost.
What does this even mean kek? If you don't post on LC anymore good for you but then why do you still care enough to insult me?
Replies: >>2562
12505122_cd6a6.gif
[Hide] (2.3MB, 500x500) Reverse
sorry nonna you failed to identify what's sufficiently mundane as per title 8 lolcow code section 1325, that's a 2 year ban. Here is your fate, yhh will throw you a flotation device.

>>2561
I'm not insulting you, that's a general you. I'm shocked at the freakin list of rules in this dang post >>2475
. It's not about you personally, although I'm frankly astonished you specifically don't find this excessive, silly, and off-putting. But that's ok.
Replies: >>2563 >>2564 >>2573
>>2562
But if you look at >>2475 and read it, there's not actually a rule list. It's just saying that thread topic and giving examples of what is on topic or off topic. It's not like the post is saying "Here's Rule 1, and then Rule 2, and next Rule 3, and Rule 4 if Rule 3 is broken," or anything. It's a long thread description, but I don't think it's off-putting or silly. I don't even think it includes a list of rules, just one: "stay on topic."
>>2562
kek spot on and nice picmix. Barely related, but I think some farmers' heads would explode if they saw the dst threads on HKC.
>>2559
literally what does that even mean
d70e592e3cebccd3bf4451568ff60d36d1dfabb2559fce3f9c7e3c4b425aa034.png
[Hide] (130.7KB, 2732x294) Reverse
>>2516
someone who replied to that post kek
Replies: >>2570 >>2584
>>2569
TIFs are a dime a dozen on LC now. There's even 2 threads specifically for them. It's so funny to see.
Replies: >>2571
>>2555
He's jeff the killer, but into anime feet
>>2570
When I see someone offsite hinting at lolcow, using lc slang or posting screencaps it's almost always a tif, they are too comfortable now.
< Remember the old days when tifs weren't even a blip on anyone's radar because timmies were just so repulsive... Let's go back.
Replies: >>2574 >>2579
>>2556
He’s so schizo he’s a thirdie indian right? Or was that webmin?
>>2562
Agreed, while I can see how it ended up that way given the absolute state it is ridiculous and offputting, all it reads as to me is a sign of the site tanking and stragglers believing the way to save it is to become sticklers for rules. Unfortunately there’s only so much we can do as farmers/users and ultimately it’s the jannies responsibility to do anything.
Replies: >>2579
>>2572
You clearly weren’t knee-deep enough in tumblr back in 2016 kek
Replies: >>2588
>>2573
webmin is the indian, check the rules page "Do not post, request, link to, or promote any content that is illegal in either India or the United States of America."
>>2572
What are you talking about kek, we always hated both, tifs always stir up shit in women's spaces and are the reason for orwellian shit like "chestfeeding" or "pregnant people"
Replies: >>2588
>>2569
“After plastic surgery I feel so much better about myself! Yes I know it’s rooted in societal expectations and internalized hatred, but i dont care teehee” Is all I hear about with tifs, spineless weaklings. Therapy is cheaper
>>2558
The over reliance on generals makes me sad, like impossible dreams, strange encounters, obsessions with people, threads of that nature wouldn’t be allowed if they were made today. I also think it’s because the 2 jannies are too lazy to check other threads and want everything centralized.
Also why is discussion more free and easygoing on a damn cuckqueaning splinter board
>>2586
lazytown spreads good vibes + most annoying moralfags aren't willing to post in a cuckqueaning board.
Replies: >>2592 >>2597
Screenshot_20250317-190609.png
[Hide] (808.6KB, 1008x879) Reverse
>>2574
Kek you're right. The first time I interacted with a TIF was on Spinster and some gc zooms meetings around 2019-2020. >>2579 is right. All they did was distract real discussion. I guess I just didn't ever think about them beforehand because I'd never actually interacted with them. The one that peaked me on Spinster had this cycle where she would go "oh no guys oh no I'm going to retrans! Oh no guys I can feel the trans taking over my body again! Somebody red pill me on transgender again I need it bad." And then she would get her hugbox and asspats. They were constantly complaining about being called mutilated even though I never actually saw anyone call them mutilated. All they ever did was attention seek. I just straight up don't remember them ever being influential or even this annoying before like 2019. I've only ever recently seen them in real life. I have a TIF professor actually. No one can clock her even though she is shaped like a bowling pin and is 5'0". Picrel, how I feel in her classes.
Replies: >>2599
>>2586
Less users. So much of the bullshit that happens on LC is because the userbase is way too large for the staff to adequately handle.
Replies: >>2592
>>2586
>>2587 has it right. Lazytown scares away a certain annoying sort and the coomer neighbour boards scare away another sort of posters. I also might be overthinking it kek.

>>2589
Agreed as well. Gatekeeping works, and it doesn’t need to be the incredibly annoying sort of gatekeeping since yhh is so obscure.
Replies: >>2599
baiting is absolutely insane tonight there’s someone claiming they’ve ended friendships over people pooing in their loo and she’s fighting with people in the copypasta thread the random questions thread and apparently somewhere on /g/. and i suspect they are the one completely chimping out in GIOYC for hours if not days now. i honestly can’t believe people are taking this bait.
>>2587
To be fair I don’t want to be on an Indian cuck IB either, but I guess it’s fine as long as no one starts spamming porn on this board.
Replies: >>2600
>>2588
>No one can clock her
90% of students in your class can clock her just like you have, they're just held back from saying so for fear of social repercussions. The trans cult works so well because they exploit the silent majority's hesitancy to speak out.

>>2592
2nd AYRT, and yeah the obscurity is what works best. LC is now known on social media as "femcel 4chan" so it attracts a certain demographic. It sucks that LC has become more well-known and mainstream, especially to kids on Twitter and TikTok. Gatekeeping always works - something that many younger people don't seem to want to recognize. It might be annoying, and sometimes it's even frustrating, but keeping the culture in check is an ongoing process that never-ending struggle.

>coomer neighbour boards scare away another sort of posters
It scares away the radfem LARPers that have never read any feminist literature or engaged in feminist theory but still act as though they're a moral authority. The whole "LC is a radfem website!" spiel they always go on falls apart when you realize that most of the anons couldn't name one well-known author besides Dworkin, and even then they only know her from the memes and have never read her works.
>>2597
NYART but truthfully I don't mind it. This just feels like I'm back in the /cgl/ days where I'm sharing a website with /b/. Just ignore your neighbors, you'll be fine
image-66.png
[Hide] (260.8KB, 1805x772) Reverse
Is it just me or are LC posters becoming stupider or is it all just bait?
Replies: >>2608 >>2619
>>2601
Is that a screencap from /ot/?
Replies: >>2609
>>2608
>Screenshot /or/
>Ask if it's bait
You're right, that was a silly question. 

But yes, in the Own Caps thread.
>>2601
<No one can clock her even though she is shaped like a bowling pin and is 5'0". 
I don't even understand TIF'ing out if you're that short
Replies: >>2637
Went to check the egirl thread on snow and these retards killed the thread with their sperging about some meth head that personally slighted them in their pedophile discord servers. I actually have a hilarious cow atm that isn’t worth posting for those idiots
Replies: >>2626
>>2625
Share with us nona >>185, I'm in the mood to look through someone retarded's socmed. 
Also jeez louise that many posts in so short a time?!
Replies: >>2628
>>2626
I’ve actually posted her in there before >>712 she is realistically a calf but she is so funny (and it seems to some other privateers) To me, she is leagues more entertaining than any of the other current egirls, she’s really just a wannabe hoodrat who adopted the whole egirl look and the dichotomy is interesting.
Some of the denpa spergs seemed to be stifling conversation of her because they’d rather talk about the usual ‘efamous’ fishtank types (that they probably share communities with)
An anon even tried to accuse I and other anons posting about her as being vendettafags? Ironic considering the usual calibre of posts in that thread. I’m glad I don’t know her kek, and sure hope I never have the displeasure of interacting
>>2550
jc personalityfag left last year, but there's an anon who keeps accusing random spergs of being her. 

she seemed to have really bad mental issues and it wasn't a good idea for her to continue posting. she was also 100% right about jc being an abuser pedocreep and I will never be able to look at him the same way.
Replies: >>2636
So what do we think is gonna actually happen with the VPN ban? 

Cerb is such a dumbass for the way she formatted the poll. Either way you look at it, it has the potential to alienate both sides. Having the pro-ban vote split between 4 options while the anti-ban vote had 1 was a recipe for disaster. Even though the anti-ban vote has the most votes of any option, the majority of anons are pro-ban and voted for some form of ban.

If there is a VPN ban, then the people that voted against it will feel cheated because their option got the most votes. If there isn't a VPN ban, the people that voted for it will feel cheated because the majority of votes were cast for it. It's a lose-lose situation. It's gonna be a disaster for Cerb PR-wise.

>>2635
Kek anon... she meant JC like junkuchan... not Jim Carrey....
Replies: >>2638 >>2641 >>2643
>>2619
could ask Ellen Page the same question kek
>>2636
oh god that's my first association with the fucking letters. I cant keep up with the personalityfagging 

>>2542
Remember this is the same site that doxed cows through minute details. I think anons forget just how deranged some other anons can be
Replies: >>2642
>>2639
Because someone decided to talk about le secret pirate infodump on lc as if she isn't obsessively reading lc for any mention of her
Replies: >>2642
>>2636
I think the ban is going to go through, but agree that the poll sucks. I just wonder what's going to happen when it doesn't magically make /ot/ a nice place to visit lol.
>>2640
Seriously. I get why some anons want to talk about her, but this is the consequence of talking about her. There's a reason 'encouraging personalityfags' is a redtext on LC. Not that many people follow her Tumblr, but now the exact URL of the board is on Tumblr for all those retards to see. Anons need to think of consequences before doing certain things.

>>2638
>Remember this is the same site that doxed cows through minute details
This is why I laugh when farmers fake being so concerned about their ~privacy~ re: VPNs. I can't remember the last time staff revealed actual personal information about someone (maybe Rita? I can't remember), but I can remember a shit ton of examples in the past year of anons being discovered and made into cows by rabid autistic farmers.
>>2636
It was obviously rigged to give the pro side more of a chance. Also love that you called Cerbmin “she” (singular),  remember when it was meant to be three people? Kek
Replies: >>2644
>>2643
I call her "she" because I think the plural pronoun makes it clunky. I don't really buy the 3 person shtick either though.
Mods are definitely trying to sneak moids in on lolcow. They aren’t doing shit about that scrote sperging in the right wing cows thread, the scrotefoiling ban is so dumb.
Replies: >>2646
>>2645
I just checked and I don't see a scrotefoiling ban?
Replies: >>2647
>>2646
I am saying that the rule itself is dumb
Replies: >>2648
>>2647
NYART but scrotefoiling is the dumbest rule. There's such a canyon of a difference between a woman who has a bad opinion and the aggressive energy moids bring to conversations. If a female is coming to lc and giving that energy, she should be gatekept. 
Also, /meta/ is the best board right now. I barely read milk since there's enough in meta to go around KEK
Replies: >>2757
Screen_Shot_2025-03-18_at_4.48.57_PM.png
[Hide] (185.2KB, 659x465) Reverse
>"I'm a newfag!"
>Pleaseeee come check out /yhh/!!!! Here's a direct link for everyone!!!

This must be a farmhand trying to fuck with /yhh/ because I refuse to believe the anons here could be this deeply and unashamedly retarded.
Replies: >>2650 >>2653
>>2649
Where is this so I can report it? I've gotten a couple of these advertisment posts deleted
Replies: >>2651
>>2650
I always report it too. It's in the VPN poll discussion thread on /ot/.
30271329a6eff97e663292a721c597e55e773017954d33ac3bcb309f122f8e67.jpeg
[Hide] (475.6KB, 1170x933) Reverse
Spoiler File
(421.6KB, 923x870) Reverse
How is someone spamming about “Chad”, “All women are meant to have animalistic sex with chad”, and “pair bonding is ackshually fake!” in a /snow/ thread just a woman using moidspeak? Either it’s the most pick-me FDS tard ever or a moid. Either way that doesn’t belong in /snow/. Mods are fucking braindead. Spoiler if you don’t wanna read the mood garbage in the second file
Replies: >>2655 >>2715
>>2649
>redtext with no deletion for 'spamming'
I want to call the farmhand theory a tinfoil but I CAN'T :chiyotable:
A true tinfoil is still a tinfoil... isn't it?
>>2652
>a woman using moidspeak?
Look at the Blackpill thread on /2X/, it's much more common than you might think. I know it's easy to say that every annoying or stupid poster is a man, but it's not really the case most of the time. Reading the post, I can infer that the person that wrote that is a woman. I'm not 100% sure, obviously, but I'm 70% certain that that's just a very stupid woman.

Honestly though, the whole "we tooootally know who is and isn't a man!" line that the farmhands' love to use isn't based in reality. No person can be 100% sure if a text was written by a man or woman, even though we all have hunches and can infer things. There is no way of knowing is a poster is a male or not unless they explicitly say so. That's sort of the paradox of LC. It's supposed to be a female-only anonymous imageboard: but, by virtue of anonymity, there is no real way of confirming that only women use it, nor is there a way to confirm how many males use it, nor have statistics relating to that ever been released. This reality is something that not a lot of farmers or staff are willing to accept.

The mod response is just a rehashing of this to make it more digestible for an irate userbase. The most important line is "report and move on." There's nothing that a user can do to stop moids from posting besides ignoring the post, reporting it, and moving on. A lot of anons really have trouble with this aspect, because there's this instinct that we wanna 'protect' our space and we think that we can do that by making fun of the moid poster or by telling him to kill himself, but in truth that's actually the reaction the moids want. Any reaction is a good reaction for them, so the best way to deal with them is to not react, to ignore, and report.
Replies: >>2656 >>2659
>>2655
I do use the blackpill thread though. The "chad" "beta" speak is completely different than what you see in /2X/. They just call eachother whores. Not being able to integrate in a cow thread and spamming the thread with your hypergamy (male) blackpill shit and how all lesbians are fake, which is all completely off topic, is moid behavior. Either way that poster should be banned because they're completely derailing
Replies: >>2657 >>2658
>>2656
It already has been banned.
Replies: >>2658
34b5982c01469256423600a01785b33986fc69fe53c293eca81d963b50a8950d.png
[Hide] (26KB, 581x209) Reverse
>>2656
samefag but like another nona in that thread said, it could very well be an fdstard who genuinely believes what she's doing is feminism. The anti-lesbian shit being spammed could then very well be because those types of women seethe about lesbians because it doesn't fall into the "All women fuck chad stay mad incel" shit they say
>>2657
Bless
>>2655
this is a really good post. i know for a fact someone i personally know has been scrotefoiled on here before. there are women who hate other women who would say the most vile shit they can think of towards other women just to soothe the pain from not being picked yet, their only and top priority. it’s so weird to me how those types are either always single or dating placeholders they don’t even like just to say they have something. there are women who believe half of what BJchan believes about women while believing none of the bad parts about men. some of the posters you are interacting with only want to bully and harass women and were on here on the first place only to focus on women they project themselves on or would like to be a version of - in this case it was TND for the “alt girl influencer who sits on her ass all day dating emo men she used to crush on as a teenager while not actually caring about animals but being called an expert animal empath for no reason.” if you see a poster shitting on just women, don’t assume they think even worse of men. if you see a woman shitting on someone posted on the other boards, it might just be that they wish they had that exact life sans heroin but not caring about the animal abuse or filth parts. there are so many actual men on here but don’t forget that sad thirty something year old discord kittens are also here and they do not care at all about the “woman only aspect” of this website.
Replies: >>2669 >>2676
1690780574825.png
[Hide] (180.8KB, 1080x1017) Reverse
Never forget the nona who responded to being scrotefoiled by posting her ovulation tracker.
Replies: >>2661 >>2665
>>2660
Honestly don't know how she paints it as the other nona just disagreeing with her when she was bringing up the "dogpill". Some women really are doomed.
Replies: >>2662 >>2663
>>2661
IIRC it was in the doghate thread, so they're both beyond help for entering that wasteland.
>>2661
Doesn't the "dogpill" in that thread just mean someone that likes dogs? It's not supposed to be something gross, it's just a funny way of saying that someone appreciates dogs as pets because everyone itt hates dogs.
>>2660
I'm sure she had some incredibly retarded opinions but BASED
>>2659
I don't know if this is too much of niche reference, but this reminds me strongly of illness faker communities. I used to lurk those types of groups because my stepbrother is faking MS and they are filled with illness fakers who are deciding other illness fakers are faking in a less correct way as them. Like everyone with DID (which does not exist) being skeptical of everyone else who says they have DID because they're doing it wrong. I strongly get a sense of deja vu in some /snow/ threads about women in this same way.
Replies: >>2675
>>2669
you understand it exactly omg. like every time i see an anorexic thread or a sex worker thread and see the sus ass posts in those threads i’m just like. okay. so snow is where people who identify with the people posted there hang out to be like i’m not like other cows. got it. back to the off topic boards and /g/ with my pretty ass there’s nothing for me here.
>>2659
>i know for a fact someone i personally know has been scrotefoiled on here before. 
How do you know who posts on an anonymous board?
>>2676
Ntayrt but some of us have farmer friends and we talk about stuff we post or what other anons say about us. It's not that deep.
>>2676
please trust that she is not someone who has ever been a friend. but she is on the outer circle of my own outer circle. she has had interpersonal drama literally on lcf but she also will vent to people and post directly and indirectly about it including screenshots that “totally weren’t here she just really agrees with the points being made and they’re applicable to my own life tee hee.” like there exist people who interact with that we sit that only be the grace of the people around them have not had a thread made about them including all the shit they’ve put out there themselves. i obviously have no way of knowing which posts are hers other than the ones she posts herself but she is very much an entire retard who thinks she is edgy for being on image boards.
Replies: >>2708
>>2586
This but seriously, off-topic boards are filled with aggressive people with zero reading comprehension and baiters, and the cow boards have schizos and tourists in every thread shitting it up, lolcow is unbearable nowadays and i mostly just lurk or post here or cc
>>2676
I work with the feds, my squad sometimes plans to mine threads together.
Replies: >>2684 >>2689
>>2682
omg no way how is your work in general tinfoil going? i’ve been working really hard in the LM thread myself
Replies: >>2689
>>2682
>>2684
Whoever is responsible for FD #32 is either on vacation or """teleworking""" because it looks like it's on autopilot. Step it up.
>>2691
Take minor comfort in that she will never post here because that would legitimize a site ran by an Indian loli foot coomer scrote.
Replies: >>2695 >>2695
2ade00578aea805f6e6642fa5124379a2049a2a306eac85c6f9809c2f0c2c03d.png
[Hide] (304.1KB, 1024x1024) Reverse
>>2691
Nah, she thrives on minute attention. Give her nothing to chew on and she'll have a better chance of cutting that shit out or going away. Use the same principles dealing with her as you do dementia paitents (minus step 3 of picrel)
>>2693
True but isn't Jeff the foot guy? :chiyopuke: Not that it matters I suppose...
Replies: >>2697 >>2697
>>2695
>>2696
The details are near the top of the meta thread >>1743
I really don't want to bring up personalityfags here. I'm so sick of everyone giving them attention. I literally could not care less about any of their tragic pasts
Replies: >>2703
>>2700
I agree 100%. Personalityfags aren't funny. They're just annoying. Let them fade into obscurity.
>>2678
Ok anon. If it's not a fake story then I can tell you and your circle are a bunch of retards.
Replies: >>2754
>>2676
Some of us met friends via friend finder or presumably people in the offshoot discord servers that used to or might still exist
Replies: >>2713
>>2710
yeah like it is very clear in some cases that sometimes there’s some weird drama going on between farmers that doesn’t make sense if it’s all truly anonymous, there’s definitely discord drama that spills out on there and i think some schizo anons are probably just discord farmers fighting
Replies: >>2753
>>2652
>How is someone spamming about “Chad”, “All women are meant to have animalistic sex with chad”, and “pair bonding is ackshually fake!” in a /snow/ thread just a woman using moidspeak?
It's not necessarily moid speak, it's more like "chan speak". These terms while not commonly used on LC are widely used on other image boards. It's not outside the realm of possibility that it's a retarded woman parroting what she's read somewhere else or thinking she's fitting in because she doesn't realize that LC is different from whatever shithole IB she came from. Far worse gets posted on /2X/ on a daily basis. Regardless of if it's a moid or a terminal pick me, it needs to be banned because it's not milk and is off topic in a /snow/ thread.
Replies: >>2725
>>2304
It's looking more likely. It's been 16 hours since the poll closed and there's still been no update from Cerb. So annoyingly pathetic. I hate this admin so much
>check the poll discussion thread
>some retard is directly linking a newfag to this board
Please stop
Why do I ever bother to go to CC. They always have the most heinous shit on the front page jesus christ :chiyopuke:
Replies: >>2719
>>2718
Next time warn nonas there's csam and not just "it's gross". I guess I learned my lesson. Can they just nuke the site already?
tbh if I were snail, I would just axe it entirely. According to the thing webmin posted, CSAM attacks are ramping up. But I swear CC has the worst problems with this, more than any other IB.
Replies: >>2721
>>2720
My guess is it's the same shit they've been dealing with since forever since the crap cuckqing warned about apparently appears benign at first glance. It's a miracle CC’s registrar/host/whatever hasn't dropped them yet.
1911846b060de4b0b7bd2bf21c1e9a0338943027f6472a40b6d0f07dbd3666fd.png
[Hide] (308KB, 1128x503) Reverse
We did it nonnies. We finally defeated the evil.

What are we voting for?
>>2723
I feel like if the VPNs are banned only on /ot/ then the baiters just will go shit up the other boards.
Replies: >>2726 >>2778
>>2715
How is wanting Chad being a pickme?
Replies: >>2727
>>2724
That's a worry of mine too, but I also think that the other boards have way better farmhands that respond to stuff a lot quicker. I only use 2 threads on /g/, so I'm not super sure about that board but I know for /m/ the culture is way different from /ot/ and less anons take bait or infight. If those boards do get shit up though, it's just more proof that the VPNtards are the 5th column. I think I'll vote for only /ot/.

I expect that this week is going to be a pandemonium of bait, infighting, and rule-breaking on /ot/.
Replies: >>2778
>>2725
Saying “women are meant to” have sex with moids is retarded and misogynistic. If you like attractive moids go ahead, but pushing that onto all women in such a descriptive manner is gross and unrelated to the thread topic. The entire thread before was debating about lesbians (screeching “dyke” saying lesbians aren’t real) and how pair bonding and orgasms are fake so I hope that gives you a little more context too.
>>2723
Which one should I pick sweet nonnies?
Replies: >>2736
>>2723
I'll vote on all of them, /snow/ has been awful on some threads lately and I know the baiters will jump ship once they can't shit up /ot/
>>2723
LC is saved! Let's pack up and head back, fellow Privateers.
>>2729
I'll still stay here until the modding team gets their shit together and we get a communicative admin(never gonna happen)
Replies: >>2732
>>2729
Meh I like it here. Fewer cocomelon-brained  retards and moralfags
>>2729
Like >>2730 said. I'm gonna keep using both sites. I'm sure there's gonna be more retarded staff choices to talk shit about. Plus I think it would be fun to cultivate a bigger community here and see where it takes us.
9b40ecb9fb61a49f0e4e374b904198932e09f57208fb624a8ea6607b03220cb8.jpeg
[Hide] (670.5KB, 648x864) Reverse
>>2729
>t.
Replies: >>2734
>>2733
Artists need to work on their signatures. Wtf is that chicken scratch at the bottom right corner
IMG_5786.jpeg
[Hide] (254.3KB, 1242x499) Reverse
IMG_5787.jpeg
[Hide] (216.1KB, 1242x465) Reverse
Schizo rant incoming but I think something happened astroturfed by one very dedicated person who is trying to undermine us and asslicks the jannies full time so they get away with it. They make up people to blame endlessly like “campers”, “baiters”, “shitpsergs”, “metafags” now especially ridiculously “vpnfags” etc but they’re super new, they didn’t even know you don’t have to Sage in /ot/. Their style is to agree with everything the mods do post hoc, like if one day the mods change their mind on vpns they will agree with them automatically. Idk what this persons end goal is but it’s very sinister and they already successfully psyop the site into thinking any disagreeing post is ‘bait’ after they wouldn’t shut up about it for weeks. This person also thought ‘janny’ was a slur. I don’t know what their end goal is but it’s pissing me off.  I don’t know what the fuck moderation wants, they don’t care about the site but they’re also endlessly redtexting it’s just uncomfortable. I guess they want like 3 pph. Picrel is them they have a very recognizable typing style I don’t care if anyone believes
Me I know what I know
Replies: >>2738 >>2739
>>2727
I think that person meant more in the evolutionary sense, as in as opposed to having sex with a gross loser you aren’t attracted to for stability, which is unnatural but the current status quo. She wasn’t saying you have to. I also don’t think it’s the same “dyke” religious schizo.
>>2723
I'm so mad there's no option for /2X/, piece of shit board that needs it more than any other
>>2735
>they are not micromanaging
>mundane thread has 40 disclaimers on what is and is not mundane
infight_1.jpeg
[Hide] (193KB, 624x949) Reverse
infight_2.jpeg
[Hide] (236.1KB, 690x1211) Reverse
infight_3.jpeg
[Hide] (373.2KB, 689x1595) Reverse
>>2735
I'm the anon that wrote the post in the first picture. I wrote it because I thought the person I was replying to (who was saying that integrating was pointless, that mods should stop banning for integration issues, and that the majority of farmers have a "vendetta against newfags") made a stupid comparison during an infight about how being called a newfag is actually a slur, and I decided to poke a little fun at how stupid the comparison was. I think I made one other post during that infight and I stopped because it was kind of gay. I didn't type the other post. I'm attaching screenshots of the entire infight.

Anons like you that try to piece together a bunch of random posts to create a character in your mind that you can fight against kinda weird me out. What exactly is the "very recognizable typing style" here? The proper punctuation? There are lots of users even in this thread that type with proper punctuation. It's not really hard to believe that 60% of the users wanted a VPN ban because less than 20% of posts are made with a VPN anyway. I don't think the poll was astroturfed at all. It sucks that a VPN ban is gonna come into effect because of a few bad apples, but I think it's necessary because of the really bad moderation.
>>2739
They didn’t say it was a slur they said it was hamfisted and overwrought. If I’m wrong on this particular screenshot then fine, I take it back, but the thing I’m describing is real. Were you on meta for the ‘camper’ debacle?
Replies: >>2742
>>2739
Ok now I’m actually very suspicious of you because I didn’t even talk about the VPN ban I was talking about this specific user and their weird tendency to make up new boogeymen every week so I don’t know why you brought that up.
Replies: >>2742
>>2740
If you're wrong about that particular screenshot then you're probably wrong about the whole thing, right? You were so sure that my post was actually made by the one sinister person that you attached it to your post to prove your point. But your point is pointless because those two posts were made by different people. 

I witnessed the /meta/ camper debacle. It was an embarrassing display of schizophrenia but I don't understand why you think that it would hold any weight on what other anons think. Many anons complain of campers, of baiters, of the so-called metafags and shitspergs, but that doesn't make them all one person.

>>2741
You did bring up the VPN ban when you mentioned "astroturfed," which was obviously a reference to your suspicion that the VPN ban poll was rigged. You then mentioned the VPN ban again in the third sentence. Talking about the VPN ban isn't making up a boogeyman, we've been talking about this for a while.

>I was talking about this specific user
But there is no specific user. I just told you that I was the one that wrote the first post because I was making an autistic joke about something I thought was stupid. You thought that that post was made by some sinister person who also made the second post. But that's not true because I made the first post and I didn't make the second post.
Replies: >>2743 >>2745
>>2742
I didn’t bring up the vpn ban itself, I was talking about “vpnfags” being used as an insult. I didn’t mention the poll or any of my ‘suspicions it was rigged’, my post had nothing to do with that. By astroturf I mean they’re astroturfing concepts and boogeymen that didn’t exist before. I’m only talking about this one poster that’s been there since last year.
Replies: >>2744
>>2743
Well, I hope that you can see why "I think something happened astroturfed by one very dedicated person" might have been a confusing sentence for some of us. I assumed you were talking about the VPN ban because that's the topic of discussion right now ITT. I don't think "baiters" and "infighters" are new terms, and I don't think they're boogeymen. Even on /yhh/ we've been complaining about the retards that use VPNs (the so-called vpnfags) to evade their bans for the past month, the first post that mentioned VPN posters ITT was >>328 and they've been discussed on LC for the past year.

Again, I don't think there is one poster. I think you're making connections that aren't there. You thought I was this one poster, but you were wrong, and then you accused me of being that one poster again when I said I wasn't. You already said you don't care if people believe your theory, so you shouldn't mind me saying that I don't believe your theory.
>>2742
It won’t let me delete but seriously 
>you brought up the vpn ban in your third sentence 
Yes as an example that they would knee jerk defend any decision made by mods. If tomorrow they got rid of redtext they would defend that too. My point is they just agree with everything for no reason and have no actual convictions.
>>2739
>I've been posting here for 6 years and still get called a newfag contantly
Holy shit, 6 years and can't integrate. I don't mind newfags if they integrate, I don't think many nonas do, simply because you can't tell if an integrated newfag is a newfag.
ah sweet, a schizo fight
i'm rooting for the one with a knife
Replies: >>2749 >>2751
I do think the anti-vpn feeling on the board was astroturfed to a huge degree. If only 16% of posters are on VPNs then why the hell are 70% of posts on /ot/ worthless bait and/or infighting? The maths don't math for me here. The CC thread only got shat up when LC went down, and the shelter threads here never went to shit. I think the problem is purely newfaggotry and dopamine addicts who only get a buzz when they're fighting. The VPN ban during the holidays when most underaged are with their families with their cellphones in phone jail... Yeah of course the site is going to be nicer. I'm rooting for a sitewide VPN ban just for vindication, /ot/ will continue to be shit.
Replies: >>2751
>>2747
well now that's the problem with fights around here, they're all armed :chiyofish:
>>2748
>If only 16% of posters are on VPNs
I'm not sure where you got this statistic from? There was a statistic released last year that revealed that 13.4% of posts in a two-week period were made through a VPN, but AFAIK there has never been statistics about how many posters use a VPN to date. I think that there should have been statistics released about the results of the VPN ban that happened in December. It would have been helpful to see how many bans were applied during the month and whether or not the VPN ban actually had a significant impact.
>I think the problem is purely newfaggotry and dopamine addicts who only get a buzz when they're fighting
Unfortunately a lot of anons think that this is the whole point of LC to begin with. Even on CC (before the LC outage) there were several posters that spoke about how baiting and infighting is the only reason they use LC.

>>2747
I didn't mean to fight kek, I just thought it was funny that I got dragged into someones schizo rant for making an autistic joke one time. I wouldn't have even said anything but she said that I was licking the jannies' asses and that annoyed me because I would never do that.
Replies: >>2752 >>2794
>>2751
>13.4 of posts
Oh shoot, you're right. I misremembered. Ain't no way only 13.4% of posts on /ot/ are bait / low quality.
Replies: >>2794
>>2713
Maybe but I think that anon (not the one you replied to, but the one who claims she knows farmers in real life) is trying to fearmonger. I don't use discord but I still think people shouldn't do that shit.
Replies: >>2754 >>2755
>>2753
Samefag but notice how she didn't reply when I called her out here >>2708. It's because she knows she can't defend herself.
Replies: >>2755
>>2753
>>2754
Ntayrt but what is she meant to defend kek? Why does she have to defend to begin with? It's pretty common for farmers to make friends with each other. Just because you never used the Friend Finder, or because you weren't a part of the Lolcord, or you aren't a part of the off-site communities don't mean they don't exist.
552162b46524deba8a45f0542d904ecf3b54dd45ad46a51bf1ef75ad8bf0f707.png
[Hide] (134.2KB, 702x237) Reverse
b0cd7d00c8d9a2939b5bd2d0e6cd2c22e809622b26a210ed51e0bd0fc928d620.jpg
[Hide] (77.1KB, 800x442) Reverse
>>2648
>/meta/ is the best board right now
good taste
I AM BOTH THE NONA YOU ARE REPLYING TO AND THE ONE YOU ARE TRYING TO TRASH TALK HI? i literally said she wasn’t my friend and then you tried to say they were my friends and the behavior i criticized is somehow what i am like. why would i defend myself? we aren’t doing infighting here. there have been countless posts the last few weeks about the discord drama happening currently and the past. i didn’t make the other ones cos i’m not in those discords but there’s no way that isn’t true and it explains A LOT. i doubt they’re like anything anyone is missing out on and clearly those are the most annoying posters who make lcf life and death lol. like i know of one cow like person who is an ex of a guy on the outskirts of a friend group i outgrew other than a couple people i talk to still. outer circle of outer circle. like acquaintance of an acquaintance who is messy online and my friends don’t like so we talk about her twice a year when she has a public melty.
Replies: >>2759
>>2758
It's ok nonita
Replies: >>2761
>>2691
I've considered this as well. I think giving them any kind of attention leads to more activity from them. I've been wondering if this tactic would work on our male personalityfaggot like if we just stopped acknowledging his general existence. Even in the ban logs, you know?
Replies: >>2783
>>2759
i just caught up and i’m even more confused because i have a completely different typing style and i literally am pro VPN BECAUSE i know that irl cow and think it would be funny if she had to leave or got caught out. and also holy shit i straight up left lcf in february because i couldn’t do it anymore; i migrated here cos i like all the nonas here. like i think it says something that even though people were schizofoiling and being accusatory towards other nomad it’s been hours and it didn’t get ugly in here. my schizo fighting style would be a flaming sword btw. :chiyofish:
Now that there is a guaranteed vpn ban on /ot/, will we migrate some of those threads over to here? I always enjoyed the consoomerism thread :chiyocry:
Replies: >>2765
>>2739
Whenever I see anons claiming they can detect certain anons by typing style I just want to scream into the void because most of the time they're not only dead wrong, they forget that it's not that hard to either imitate another posters style if you're a savvy typist. Like no1curr about your schizo ass ramblings
>>2762
i would love that. that was one of my favorites because seeing the amount of stuff people had boggled my mind. i think we should stay to specific topic boards instead of the ones that attract baiters like unpopular opinions. even vent confessions and GIOYC have caused complete shit shows. i also don’t think moving cow culture here would be that fun, it would draw people to us and it’s never going to be the same for people into following cows as those threads there where everyone can come together. i really hope this ends up being more like crystal cafe COULD have been with just a small community of girls talking nicely with each other. it feels like our community here is kind of in agreement we don’t want that hostile atmosphere and nona vs nona violence.
1ad3ef241755b4a2b1dd046444d160505362aa07ad3d4fef0bccf5dfacec6a3c.jpeg
[Hide] (49.9KB, 624x621) Reverse
Can't this go in the cow thread at least? This no longer has anything to do with lc, I'm so tired of hearing about this personalityfag and watching the discussion that's going to fuel more of her cringe ass Twitter posts. I hope you all are excited to get mentioned on fucking Roblox by a literal who personalityfag
Replies: >>2777
>>2774
Agreed, it'd at least be more appropriate to post about her there. Though I'd rather not have her brought up at all, she's clearly living in some anon's brains.
Replies: >>2779
>>2724
>>2726
Imo dealing with bait on other boards isn't as bad as /ot/ because the other boards are generally slower, baiters won't get the dopamine rush they want plus there's more of a specific set topic in /g/ /m/ etc. threads so if someone tries to bait or infight in say an animal image dumping thread for example, it'll look very obvious and should be easier to ban/report. Mods basically just have to go after whoever strays too far from the original thread topic
>>2777
I would prefer ignoring all personalityfags but clearly you're right and she's living in some nona's head. I check this thread for lc and cc discussion, so at least move her to the cow thread of she HAS to get mentioned. Unless capmin decides to make personalityfag discussion off-limits.
Replies: >>2784
I would also prefer ignoring them. But I think the cow thread would be a good fit for continued discussion if people feel the need. I may move all the posts ITT about her over to that thread if that's wanted.
>>2780
That sounds good!
>>2760
>Even in the ban logs, you know?
it seems like captmin has started doing this already, i reported a post of his and it got a vague ban message this time
Replies: >>2784
>>2779
If I were first mate for a day I'd move personalityfag posts to a hidden thread. Maybe the thread could only be accessible from the catalog.
>>2780
Aye aye, thank you for your continued efforts.
>>2783
Based and correct way of handling things.
>>2780
feel free to move any of my posts as you see fit! i understand why people feel this way
>>2780
This seems like a good compromise. Thanks, Captmin!
wotd.jpg
[Hide] (51.2KB, 1000x563) Reverse
It's time for lc's word of the day, nonnie!
<oh boy!
Today's word of the day is 'ad hoc', do you know what that means?
<no, I don't!
Of course you don't. You're esl.
<that's rather eslphobic of you, cerb!
I don't care! Be sure to vote in the poll before looking up what it means.
<okay!
Remember everyone, only bad actors and kiwiscrotes use VPNs
<it still won't let me vote even if i leave incognito..
>>2787
What gets me about the "ad hoc" option is that cerb barely does anything. How can we trust them to enforce the said "ad hoc" threads in question? We're lucky if they post once every few months, let alone implementing actual moderation
Replies: >>2800
>>2787
i don’t have anything to add but i just wanna say the way you format your posts on here always brightens my day
The discourse about the word ad hoc made me realize that I didn't know what it meant. And I see it all the time at work for meetings. Like ad hoc meeting? And I just never question what the hell it meant...
>>2751
>>2752
<despite being only 13% of the population, VPNposters are responsible for over half of the spam
Replies: >>2795
>>2794
<Sorry to harp on this, but it's not 13% of the population. It's 13% of posts. We don't have any stats on how many posters use VPNS. 13 of every 100 posts were made through a VPN.
>>2787
>Banned only on an hoc tuah basis
Replies: >>2797
>>2787
IDK if it's just me, but I thought Latin phrases like this were widely known? In school we had to learn the main ones, like et cetera, quid pro quo, ad nauseam, etc.. I was surprised to see people confused by ad hoc, I thought even ESLfags would have been taught these. It also disappointed me to see people read that, not understand it, but refuse to look it up.
>>2796
kek
Replies: >>2798 >>2801
>>2797
>even ESLfags would have been taught these
ESLfags here, I was indeed taught these. Kinda weird that Latin stock phrases are losing their cultural grip like this considering that Latin was the lingua franca before English.
>>2788
Dw they’re very active with implementing changes that drive down pph and userbase so this will come swiftly. Don’t expect them to do any QOL fixes though that’s bigoted or something of that nature
>>2797
ESLfag here, never taught that shit, I know about it only because of some games multiplayer server hosting, but if you can't even check urban dictionary or a google search before voting idk what you're doing, I do that shit with uquizes or zoomer slang and you can't do that with a poll you care about?
5960df104d7e4fdc4058a355746a0f14f1e227ce62b206c348c78daf396409f4.png
[Hide] (5.4KB, 371x96) Reverse
:chiyotable: Fuck off I swear to christ. In the VPN thread as per usual.
Replies: >>2810 >>2821
>>2806
Report it as advertising for a malicious scrote site (not those words exactly, obviously).
1501d33ea932c6cca72e88a36b4a1d76bcf6d0e6c586b3f4f532cb2bc63ed8ec.png
[Hide] (41.4KB, 513x278) Reverse
Anyone else watching the VPN thread melties and laughing? 

>>2806
It's gotta be trolls or people that hate us. I refuse to believe an anon that genuinely using /yohoho/ could be this dumb.
Replies: >>2823
I shouldn't cackle at the VPN thread. I am, but I shouldn't...
>If my grandma had two wheels she would have been a bicycle.
kek
Replies: >>2823 >>2824
846e35bcbeb28386881d0785f49a7b5a31fbeeb994e3d387eb1886a828ced3cf.png
[Hide] (58.1KB, 797x462) Reverse
>>2821
>>2822 here and yes, it's a wonderful shitshow. I don't have strong opinions about the looming VPN ban either way so the thread is pure entertainment. Also, it's extremely odd that links to jc stay on lc without getting deleted or even redtexted.
Replies: >>2825
b1e67e5a72dd24dcbd31c5704b4d199bd1a4c26f55d492c7856fb1c6ccc5f76a.jpeg
[Hide] (807.2KB, 1242x1397) Reverse
>>2822
my favorite so far is "I have a law degree"
Replies: >>2827 >>2830
>>2823
They like it as a way to filter bad actors off the site
>>2824
>Polisci cow
I know she meant farmers but I'm picturing cerb talking to Russell Greer.
>>2824
Do we have any internet lawyers onboard who would like to provide their opinion? kek
The VPN talk thread is making me want to kill myself. Anyone else? It's stressful and paranoia inducing; everything is fucked up.
Replies: >>2835 >>2837
>>2833
>>2834
Don't let it get to you, anon. It's just really cringe fearmongering. We've already discussed it here, but VPNs are pretty much pointless for protecting your post history or identity. The only real use for VPNs on LC is for ban evasion. Everyone that's genuinely concerned about their privacy is already aware of the work-arounds. The only people that are concerntrolling in that thread are the ban evaders that are too stupid to know how else to do it without the use of a VPN.
Replies: >>2838 >>2866
>>2834
Why? Are you concerned some farmhand is going to build a dossier on you? Most of us are far too boring for someone to paw through our post history. Take a break from posting on lc and don't let paranoia consume you.
Replies: >>2841 >>2866
>>2835
The thing that gives me paranoia is that I never took the precautions and now I know how easy it is for other users to expose each other for fun. And how much information mods know about anons. I know I'm a random anon in the sea of random anons; I wish I only ever lurked from the start though. A post said -it's almost like you shouldn't share anything personal in here- but vent threads and mundane threads and the nice anons made LC look more friendly than it actually is. I feel like an idiot..... I never thought things would turn out this way. I should had known better! I'm so stupid!
Replies: >>2842 >>2843 >>2844
>>2837
nta, i have shared too much of myself to feel comfortable in there anymore, like my art and life problems, personal stuff and dumb idiot shit. i hope no one ever finds because it is buried inside threads and threads but as the situation develops everything is so hopeless, it only takes one curious anon with bad intentions to ruin your life, and right now i feel vulnerable and one step closer to getting my life ruined.
Replies: >>2853
>>2838
With all due respect: if you're not doing anything consistently annoying, and you're not acting like a retard every single day, nobody will care. The only reason certain anons care so much about "exposing" personalityfags is because those personalityfags have spent months or years shitting up the site consistently.

If you're nervous about posting on LC, then take some time to develop your anonymity skills. Brush up on basic internet safety. Honestly, even without posting on a VPN, there is no real way for anyone to figure out who you are based on your posts as long as you practice basic internet safety.
Replies: >>2845
>>2838
Nayrt but for what it's worth I don't think you're an idiot for participating in /ot/ and divulging a few personal details. I feel like the longer you go without posting the less likely it will be for someone to try to pry, and that's already an incredibly unlikely scenario. Having said that it is relieving that logs and IPs are purged after 7 days here.
>>2838
I have no shame indulging with pleasant conversations in vent/mundane because I have nothing to lose in my occupation and it would be very hard to convince boomers that the messages from a mongolian basket weaving site were made by me and not someone in my household. If I lived alone I would say its a roommate. 
if someone digs up old bones and laughs at it who cares I deleted it for a reason therefore no longer associating or believing those thoughts.
Replies: >>2850
>>2842
>there is no real way for anyone to figure out who you are based on your posts as long as you practice basic internet safety.
Some of us were way too retarded years ago and are only worrying about it now
>>2845
I mean if you want a fresh start, you can just download a different browser, change your IP address, and start fresh. If you have a common device, it's even better.
>>2845
Unless you were posting your ID or something, I think you're fine.
>>2845
This, but also the one fortunate thing we have going for us is that the internet is only getting more convoluted. We're already a drop in an ocean and pretty soon we'll be an atom in a universe. I use to lose sleep thinking about all this but at the end of the day, we're a passing thought even if you are someone with internet fame. your footprint will be forgotten one day
>>2845
Right, when I first started using LC I was 18 and honestly still really dumb, it’s horrifying that some shit is still up. I wisened up by 19 but I honestly wanted the raids to wipe some of the site for good somehow.
Replies: >>2853 >>2860
>>2844
Oh yeah, it must've been my neighbor's strange shut-in daughter on my wifi. No clue otherwise, boss.
>>2849
Honestly? As much as I love my lolcor I wouldn't mind for some type of fresh start, I'm not the same retard I was 5, 2, 7, many years ago
>>2841
I'd imagine the art thing is very unfortunate, how worried should you be though?
I was worried for a while but realistically my posts are a drop in the ocean. I sometimes would take precautions and I really have no way of knowing which posts (from years ago) would be tied to which IP/post history. 
Considering I was one of the anons calling them trannyjannys I don’t doubt they’ve perused or laughed at my posts, but to actually find my info would be difficult and I doubt the jannies would bother for some random retard like myself and most of the other anons. Now, it’s just a bit embarrassing, but I haven’t been using LC as much for the past month, and shall be forgotten!
>>2849
Same, I posted too many personal details that a snoopy anon with bad intentions could uncover who I am. But I’m less paranoid now, I’ve moved away, changed IP addresses, got new devices. I never posted nudes. Unfortunately I have posted a part of my face on lolcow for beauty advice but cropped out identifying features. 
I’m hoping the site gets nuked with no archive so I can rest easy.
it’s over for people who have their legal names and pictures posted even if they change their names cos your old alias is always tied to your new name change. if it shows up on google you’re straight up just cooked. other than that who would ever find it? it’s buried by now.
Replies: >>2862
>>2861
But who would be retarded enough to post their legal name and picture? The one time I recall someone doing that in 2018, she was having an actual psychotic breakdown and the admin removed all the posts anyway because she recognized the severity of the situation.
Replies: >>2869
>Enter the Gender Ideology Hate thread
>90% of anons are steeped in Gender Ideology and unfamiliar with 2nd and 3rd wave theory
>Exit the Gender Ideology Hate thread
I don't know what I expected. Dead dove don't open.
Replies: >>2864 >>2865 >>2868
>>2863
It's the Gender Ideology hate thread not a feminism thread
>>2863
Kek anon are you lost?
I hate how everyone on lc says "crashing out/crash out" now, it's in every fucking thread. Feels like there's nothing but teenagers on there
>>2835
>>2837
Can't really blame them considering the Ian/shoeonhead incident years ago
Replies: >>2867
>>2866
Makes me want to say shit like phat or I'll cat your bare buff bloke you butters neek chav cunt just to be annoying I won't :chiyopuke:
Another aspect of privacy concern on LC is that everything is archived. On a traditional IB there's a limited number of threads, so when a thread dies, it's deleted. I understand the logic for this on /cow/ boards but it's never made much sense for /ot/.

>>2863
>there's gender ideology hate in the gender ideology thread
What?
Replies: >>2871 >>2873
>>2862
exactly. unless you get posted like as a thread or a personal cow you are fine. the art thing is bad, i’ve always questioned whether the draw nonas are really making good choices depending on how distinct their art style is. but the average person is not going to be able to tell a random unsigned piece was yours. it would require so many coincidences for the wrong person to be able to identify you based on art. it’s more likely it would be like your bff who doesn’t hate you and recognizes your art or something cos she’s always looking at it. unless you’ve got some serious opps in the online art world. like i think the only other real risk is befriending the wrong nona from friend finder or something. like even if you annoy people, the fight ends and at most they’re a psycho who accuses everyone of being you for a couple days and it’s more the frustration you’ve slipped like water through their hands and they want to yell at you more than like. a desire to stalk you. and those psychos are literally never right, i had one accuse people of being me who capitalized their letters and it’s just like. i know you know that wasn’t me and you’re just still mad and want to pretend anyone who you don’t like is me and not that many people don’t agree with you? and it’s all fights over like dumb opinions and not identifiable stuff. i hardly doubt posting your art is going to make people furious and try to find you like getting into an argument about which men are ugly (all of them) or fujo shit, you know what i mean?
Replies: >>2871 >>2878
>>2868
Every IB out there has at least a few threads archived, 4chan has several archive sites dedicated to it, and it's even mentioned on the privacy page here that threads might get instantly archived. Having said that, it shouldn't be a major concern if you're not positively identifying yourself with every post you make. I find it more worrisome that staff members could identify every post you've made via IP or user agent and make a helldump about it.
>>2869
Not an artist, but I hope that artists on lc can rely on plausible deniability if someone identifies their art. Art styles get copied all the time, it could be anyone who made doodle x or y, who could say it's this specific artist who did it.
Replies: >>2877 >>2880
>>2868
>there's gender ideology hate in the gender ideology thread
Read what I wrote. I was expecting gender ideology hate, but most of what I read is support for it.
Replies: >>2876
>>2873
Everyone in that thread is aware that you can't be a woman if you werent born one, i think that's pretty against it.
>>2871
yeah like i didn’t want to say anything that could be perceived as diminishing nona’s individuality or talent or anything. it’s not like anyone is gonna post their masterpiece they want to show in a gallery on here if they’re trying to hide who they are. it’s probably mostly doodles.
Replies: >>2878
>>2877
>>2869
I think it's most likely that artists and their friends know their art quirks and how to recognize their art and it all may be iffy depending on the situation.
>depending on how distinct their art style is. but the average person is not going to be able to tell a random unsigned piece was yours. it would require so many coincidences for the wrong person to be able to identify you based on art.
Yeah but *what if*? It may still fuck them over. What are the odds.
>>2871
4chan archive software just archives the post. It doesn't scrape the IP of the poster and there's no way of linking a single post to a post history or any other information.
Replies: >>2888
a1d0aa144b4d2faca8f48d7f077853e1f1e60feeb561642a2b3326bc0d7619fb.png
[Hide] (296.7KB, 508x542) Reverse
Unsure if I post here or the tinfoil thread sorry captain, the reason LC is so shit rn isn't only because it being spammed offsite allowed it to be noticed just not by newfags, but the elites/TPTB as well, socmed companies don't want women to be outside of their bubble and certain threads don't help, 
The disruptive bait on offtopic boards is not just retarded newfags, they're malicious agents, "the discords" you hear about are just glowies. /2X/ was a test for them, it was an easy target and a threat for the moid elite, that's why they killed asheras garden too, and may be responsible for CC's downfall. I also believe because of the reputation as a "femcel" site the glowies may be trying to groom the userbase and spreading that reputation as well in order to attract more easy targets.
That's why cerbmin is so quiet as well. I don't think the downtime that brought us here was a attack though, leftypol also went through the same problem.
>>2885
We have a Tinfoil thread, this could be an interesting post there! I'm a part of a farmer Discord server and really it's just us doing normal stuff and talking about cows and our days.
Replies: >>2890
>>2885
>I don't think the downtime that brought us here was a attack though, leftypol also went through the same problem.
Didn't cerbmin confirm it was from /ot/ being hacked, or do you mean the hack was possibly an excuse for something else?
Replies: >>2890 >>2893
>>2880
My apologies, I thought we were talking about the external archives and not the internal ones that staff have access to with IP information. I have to wonder what other IBs have dumped a poster's post history before.
>>2845
I made some pretty retarded decisions and have posted parts of my face for advice like another anon said and nobody's doxed me yet. Luckily all exif data on my phone is automatically set to off but I'd recommend anyone do the same, disable your location data on your phone photos.

I don't think anons will dox anyone unless they're a personalityfag or they have some sort of vendetta against them.
>>2887
I meant that it wasn't a targeted fed attack, I don't believe it was the glowies
>>2886
There isn't just one discord, and it's clear that certain posters operate on a group.
Also the fucking american threads in november, wtf was that shit, how did mods not do anything sooner, it wasn't just twitter/reddit/whateverfags, you cannot make me believe that TPTB don't know shit about LC after that
>>2885
A few celebrities have been alleged to have visited and lurked LC so it's not that out of the box to imply it's known outside niche circles and to more powerful people. Anons just wouldn't want to accept it because it means something's been psyopped. Hate to admit the world is full of psyops. 

Also when it comes to celebrity posting why do the Chappell and Sabrina hate anons feel vaguely inorganic? It almost feels more like promotion than actual hate. Does anyone care about them this much?
Replies: >>2894 >>2900
>>2887
nta but I think the hack was over something else, but I'm not sure what. I also don't think it had to do with the leftypol attack. I think whoever did it was trying to target something in /ot/ specifically because that was the board they erased. It's weird they didn't go for a cow board so it must've been specifically pictures posted in /ot/ to erase an entire catalogue and years worth of photos
>>2885
Honestly replace the "elites" with moids in general and you're right on the money. CC is raided all the time and posted all the time on scrote forums. It's to troll "teh foids". Anti-feminists and personalityfag schizos shat up /2X/ to where it is nowadays (I hope to see a revival). Moids do not want women to have community. Single sex spaces are important beyond safety. They'll do anything to bring us down, it's why it's important to hold the line.
>>2892
Nobody likes Chappell because she's a fake lesbian with a large platform. That causes more and more people to believe lesbians aren't real and it does a ton of harm to our community. She invites trannies and queers into the lesbian community, she's rightfully hated. The only celebrity who has been allegedly confirmed to lurk lolcow is Doja Cat. Grimes allegedly does too, I remember when her thread was getting absolutely SPAMMED with emoticons and weird word spaghetti, not coherent at all. Now *that* was creepy as fuck. Wish I had screenshots
Replies: >>2896 >>2923
>>2894
With the amount of celebricows threads I just wonder if more of them have found the site. Remember how people's publicists use Google alerts and even then most obscure shit pops up in there
>>2892
the sabrina poster is baiting every single time. there is literally no reason we need to agree with her that sabrina is inappropriate every single time she debuts a “new position”. that person reports on her as much as a fan account. i literally would never have seen a quarter of what is posted in there. everyone agrees it sucks hardly anyone wants to argue anymore because it has been the same exact posts for over a year arguing against statements people didn’t even make. it’s literally one single person baiting at this point because their autism makes them want to fight with people over the same thing every day i guess. it’s honestly like if bjchan developed a fixation on one woman. we get it.
Replies: >>2904
>>2900
Other than being sexual and dating that wifebeater ugly Irish actor Sabrina isn't much of a cow. And if being sexualized was a crime that'd be a dime a dozen with pop singers.
Replies: >>2905 >>2929
>>2904
calling her a literal pedo like they have been has been crazy to witness. like you KNOW that person isn’t batting an eye when their male friends creeped on high school girls but whatever sure. having fans up on stage makes her a pedophile why not.
Help. Do we have a vent or advice thread in here?
Replies: >>2916
>>2915
Unless it would go in Confessions? No. Make it, lass.
Replies: >>2917
>>2916
NTA, would a vent thread be safe with a userbase this small ye think? Not that I don't have faith in my fellow privateers but I do have my worries.
Replies: >>2918 >>2919
>>2917
Nayrt but it should be as safe as lc or cc. Maybe vent posts could get wiped after a certain amount of time.
Replies: >>2932
>>2917
An advice thread would be great, just make sure to be vague and omit some key details
2af9c7bb6d45ff04ed621fef98bd42953dcc7ca72de11b6e62a5b44b573bac71.png
[Hide] (606.5KB, 1080x1313) Reverse
This is getting silly.
Replies: >>2978 >>3034
>>2894
But it isn't just moids, it's TPTB (that are scrotes), even moid imageboards eventually have problems like this until eventually the admin gives up or it gets shut down due to too many fedposts.
am i brainrotted or is the amerifag thread op a happy merchant? fucking KEK how did that get past the mods?
Replies: >>2931 >>2943 >>2978
>>2904
wait no cos why is the new celebrities thread even called that? like the ongoing thing they’ve sperged about for a year? that is like the least relevant thing they could have gone with it’s so fucking weird. like just say she’s a chicken nugget whose one true wish was to be a bop and go.
0c576d582ddcac3bb8f8bc4445eea21808dda5bdfd0e5ef902fdc52252c6dfd0.jpg
[Hide] (8KB, 389x71) Reverse
Alright this has to be targeted, who is squawking in the blackpill threads? Inb4 report, I always do
Replies: >>2934 >>3038
67DDFE6F-D470-45B0-933C-0A7DE9C1C540.jpeg
[Hide] (59.8KB, 260x600) Reverse
>>2926
KEK YOU ABSOLUTE SCHIZO HOW WERE YOU ABLE TO SPOT THIS :chiyofish:
Replies: >>2936 >>2978
>>2918
>Maybe vent posts could get wiped after a certain amount of time.
Could captmin do that?
Replies: >>2933
>>2932
Captmin could make it a cyclical thread, but people will archive it anyways like what happened in the /shelter/ thread(s)
Replies: >>2955
>>2930
I have a tinfoil about it but I'd rather not go into too much detail. I think someone is trying to make themselves a cow and is using this board as a jumping point.  Either way it's annoying
Replies: >>2935 >>2937 >>3023
>>2934
I'd believe that, it feels like the same person (the mods are also acting strangely around their posts, hmm :chiyolook:) I wonder if it's TIFchan
Replies: >>2940 >>3023
>>2931
Privateers are quick to recognize happy merchants...
Replies: >>2939
>>2934
If you're talking about who I assume you are, I don't think they'll ever be a proper lolcow, too repetitive and not funny, the best they can get is alogs.
>>2936
I've been on the internet too long to not notice schizo stuff unfortunately
>>2935
>the mods are also acting strangely around their posts
Right? It's blatant advertising. Why aren't they deleting the post like other link spam instead of just redtexting it?
Replies: >>2941 >>2978
>>2940
This is the part that I don't understand. Why leave them up? It's pretty malicious tbh
Replies: >>2978
clampschizo.PNG
[Hide] (173.6KB, 1837x436) Reverse
My least favorite part of LC are the insane moralfags who chimp out over any piece of media's purity. Usually I see this behavior in the fandom cancer threads in /ot/ but it's spreading to /m/ a little. Posting once about how a character's outfit is tasteless and a weird choice for a shoujo manga is perfectly fine but having a whole spergout that spans multiple posts and dying on that hill to screech at anyone who still likes it is so annoying. Of course she has to say that CLAMP is grooming kids and are predatory lesbians kek.
Replies: >>3028 >>3040
>>2926
I recognised it for what it was and reported it about an hour after the thread was made. I've been banned for racebait in the past for saying that one of a cow's orbiters looked like a happy merchant meme, so the mods are perfectly aware of what it is.
I don’t care about the threadpic but what’s with the /pol/tards in amerifags? Saying liberal women are mentally ill and whatnot and posting their retarded memes.
Replies: >>2952 >>2954 >>2978
Screenshot_20250321_104725.png
[Hide] (477.8KB, 1708x700) Reverse
>>2951
politics in those threads should just be banned and we can do what the fake language people do and keysmash at each other.
>>2951
The threadpic is a rightwing chronically online moid dogwhistle, the thread is clearly being taken over. So that's why
Replies: >>2956 >>2960
>>2933
While I agree it's not completely safe here, the threads in /ot/ and /g/ don't feel any more safer either. There's perks to be able to ask for advice anonymously, how anonymous can you truly be though if everything is forever archived and your post history available for prying eyes. I want to be able to vent with women that understand.
>>2954
That thread and by extent /ot/ has been taken over for more than a year now
Replies: >>2958
>>2956
This is the worst I've seen it in a while with how upfront they're being with the lame memes. Not even attempting to not be scrotish
>>2954
We should just make a new one because the last one was a “shit thread” and just stubbornly stay on it so the mods can’t do anything.
Replies: >>2961 >>2962
>>2960
Samefag but also make the threadpic something that triggers scrotes. Like AOC and Nancy Mace holding hands for female solidarity with Alfred there or some shit and a bunch of venus symbols
>>2960
I don't visit /ot/ enough to do that. The farmhands can change op pics, they just don't care anymore. They're inviting these faggots with open arms
12502772_23c64.gif
[Hide] (1.4MB, 500x500) Reverse
Ugh not AOC she is so cringe and fake. What was wrong with hetalia america threadpics? Why did they stop?
Replies: >>2965
be8a55234a0638bd40e6bc033fe6bc0dc18876e2cf3a4de175a3d808734c187f.jpeg
[Hide] (1.1MB, 1170x851) Reverse
This is so bad but do you nonas understand my vision
Replies: >>2966 >>2968 >>2970
>>2963
Hetalia op pics are top tier, I don't mind the American dad ones either. I don't think any politician should be the op pics though
Replies: >>2969
>>2964
YES! I love this nonna!

Can farmhands really change threadpics though? I have vichan on a little rpi and I can't do it.
Replies: >>2968
>>2964
I love this one

>>2966
Yes, they've done it for that thread before and they just did it for the moovie room pic recently.
>>2965
I agree, I think politicians as threadpics would attract the wrong kind of crowd.
>>2964
KEK
>>2920
It has to be someone trying to bring more attention to this board with bad intentions. They're probably trying to direct the VPNfags over here to shit this place up, but that won't really work because a lot of ranges are already blocked & those baiters rely on the fast-pace of LC to sustain themselves.

>>2941
>>2940
Jannies don't like this place for the same reason they don't like CC: they don't like that there's a place online for farmers to complain about them. Jannies have been known to lurk CC threads to either defend themselves or defend the current Admin, you can see an example of that here: >>777 (which has very auspicious post number so it must be true). They really dislike the fact that there are other places online that record their wrong-doings and failings, because they can't control the narrative here like they can on LC. The reason they're leaving up the JC posts is because they hope that the retards that have been shitting up LC migrate over here. They want this because it'll make their jobs as mods easier, since they won't have to deal with those retards anymore, but they also want to destabilize JC so that this place becomes worse and less inviting for dissatisfied farmers.

>>2931
>>2926
I never engaged in the alt-right stuff, but I'm kind of confused how you got the second picture from the first? I know that that picture is antisemitic and used by rightoids, but I'm not sure how you figured out the Jew caricature was in that picture? 

>>2951
Americans are very stupid (no offense to Americans) so it's very VERY easy to bait them. Ever since the Amerifags thread started getting super political, it's been a perfect den for retards to bait and infight with the Zoomers that think Trump is Hitler 2. That's why it's one of the only threads that had a VPN ban several times. IMO, there should really be a blanket ban on political sperging in that thread. LC isn't the place to discuss American politics.
Replies: >>2981 >>2982 >>3029
>>2978
>but I'm not sure how you figured out the Jew caricature was in that picture? 
nta but it's his silhouette. I didn't catch it either. Anon has a good eye
>>2978
I'm not altright at all, just terminally online. It's a common joke for them to hide this image in innocent things. Similar to the "is this loss?" meme but for the altright. You recognize a pattern with "loss" if it gets hidden in enough things. Same concept.
Replies: >>2983
>>2982
Sorry, I didn't mean to imply you were altright. I meant I'm not familiar with any of it. I didn't even know it was called happy merchant.
1742625675575-tegaki.png
[Hide] (11.2KB, 500x500) Reverse
>>2934
>>2935
I'm always surprised how some of you are able to pattern recognize anons so easily. Not trying to offend, but are you guys always keeping tabs open on lcf threads and checking up on them? I've been reduced to occasionally visiting the same handful of threads in /g/ and /ot/ the past two years because I can't bear most of the community anymore, so I just don't know how some of you do it.
>>3023
... and now I'm realizing I'm pretty recognizable on here lol. Ah well. I like this place.
Replies: >>3076
>>2942
She is right. Sneed.
>>2978
>I'm kind of confused how you got the second picture from the first?
NTA. The happy merchant image has been around on image boards for over fifteen years. It permeated 4chan to the point that it was unavoidable. It's a common meme to use an obfuscated version as a dog whistle. It spread to the wider internet after Ben Garrison got in a fight with /pol/ and called moot a cuck, because /pol/ was editing his political cartoons with A Wyatt Man drawings including happy merchant.
6f4f13285c108e099f79eaac83d986294d1cd6ff5a180e53b068ede7ea4c77f7.jpg
[Hide] (93.5KB, 1080x1151) Reverse
>>3023
>I'm always surprised how some of you are able to pattern recognize anons so easily.
Don't be. The hallmark of schizophrenia is an extreme affinity for recognizing patterns. That's basically what causes the delusions; they start to see patterns everywhere.
>>2920
If I was more schizophrenic I'd think that the mods are linking the board here so all the baiters have an outlet kek.
>>3023
One AYRT and I don't recognize people really, just look at the state of the cow thread. I'm not giving it more attention it's worth but I'm not one of those "I know that typing style!" anons. I'm just tinfoiling on observation
Replies: >>3037
>>3036
Correction, the cow thread is looking much better the past couple of days. My answer stands though, I'm based on observation and past experience. Not pattern recognition
>>2930
We're going to need more keels to be hauling
1733416966189.png
[Hide] (227.6KB, 500x561) Reverse
>>3023
If you're from a low traffic country, you can follow some posters around based on slang, localisms (eg bin vs trash) and sentence structure. The last one is kind of tricky to explain but even non-ESLs have quirks. It's very noticeable if you go to say an Australian cow thread who is Australian vs who is one of the majority American users.
Replies: >>3064
>>2942
What exactly do they want her to wear? Like a burka or something?
Replies: >>3042
>>3040
Idk matey, burka porn exists out there. To protect women and girls from coomers and groomers I think all women's media should be grey cubes with robotic neutral voices.
Replies: >>3048
>>3042
Got blackpilled in the LC hate / bunker... They will still want to fuck the cubes, won't they?
Replies: >>3049
dying_for_a_cigerette.jpg
[Hide] (133.6KB, 390x595) Reverse
>>3048
It's likely
>>3023
AYRT, oh no I'm not good recognising anons at all. Oftentimes I'll just have a vibe at most and I don't say anything about it because that's obnoxious, with the advertiser I feel like it's the same anon because it keeps explicitly advertising in the same threads and replying to anons who seem a bit more green than the average. 
As for being recognisable I feel like all anons have their quirks when they're posting on autopilot especially if they're non-burgers as >>3039 said, but I feel like in a space like this I don't think it's that much of an issue as long as you're not revealing personal information. I think there's about 40 posters here if I'm being generous so I think everyone knows that you're going to be bumping into the same anons. Also cute fish nona :chiyofish:
1525975736529.png
[Hide] (338KB, 1133x937) Reverse
Went to read old CC threads for the sake of it, and damn it really hit me with the "what could have been". If only had it been better moderated and moids didn't try to raid as often. If only...
Replies: >>3070 >>3140
>>3069
I feel like that whenever I read old /2X/ posts outside of the bp thread, it's literally dead now.
Replies: >>3071
>>3070
Me too, but since I come back to reread those old threads quite often it doesn't hit as hard. The female philosophers thread is my favorite, I wish it was still active so I could sperg as well.
Replies: >>3072
>>3071
>I wish it was still active so I could sperg as well.
Go for it! Nona! I've noticed mods are a little quicker with the /2X/ bans nowadays, so aggro retards will get banned. I'm sure other nonas are eager to have conversations with the nonas there, I am myself. Don't know how privateers will feel about feminists threads here, though
1731880147266.jpg
[Hide] (22.6KB, 261x215) Reverse
>>3027
I don't recognize you, seriously.
LC is 10 years old at this point, do you think it'll last another 10 years? And do you want it to last another 10 years?
A shot in the dark: does anyone have any information, no matter how small, on the whereabouts of Snail? AKA, CC's MIA admin? It's a mystery that I've always wanted to conclude. Where exactly did she go? What drama happened after the townhall?

>>3081
I think there's going to be a major overhaul in how the internet operates in the next decade. I don't think that the majority of countries will be able to access the internet in the same way as they can now. I think by 2035, most, if not all, of the major social media titans that rose to the centre-stage in the late 00s and early 10s will be gone. I don't really know it LC is gonna make it that far. I'd like to think that it would, but part of me wonders: will I still care about LC in a decade? Will I still be online in a decade? I like LC a lot, but as I continue to grow and mature I'm finding myself drawn away from the virtual world and into the real one. Anonymous IBs were appealing to me because I was always sort of self-conscious, but the more I develop my self-esteem and the more I put myself out there the more that I find anonymity to be more of a hassle than a feature.
Replies: >>3095
>>3084
I don't think even the CC mods know what's up with Snail. It's a skeleton crew over there.
>>3081
No, and no. I feel like it is a bit of a product of its time and that's okay. I think I'm always going to be drawn to forums and ibs because I have been for most of my (sentient) life but the culture of LC is quite specfic and I don't see that being able to continue, especially when you bear in mind the current treatment of LC by Cerb et al. Either it's going to die a quiet death curled up under the verandah or it's going to completely change and then become a ghost town after a while. I give LC five years tops, it's already changed so much since 2020 and I don't see it getting better.
Replies: >>3098
>>3095
Unpopular opinion: I enjoyed pandemic lolcow.
Replies: >>3099 >>3114
>>3098
AYRT, I didn't mind 2020 LC either but post-2023 was a vile drop off
Replies: >>3136
>>3081
>do you want it to last another 10 years 
Ask me a few years ago and I'd say yes but not anymore. Let that ship sink! They get what they deserve :chiyoclasp: :chiyoclasp: :chiyoclasp: 

>>3098
I can't remember if tempcow and bunker threads were around that period. Those were the only highlights for me in recent years. So fun reveling in all that chaos with everyone just crammed into one space
1645579319470.png
[Hide] (357.6KB, 349x439) Reverse
I think the /m/assacre was one of the worst things that happened in the website despite the bunkers being fun. The lack of communication from the admins and the time it took for /m/ to be restored to semi-normalcy destroyed the /m/ I knew and looking back was a sign for the things to come.
>>3081
I would rather LC die healthily with the userbase easily moving to a new website instead of a slow death where users spread out and a true LC can't be replicated
I just remembered that gen alpha are going to be the next anons that will colonize lolcow in a few years.
>>3099
2023 is when the pandemic ended.
Replies: >>3139
>>3136
There's no way gen alpha will plague lc like zoomies. Not to act like imageboards are sooper secret anti-normie strongholds because they're not, but the alphatards are literally only capable of using apps. I've met children who got too confused to use a keyboard and tried to touch computer monitors like they were iPads kek I think they're gonna stick to roblox then filter out to trash like leddit/threads/twitter. Maybe 1% will use 4c and sharty, which of course in 5 years you will now need to use your ssn to post on, while feeling like Elite Hackermen and until they inevitably become the next school shooters
Replies: >>3157
>>3069
Same. The death of CC makes me sadder than the drop in quality of LC. I'd sacrifice LC for CC if I had to choose tbh, easily, it was pretty cozy and fun and had a nice culture during its peak. I wish someone who actually cared took over it and revived it.
Replies: >>3141
>>3140
There's no way CC is getting saved, it's like reviving a corpse at this point.
Replies: >>3142
>>3141
Yeah it's far too late for them, but I still like to think about it.
a363fc4f9b47ba5f34faa9ae56d55189eab30dd70bcd8046d1ff8184d42f15ad.png
[Hide] (466.8KB, 1080x1786) Reverse
I'm sorry but kek
Replies: >>3156 >>3162
>>3154
I'm so confused. Are they talking about here? Where is that poll on this site?
Replies: >>3158
>>3139
There's a bunch of Gen alpha kids who can't even read and write properly. The world is doomed
>>3156
Issa joke about here. It's an obvious inspect element job on the lc VPN poll
Replies: >>3201
a4730bf465c307ed47b19039c61166f6d1531a392b9f9667b97593930e86aa15.jpg
[Hide] (299.6KB, 1080x1000) Reverse
Replies: >>3162 >>3185
f2c467e5b74d1c78813ba8ec15dd269c659e72d2bae35f35bfaf691d9d4e2516.jpg
[Hide] (75KB, 589x960) Reverse
Oh my gosh girls! All of those advertisements on lolcow (the girl site!!) are making me get euphoria boners!! We have so much cis (fake) females here who wanna talk about gurl things with us! I feel like such a woman tehehehe. I hope they keep linking us on there!! (Picrel is literally me... I'm such an innocent anime girl tehee!!!)
Replies: >>3161
>>3160
A talk-like-a-troon thread is a novel concept but I don't want to inadvertently attract them here.
Replies: >>3162 >>3163
>>3161
Kekk, I think it would be funny but probably not a good idea.
>>3159
>>3154
If we keep this up, the jannies might start deleting the links posted on LC.
>>3161
What are your guys thoughts on GC threads in general? too political?
>>3163
I think a GC thread would be good.
>>3163
We should definitely have one imo.  I hate to see how GC spaces continue to be purged online. Ovarit is shutting down(even though some users on there are annoying as fuck) Plus it'd filter retards.
Replies: >>3167
>>3163
Not too political. Having one here would be fine imo.
>>3165
horrible idea that will just result in raids. maybe keep that stuff on lcf.
>>3163
I like GC threads but I'd be wary, having one concertrated place to discuss it is not a fantastic idea because that then makes a concertrated area to raid. It takes one wandering, lost TIM or one TIF bawling to her TIM friend, and  the question of why they're on a pirate board doesn't really have the same impact.
1648846376062.jpeg
[Hide] (78.9KB, 640x450) Reverse
>>3163
It attracts moids and politispergs too much, I hate trannies but I don't think troon hate needs containment for now.
>>3163
That's a bad idea. It'll devolved into infighting from moids coming here to troll.
>>3163
I'd be fine with it. Is there any content worth archiving off ovarit? Could start with that.
why are they posting tranny porn in the VPN thread :chiyopuke:
Replies: >>3184
>>3183
I don't know, it's very unneccessary :chiyoalarm:
e643b55d4302ffbdfc43f78d9c822edb55dc0dcb9e78df9a0057cfb855303b3b.png
[Hide] (260.8KB, 910x355) Reverse
>>3159
farmhands are b-based??
9e2cde8451701757ace105c09bfcb16e6216589bb52406d29199af0aa11f6fe7.png
[Hide] (330.4KB, 910x505) Reverse
double post but kek southern nonas can't catch a break.
Replies: >>3191 >>3201
>>3186
I thought the first one was banned because of the large spacing in her post, not the word itself
>>3158
Damn, nta but that went over my head. Very clever, kek 

>>3186 
Maybe I need more context but that bait ban is so gay
What are poll results looking like? I didn't vote so I can't see the results
Replies: >>3205
Screenshot_2025-03-24_015735.png
[Hide] (448.8KB, 1843x588) Reverse
>>3203
Replies: >>3206 >>3209
>>3205
Thanks nona . I'm surprised option 2 has the least votes. I thought it was the more desired outcome?
Replies: >>3207
>>3206
AFAIK, the most desired outcome was a total ban on /ot/ and a ban on select threads on /g/ like ones relating to sexuality and race. I don't think anybody wanted a VPN ban on /m/. I've seen a few of the /ot/ trolls in the VPN ban thread have the "if I can't use a VPN, then nobody can!" mentality and voting for all boards to spite others.
mariposas2.gif
[Hide] (20KB, 132x144) Reverse
>>3205
Maybe it's a little early but I feel slightly more hopeful for the results now. I do believe that it's going to do nothing but kill traffic slightly and maybe give bans a heavier sway on the less technical anons (based on the latter result of Hellmas, which even then wasn't a good time to test this at all, right now would have been the optimal time imo) and anons who only use /ot/ are going to find a new thing to complain about by December but better that happen to that board than the whole site.  I hate that the hidden board was only ever included in a full blanket ban as if it were as harmless as /m/ or as important as the cow boards.
>>3163
It probably wouldn't be a good idea. If this board starts hosting political discussion, it's going to attract posters that want to talk about politics and nothing else.
So many newfags with Reddit spacing saying shit like "delulu" and "girlies." Make it stop.
Replies: >>3219 >>3221
>>3218
I don't mind anons using those words
Replies: >>3222 >>3223
>>3218
The future is now, auntie. Get with the times.
Replies: >>3222
>>3219
>>3221
If they want to use them they should quit reddit spacing and typing in all caps
>>3219
I'll allow a cheeky "girlies", but "delulu"?
I remember when delulu was ban worthy
Replies: >>3226
>>3224
Take me back to those days. I'm not even old, I just hate how Tiktok's retarded lexicon has an iron grip on both real life and every corner of the internet.
Replies: >>3235
2472898ea27aaca842d2f190dfe78258660ff47202e151c33007325d008d69c2.png
[Hide] (51.1KB, 1117x130) Reverse
>I was framed for murder!

Then everyone clapped, right? Is LC really turning into Reddit 2.0? Kek
Replies: >>3234 >>3235 >>3238
>>3230
Considering how many anons lie and make shit up, it has always been.
>>3226
>>3230
Delulu is a fun word, let the girlies have their fun.
Replies: >>3236
>>3235
NTA, "delulu" itself could be fine, it's the context it's mostly used in that is not and makes it obnoxious.
>>3230
Careful, the hardass lc hitwomen might come after you for this post.
I've noticed so many rude posts lately. Not anything ban-worthy or extremely nasty, more like condescending, disdainful posts. Not to be schizo but all in a similar cadence too... I stopped giving a fuck long ago whether or not an anon didn't like my post but it makes me sad to see random anons genuineposting/effortposting and get out of pocket rude replies, why does it feel like some people just go on lc to get mad and infight and bait?? Cortisol addiction? Mental illness?
>>3247
>why does it feel like some people just go on lc to get mad and infight and bait??
Because they do? I hate saying this, but it's just part of the culture. 

No, I'm not defending it. The site and its culture are trash. Fortunately, it will die soon after the VPN ban.
Replies: >>3256
dc651c6985421826170710213657bff10bce5765195d7624f37703087dd6d46f.png
[Hide] (38.1KB, 664x132) Reverse
Newfags are so annoyingly cocky nowadays
>>3251
they're 100% from tiktok
>>3250
Right I guess what I meant was, why do they do that? It just seems pointless
>>3251
>Wipe that kek off your face

:chiyofish::chiyofish::chiyofish:
Replies: >>3266
>>3247
>spoiler
That doesn't mean much tbh. Certain groups of people speak in exactly the same way. Zoomers, specifically when they want to be rude, all sound the same, and even moreso if they're all the same sex (I'm assuming they're mostly women). It's pretty maddening.
>why does it feel like some people just go on lc to get mad and infight and bait??
Because they do. Lc has a pretty shitty mean girl culture and posters think they have to be annoyingly rude all the time to fit in. They will say it's just ib culture xd but the meanness of other chans tends to be funny or feel somewhat lighthearted. On lc it really just feels like someone is being an obnoxious weirdo on a Regina George larp mocking you for no reason, and the only people having fun are the other larpers replying with "KEK nonnie" and taking notes.
Replies: >>3262
>why does it feel like some people just go on lc to get mad and infight and bait??
Honestly it feels like that's the whole internet right now.
Replies: >>3262
>>3261
>>3259
>>3247
Ragebait goes viral constantly, leading socmed algorithms to push it down your throat and people who were maybe more normie-adjacent prior the pandemic saw that and assumed that's what the internet is for, then anons who have never really ventured far into the internet let alone touched a forum (besides Reddit but that is hell on earth) apply that to LC. The worst part is that it works because retards do not have the ability to ignore and move on, they must engage so they can get attention.:chiyopuke:It's a constant loop of negativity, which then pushes away more chill anons because they don't want to deal or be yelled at by a mushy brained anon who needs 24/7 human interaction so then they start infesting the place as newfags assume that's how you intergrate.
Replies: >>3460
>>3247
I like the genuine posters but they are too few nowadays. There were petty catty comments back in the day mid/late circa-2010s, but they were creative and lighthearted and you could tell it was a joke, now it’s only immediate negative/rude generic comment without any wit and full of petty spite. I don’t react to it at all, I just ignore and move on because they’re obviously lonely trying to cause a fight on the internet for some human interaction and attention, even if it’s negative.
>>3251
behold, the imageboard in your near future.
>>3258
it was
>wipe that kek off your mouth
which is even more awful sounding.
>>3251
Thread?
Replies: >>3270
>>3251
This is what happens when you let the "delulu girlies" have their fun
>>3267
'difficulty relating to other women' in /g/
Replies: >>3273
7848866ef53ce370b59c889bb4a0d29e7c779ae7b0482d365818c5a6ba4e840c.jpeg
[Hide] (613.8KB, 1027x1176) Reverse
The state of /snow/. I dare say /snow/ is even worse than /ot/ because every other post is unsaged bait or schizoramblings. I don’t want VPN on /snow/ because I don’t want my IP associated with ~hate speech- but what else can be done? It’s obvious what kind of tourists some threads (political threads especially) are attracting. I fucking hate the state of the internet.
Replies: >>3272
>>3271
Sorry I can’t scuttle this post for some reason, but I meant to say I DON’T want a VPN ban on /snow/ if possible.
>>3270
kek... I can see why she struggles.
I have started to hate cc even more than 4chan.
Replies: >>3279 >>3303
>>3278
I feel your pain, nonna. I miss CC. I haven't been back since the shelter threads.
>check LC for the first time in a month
>Luigi thread #31
How the fuck are there 31 threads worth to talk about this dude. I know I can just hide it, but blood of Christ, he is not that appealing.
Replies: >>3282 >>3287
>>3281
It’s always on the front page too
bafb31c037e405c51250f922ac87ad980ffa27ac949fc6452d2e2687b4e36906.png
[Hide] (5.8MB, 1479x2048) Reverse
>>3281
Maybe they'll make their own imageboard and all migrate to it.
Replies: >>3289
29342367230c16da9214ef7faa6306b243f96ebf72b840d123fa724a55f83a9b.png
[Hide] (10.6KB, 532x176) Reverse
24 hours or so remain, looks like only /ot/ is getting this treatment. If Cerb even heeds the poll results.
>>3287
I don't know much about Luigifags because I get rential vasospasms whenever I see Luigi infighting but they seem too uncommitted to do that. Luigifagging seems like a pantomime, it doesn't feel real, I don't think they have the passion to do something like that even though it would benefit everyone.
Replies: >>3291 >>3305
>>3289
>If Cerb even heeds the poll results.
Lmao I can totally see cerbmin going "oh well guys looks like 60% of people voted for a VPN ban that's not restricted to /ot/ so we'll have to do another runoff with the first two options :-)" also known as lying with statistics
>>3278
CC is so plagued, I'm so sorry nona.
>>3289
>rential vasospasms
>transient monocular blindness or visual impairment

wow I feel better educated and also in total emotional agreement with you on the topic
053A8BCD-3254-444E-915F-BCEE094EE485.jpeg
[Hide] (96.9KB, 1200x1000) Reverse
A few months ago I made one bait post to see what the appeal was and everyone called me retarded, I still don’t understand the appeal.
Replies: >>3308 >>3309 >>3335
>>3307
You got replies instead of being ignored, that's it, that's the appeal
>>3307
tbh i don't get it either. i suppose for some any attention is better than no attention, but for me being called retarded online just makes me feel sad :(
Replies: >>3310
>>3309
Let this be a lesson to all of us to not be intentionally retarded online.
1743013840541.png
[Hide] (482.7KB, 708x921) Reverse
Whenever I see something funny on LC it gives me a burst of hope
Replies: >>3318
>>3314
LMAO
>>3307
I made some bait posts and the fun part is that people get mad. And sometimes they start a fight between each other.
Replies: >>3339 >>3340 >>3342
>>3335
People should be able to recognize and ignore bait anyway. I guess I can't blame you too much.
trash_pirate.jpg
[Hide] (197.9KB, 1242x1229) Reverse
>>3335
Oh no, this is what we'll be known for now.
>>3335
>how do you do fellow privateer
Replies: >>3347
>>3342
ntayrt but kek I made this after seeing your post >>3346
Replies: >>3443
wtf.png
[Hide] (37.7KB, 1840x108) Reverse
worst post ive seen in quite a while
Replies: >>3349
>>3348
Reminds me of when an anon way back when said she was exactly like PT because she was racist to asians but a million times worse
What is the even the point of sty? is that lc’s version of /b/?
Replies: >>3367 >>3373 >>3404
>>3366
it's a mix between /b/ and /trash/
Replies: >>3373
>>3366
>>3367
I knew /sty/ existed but I didn't know people were actually using it. Or am I getting confused? I remember it having its own board theme before.
Replies: >>3375 >>3444
I thought /sty/ was a joke...
>>3373
It's more than 8 years old and has less than 10K posts, I don't think many people are using it.
vpn-poll-result.png
[Hide] (184.8KB, 1832x291) Reverse
VPN poll results

VPNs will be banned on /ot/ only.
Replies: >>3400 >>3401
>>3378
I hope this outcome triggers a good /m/ revival.
>>3378
It's sad. I'll miss talking to nonnas in the vent threads and the generals, but there's too much of a history on LC with vendettafag farmhands for me to feel comfortable talking with a VPN off.  
I suppose it's time to grow up and post elsewhere. I'm glad we at least have /yohoho/.
Replies: >>3403
>>3401
We still don't know if it's ad hoc or a global /ot/ ban though
>>3366
/sty/ is bizarre, iirc the Fluffy Pony Abuse thread was the most active one
Replies: >>3406
>>3404
Oh no, now I know why I haven't used that board. No "cute aggression" for me, thanks.
Has anyone else noticed that LC has been a bit slow this past fortnight, especially the cow boards. Maybe it's just the threads I lurk or post in but I don't really have the incentive to check on them as much because there's been a sizable drop off in activity. Is there some burger event happening because it feels the activity of a holiday. It's motivating me to read some 8 year old threads though, and that has been a treat.
Replies: >>3427 >>3434
e04b1aaad1cc4a7c19329ac343b1c98248094cf4535335610848a7ce4c5d8e94.jpg
[Hide] (100.2KB, 576x1024) Reverse
>>3422
well for burger events there's college basketball but I don't think there's a big overlap between college basketball fans and farmers kek. Saint Patrick's Day and Easter also happened, which may have caused a dip in activity due to family obligations.
>>3422
I’ve noticed that /snow/ has been super slow and low quality for a while. Maybe the /ot/ ban will increase traffic, but honestly I think a lot of genuine farmers have just stopped posting there. It’s sad.
Replies: >>3435
>>3434
/w/ is pretty much dead apart from 3 threads about boring cows and necrobumping. They need to put it out of its misery already and merge it back into /snow/
Replies: >>3436
>>3435
They'll never merge it back. At best they'll lock and hide it to let it rot in darkness.
I don't really get why /w/ gets sequestered away from /snow/. I also don't get why celebricows is in /ot/ and autosaged when it's usually the funniest milkiest thread available anyway. Maybe I'm missing the point because I want to laugh at cows and not moralfag at them. Most of the general cow threads on /snow/ are completely milkless. The radfem cows one is just vendetta / selfposting. The cartoon industry one is just spergs outsperging one another about children's shows and commentary youtubers, the pro-ana one is just bone rattling. The TIM and fakeboi threads are good, and often spawns calves. I can't even remember any others.
Replies: >>3442 >>3465
858a5da829ce89a1fa9b6f7aee70e0f675c824327a61a8bc2e2d82b6625296e9.gif
[Hide] (198.8KB, 220x165) Reverse
>>3441
>the pro-ana one is just bone rattling
>>3347
just seeing this now, great work nona
>>3373
There are like 3 anons who post on /sty/ at most currently, assuming they're not samefagging. I like it though, it feels more like an old school ib to me than every other board.
Replies: >>3446
Screenshot_20250328_175103.png
[Hide] (34.8KB, 1651x136) Reverse
posts like picrel are so bleak. I don't know why people aren't able to just ignore stuff they don't like or recognize bait for bait.
>>3444
/sty/ is what CC would be without moderation. I don't blame snail for ghosting. Probably got burnt out seeing CP and moid raids every time she logged in
What do you guys think is the next LC bogeyman that causes a stupid amount of anons to rally up around and whine about? Because sure as sticks the VPN is not goin to solve any of the main issues they were complaining about.
Replies: >>3456 >>3461 >>3467
>>3451
the next bogeyman is going to be this place sending our absolutely devious agent provocateurs obviously.
Replies: >>3467
>>3247
There's always been cunts on there (comes with the territory of lcf being primarily a gossip board) but I do think the online landscape has changed significantly the past couple of years. Everywhere you go there's lots of weird opinionated and argumentive doubling-down that you just can't talk anyone down from. 
>>3262 
Very well put. I think algorithms everywhere are incentivizing that sort of ragebait behavior but I also think it's worth mentioning how twitter in particular is THE entrylevel hub for normalfaggots nowadays, and we all know that website is nothing but shitflinging where no one wants to take an L. So that could very well be another source of groomed shit behavior. 
>>3251 
I've felt this way for years but I really do think lcf could be saved if mods were more anal about policing zoomie tiktok lingo. Imagine if grammar nazi'ing was a thing again and we had that enforced too kek.
Replies: >>3483
>>3451
I hope it's paranoia that cerbmin is a man lol
Replies: >>3463
>>3461
A man? Probably not. Discord kitten? Maybe. >>2070
>>3441
Over the years I've noticed that the cow has little to do with the quality or how enjoyable their threads are. It's entirely dependent on the other farmers posting in the thread. A cow could be producing a milk fountain and unless there's interesting and funny posts being made, it's not a good thread.
Replies: >>3467
>>3465
Very true. There's some cows I don't find interesting at all, but the threads are funny enough to be worth the read.
>>3451
I just saw someone get called an LLM, so I expect that to kick up. Deepseekfoiling will be against the rules soon enough. But also agree with >>3456 we will be blamed for lolcor's newfag infestation.
Replies: >>3471
>>3467
>I just saw someone get called an LLM
Aha, that's what Cerb is going to implement next, a mandatory captcha before you post.
>>3460
>I really do think lcf could be saved if mods were more anal about policing zoomie tiktok lingo
I don't disagree with this idea entirely, but then I feel like it kind of leaves the question of what's considered "TikTok lingo"? I know there are some obvious ones (slay, tea, stan, ick, flop, etc.) but I feel like there may be some terms that could be a bit more on the fence in terms of how people feel about using them. "Simp" has been used plenty over the years, same as "yikes", and I've seen some people use "crash out" when talking about cows freaking out. Hell honestly the phrase "take an L" that you used earlier in your post could be argued as being "TikTok lingo" since it's fairly frequently used by the zoomer demographic. 
I feel like it might just be a bit of a difficult thing to enforce since some zoomer phrases seem to be a bit more acceptable to use than others, so what's okay or not would just be left up to moderator discretion which could lead to some bullshit arbitrary bans.
The lolcow awards are in! It's so fucking rigged, how tf did Luigi win 2 awards
Replies: >>3485
>>3484
NO fucking way he won the picmix one without heavy rigging :chiyotable:
Replies: >>3487 >>3490
>>3485
Best thread as well? No fucking way where did all of these luigifags come from?
Replies: >>3488 >>3489
>>3487
There's at most like 40 Luigifags sitewide, unless redditfags joined in it makes no sense
>>3487
It's gotta be people taking the piss, there's no way.
>>3485
I don't wanna sound schizo, but when the LC awards Google form was still up, I checked about 45 minutes before it closed and Luigi did have best PicMix, but he didn't have Best Thread.
Replies: >>3492
65b18d565308aa87c591009ccdb679b2752aaa0f183a04aca7bcc8a26376cc00.png
[Hide] (437.4KB, 768x677) Reverse
8d949ffccea4c5331d90b7cf51e30b39bfdcd3b90bf675fc6b35801c5149e041.png
[Hide] (122.7KB, 1737x635) Reverse
>>3490
>Luigi presumably didn't win Best Thread
>Cerb said there were votes that were discounted
>Yet somehow only the results of the PicMix and Favorite Cow Awards were changed
Curious...
8edd84f03b432b47b15c23a678790d104caf4b7020b01bd61057a665f7e3285c.png
[Hide] (31.3KB, 1163x143) Reverse
36468b87f671442cf21c62d2fe30712cfc23df0e884e8aa56d05668eb4f22007.png
[Hide] (23.9KB, 204x223) Reverse
:chiyolook:
Actually quite a cute April Fool's this year
Replies: >>3588
>>3582
They did a great job, it gave me a jumpscare kek. Probably the best April fools on the site. My singular and miniscule nitpick is I wish the usernames didn't randomize on refresh.

Ω Thread has reached reply limit. Ω


1536 replies | 285 files
Connecting...
Show Post Actions

Actions:

Captcha:

- news + rules + faq + privacy + markup -
- jschan 1.7.0 + Junkuchan + Kiramoji 3.3.2 -